Assessment of radiation doses received by patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to disease location

Objective: patients are exposed to ionizing radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Radiation dose depends on multiple factors. The goal of this study was to assess fluoroscopy time (FT), radiation doses and effective dose (ED) during ERCP according to the condition b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista española de enfermedades digestivas 2021-07, Vol.113 (7), p.500-504
Hauptverfasser: Velayos Jimenez, Benito, Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del, Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; spa
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 504
container_issue 7
container_start_page 500
container_title Revista española de enfermedades digestivas
container_volume 113
creator Velayos Jimenez, Benito
Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del
Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe
description Objective: patients are exposed to ionizing radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Radiation dose depends on multiple factors. The goal of this study was to assess fluoroscopy time (FT), radiation doses and effective dose (ED) during ERCP according to the condition being treated. Materials and methods: a descriptive study was performed of 369 consecutive ERCPs from January 2017 to June 2019. Patient demographic and procedure data were collected. FT, cumulative dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy DAP, DA fluoroscopy, air kerma, and number of radiographs were assessed. ED was estimated using specific conversion factors. Results: the mean age was 73.34 years and 193 subjects were male. Mean FT was 4.56 [+ or -] 0.17 min, cumulative DAP was 2,056.73 [+ or -] 188.83 cGyc[m.sup.2], fluoroscopy DAP was 1,722.90 [+ or -] 82.26 cGyc[m.sup.2] and air kerma was 85.84 [+ or -] 4.93 mGy. The number of radiographs was 2.10 [+ or -] 0.07 and the mean ED was 5.34 [+ or -] 0.49 mSv. FT was significantly longer for choledocholithiasis (CL), proximal malignant biliary stricture (PMBS) and distal malignant biliary stricture (DMBS) versus others (OT). Cumulative DAP was higher for PMBS (p < 0.002). FT, cumulative DAP, fluoroscopy DAP and air kerma values were significantly higher for complicated CL as compared to simple CL. ED was higher for CL, DMBS and PMBS, but only significantly (p < 0.002) for PMBS. Conclusions: FT for ERCP is variable and increases with exploration difficulty. Thus, it is longer in the case of PMBS, as well as with the amount of radiation received by the patients and ED. Keywords: Radiation. Fluoroscopy time. ERCP. Effective dose.
doi_str_mv 10.17235/reed.2020.7335/2020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465446581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A669616143</galeid><sourcerecordid>A669616143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g286t-6851466fbbe85c75ea9b824d1dd814887bfba6d30bfa2624427bcb44bd6440693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhntQcF39Bx4CgnjZmqRpmj0ui1-w4EXPSz6mbaTb1CQV9g_4u01dDytIGDLzzvNOwmTZFcE5qWhR3nkAk1NMcV4VqZyyk2xGSIEXmGBxlp2H8I4xK3hJZ9nXKgQIYQd9RK5GXhoro3U9Mi7pyIMG-wkGqT0aUiNhAZnR275B0CdGu8HqhEXvmmQGpFvXyb6xbpC99iDjpA_tHkmtnTeTMTpkbAAZAHVO_zx3kZ3Wsgtw-XvPs7eH-9f102Lz8vi8Xm0WDRU8LrgoCeO8VgpEqasS5FIJygwxRhAmRKVqJbkpsKol5ZQxWimtGFOGM4b5sphnt4e5g3cfI4S43dmgoUtfBjeGLWW8ZCkESej1AW1kB1vb1y56qSd8u-J8yQknrEhU_g-VjoGd1a6H2ib9j-HmyNCC7GIbXDdOWwjH4DceU5DO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465446581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of radiation doses received by patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to disease location</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Velayos Jimenez, Benito ; Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del ; Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe</creator><creatorcontrib>Velayos Jimenez, Benito ; Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del ; Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: patients are exposed to ionizing radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Radiation dose depends on multiple factors. The goal of this study was to assess fluoroscopy time (FT), radiation doses and effective dose (ED) during ERCP according to the condition being treated. Materials and methods: a descriptive study was performed of 369 consecutive ERCPs from January 2017 to June 2019. Patient demographic and procedure data were collected. FT, cumulative dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy DAP, DA fluoroscopy, air kerma, and number of radiographs were assessed. ED was estimated using specific conversion factors. Results: the mean age was 73.34 years and 193 subjects were male. Mean FT was 4.56 [+ or -] 0.17 min, cumulative DAP was 2,056.73 [+ or -] 188.83 cGyc[m.sup.2], fluoroscopy DAP was 1,722.90 [+ or -] 82.26 cGyc[m.sup.2] and air kerma was 85.84 [+ or -] 4.93 mGy. The number of radiographs was 2.10 [+ or -] 0.07 and the mean ED was 5.34 [+ or -] 0.49 mSv. FT was significantly longer for choledocholithiasis (CL), proximal malignant biliary stricture (PMBS) and distal malignant biliary stricture (DMBS) versus others (OT). Cumulative DAP was higher for PMBS (p &lt; 0.002). FT, cumulative DAP, fluoroscopy DAP and air kerma values were significantly higher for complicated CL as compared to simple CL. ED was higher for CL, DMBS and PMBS, but only significantly (p &lt; 0.002) for PMBS. Conclusions: FT for ERCP is variable and increases with exploration difficulty. Thus, it is longer in the case of PMBS, as well as with the amount of radiation received by the patients and ED. Keywords: Radiation. Fluoroscopy time. ERCP. Effective dose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1130-0108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7335/2020</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</publisher><ispartof>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas, 2021-07, Vol.113 (7), p.500-504</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Velayos Jimenez, Benito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of radiation doses received by patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to disease location</title><title>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</title><description>Objective: patients are exposed to ionizing radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Radiation dose depends on multiple factors. The goal of this study was to assess fluoroscopy time (FT), radiation doses and effective dose (ED) during ERCP according to the condition being treated. Materials and methods: a descriptive study was performed of 369 consecutive ERCPs from January 2017 to June 2019. Patient demographic and procedure data were collected. FT, cumulative dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy DAP, DA fluoroscopy, air kerma, and number of radiographs were assessed. ED was estimated using specific conversion factors. Results: the mean age was 73.34 years and 193 subjects were male. Mean FT was 4.56 [+ or -] 0.17 min, cumulative DAP was 2,056.73 [+ or -] 188.83 cGyc[m.sup.2], fluoroscopy DAP was 1,722.90 [+ or -] 82.26 cGyc[m.sup.2] and air kerma was 85.84 [+ or -] 4.93 mGy. The number of radiographs was 2.10 [+ or -] 0.07 and the mean ED was 5.34 [+ or -] 0.49 mSv. FT was significantly longer for choledocholithiasis (CL), proximal malignant biliary stricture (PMBS) and distal malignant biliary stricture (DMBS) versus others (OT). Cumulative DAP was higher for PMBS (p &lt; 0.002). FT, cumulative DAP, fluoroscopy DAP and air kerma values were significantly higher for complicated CL as compared to simple CL. ED was higher for CL, DMBS and PMBS, but only significantly (p &lt; 0.002) for PMBS. Conclusions: FT for ERCP is variable and increases with exploration difficulty. Thus, it is longer in the case of PMBS, as well as with the amount of radiation received by the patients and ED. Keywords: Radiation. Fluoroscopy time. ERCP. Effective dose.</description><issn>1130-0108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhntQcF39Bx4CgnjZmqRpmj0ui1-w4EXPSz6mbaTb1CQV9g_4u01dDytIGDLzzvNOwmTZFcE5qWhR3nkAk1NMcV4VqZyyk2xGSIEXmGBxlp2H8I4xK3hJZ9nXKgQIYQd9RK5GXhoro3U9Mi7pyIMG-wkGqT0aUiNhAZnR275B0CdGu8HqhEXvmmQGpFvXyb6xbpC99iDjpA_tHkmtnTeTMTpkbAAZAHVO_zx3kZ3Wsgtw-XvPs7eH-9f102Lz8vi8Xm0WDRU8LrgoCeO8VgpEqasS5FIJygwxRhAmRKVqJbkpsKol5ZQxWimtGFOGM4b5sphnt4e5g3cfI4S43dmgoUtfBjeGLWW8ZCkESej1AW1kB1vb1y56qSd8u-J8yQknrEhU_g-VjoGd1a6H2ib9j-HmyNCC7GIbXDdOWwjH4DceU5DO</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Velayos Jimenez, Benito</creator><creator>Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del</creator><creator>Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe</creator><general>Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</general><scope>INF</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Assessment of radiation doses received by patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to disease location</title><author>Velayos Jimenez, Benito ; Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del ; Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g286t-6851466fbbe85c75ea9b824d1dd814887bfba6d30bfa2624427bcb44bd6440693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Velayos Jimenez, Benito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Velayos Jimenez, Benito</au><au>Olmo Martinez, Lourdes del</au><au>Munoz Moreno, Maria Fe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of radiation doses received by patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to disease location</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>500-504</pages><issn>1130-0108</issn><abstract>Objective: patients are exposed to ionizing radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Radiation dose depends on multiple factors. The goal of this study was to assess fluoroscopy time (FT), radiation doses and effective dose (ED) during ERCP according to the condition being treated. Materials and methods: a descriptive study was performed of 369 consecutive ERCPs from January 2017 to June 2019. Patient demographic and procedure data were collected. FT, cumulative dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy DAP, DA fluoroscopy, air kerma, and number of radiographs were assessed. ED was estimated using specific conversion factors. Results: the mean age was 73.34 years and 193 subjects were male. Mean FT was 4.56 [+ or -] 0.17 min, cumulative DAP was 2,056.73 [+ or -] 188.83 cGyc[m.sup.2], fluoroscopy DAP was 1,722.90 [+ or -] 82.26 cGyc[m.sup.2] and air kerma was 85.84 [+ or -] 4.93 mGy. The number of radiographs was 2.10 [+ or -] 0.07 and the mean ED was 5.34 [+ or -] 0.49 mSv. FT was significantly longer for choledocholithiasis (CL), proximal malignant biliary stricture (PMBS) and distal malignant biliary stricture (DMBS) versus others (OT). Cumulative DAP was higher for PMBS (p &lt; 0.002). FT, cumulative DAP, fluoroscopy DAP and air kerma values were significantly higher for complicated CL as compared to simple CL. ED was higher for CL, DMBS and PMBS, but only significantly (p &lt; 0.002) for PMBS. Conclusions: FT for ERCP is variable and increases with exploration difficulty. Thus, it is longer in the case of PMBS, as well as with the amount of radiation received by the patients and ED. Keywords: Radiation. Fluoroscopy time. ERCP. Effective dose.</abstract><pub>Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</pub><doi>10.17235/reed.2020.7335/2020</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1130-0108
ispartof Revista española de enfermedades digestivas, 2021-07, Vol.113 (7), p.500-504
issn 1130-0108
language eng ; spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465446581
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Assessment of radiation doses received by patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography according to disease location
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A09%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20radiation%20doses%20received%20by%20patients%20during%20endoscopic%20retrograde%20cholangiopancreatography%20according%20to%20disease%20location&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20enfermedades%20digestivas&rft.au=Velayos%20Jimenez,%20Benito&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=500-504&rft.issn=1130-0108&rft_id=info:doi/10.17235/reed.2020.7335/2020&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA669616143%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465446581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A669616143&rfr_iscdi=true