Screening strategy for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or “one size fits all”?
Screening for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single‐center, cross‐sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical transplantation 2021-02, Vol.35 (2), p.e14170-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e14170 |
container_title | Clinical transplantation |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Cun, Hasret Hönger, Gideon Kleiser, Marc Amico, Patrizia Wehmeier, Caroline Steiger, Jürg Dickenmann, Michael Schaub, Stefan |
description | Screening for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single‐center, cross‐sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for de novo DSA at annual visits after a median of 5 years post‐transplant (range 1 to 19 years). Overall, de novo DSAs were detected in 55/464 patients (11.9%) with a stepwise increase of the prevalence from 4.9% at 1 year post‐transplant to 18.9% at >10 years post‐transplant. Subsequent allograft biopsies were performed in 24/55 patients (44%). The main reasons to omit biopsies were good/stable allograft function and anticipated lack of clinical consequences (eg, relevant comorbidities). Rejection processes were detected in 16/24 biopsies (67%). Therapeutic interventions were made in 18/464 screened patients (3.9%) with a significantly higher rate in the youngest quartile of patients (≤48 years; 7.9%) compared to the middle 50% (49–67 years; 3%) and the oldest quartile (≥68 years; 1.7%) (P = .03). Our study suggests that the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening after kidney transplantation is overall low, but significantly higher in younger patients, arguing for a personalized, age‐adapted de novo DSA screening strategy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ctr.14170 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465445015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465445015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-92af2bd0638682916286a04217fa43ef41a6694c9a476e2c7f0cf7fdd7747a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9OVDEUhxsigQFZ8ALmLGUx0Pb29s51Y8gExGQSDcL6ptOeYvVOO7YdzWU1j-Befbl5EoqD7uimf_L1a8_5EXLM6Ckr40zneMoEa-gOGbGqbceUMv6CjGhLeVnLap8cpPSlnEom6z2yX1VcNKKRI_Lrk46I3vk7SDmqjHcD2BDBIPjwPYAJPsTN-mdaonbWabianYPy2c2DcZhgjkPwBvJnBOtiyjCgiqBsxghfnfE4QNH6tOzLJZVd8G_gI8YUvOrdPRoob23Wv4NHSGVfJDmB6vvN-s_bl2TXqj7h0dN8SG4vL26mV-PZh3fvp-ezsa54TcctV5bPTSlzIie8ZZJPpKKCs8YqUaEVTEnZCt2qUjFy3ViqbWONaUoLFLfVIXm99S5j-LbClLuFSxr78mUMq9RxIWshasrqgp5sUR1DShFtt4xuoeLQMdo9ZtGVLLq_WRT21ZN2NV-g-U_-a34BzrbAD9fj8Lypm95cb5UPLlWYUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465445015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening strategy for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or “one size fits all”?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cun, Hasret ; Hönger, Gideon ; Kleiser, Marc ; Amico, Patrizia ; Wehmeier, Caroline ; Steiger, Jürg ; Dickenmann, Michael ; Schaub, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Cun, Hasret ; Hönger, Gideon ; Kleiser, Marc ; Amico, Patrizia ; Wehmeier, Caroline ; Steiger, Jürg ; Dickenmann, Michael ; Schaub, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Screening for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single‐center, cross‐sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for de novo DSA at annual visits after a median of 5 years post‐transplant (range 1 to 19 years). Overall, de novo DSAs were detected in 55/464 patients (11.9%) with a stepwise increase of the prevalence from 4.9% at 1 year post‐transplant to 18.9% at >10 years post‐transplant. Subsequent allograft biopsies were performed in 24/55 patients (44%). The main reasons to omit biopsies were good/stable allograft function and anticipated lack of clinical consequences (eg, relevant comorbidities). Rejection processes were detected in 16/24 biopsies (67%). Therapeutic interventions were made in 18/464 screened patients (3.9%) with a significantly higher rate in the youngest quartile of patients (≤48 years; 7.9%) compared to the middle 50% (49–67 years; 3%) and the oldest quartile (≥68 years; 1.7%) (P = .03). Our study suggests that the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening after kidney transplantation is overall low, but significantly higher in younger patients, arguing for a personalized, age‐adapted de novo DSA screening strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14170</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33247476</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Aged ; allograft rejection ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies ; Graft Rejection - diagnosis ; Graft Rejection - epidemiology ; Graft Rejection - etiology ; Graft Survival ; HLA Antigens ; Humans ; Isoantibodies ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; renal transplantation ; screening procedure ; Tissue Donors</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2021-02, Vol.35 (2), p.e14170-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-92af2bd0638682916286a04217fa43ef41a6694c9a476e2c7f0cf7fdd7747a2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-92af2bd0638682916286a04217fa43ef41a6694c9a476e2c7f0cf7fdd7747a2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5353-2313 ; 0000-0002-9170-1341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.14170$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.14170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247476$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cun, Hasret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hönger, Gideon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiser, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amico, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehmeier, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiger, Jürg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickenmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaub, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Screening strategy for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or “one size fits all”?</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Screening for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single‐center, cross‐sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for de novo DSA at annual visits after a median of 5 years post‐transplant (range 1 to 19 years). Overall, de novo DSAs were detected in 55/464 patients (11.9%) with a stepwise increase of the prevalence from 4.9% at 1 year post‐transplant to 18.9% at >10 years post‐transplant. Subsequent allograft biopsies were performed in 24/55 patients (44%). The main reasons to omit biopsies were good/stable allograft function and anticipated lack of clinical consequences (eg, relevant comorbidities). Rejection processes were detected in 16/24 biopsies (67%). Therapeutic interventions were made in 18/464 screened patients (3.9%) with a significantly higher rate in the youngest quartile of patients (≤48 years; 7.9%) compared to the middle 50% (49–67 years; 3%) and the oldest quartile (≥68 years; 1.7%) (P = .03). Our study suggests that the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening after kidney transplantation is overall low, but significantly higher in younger patients, arguing for a personalized, age‐adapted de novo DSA screening strategy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>allograft rejection</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - etiology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>HLA Antigens</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isoantibodies</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>renal transplantation</subject><subject>screening procedure</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9OVDEUhxsigQFZ8ALmLGUx0Pb29s51Y8gExGQSDcL6ptOeYvVOO7YdzWU1j-Befbl5EoqD7uimf_L1a8_5EXLM6Ckr40zneMoEa-gOGbGqbceUMv6CjGhLeVnLap8cpPSlnEom6z2yX1VcNKKRI_Lrk46I3vk7SDmqjHcD2BDBIPjwPYAJPsTN-mdaonbWabianYPy2c2DcZhgjkPwBvJnBOtiyjCgiqBsxghfnfE4QNH6tOzLJZVd8G_gI8YUvOrdPRoob23Wv4NHSGVfJDmB6vvN-s_bl2TXqj7h0dN8SG4vL26mV-PZh3fvp-ezsa54TcctV5bPTSlzIie8ZZJPpKKCs8YqUaEVTEnZCt2qUjFy3ViqbWONaUoLFLfVIXm99S5j-LbClLuFSxr78mUMq9RxIWshasrqgp5sUR1DShFtt4xuoeLQMdo9ZtGVLLq_WRT21ZN2NV-g-U_-a34BzrbAD9fj8Lypm95cb5UPLlWYUQ</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Cun, Hasret</creator><creator>Hönger, Gideon</creator><creator>Kleiser, Marc</creator><creator>Amico, Patrizia</creator><creator>Wehmeier, Caroline</creator><creator>Steiger, Jürg</creator><creator>Dickenmann, Michael</creator><creator>Schaub, Stefan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-2313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9170-1341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Screening strategy for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or “one size fits all”?</title><author>Cun, Hasret ; Hönger, Gideon ; Kleiser, Marc ; Amico, Patrizia ; Wehmeier, Caroline ; Steiger, Jürg ; Dickenmann, Michael ; Schaub, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-92af2bd0638682916286a04217fa43ef41a6694c9a476e2c7f0cf7fdd7747a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>allograft rejection</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - etiology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>HLA Antigens</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isoantibodies</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>renal transplantation</topic><topic>screening procedure</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cun, Hasret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hönger, Gideon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiser, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amico, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehmeier, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiger, Jürg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickenmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaub, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cun, Hasret</au><au>Hönger, Gideon</au><au>Kleiser, Marc</au><au>Amico, Patrizia</au><au>Wehmeier, Caroline</au><au>Steiger, Jürg</au><au>Dickenmann, Michael</au><au>Schaub, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening strategy for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or “one size fits all”?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e14170</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14170-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Screening for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single‐center, cross‐sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for de novo DSA at annual visits after a median of 5 years post‐transplant (range 1 to 19 years). Overall, de novo DSAs were detected in 55/464 patients (11.9%) with a stepwise increase of the prevalence from 4.9% at 1 year post‐transplant to 18.9% at >10 years post‐transplant. Subsequent allograft biopsies were performed in 24/55 patients (44%). The main reasons to omit biopsies were good/stable allograft function and anticipated lack of clinical consequences (eg, relevant comorbidities). Rejection processes were detected in 16/24 biopsies (67%). Therapeutic interventions were made in 18/464 screened patients (3.9%) with a significantly higher rate in the youngest quartile of patients (≤48 years; 7.9%) compared to the middle 50% (49–67 years; 3%) and the oldest quartile (≥68 years; 1.7%) (P = .03). Our study suggests that the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening after kidney transplantation is overall low, but significantly higher in younger patients, arguing for a personalized, age‐adapted de novo DSA screening strategy.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>33247476</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.14170</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-2313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9170-1341</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0902-0063 |
ispartof | Clinical transplantation, 2021-02, Vol.35 (2), p.e14170-n/a |
issn | 0902-0063 1399-0012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465445015 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged allograft rejection Cross-Sectional Studies de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies Graft Rejection - diagnosis Graft Rejection - epidemiology Graft Rejection - etiology Graft Survival HLA Antigens Humans Isoantibodies Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects Middle Aged renal transplantation screening procedure Tissue Donors |
title | Screening strategy for de novo donor‐specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or “one size fits all”? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A55%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20strategy%20for%20de%20novo%20donor%E2%80%90specific%20HLA%20antibodies%20beyond%20the%20first%20year%20after%20kidney%20transplantation:%20Personalized%20or%20%E2%80%9Cone%20size%20fits%20all%E2%80%9D?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Cun,%20Hasret&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e14170&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14170-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.14170&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465445015%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465445015&rft_id=info:pmid/33247476&rfr_iscdi=true |