In Vitro Fertilization Informed Consent: Revisited, Empirically
A thorough informed consent (IC) process is required before in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments can begin because these treatments are by and large elective and they have expectable and preventable complications, such as ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and multi-fetal pregnancies. To empirica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Israel Medical Association journal 2020-11, Vol.11 (22), p.681-683 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 683 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 681 |
container_title | The Israel Medical Association journal |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona Rosenfeld, Yaakov Keinan Boker, Lital |
description | A thorough informed consent (IC) process is required before in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments can begin because these treatments are by and large elective and they have expectable and preventable complications, such as ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and multi-fetal pregnancies.
To empirically examine whether patient knowledge and understanding of potential hazards associated with IVF treatment are better after the IC process compared to before. The authors hypothesized that patients' better understanding of potential complications would be translated and expressed as rational choices of treatment alternatives.
Responses of 48 IVF patients after IC process (study group) from two IVF units in northern Israel were compared to those of 46 patients before IVF (control group). Only women undergoing IVF for first time who were older than 18 years of age were eligible for the study.
Socio-demographic parameters were found to be quite similar between the study group and the control group. Contrary to our expectations, in the study group 12 women (25.5%) considered delivery of a single baby as their optimal result, compared to 15 (32.6%) in the control group. Furthermore, preferences shifted toward triplets: eight patients (17%) after IC considered this option as their best result, compared to only five patients (11%) before IC.
C process goals are not achieved under current practices, at least as far as IVF treatment are concerned. New tools and incentives should be implemented to meet the requirements dictated by the laws regarding patient rights. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465756069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465756069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-ce9c4541f17d02e34428c73e6015194c5699ea8a715b502df2ecdd405b42af5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j09LwzAcQHNQ3Jx-BcnRg4UkzS9pvIiUTQsDQYbXkia_QqT_TFphfnoHztO7PB68C7LmoCDjrChW5DqlT8YEADNXZJXnQhpd6DV5qgb6EeY40h3GOXThx85hHGg1tGPs0dNyHBIO8yN9x--Qwoz-gW77KcTgbNcdb8hla7uEt2duyGG3PZSv2f7tpSqf99kESmcOjZMgecu1ZwJzKUXhdI6KceBGOlDGoC2s5tAAE74V6LyXDBopbAuYb8j9X3aK49eCaa77kBx2nR1wXFItpAINiilzUu_O6tKcBuopht7GY_3_nP8CMj5Q7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465756069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro Fertilization Informed Consent: Revisited, Empirically</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona ; Rosenfeld, Yaakov ; Keinan Boker, Lital</creator><creatorcontrib>Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona ; Rosenfeld, Yaakov ; Keinan Boker, Lital</creatorcontrib><description>A thorough informed consent (IC) process is required before in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments can begin because these treatments are by and large elective and they have expectable and preventable complications, such as ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and multi-fetal pregnancies.
To empirically examine whether patient knowledge and understanding of potential hazards associated with IVF treatment are better after the IC process compared to before. The authors hypothesized that patients' better understanding of potential complications would be translated and expressed as rational choices of treatment alternatives.
Responses of 48 IVF patients after IC process (study group) from two IVF units in northern Israel were compared to those of 46 patients before IVF (control group). Only women undergoing IVF for first time who were older than 18 years of age were eligible for the study.
Socio-demographic parameters were found to be quite similar between the study group and the control group. Contrary to our expectations, in the study group 12 women (25.5%) considered delivery of a single baby as their optimal result, compared to 15 (32.6%) in the control group. Furthermore, preferences shifted toward triplets: eight patients (17%) after IC considered this option as their best result, compared to only five patients (11%) before IC.
C process goals are not achieved under current practices, at least as far as IVF treatment are concerned. New tools and incentives should be implemented to meet the requirements dictated by the laws regarding patient rights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1565-1088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33249787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Israel</publisher><subject>Adult ; Comprehension ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects ; Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence ; Israel ; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - etiology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Israel Medical Association journal, 2020-11, Vol.11 (22), p.681-683</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Yaakov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keinan Boker, Lital</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro Fertilization Informed Consent: Revisited, Empirically</title><title>The Israel Medical Association journal</title><addtitle>Isr Med Assoc J</addtitle><description>A thorough informed consent (IC) process is required before in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments can begin because these treatments are by and large elective and they have expectable and preventable complications, such as ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and multi-fetal pregnancies.
To empirically examine whether patient knowledge and understanding of potential hazards associated with IVF treatment are better after the IC process compared to before. The authors hypothesized that patients' better understanding of potential complications would be translated and expressed as rational choices of treatment alternatives.
Responses of 48 IVF patients after IC process (study group) from two IVF units in northern Israel were compared to those of 46 patients before IVF (control group). Only women undergoing IVF for first time who were older than 18 years of age were eligible for the study.
Socio-demographic parameters were found to be quite similar between the study group and the control group. Contrary to our expectations, in the study group 12 women (25.5%) considered delivery of a single baby as their optimal result, compared to 15 (32.6%) in the control group. Furthermore, preferences shifted toward triplets: eight patients (17%) after IC considered this option as their best result, compared to only five patients (11%) before IC.
C process goals are not achieved under current practices, at least as far as IVF treatment are concerned. New tools and incentives should be implemented to meet the requirements dictated by the laws regarding patient rights.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - etiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1565-1088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j09LwzAcQHNQ3Jx-BcnRg4UkzS9pvIiUTQsDQYbXkia_QqT_TFphfnoHztO7PB68C7LmoCDjrChW5DqlT8YEADNXZJXnQhpd6DV5qgb6EeY40h3GOXThx85hHGg1tGPs0dNyHBIO8yN9x--Qwoz-gW77KcTgbNcdb8hla7uEt2duyGG3PZSv2f7tpSqf99kESmcOjZMgecu1ZwJzKUXhdI6KceBGOlDGoC2s5tAAE74V6LyXDBopbAuYb8j9X3aK49eCaa77kBx2nR1wXFItpAINiilzUu_O6tKcBuopht7GY_3_nP8CMj5Q7A</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona</creator><creator>Rosenfeld, Yaakov</creator><creator>Keinan Boker, Lital</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>In Vitro Fertilization Informed Consent: Revisited, Empirically</title><author>Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona ; Rosenfeld, Yaakov ; Keinan Boker, Lital</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p567-ce9c4541f17d02e34428c73e6015194c5699ea8a715b502df2ecdd405b42af5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - etiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Yaakov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keinan Boker, Lital</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Israel Medical Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev, Ilona</au><au>Rosenfeld, Yaakov</au><au>Keinan Boker, Lital</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro Fertilization Informed Consent: Revisited, Empirically</atitle><jtitle>The Israel Medical Association journal</jtitle><addtitle>Isr Med Assoc J</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>683</epage><pages>681-683</pages><issn>1565-1088</issn><abstract>A thorough informed consent (IC) process is required before in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments can begin because these treatments are by and large elective and they have expectable and preventable complications, such as ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and multi-fetal pregnancies.
To empirically examine whether patient knowledge and understanding of potential hazards associated with IVF treatment are better after the IC process compared to before. The authors hypothesized that patients' better understanding of potential complications would be translated and expressed as rational choices of treatment alternatives.
Responses of 48 IVF patients after IC process (study group) from two IVF units in northern Israel were compared to those of 46 patients before IVF (control group). Only women undergoing IVF for first time who were older than 18 years of age were eligible for the study.
Socio-demographic parameters were found to be quite similar between the study group and the control group. Contrary to our expectations, in the study group 12 women (25.5%) considered delivery of a single baby as their optimal result, compared to 15 (32.6%) in the control group. Furthermore, preferences shifted toward triplets: eight patients (17%) after IC considered this option as their best result, compared to only five patients (11%) before IC.
C process goals are not achieved under current practices, at least as far as IVF treatment are concerned. New tools and incentives should be implemented to meet the requirements dictated by the laws regarding patient rights.</abstract><cop>Israel</cop><pmid>33249787</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1565-1088 |
ispartof | The Israel Medical Association journal, 2020-11, Vol.11 (22), p.681-683 |
issn | 1565-1088 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465756069 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Comprehension Female Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects Fertilization in Vitro - legislation & jurisprudence Humans Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence Israel Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - etiology Pregnancy Pregnancy, Multiple - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
title | In Vitro Fertilization Informed Consent: Revisited, Empirically |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A48%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20Fertilization%20Informed%20Consent:%20Revisited,%20Empirically&rft.jtitle=The%20Israel%20Medical%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Voskoboynikov-Ugortsev,%20Ilona&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=683&rft.pages=681-683&rft.issn=1565-1088&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2465756069%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465756069&rft_id=info:pmid/33249787&rfr_iscdi=true |