Best Practices in Resident Research- A National Survey of High Functioning Internal Medicine Residency Programs in Resident Research in USA

Meaningful participation in research for both faculty and residents is generally viewed to be an essential component of residency training. To better understand best practices in residency research, the authors conducted a survey among Internal Medicine (IM) Residency Programs with experience in res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of the medical sciences 2021-01, Vol.361 (1), p.23-29
Hauptverfasser: Ercan-Fang, Nacide G., Mahmoud, Mai A., Cottrell, Carol, Campbell, James P., MacDonald, David M., Arayssi, Thurayya, Rockey, Don C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title The American journal of the medical sciences
container_volume 361
creator Ercan-Fang, Nacide G.
Mahmoud, Mai A.
Cottrell, Carol
Campbell, James P.
MacDonald, David M.
Arayssi, Thurayya
Rockey, Don C.
description Meaningful participation in research for both faculty and residents is generally viewed to be an essential component of residency training. To better understand best practices in residency research, the authors conducted a survey among Internal Medicine (IM) Residency Programs with experience in research. Phone interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of Residency Program Directors (PDs). Survey responses were analyzed across the following domains: size and makeup of the residency and research programs, resources for research, role of the PD/research director (RD), profile of trainees doing research, curriculum description, scope of research, role of mentors, career choices and determinants of success. Fifteen programs were included in the study. Across these programs, approximately two-thirds of residents were involved in research during their training . Eighty percent of the programs required an application for residents to engage in research. Ninety-two percent of the programs had a RD but only 58% had a formal research curriculum. Clinical research projects were the most common types of research. On average, two-thirds of residents involved in research submitted abstracts to regional and/or national meetings. The factor most frequently associated with resident research success was an effective faculty research mentor. Research success during residency is multifactorial. The authors propose that having a robust structure for research that is led by a residency RD, and the presence of effective mentors and strong administrative support are critical for success.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2468341258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002962920303530</els_id><sourcerecordid>2468341258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e98cc4c4a81e477ac21fb933b1bcc21f3652aeb91c97714a5528934982a88bc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EgvL4AiTkJZsEP5LWXrAoiFIkXuKxtpzptLhqkmInSP0GfhqHUlaIlUeeM3M19xJyzFnKGe-fzVNbzsuQCiZYylTKWLZFejyXKhFas23SY4yJRPeF3iP7IcwZ40JxuUv2pBRKCZb3yOcFhoY-eguNAwzUVfQJg5tg1XQFWg9vCR3Se9u4urIL-tz6D1zRekrHbvZGR20FXcdVM3pTNeg75g4nDlyFm1Wwigr1zNvyb4Hu8_V5eEh2pnYR8OjnPSCvo6uXy3Fy-3B9czm8TUDmuklQK4AMMqs4ZoOBBcGnhZay4AV0teznwmKhOejBgGc2z4XSMtNKWKUKyOUBOV3vXfr6vY33m9IFwMXCVli3wYisr2TGRa4iKtco-DoEj1Oz9K60fmU4M10KZm6-UzBdCoYpE1OIUyc_Am1R4uR3ZmN7BM7XAMYzPxx6E8BFn6JvHqExk9r9K_AFpB2aLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2468341258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best Practices in Resident Research- A National Survey of High Functioning Internal Medicine Residency Programs in Resident Research in USA</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ercan-Fang, Nacide G. ; Mahmoud, Mai A. ; Cottrell, Carol ; Campbell, James P. ; MacDonald, David M. ; Arayssi, Thurayya ; Rockey, Don C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ercan-Fang, Nacide G. ; Mahmoud, Mai A. ; Cottrell, Carol ; Campbell, James P. ; MacDonald, David M. ; Arayssi, Thurayya ; Rockey, Don C.</creatorcontrib><description>Meaningful participation in research for both faculty and residents is generally viewed to be an essential component of residency training. To better understand best practices in residency research, the authors conducted a survey among Internal Medicine (IM) Residency Programs with experience in research. Phone interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of Residency Program Directors (PDs). Survey responses were analyzed across the following domains: size and makeup of the residency and research programs, resources for research, role of the PD/research director (RD), profile of trainees doing research, curriculum description, scope of research, role of mentors, career choices and determinants of success. Fifteen programs were included in the study. Across these programs, approximately two-thirds of residents were involved in research during their training . Eighty percent of the programs required an application for residents to engage in research. Ninety-two percent of the programs had a RD but only 58% had a formal research curriculum. Clinical research projects were the most common types of research. On average, two-thirds of residents involved in research submitted abstracts to regional and/or national meetings. The factor most frequently associated with resident research success was an effective faculty research mentor. Research success during residency is multifactorial. The authors propose that having a robust structure for research that is led by a residency RD, and the presence of effective mentors and strong administrative support are critical for success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-2990</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33288205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Internal Medicine - education ; Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Research Design - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of the medical sciences, 2021-01, Vol.361 (1), p.23-29</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e98cc4c4a81e477ac21fb933b1bcc21f3652aeb91c97714a5528934982a88bc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e98cc4c4a81e477ac21fb933b1bcc21f3652aeb91c97714a5528934982a88bc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33288205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ercan-Fang, Nacide G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Mai A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arayssi, Thurayya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockey, Don C.</creatorcontrib><title>Best Practices in Resident Research- A National Survey of High Functioning Internal Medicine Residency Programs in Resident Research in USA</title><title>The American journal of the medical sciences</title><addtitle>Am J Med Sci</addtitle><description>Meaningful participation in research for both faculty and residents is generally viewed to be an essential component of residency training. To better understand best practices in residency research, the authors conducted a survey among Internal Medicine (IM) Residency Programs with experience in research. Phone interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of Residency Program Directors (PDs). Survey responses were analyzed across the following domains: size and makeup of the residency and research programs, resources for research, role of the PD/research director (RD), profile of trainees doing research, curriculum description, scope of research, role of mentors, career choices and determinants of success. Fifteen programs were included in the study. Across these programs, approximately two-thirds of residents were involved in research during their training . Eighty percent of the programs required an application for residents to engage in research. Ninety-two percent of the programs had a RD but only 58% had a formal research curriculum. Clinical research projects were the most common types of research. On average, two-thirds of residents involved in research submitted abstracts to regional and/or national meetings. The factor most frequently associated with resident research success was an effective faculty research mentor. Research success during residency is multifactorial. The authors propose that having a robust structure for research that is led by a residency RD, and the presence of effective mentors and strong administrative support are critical for success.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - education</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Research Design - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9629</issn><issn>1538-2990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EgvL4AiTkJZsEP5LWXrAoiFIkXuKxtpzptLhqkmInSP0GfhqHUlaIlUeeM3M19xJyzFnKGe-fzVNbzsuQCiZYylTKWLZFejyXKhFas23SY4yJRPeF3iP7IcwZ40JxuUv2pBRKCZb3yOcFhoY-eguNAwzUVfQJg5tg1XQFWg9vCR3Se9u4urIL-tz6D1zRekrHbvZGR20FXcdVM3pTNeg75g4nDlyFm1Wwigr1zNvyb4Hu8_V5eEh2pnYR8OjnPSCvo6uXy3Fy-3B9czm8TUDmuklQK4AMMqs4ZoOBBcGnhZay4AV0teznwmKhOejBgGc2z4XSMtNKWKUKyOUBOV3vXfr6vY33m9IFwMXCVli3wYisr2TGRa4iKtco-DoEj1Oz9K60fmU4M10KZm6-UzBdCoYpE1OIUyc_Am1R4uR3ZmN7BM7XAMYzPxx6E8BFn6JvHqExk9r9K_AFpB2aLw</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Ercan-Fang, Nacide G.</creator><creator>Mahmoud, Mai A.</creator><creator>Cottrell, Carol</creator><creator>Campbell, James P.</creator><creator>MacDonald, David M.</creator><creator>Arayssi, Thurayya</creator><creator>Rockey, Don C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Best Practices in Resident Research- A National Survey of High Functioning Internal Medicine Residency Programs in Resident Research in USA</title><author>Ercan-Fang, Nacide G. ; Mahmoud, Mai A. ; Cottrell, Carol ; Campbell, James P. ; MacDonald, David M. ; Arayssi, Thurayya ; Rockey, Don C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e98cc4c4a81e477ac21fb933b1bcc21f3652aeb91c97714a5528934982a88bc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - education</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Research Design - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ercan-Fang, Nacide G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Mai A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arayssi, Thurayya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockey, Don C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of the medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ercan-Fang, Nacide G.</au><au>Mahmoud, Mai A.</au><au>Cottrell, Carol</au><au>Campbell, James P.</au><au>MacDonald, David M.</au><au>Arayssi, Thurayya</au><au>Rockey, Don C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best Practices in Resident Research- A National Survey of High Functioning Internal Medicine Residency Programs in Resident Research in USA</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of the medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>361</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>23-29</pages><issn>0002-9629</issn><eissn>1538-2990</eissn><abstract>Meaningful participation in research for both faculty and residents is generally viewed to be an essential component of residency training. To better understand best practices in residency research, the authors conducted a survey among Internal Medicine (IM) Residency Programs with experience in research. Phone interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of Residency Program Directors (PDs). Survey responses were analyzed across the following domains: size and makeup of the residency and research programs, resources for research, role of the PD/research director (RD), profile of trainees doing research, curriculum description, scope of research, role of mentors, career choices and determinants of success. Fifteen programs were included in the study. Across these programs, approximately two-thirds of residents were involved in research during their training . Eighty percent of the programs required an application for residents to engage in research. Ninety-two percent of the programs had a RD but only 58% had a formal research curriculum. Clinical research projects were the most common types of research. On average, two-thirds of residents involved in research submitted abstracts to regional and/or national meetings. The factor most frequently associated with resident research success was an effective faculty research mentor. Research success during residency is multifactorial. The authors propose that having a robust structure for research that is led by a residency RD, and the presence of effective mentors and strong administrative support are critical for success.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33288205</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9629
ispartof The American journal of the medical sciences, 2021-01, Vol.361 (1), p.23-29
issn 0002-9629
1538-2990
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2468341258
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biomedical Research - statistics & numerical data
Internal Medicine - education
Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Research Design - statistics & numerical data
United States
title Best Practices in Resident Research- A National Survey of High Functioning Internal Medicine Residency Programs in Resident Research in USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A32%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20Practices%20in%20Resident%20Research-%20A%20National%20Survey%20of%20High%20Functioning%20Internal%20Medicine%20Residency%20Programs%20in%20Resident%20Research%20in%20USA&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20the%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Ercan-Fang,%20Nacide%20G.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=361&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=23-29&rft.issn=0002-9629&rft.eissn=1538-2990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2468341258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2468341258&rft_id=info:pmid/33288205&rft_els_id=S0002962920303530&rfr_iscdi=true