Geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Older adults are the most frequent users of emergency services. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help identify high-risk older adults at an early stage. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and evaluate CGA tools used in the emergency department (ED), analyze th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental gerontology 2021-02, Vol.144, p.111184-111184, Article 111184
Hauptverfasser: Häseler-Ouart, Kristin, Arefian, Habibollah, Hartmann, Michael, Kwetkat, Anja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111184
container_issue
container_start_page 111184
container_title Experimental gerontology
container_volume 144
creator Häseler-Ouart, Kristin
Arefian, Habibollah
Hartmann, Michael
Kwetkat, Anja
description Older adults are the most frequent users of emergency services. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help identify high-risk older adults at an early stage. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and evaluate CGA tools used in the emergency department (ED), analyze their predictive validity for adverse outcomes and recommend tools for this particular situation. We systematically searched Medline, Web of Science and CENTRAL for eligible articles published in peer-reviewed journals that observed patients ≥65 years admitted to the ED, used at least one assessment tool and reported adverse outcomes of interest. We performed a descriptive analysis and a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of the assessment tools for the chosen adverse outcomes. 28 eligible studies were included. The pooled sensitivity (95% CI) of the assessment tools for predicting mortality within short (28–90 days) and long (180–365 days) periods after the first ED visit was 0.77 (0.61–0.89) and 0.79 (0.46–0.96), respectively, with specificity (95% CI) values of 0.45 (0.32–0.59) and 0.37 (0.14–0.65). These findings indicate that the tools used in the included studies had modest predictive accuracy for mortality and were more appropriate for identifying individuals at high risk of readmission in the short term than in the long term. Early use of assessment tools in the ED might improve clinical decision making and reduce negative outcomes for older adults. •The obsolescence of the population requires changes in medical care, especially in the emergency department (ED)•CGA may help to identify high-risk older adults (OA) at an early stage in order to treat them with geriatric therapy promptly•For the different domains of CGA there is a great variety of assessment tools•We evaluated the predictive validity for adverse outcomes and try to recommend assessment tools for OAs admitted to ED
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111184
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2467840440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0531556520305325</els_id><sourcerecordid>2467840440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d1bfb768ff99063d64ceae6ab872631e4ac43e4f379834699006b44579a10caf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVoaNykvyAQdMxlXWml1e4WegghTQuBXpKzmJVmHZn9cDRyG__7yLWbY-cyMDzvDPMwdinFUgppvqyX-LrCuCxFmSe5Gn3CFrKpVWEaWX1gC1EpWVSVqc7YJ6K1EMKUSn5kZ0qVdWuMXrCXe4wBUgyOAxESjTgl3s-Rz4PHyMFvh0S5jSEl9DzNPD0jxxHjCie34x43ENM-9ZXfcNpRwhFSXhfxd8A_HCbPR0xQwATDjgJdsNMeBsLPx37Onr7fPd7-KB5-3f-8vXkonKraVHjZ9V1tmr5vW2GUN9ohoIGuqUujJGpwWqHuVd02SpsMCdNpXdUtSOGgV-fs-rB3E-eXLVKyYyCHwwATzluypTZ1o4XWIqPqgLo4E0Xs7SaGEeLOSmH3ru3a_nVt967twXVOXR0PbLsR_Xvmn9wMfDsAmN_MMqIlF7I09CGiS9bP4b8H3gAbt5Js</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2467840440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Häseler-Ouart, Kristin ; Arefian, Habibollah ; Hartmann, Michael ; Kwetkat, Anja</creator><creatorcontrib>Häseler-Ouart, Kristin ; Arefian, Habibollah ; Hartmann, Michael ; Kwetkat, Anja</creatorcontrib><description>Older adults are the most frequent users of emergency services. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help identify high-risk older adults at an early stage. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and evaluate CGA tools used in the emergency department (ED), analyze their predictive validity for adverse outcomes and recommend tools for this particular situation. We systematically searched Medline, Web of Science and CENTRAL for eligible articles published in peer-reviewed journals that observed patients ≥65 years admitted to the ED, used at least one assessment tool and reported adverse outcomes of interest. We performed a descriptive analysis and a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of the assessment tools for the chosen adverse outcomes. 28 eligible studies were included. The pooled sensitivity (95% CI) of the assessment tools for predicting mortality within short (28–90 days) and long (180–365 days) periods after the first ED visit was 0.77 (0.61–0.89) and 0.79 (0.46–0.96), respectively, with specificity (95% CI) values of 0.45 (0.32–0.59) and 0.37 (0.14–0.65). These findings indicate that the tools used in the included studies had modest predictive accuracy for mortality and were more appropriate for identifying individuals at high risk of readmission in the short term than in the long term. Early use of assessment tools in the ED might improve clinical decision making and reduce negative outcomes for older adults. •The obsolescence of the population requires changes in medical care, especially in the emergency department (ED)•CGA may help to identify high-risk older adults (OA) at an early stage in order to treat them with geriatric therapy promptly•For the different domains of CGA there is a great variety of assessment tools•We evaluated the predictive validity for adverse outcomes and try to recommend assessment tools for OAs admitted to ED</description><identifier>ISSN: 0531-5565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111184</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33279664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Comprehensive geriatric assessment ; Emergency department ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Experimental gerontology, 2021-02, Vol.144, p.111184-111184, Article 111184</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d1bfb768ff99063d64ceae6ab872631e4ac43e4f379834699006b44579a10caf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d1bfb768ff99063d64ceae6ab872631e4ac43e4f379834699006b44579a10caf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556520305325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33279664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Häseler-Ouart, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arefian, Habibollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwetkat, Anja</creatorcontrib><title>Geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Experimental gerontology</title><addtitle>Exp Gerontol</addtitle><description>Older adults are the most frequent users of emergency services. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help identify high-risk older adults at an early stage. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and evaluate CGA tools used in the emergency department (ED), analyze their predictive validity for adverse outcomes and recommend tools for this particular situation. We systematically searched Medline, Web of Science and CENTRAL for eligible articles published in peer-reviewed journals that observed patients ≥65 years admitted to the ED, used at least one assessment tool and reported adverse outcomes of interest. We performed a descriptive analysis and a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of the assessment tools for the chosen adverse outcomes. 28 eligible studies were included. The pooled sensitivity (95% CI) of the assessment tools for predicting mortality within short (28–90 days) and long (180–365 days) periods after the first ED visit was 0.77 (0.61–0.89) and 0.79 (0.46–0.96), respectively, with specificity (95% CI) values of 0.45 (0.32–0.59) and 0.37 (0.14–0.65). These findings indicate that the tools used in the included studies had modest predictive accuracy for mortality and were more appropriate for identifying individuals at high risk of readmission in the short term than in the long term. Early use of assessment tools in the ED might improve clinical decision making and reduce negative outcomes for older adults. •The obsolescence of the population requires changes in medical care, especially in the emergency department (ED)•CGA may help to identify high-risk older adults (OA) at an early stage in order to treat them with geriatric therapy promptly•For the different domains of CGA there is a great variety of assessment tools•We evaluated the predictive validity for adverse outcomes and try to recommend assessment tools for OAs admitted to ED</description><subject>Comprehensive geriatric assessment</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0531-5565</issn><issn>1873-6815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVoaNykvyAQdMxlXWml1e4WegghTQuBXpKzmJVmHZn9cDRyG__7yLWbY-cyMDzvDPMwdinFUgppvqyX-LrCuCxFmSe5Gn3CFrKpVWEaWX1gC1EpWVSVqc7YJ6K1EMKUSn5kZ0qVdWuMXrCXe4wBUgyOAxESjTgl3s-Rz4PHyMFvh0S5jSEl9DzNPD0jxxHjCie34x43ENM-9ZXfcNpRwhFSXhfxd8A_HCbPR0xQwATDjgJdsNMeBsLPx37Onr7fPd7-KB5-3f-8vXkonKraVHjZ9V1tmr5vW2GUN9ohoIGuqUujJGpwWqHuVd02SpsMCdNpXdUtSOGgV-fs-rB3E-eXLVKyYyCHwwATzluypTZ1o4XWIqPqgLo4E0Xs7SaGEeLOSmH3ru3a_nVt967twXVOXR0PbLsR_Xvmn9wMfDsAmN_MMqIlF7I09CGiS9bP4b8H3gAbt5Js</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Häseler-Ouart, Kristin</creator><creator>Arefian, Habibollah</creator><creator>Hartmann, Michael</creator><creator>Kwetkat, Anja</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Häseler-Ouart, Kristin ; Arefian, Habibollah ; Hartmann, Michael ; Kwetkat, Anja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d1bfb768ff99063d64ceae6ab872631e4ac43e4f379834699006b44579a10caf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Comprehensive geriatric assessment</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Häseler-Ouart, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arefian, Habibollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwetkat, Anja</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental gerontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Häseler-Ouart, Kristin</au><au>Arefian, Habibollah</au><au>Hartmann, Michael</au><au>Kwetkat, Anja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Experimental gerontology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Gerontol</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>144</volume><spage>111184</spage><epage>111184</epage><pages>111184-111184</pages><artnum>111184</artnum><issn>0531-5565</issn><eissn>1873-6815</eissn><abstract>Older adults are the most frequent users of emergency services. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help identify high-risk older adults at an early stage. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and evaluate CGA tools used in the emergency department (ED), analyze their predictive validity for adverse outcomes and recommend tools for this particular situation. We systematically searched Medline, Web of Science and CENTRAL for eligible articles published in peer-reviewed journals that observed patients ≥65 years admitted to the ED, used at least one assessment tool and reported adverse outcomes of interest. We performed a descriptive analysis and a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of the assessment tools for the chosen adverse outcomes. 28 eligible studies were included. The pooled sensitivity (95% CI) of the assessment tools for predicting mortality within short (28–90 days) and long (180–365 days) periods after the first ED visit was 0.77 (0.61–0.89) and 0.79 (0.46–0.96), respectively, with specificity (95% CI) values of 0.45 (0.32–0.59) and 0.37 (0.14–0.65). These findings indicate that the tools used in the included studies had modest predictive accuracy for mortality and were more appropriate for identifying individuals at high risk of readmission in the short term than in the long term. Early use of assessment tools in the ED might improve clinical decision making and reduce negative outcomes for older adults. •The obsolescence of the population requires changes in medical care, especially in the emergency department (ED)•CGA may help to identify high-risk older adults (OA) at an early stage in order to treat them with geriatric therapy promptly•For the different domains of CGA there is a great variety of assessment tools•We evaluated the predictive validity for adverse outcomes and try to recommend assessment tools for OAs admitted to ED</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33279664</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.exger.2020.111184</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0531-5565
ispartof Experimental gerontology, 2021-02, Vol.144, p.111184-111184, Article 111184
issn 0531-5565
1873-6815
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2467840440
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Comprehensive geriatric assessment
Emergency department
Systematic review
title Geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geriatric%20assessment%20for%20older%20adults%20admitted%20to%20the%20emergency%20department:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20gerontology&rft.au=H%C3%A4seler-Ouart,%20Kristin&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=144&rft.spage=111184&rft.epage=111184&rft.pages=111184-111184&rft.artnum=111184&rft.issn=0531-5565&rft.eissn=1873-6815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.exger.2020.111184&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2467840440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2467840440&rft_id=info:pmid/33279664&rft_els_id=S0531556520305325&rfr_iscdi=true