Ultraviolet A rush hardening for chronic actinic dermatitis: Pilot treatment outcomes

Chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) is a common debilitating photodermatosis. Patients often have to completely avoid outdoor activities, which severely impacts their quality of life. Phototherapy is effective for CAD and seems to increase patients’ tolerance towards sunlight and consequently decrease...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dermatology 2021-03, Vol.48 (3), p.385-388
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Tianjing, Gong, Yangyang, Rong, Wei, Li, Li, Zhang, Jialin, Li, Hui‐Zhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 3
container_start_page 385
container_title Journal of dermatology
container_volume 48
creator Wang, Tianjing
Gong, Yangyang
Rong, Wei
Li, Li
Zhang, Jialin
Li, Hui‐Zhong
description Chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) is a common debilitating photodermatosis. Patients often have to completely avoid outdoor activities, which severely impacts their quality of life. Phototherapy is effective for CAD and seems to increase patients’ tolerance towards sunlight and consequently decrease the extent of disease. Unfortunately, the slower onset and time‐consuming nature of phototherapy limits the clinical application. Considering the effectiveness and time‐saving nature of ultraviolet (UV)‐A rush hardening in solar urticaria, we performed a pilot study to determine whether UV‐A rush hardening is effective in CAD. Six patients with CAD were exposed to multiple sessions of UV‐A for 4–5 days at 1‐h intervals/day. Subsequently, maintenance UV‐A exposure was performed at 1–2‐week intervals. Phototesting at baseline showed that three patients were sensitive to both UV‐A and ‐B, and the other three patients only showed UV‐A sensitivity. All of the patients responded well to UV‐A rush hardening and four (67%) maintained a good remission status after 1 year. The results of this pilot study suggest that UV‐A rush hardening phototherapy is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of CAD, while future larger prospective studies using objective scores of disease activity and quality of life are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1346-8138.15667
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2466772383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2494721336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-bbb48406c2ab1ca09b4ed9d3996d801563d2b73540d9561cf7fcecffbde568d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EglKY2ZAlFpa0dvyRhK0q36oEA50tx3aoURIX2wHx73EpMLBwy0mn517dPQCcYDTBqaaYUJ6VmJQTzDgvdsDod7ILRoiULMspKg7AYQgvCOUVw2gfHBCSc0oZG4Hlso1evlnXmghn0A9hBVfSa9Pb_hk2zkO18q63CkoV7aZr4zsZbbThAj7a1kUYvZGxM32EbojKdSYcgb1GtsEcf_cxWF5fPc1vs8XDzd18tsgUqViR1XVNS4q4ymWNlURVTY2uNKkqrkuUPiI6rwvCKNIV41g1RaOMappaG8ZLjcgYnG9z1969DiZE0dmgTNvK3rghiJwmKUVOSpLQsz_oixt8n65LVEWLHBPCEzXdUsq7ELxpxNrbTvoPgZHYGBcbv2LjV3wZTxun37lD3Rn9y_8oTgDbAu-2NR__5Yn7y6tt8CcwForm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494721336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultraviolet A rush hardening for chronic actinic dermatitis: Pilot treatment outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Wang, Tianjing ; Gong, Yangyang ; Rong, Wei ; Li, Li ; Zhang, Jialin ; Li, Hui‐Zhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tianjing ; Gong, Yangyang ; Rong, Wei ; Li, Li ; Zhang, Jialin ; Li, Hui‐Zhong</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) is a common debilitating photodermatosis. Patients often have to completely avoid outdoor activities, which severely impacts their quality of life. Phototherapy is effective for CAD and seems to increase patients’ tolerance towards sunlight and consequently decrease the extent of disease. Unfortunately, the slower onset and time‐consuming nature of phototherapy limits the clinical application. Considering the effectiveness and time‐saving nature of ultraviolet (UV)‐A rush hardening in solar urticaria, we performed a pilot study to determine whether UV‐A rush hardening is effective in CAD. Six patients with CAD were exposed to multiple sessions of UV‐A for 4–5 days at 1‐h intervals/day. Subsequently, maintenance UV‐A exposure was performed at 1–2‐week intervals. Phototesting at baseline showed that three patients were sensitive to both UV‐A and ‐B, and the other three patients only showed UV‐A sensitivity. All of the patients responded well to UV‐A rush hardening and four (67%) maintained a good remission status after 1 year. The results of this pilot study suggest that UV‐A rush hardening phototherapy is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of CAD, while future larger prospective studies using objective scores of disease activity and quality of life are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0385-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1346-8138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33264455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>chronic actinic dermatitis ; Dermatitis ; Humans ; Light therapy ; Patients ; Photosensitivity Disorders - etiology ; Phototherapy ; Pilot Projects ; pilot study ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Remission ; rush hardening ; Treatment Outcome ; ultraviolet A ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects ; Urticaria</subject><ispartof>Journal of dermatology, 2021-03, Vol.48 (3), p.385-388</ispartof><rights>2020 Japanese Dermatological Association</rights><rights>2020 Japanese Dermatological Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Japanese Dermatological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-bbb48406c2ab1ca09b4ed9d3996d801563d2b73540d9561cf7fcecffbde568d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-bbb48406c2ab1ca09b4ed9d3996d801563d2b73540d9561cf7fcecffbde568d03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2731-458X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1346-8138.15667$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1346-8138.15667$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33264455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tianjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rong, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jialin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hui‐Zhong</creatorcontrib><title>Ultraviolet A rush hardening for chronic actinic dermatitis: Pilot treatment outcomes</title><title>Journal of dermatology</title><addtitle>J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) is a common debilitating photodermatosis. Patients often have to completely avoid outdoor activities, which severely impacts their quality of life. Phototherapy is effective for CAD and seems to increase patients’ tolerance towards sunlight and consequently decrease the extent of disease. Unfortunately, the slower onset and time‐consuming nature of phototherapy limits the clinical application. Considering the effectiveness and time‐saving nature of ultraviolet (UV)‐A rush hardening in solar urticaria, we performed a pilot study to determine whether UV‐A rush hardening is effective in CAD. Six patients with CAD were exposed to multiple sessions of UV‐A for 4–5 days at 1‐h intervals/day. Subsequently, maintenance UV‐A exposure was performed at 1–2‐week intervals. Phototesting at baseline showed that three patients were sensitive to both UV‐A and ‐B, and the other three patients only showed UV‐A sensitivity. All of the patients responded well to UV‐A rush hardening and four (67%) maintained a good remission status after 1 year. The results of this pilot study suggest that UV‐A rush hardening phototherapy is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of CAD, while future larger prospective studies using objective scores of disease activity and quality of life are needed.</description><subject>chronic actinic dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Photosensitivity Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Phototherapy</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>pilot study</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>rush hardening</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ultraviolet A</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urticaria</subject><issn>0385-2407</issn><issn>1346-8138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EglKY2ZAlFpa0dvyRhK0q36oEA50tx3aoURIX2wHx73EpMLBwy0mn517dPQCcYDTBqaaYUJ6VmJQTzDgvdsDod7ILRoiULMspKg7AYQgvCOUVw2gfHBCSc0oZG4Hlso1evlnXmghn0A9hBVfSa9Pb_hk2zkO18q63CkoV7aZr4zsZbbThAj7a1kUYvZGxM32EbojKdSYcgb1GtsEcf_cxWF5fPc1vs8XDzd18tsgUqViR1XVNS4q4ymWNlURVTY2uNKkqrkuUPiI6rwvCKNIV41g1RaOMappaG8ZLjcgYnG9z1969DiZE0dmgTNvK3rghiJwmKUVOSpLQsz_oixt8n65LVEWLHBPCEzXdUsq7ELxpxNrbTvoPgZHYGBcbv2LjV3wZTxun37lD3Rn9y_8oTgDbAu-2NR__5Yn7y6tt8CcwForm</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Wang, Tianjing</creator><creator>Gong, Yangyang</creator><creator>Rong, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Li</creator><creator>Zhang, Jialin</creator><creator>Li, Hui‐Zhong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2731-458X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Ultraviolet A rush hardening for chronic actinic dermatitis: Pilot treatment outcomes</title><author>Wang, Tianjing ; Gong, Yangyang ; Rong, Wei ; Li, Li ; Zhang, Jialin ; Li, Hui‐Zhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-bbb48406c2ab1ca09b4ed9d3996d801563d2b73540d9561cf7fcecffbde568d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>chronic actinic dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Photosensitivity Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Phototherapy</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>pilot study</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>rush hardening</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ultraviolet A</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urticaria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tianjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rong, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jialin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hui‐Zhong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Tianjing</au><au>Gong, Yangyang</au><au>Rong, Wei</au><au>Li, Li</au><au>Zhang, Jialin</au><au>Li, Hui‐Zhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultraviolet A rush hardening for chronic actinic dermatitis: Pilot treatment outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>385-388</pages><issn>0385-2407</issn><eissn>1346-8138</eissn><abstract>Chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) is a common debilitating photodermatosis. Patients often have to completely avoid outdoor activities, which severely impacts their quality of life. Phototherapy is effective for CAD and seems to increase patients’ tolerance towards sunlight and consequently decrease the extent of disease. Unfortunately, the slower onset and time‐consuming nature of phototherapy limits the clinical application. Considering the effectiveness and time‐saving nature of ultraviolet (UV)‐A rush hardening in solar urticaria, we performed a pilot study to determine whether UV‐A rush hardening is effective in CAD. Six patients with CAD were exposed to multiple sessions of UV‐A for 4–5 days at 1‐h intervals/day. Subsequently, maintenance UV‐A exposure was performed at 1–2‐week intervals. Phototesting at baseline showed that three patients were sensitive to both UV‐A and ‐B, and the other three patients only showed UV‐A sensitivity. All of the patients responded well to UV‐A rush hardening and four (67%) maintained a good remission status after 1 year. The results of this pilot study suggest that UV‐A rush hardening phototherapy is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of CAD, while future larger prospective studies using objective scores of disease activity and quality of life are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33264455</pmid><doi>10.1111/1346-8138.15667</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2731-458X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0385-2407
ispartof Journal of dermatology, 2021-03, Vol.48 (3), p.385-388
issn 0385-2407
1346-8138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2466772383
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects chronic actinic dermatitis
Dermatitis
Humans
Light therapy
Patients
Photosensitivity Disorders - etiology
Phototherapy
Pilot Projects
pilot study
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Remission
rush hardening
Treatment Outcome
ultraviolet A
Ultraviolet radiation
Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects
Urticaria
title Ultraviolet A rush hardening for chronic actinic dermatitis: Pilot treatment outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T19%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultraviolet%20A%20rush%20hardening%20for%20chronic%20actinic%20dermatitis:%20Pilot%20treatment%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dermatology&rft.au=Wang,%20Tianjing&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=385-388&rft.issn=0385-2407&rft.eissn=1346-8138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1346-8138.15667&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494721336%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494721336&rft_id=info:pmid/33264455&rfr_iscdi=true