Time is Money: Relative Value Units and Operative Time in Otolaryngology

Objectives Physician compensation for procedures is typically rooted in the work relative value unit (wRVU) system. Operative time is one of the factors that goes into the determination of wRVU assignment. There should be consistency between the wRVU/hr rate, irrespective of average operative time r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2021-02, Vol.131 (2), p.E395-E400
Hauptverfasser: Barinsky, Gregory L., Wassef, David W., Povolotskiy, Roman, Grube, Jordon G., Hsueh, Wayne D., Baredes, Soly, Eloy, Jean Anderson
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E400
container_issue 2
container_start_page E395
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 131
creator Barinsky, Gregory L.
Wassef, David W.
Povolotskiy, Roman
Grube, Jordon G.
Hsueh, Wayne D.
Baredes, Soly
Eloy, Jean Anderson
description Objectives Physician compensation for procedures is typically rooted in the work relative value unit (wRVU) system. Operative time is one of the factors that goes into the determination of wRVU assignment. There should be consistency between the wRVU/hr rate, irrespective of average operative time required to perform certain procedures. We investigate if wRVU assignment for otolaryngology procedures adequately accounts for increased operative time. Study Design Retrospective analysis of a surgical database. Methods NSQIP was queried from 2015–2018 for the top 50 most frequently performed otolaryngology Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes completed as standalone procedures. Median operative time was determined for each CPT code, and wRVU/hr was calculated. Correlations between operative time, wRVU, and wRVU/hr were investigated using linear regression analysis. A secondary analysis using complication rate as an indicator for procedure complexity was performed to examine the relation between wRVUs and complication rates. Results Fifty CPT codes containing 64,084 patients where only one code was reported were included in this analysis. The median operative time was 84 minutes, median wRVU was 11.23, and median wRVU/hour was 7.96. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong positive correlation between operative time and wRVU assignment (R2 = 0.805, P
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lary.28988
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2466771324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2466771324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-23589d18bf83bf5977fac6c8990343cbae74452b37134a470f5aa7ef13aaaccd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUxoMobk4v_gES8CJCZ9IkTeptDHXCZDA20VNI03RU2mY2rdL_3sxODx48vcP3e9973wfAOUZjjFB4U6i6G4ciFuIADDEjOKBxzA7B0IskECx8GYAT594QwpwwdAwGhITca_EQzFZ5aWDu4JOtTHcLl6ZQTf5h4LMqWgPXVd44qKoULram7pV-o4KLxu4uVxtb2E13Co4yVThztp8jsL6_W01nwXzx8DidzANNGBdBSJiIUyySTJAkYzHnmdKRFnGMCCU6UYZTysKEcEyoohxlTCluMkyUUlqnZASuet9tbd9b4xpZ5k6bolCVsa2TIY0i7pdD6tHLP-ibbevKf-cpHglBokh46rqndG2dq00mt3Ve-mASI7nrV-5Syu9-PXyxt2yT0qS_6E-hHsA98JkXpvvHSs4ny9fe9Au3IoSK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476883668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time is Money: Relative Value Units and Operative Time in Otolaryngology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Barinsky, Gregory L. ; Wassef, David W. ; Povolotskiy, Roman ; Grube, Jordon G. ; Hsueh, Wayne D. ; Baredes, Soly ; Eloy, Jean Anderson</creator><creatorcontrib>Barinsky, Gregory L. ; Wassef, David W. ; Povolotskiy, Roman ; Grube, Jordon G. ; Hsueh, Wayne D. ; Baredes, Soly ; Eloy, Jean Anderson</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Physician compensation for procedures is typically rooted in the work relative value unit (wRVU) system. Operative time is one of the factors that goes into the determination of wRVU assignment. There should be consistency between the wRVU/hr rate, irrespective of average operative time required to perform certain procedures. We investigate if wRVU assignment for otolaryngology procedures adequately accounts for increased operative time. Study Design Retrospective analysis of a surgical database. Methods NSQIP was queried from 2015–2018 for the top 50 most frequently performed otolaryngology Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes completed as standalone procedures. Median operative time was determined for each CPT code, and wRVU/hr was calculated. Correlations between operative time, wRVU, and wRVU/hr were investigated using linear regression analysis. A secondary analysis using complication rate as an indicator for procedure complexity was performed to examine the relation between wRVUs and complication rates. Results Fifty CPT codes containing 64,084 patients where only one code was reported were included in this analysis. The median operative time was 84 minutes, median wRVU was 11.23, and median wRVU/hour was 7.96. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong positive correlation between operative time and wRVU assignment (R2 = 0.805, P &lt; .001). Further analysis found no correlation between operative time and wRVU/hr (R2 = 0.008, P = .525). Linear regression of wRVU/hr and complication rate showed a statistically significant positive correlation (R2 = 0.113, P = .017). Conclusion This analysis suggests that compensation for otolaryngology procedures is positively correlated with operative time. Surgeries where more than one code is reported could not be evaluated, thus excluding some common combination of procedures performed by otolaryngologists. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E395–E400, 2021</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.28988</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33270239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>billing ; Current Procedural Terminology ; Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Laryngoscopy ; NSQIP ; Operative Time ; Otolaryngology ; Otolaryngology - economics ; Otolaryngology - statistics &amp; numerical data ; otolaryngology compensation ; Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - economics ; Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; physician compensation ; procedure complexity ; Regression analysis ; reimbursement ; Relative Value Scales ; Relative value unit ; Retrospective Studies ; Terminology ; wRVU</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2021-02, Vol.131 (2), p.E395-E400</ispartof><rights>2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA)</rights><rights>2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).</rights><rights>2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-23589d18bf83bf5977fac6c8990343cbae74452b37134a470f5aa7ef13aaaccd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-23589d18bf83bf5977fac6c8990343cbae74452b37134a470f5aa7ef13aaaccd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5773-182X ; 0000-0003-2893-7818 ; 0000-0002-8877-5964 ; 0000-0001-7063-9692 ; 0000-0002-7536-0268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.28988$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.28988$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barinsky, Gregory L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wassef, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Povolotskiy, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grube, Jordon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsueh, Wayne D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baredes, Soly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eloy, Jean Anderson</creatorcontrib><title>Time is Money: Relative Value Units and Operative Time in Otolaryngology</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives Physician compensation for procedures is typically rooted in the work relative value unit (wRVU) system. Operative time is one of the factors that goes into the determination of wRVU assignment. There should be consistency between the wRVU/hr rate, irrespective of average operative time required to perform certain procedures. We investigate if wRVU assignment for otolaryngology procedures adequately accounts for increased operative time. Study Design Retrospective analysis of a surgical database. Methods NSQIP was queried from 2015–2018 for the top 50 most frequently performed otolaryngology Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes completed as standalone procedures. Median operative time was determined for each CPT code, and wRVU/hr was calculated. Correlations between operative time, wRVU, and wRVU/hr were investigated using linear regression analysis. A secondary analysis using complication rate as an indicator for procedure complexity was performed to examine the relation between wRVUs and complication rates. Results Fifty CPT codes containing 64,084 patients where only one code was reported were included in this analysis. The median operative time was 84 minutes, median wRVU was 11.23, and median wRVU/hour was 7.96. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong positive correlation between operative time and wRVU assignment (R2 = 0.805, P &lt; .001). Further analysis found no correlation between operative time and wRVU/hr (R2 = 0.008, P = .525). Linear regression of wRVU/hr and complication rate showed a statistically significant positive correlation (R2 = 0.113, P = .017). Conclusion This analysis suggests that compensation for otolaryngology procedures is positively correlated with operative time. Surgeries where more than one code is reported could not be evaluated, thus excluding some common combination of procedures performed by otolaryngologists. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E395–E400, 2021</description><subject>billing</subject><subject>Current Procedural Terminology</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>NSQIP</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Otolaryngology - economics</subject><subject>Otolaryngology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>otolaryngology compensation</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - economics</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>physician compensation</subject><subject>procedure complexity</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>reimbursement</subject><subject>Relative Value Scales</subject><subject>Relative value unit</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>wRVU</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUxoMobk4v_gES8CJCZ9IkTeptDHXCZDA20VNI03RU2mY2rdL_3sxODx48vcP3e9973wfAOUZjjFB4U6i6G4ciFuIADDEjOKBxzA7B0IskECx8GYAT594QwpwwdAwGhITca_EQzFZ5aWDu4JOtTHcLl6ZQTf5h4LMqWgPXVd44qKoULram7pV-o4KLxu4uVxtb2E13Co4yVThztp8jsL6_W01nwXzx8DidzANNGBdBSJiIUyySTJAkYzHnmdKRFnGMCCU6UYZTysKEcEyoohxlTCluMkyUUlqnZASuet9tbd9b4xpZ5k6bolCVsa2TIY0i7pdD6tHLP-ibbevKf-cpHglBokh46rqndG2dq00mt3Ve-mASI7nrV-5Syu9-PXyxt2yT0qS_6E-hHsA98JkXpvvHSs4ny9fe9Au3IoSK</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Barinsky, Gregory L.</creator><creator>Wassef, David W.</creator><creator>Povolotskiy, Roman</creator><creator>Grube, Jordon G.</creator><creator>Hsueh, Wayne D.</creator><creator>Baredes, Soly</creator><creator>Eloy, Jean Anderson</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-182X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-7818</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-5964</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7063-9692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-0268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Time is Money: Relative Value Units and Operative Time in Otolaryngology</title><author>Barinsky, Gregory L. ; Wassef, David W. ; Povolotskiy, Roman ; Grube, Jordon G. ; Hsueh, Wayne D. ; Baredes, Soly ; Eloy, Jean Anderson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-23589d18bf83bf5977fac6c8990343cbae74452b37134a470f5aa7ef13aaaccd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>billing</topic><topic>Current Procedural Terminology</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>NSQIP</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Otolaryngology - economics</topic><topic>Otolaryngology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>otolaryngology compensation</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - economics</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>physician compensation</topic><topic>procedure complexity</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>reimbursement</topic><topic>Relative Value Scales</topic><topic>Relative value unit</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>wRVU</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barinsky, Gregory L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wassef, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Povolotskiy, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grube, Jordon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsueh, Wayne D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baredes, Soly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eloy, Jean Anderson</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barinsky, Gregory L.</au><au>Wassef, David W.</au><au>Povolotskiy, Roman</au><au>Grube, Jordon G.</au><au>Hsueh, Wayne D.</au><au>Baredes, Soly</au><au>Eloy, Jean Anderson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time is Money: Relative Value Units and Operative Time in Otolaryngology</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>E395</spage><epage>E400</epage><pages>E395-E400</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives Physician compensation for procedures is typically rooted in the work relative value unit (wRVU) system. Operative time is one of the factors that goes into the determination of wRVU assignment. There should be consistency between the wRVU/hr rate, irrespective of average operative time required to perform certain procedures. We investigate if wRVU assignment for otolaryngology procedures adequately accounts for increased operative time. Study Design Retrospective analysis of a surgical database. Methods NSQIP was queried from 2015–2018 for the top 50 most frequently performed otolaryngology Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes completed as standalone procedures. Median operative time was determined for each CPT code, and wRVU/hr was calculated. Correlations between operative time, wRVU, and wRVU/hr were investigated using linear regression analysis. A secondary analysis using complication rate as an indicator for procedure complexity was performed to examine the relation between wRVUs and complication rates. Results Fifty CPT codes containing 64,084 patients where only one code was reported were included in this analysis. The median operative time was 84 minutes, median wRVU was 11.23, and median wRVU/hour was 7.96. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong positive correlation between operative time and wRVU assignment (R2 = 0.805, P &lt; .001). Further analysis found no correlation between operative time and wRVU/hr (R2 = 0.008, P = .525). Linear regression of wRVU/hr and complication rate showed a statistically significant positive correlation (R2 = 0.113, P = .017). Conclusion This analysis suggests that compensation for otolaryngology procedures is positively correlated with operative time. Surgeries where more than one code is reported could not be evaluated, thus excluding some common combination of procedures performed by otolaryngologists. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E395–E400, 2021</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33270239</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.28988</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-182X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-7818</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-5964</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7063-9692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-0268</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2021-02, Vol.131 (2), p.E395-E400
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2466771324
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects billing
Current Procedural Terminology
Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Laryngoscopy
NSQIP
Operative Time
Otolaryngology
Otolaryngology - economics
Otolaryngology - statistics & numerical data
otolaryngology compensation
Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - economics
Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
physician compensation
procedure complexity
Regression analysis
reimbursement
Relative Value Scales
Relative value unit
Retrospective Studies
Terminology
wRVU
title Time is Money: Relative Value Units and Operative Time in Otolaryngology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A10%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%20is%20Money:%20Relative%20Value%20Units%20and%20Operative%20Time%20in%20Otolaryngology&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Barinsky,%20Gregory%20L.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=E395&rft.epage=E400&rft.pages=E395-E400&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.28988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466771324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476883668&rft_id=info:pmid/33270239&rfr_iscdi=true