Automatic fundus image quality assessment on a continuous scale
Fundus photography is commonly used for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of various diseases affecting the eye. In addition, it has shown promise in the diagnosis of brain diseases and evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors. Good image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers in biology and medicine 2021-02, Vol.129, p.104114-104114, Article 104114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104114 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104114 |
container_title | Computers in biology and medicine |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Karlsson, Robert A. Jonsson, Benedikt A. Hardarson, Sveinn H. Olafsdottir, Olof B. Halldorsson, Gisli H. Stefansson, Einar |
description | Fundus photography is commonly used for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of various diseases affecting the eye. In addition, it has shown promise in the diagnosis of brain diseases and evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors. Good image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely. Here, we propose a method that automatically grades image quality on a continuous scale which is more flexible than binary quality classification. The method utilizes random forest regression models trained on image features discovered automatically by combining basic image filters using simulated annealing as well as features extracted with the discrete Fourier transform. The method was developed and tested on images from two different fundus camera models. The quality of those images was rated on a continuous scale from 0.0 to 1.0 by five experts. In addition, the method was tested on DRIMDB, a publicly available dataset with binary quality ratings. On the DRIMDB dataset the method achieves an accuracy of 0.981, sensitivity of 0.993 and specificity of 0.958 which is consistent with the state of the art. When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters.
•Good fundus image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely.•The method automatically grades fundus image quality on a continuous scale.•Features are discovered automatically using simulated annealing.•When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104114 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2466292111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010482520304455</els_id><sourcerecordid>2466292111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2efdd16e5b673eee14d6859456b525ef2e405c6af0f7bb397d8f6e30ba610b853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6F6TgxUvXSZqk7UnWxRcseNFzSNOpZGmb3aYV9t-bUhfBi6eBmW9eHyERhSUFKu-2S-OaXWFdg-WSARvTnFJ-QuY0S_MYRMJPyRyAQswzJmbkwvstAHBI4JzMkoTJUIM5uV8NvWt0b01UDW05-Mg2-hOj_aBr2x8i7T1632DbR66NdGRc29t2cAH0Rtd4Sc4qXXu8-okL8vH0-L5-iTdvz6_r1SY2HFgfM6zKkkoUhUwTRKS8lJnIuZCFYAIrhhyEkbqCKi2KJE_LrJKYQKElhSITyYLcTnN3ndsP6HvVWG-wrnWL4RjFuJQsZ5TSgN78Qbdu6NpwXaDSPM9yno5UNlGmc953WKldF17vDoqCGiWrrfqVrEbJapIcWq9_FgzFWDs2Hq0G4GECMBj5stgpbyy2BkvboelV6ez_W74BakORvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479989471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic fundus image quality assessment on a continuous scale</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Karlsson, Robert A. ; Jonsson, Benedikt A. ; Hardarson, Sveinn H. ; Olafsdottir, Olof B. ; Halldorsson, Gisli H. ; Stefansson, Einar</creator><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Robert A. ; Jonsson, Benedikt A. ; Hardarson, Sveinn H. ; Olafsdottir, Olof B. ; Halldorsson, Gisli H. ; Stefansson, Einar</creatorcontrib><description>Fundus photography is commonly used for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of various diseases affecting the eye. In addition, it has shown promise in the diagnosis of brain diseases and evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors. Good image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely. Here, we propose a method that automatically grades image quality on a continuous scale which is more flexible than binary quality classification. The method utilizes random forest regression models trained on image features discovered automatically by combining basic image filters using simulated annealing as well as features extracted with the discrete Fourier transform. The method was developed and tested on images from two different fundus camera models. The quality of those images was rated on a continuous scale from 0.0 to 1.0 by five experts. In addition, the method was tested on DRIMDB, a publicly available dataset with binary quality ratings. On the DRIMDB dataset the method achieves an accuracy of 0.981, sensitivity of 0.993 and specificity of 0.958 which is consistent with the state of the art. When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters.
•Good fundus image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely.•The method automatically grades fundus image quality on a continuous scale.•Features are discovered automatically using simulated annealing.•When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33260100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Automation ; Brain diseases ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Cataracts ; Datasets ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Diagnosis ; Digital cameras ; Evaluation ; Feature extraction ; Fourier transforms ; Fundus image quality assessment ; Fundus imaging ; Glaucoma ; Health risks ; Human performance ; Image classification ; Image filters ; Image quality ; Machine learning ; Medical imaging ; Methods ; Oxygen saturation ; Patients ; Photography ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Retina ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Simulated annealing ; State-of-the-art reviews ; User interface</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2021-02, Vol.129, p.104114-104114, Article 104114</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2efdd16e5b673eee14d6859456b525ef2e405c6af0f7bb397d8f6e30ba610b853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2efdd16e5b673eee14d6859456b525ef2e405c6af0f7bb397d8f6e30ba610b853</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7067-9862 ; 0000-0001-6438-454X ; 0000-0002-5401-5940</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2479989471?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonsson, Benedikt A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardarson, Sveinn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olafsdottir, Olof B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halldorsson, Gisli H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefansson, Einar</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic fundus image quality assessment on a continuous scale</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>Fundus photography is commonly used for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of various diseases affecting the eye. In addition, it has shown promise in the diagnosis of brain diseases and evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors. Good image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely. Here, we propose a method that automatically grades image quality on a continuous scale which is more flexible than binary quality classification. The method utilizes random forest regression models trained on image features discovered automatically by combining basic image filters using simulated annealing as well as features extracted with the discrete Fourier transform. The method was developed and tested on images from two different fundus camera models. The quality of those images was rated on a continuous scale from 0.0 to 1.0 by five experts. In addition, the method was tested on DRIMDB, a publicly available dataset with binary quality ratings. On the DRIMDB dataset the method achieves an accuracy of 0.981, sensitivity of 0.993 and specificity of 0.958 which is consistent with the state of the art. When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters.
•Good fundus image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely.•The method automatically grades fundus image quality on a continuous scale.•Features are discovered automatically using simulated annealing.•When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Brain diseases</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Digital cameras</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Fundus image quality assessment</subject><subject>Fundus imaging</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Image filters</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Oxygen saturation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Simulated annealing</subject><subject>State-of-the-art reviews</subject><subject>User interface</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6F6TgxUvXSZqk7UnWxRcseNFzSNOpZGmb3aYV9t-bUhfBi6eBmW9eHyERhSUFKu-2S-OaXWFdg-WSARvTnFJ-QuY0S_MYRMJPyRyAQswzJmbkwvstAHBI4JzMkoTJUIM5uV8NvWt0b01UDW05-Mg2-hOj_aBr2x8i7T1632DbR66NdGRc29t2cAH0Rtd4Sc4qXXu8-okL8vH0-L5-iTdvz6_r1SY2HFgfM6zKkkoUhUwTRKS8lJnIuZCFYAIrhhyEkbqCKi2KJE_LrJKYQKElhSITyYLcTnN3ndsP6HvVWG-wrnWL4RjFuJQsZ5TSgN78Qbdu6NpwXaDSPM9yno5UNlGmc953WKldF17vDoqCGiWrrfqVrEbJapIcWq9_FgzFWDs2Hq0G4GECMBj5stgpbyy2BkvboelV6ez_W74BakORvg</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Karlsson, Robert A.</creator><creator>Jonsson, Benedikt A.</creator><creator>Hardarson, Sveinn H.</creator><creator>Olafsdottir, Olof B.</creator><creator>Halldorsson, Gisli H.</creator><creator>Stefansson, Einar</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7067-9862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-454X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-5940</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Automatic fundus image quality assessment on a continuous scale</title><author>Karlsson, Robert A. ; Jonsson, Benedikt A. ; Hardarson, Sveinn H. ; Olafsdottir, Olof B. ; Halldorsson, Gisli H. ; Stefansson, Einar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-2efdd16e5b673eee14d6859456b525ef2e405c6af0f7bb397d8f6e30ba610b853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Brain diseases</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Digital cameras</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Fundus image quality assessment</topic><topic>Fundus imaging</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Image filters</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Oxygen saturation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Simulated annealing</topic><topic>State-of-the-art reviews</topic><topic>User interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonsson, Benedikt A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardarson, Sveinn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olafsdottir, Olof B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halldorsson, Gisli H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefansson, Einar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karlsson, Robert A.</au><au>Jonsson, Benedikt A.</au><au>Hardarson, Sveinn H.</au><au>Olafsdottir, Olof B.</au><au>Halldorsson, Gisli H.</au><au>Stefansson, Einar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic fundus image quality assessment on a continuous scale</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>129</volume><spage>104114</spage><epage>104114</epage><pages>104114-104114</pages><artnum>104114</artnum><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><abstract>Fundus photography is commonly used for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of various diseases affecting the eye. In addition, it has shown promise in the diagnosis of brain diseases and evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors. Good image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely. Here, we propose a method that automatically grades image quality on a continuous scale which is more flexible than binary quality classification. The method utilizes random forest regression models trained on image features discovered automatically by combining basic image filters using simulated annealing as well as features extracted with the discrete Fourier transform. The method was developed and tested on images from two different fundus camera models. The quality of those images was rated on a continuous scale from 0.0 to 1.0 by five experts. In addition, the method was tested on DRIMDB, a publicly available dataset with binary quality ratings. On the DRIMDB dataset the method achieves an accuracy of 0.981, sensitivity of 0.993 and specificity of 0.958 which is consistent with the state of the art. When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters.
•Good fundus image quality is important if diagnosis is to be accurate and timely.•The method automatically grades fundus image quality on a continuous scale.•Features are discovered automatically using simulated annealing.•When evaluating image quality on a continuous scale the method outperforms human raters.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33260100</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104114</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7067-9862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-454X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-5940</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4825 |
ispartof | Computers in biology and medicine, 2021-02, Vol.129, p.104114-104114, Article 104114 |
issn | 0010-4825 1879-0534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2466292111 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Automation Brain diseases Cardiovascular diseases Cataracts Datasets Diabetes Diabetic retinopathy Diagnosis Digital cameras Evaluation Feature extraction Fourier transforms Fundus image quality assessment Fundus imaging Glaucoma Health risks Human performance Image classification Image filters Image quality Machine learning Medical imaging Methods Oxygen saturation Patients Photography Quality assessment Quality control Regression analysis Regression models Retina Risk analysis Risk factors Simulated annealing State-of-the-art reviews User interface |
title | Automatic fundus image quality assessment on a continuous scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A02%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20fundus%20image%20quality%20assessment%20on%20a%20continuous%20scale&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Karlsson,%20Robert%20A.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=104114&rft.epage=104114&rft.pages=104114-104114&rft.artnum=104114&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466292111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479989471&rft_id=info:pmid/33260100&rft_els_id=S0010482520304455&rfr_iscdi=true |