Patients’ and surgeons’ experiences after failed breast reconstruction: A qualitative study

The goal of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR) is to improve the quality of life of patients. However, complications following autologous BR (A-BR) and implant-based BR (I-BR) occur frequently and may even lead to BR-failure, which can be a distressing event for both patients and surgeons. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2021-07, Vol.74 (7), p.1480-1485
Hauptverfasser: Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E., van Hoogdalem, Lothar E., Mureau, Marc A.M., Ismail, Sohal, Gopie, Jessica P., Tibben, Aad, Kranenburg, Leonieke W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1485
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1480
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 74
creator Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E.
van Hoogdalem, Lothar E.
Mureau, Marc A.M.
Ismail, Sohal
Gopie, Jessica P.
Tibben, Aad
Kranenburg, Leonieke W.
description The goal of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR) is to improve the quality of life of patients. However, complications following autologous BR (A-BR) and implant-based BR (I-BR) occur frequently and may even lead to BR-failure, which can be a distressing event for both patients and surgeons. The current study, therefore, examines the experiences of both patients and surgeons after a BR-failure. Patients with a failed BR from a large multicenter cohort study and participating plastic surgeons were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews focusing on their experiences. The interviews were analyzed according to the principles of grounded theory. Fourteen patients with a failed I-BR, four patients with a failed A-BR, and four plastic surgeons were participated. Three main categories emerged from the data: personal experiences with BR-failure, the motives for a redo of a failed BR, and patient–surgeon communication. Patients would like to be treated with more attention to their personal feelings and lives, instead of being approached from a purely medical-technical perspective. Surgeons may experience feelings of guilt leading to the strong urge to fix the failed BR, whereas patients may be less inclined to undergo additional operations. Patients want to know what the choice for a particular type of BR would mean to their personal lives. The impact of I-BR-failure may be underestimated and requires the same degree of intensive aftercare and attention. Implementing the recommendations of this study in clinical practice may facilitate improvements in how both patients and surgeons cope with a BR-failure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2467613742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681520305775</els_id><sourcerecordid>2467613742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-cb18b66028ae0f3e039e2b0a43129248ed46170621052f4ef1ba710e206023f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhiMEEqVwAVZeskkY24njIjZVxUtCggWsLSeZIEdpktpORXdcg-txEpyWNat5_f9o5ouiSwoJBSqum6RoBpcwYFMjAQlH0YzKXMaQ8cVxyPNUxkLS7DQ6c64BSDlNs1mkXrU32Hn38_VNdFcRN9oP7Lt9jZ8D2jAt0RFde7Sk1qbFihQWtfPEYhmU3o6lN313Q5ZkM-rW-LByi8T5sdqdRye1bh1e_MV59H5_97Z6jJ9fHp5Wy-e45Jz7uCyoLIQAJjVCzRH4AlkBOlzJFiyVWKWC5iAYhYzVKda00DkFZBA8vBZ8Hl0d9g6234zovFobV2Lb6g770SmWilxQnqcsSNlBWtreOYu1GqxZa7tTFNREUzVqoqkmmlMv0Aym24MJwxNbg1a5ck-mMoGCV1Vv_rP_AnS_gEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2467613742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients’ and surgeons’ experiences after failed breast reconstruction: A qualitative study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E. ; van Hoogdalem, Lothar E. ; Mureau, Marc A.M. ; Ismail, Sohal ; Gopie, Jessica P. ; Tibben, Aad ; Kranenburg, Leonieke W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E. ; van Hoogdalem, Lothar E. ; Mureau, Marc A.M. ; Ismail, Sohal ; Gopie, Jessica P. ; Tibben, Aad ; Kranenburg, Leonieke W.</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR) is to improve the quality of life of patients. However, complications following autologous BR (A-BR) and implant-based BR (I-BR) occur frequently and may even lead to BR-failure, which can be a distressing event for both patients and surgeons. The current study, therefore, examines the experiences of both patients and surgeons after a BR-failure. Patients with a failed BR from a large multicenter cohort study and participating plastic surgeons were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews focusing on their experiences. The interviews were analyzed according to the principles of grounded theory. Fourteen patients with a failed I-BR, four patients with a failed A-BR, and four plastic surgeons were participated. Three main categories emerged from the data: personal experiences with BR-failure, the motives for a redo of a failed BR, and patient–surgeon communication. Patients would like to be treated with more attention to their personal feelings and lives, instead of being approached from a purely medical-technical perspective. Surgeons may experience feelings of guilt leading to the strong urge to fix the failed BR, whereas patients may be less inclined to undergo additional operations. Patients want to know what the choice for a particular type of BR would mean to their personal lives. The impact of I-BR-failure may be underestimated and requires the same degree of intensive aftercare and attention. Implementing the recommendations of this study in clinical practice may facilitate improvements in how both patients and surgeons cope with a BR-failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast implants ; Mammaplasty ; Patient experiences ; Postoperative complications ; Qualitative research ; Surgeon experiences</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2021-07, Vol.74 (7), p.1480-1485</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-cb18b66028ae0f3e039e2b0a43129248ed46170621052f4ef1ba710e206023f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-cb18b66028ae0f3e039e2b0a43129248ed46170621052f4ef1ba710e206023f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681520305775$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hoogdalem, Lothar E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mureau, Marc A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Sohal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopie, Jessica P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranenburg, Leonieke W.</creatorcontrib><title>Patients’ and surgeons’ experiences after failed breast reconstruction: A qualitative study</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><description>The goal of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR) is to improve the quality of life of patients. However, complications following autologous BR (A-BR) and implant-based BR (I-BR) occur frequently and may even lead to BR-failure, which can be a distressing event for both patients and surgeons. The current study, therefore, examines the experiences of both patients and surgeons after a BR-failure. Patients with a failed BR from a large multicenter cohort study and participating plastic surgeons were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews focusing on their experiences. The interviews were analyzed according to the principles of grounded theory. Fourteen patients with a failed I-BR, four patients with a failed A-BR, and four plastic surgeons were participated. Three main categories emerged from the data: personal experiences with BR-failure, the motives for a redo of a failed BR, and patient–surgeon communication. Patients would like to be treated with more attention to their personal feelings and lives, instead of being approached from a purely medical-technical perspective. Surgeons may experience feelings of guilt leading to the strong urge to fix the failed BR, whereas patients may be less inclined to undergo additional operations. Patients want to know what the choice for a particular type of BR would mean to their personal lives. The impact of I-BR-failure may be underestimated and requires the same degree of intensive aftercare and attention. Implementing the recommendations of this study in clinical practice may facilitate improvements in how both patients and surgeons cope with a BR-failure.</description><subject>Breast implants</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Patient experiences</subject><subject>Postoperative complications</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surgeon experiences</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhiMEEqVwAVZeskkY24njIjZVxUtCggWsLSeZIEdpktpORXdcg-txEpyWNat5_f9o5ouiSwoJBSqum6RoBpcwYFMjAQlH0YzKXMaQ8cVxyPNUxkLS7DQ6c64BSDlNs1mkXrU32Hn38_VNdFcRN9oP7Lt9jZ8D2jAt0RFde7Sk1qbFihQWtfPEYhmU3o6lN313Q5ZkM-rW-LByi8T5sdqdRye1bh1e_MV59H5_97Z6jJ9fHp5Wy-e45Jz7uCyoLIQAJjVCzRH4AlkBOlzJFiyVWKWC5iAYhYzVKda00DkFZBA8vBZ8Hl0d9g6234zovFobV2Lb6g770SmWilxQnqcsSNlBWtreOYu1GqxZa7tTFNREUzVqoqkmmlMv0Aym24MJwxNbg1a5ck-mMoGCV1Vv_rP_AnS_gEU</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E.</creator><creator>van Hoogdalem, Lothar E.</creator><creator>Mureau, Marc A.M.</creator><creator>Ismail, Sohal</creator><creator>Gopie, Jessica P.</creator><creator>Tibben, Aad</creator><creator>Kranenburg, Leonieke W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Patients’ and surgeons’ experiences after failed breast reconstruction: A qualitative study</title><author>Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E. ; van Hoogdalem, Lothar E. ; Mureau, Marc A.M. ; Ismail, Sohal ; Gopie, Jessica P. ; Tibben, Aad ; Kranenburg, Leonieke W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-cb18b66028ae0f3e039e2b0a43129248ed46170621052f4ef1ba710e206023f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Breast implants</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Patient experiences</topic><topic>Postoperative complications</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surgeon experiences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hoogdalem, Lothar E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mureau, Marc A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Sohal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopie, Jessica P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranenburg, Leonieke W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kouwenberg, Casimir A.E.</au><au>van Hoogdalem, Lothar E.</au><au>Mureau, Marc A.M.</au><au>Ismail, Sohal</au><au>Gopie, Jessica P.</au><au>Tibben, Aad</au><au>Kranenburg, Leonieke W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients’ and surgeons’ experiences after failed breast reconstruction: A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1480</spage><epage>1485</epage><pages>1480-1485</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>The goal of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR) is to improve the quality of life of patients. However, complications following autologous BR (A-BR) and implant-based BR (I-BR) occur frequently and may even lead to BR-failure, which can be a distressing event for both patients and surgeons. The current study, therefore, examines the experiences of both patients and surgeons after a BR-failure. Patients with a failed BR from a large multicenter cohort study and participating plastic surgeons were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews focusing on their experiences. The interviews were analyzed according to the principles of grounded theory. Fourteen patients with a failed I-BR, four patients with a failed A-BR, and four plastic surgeons were participated. Three main categories emerged from the data: personal experiences with BR-failure, the motives for a redo of a failed BR, and patient–surgeon communication. Patients would like to be treated with more attention to their personal feelings and lives, instead of being approached from a purely medical-technical perspective. Surgeons may experience feelings of guilt leading to the strong urge to fix the failed BR, whereas patients may be less inclined to undergo additional operations. Patients want to know what the choice for a particular type of BR would mean to their personal lives. The impact of I-BR-failure may be underestimated and requires the same degree of intensive aftercare and attention. Implementing the recommendations of this study in clinical practice may facilitate improvements in how both patients and surgeons cope with a BR-failure.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.080</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2021-07, Vol.74 (7), p.1480-1485
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2467613742
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Breast implants
Mammaplasty
Patient experiences
Postoperative complications
Qualitative research
Surgeon experiences
title Patients’ and surgeons’ experiences after failed breast reconstruction: A qualitative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A11%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%E2%80%99%20and%20surgeons%E2%80%99%20experiences%20after%20failed%20breast%20reconstruction:%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Kouwenberg,%20Casimir%20A.E.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1480&rft.epage=1485&rft.pages=1480-1485&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2467613742%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2467613742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1748681520305775&rfr_iscdi=true