FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use?
Publication of the Intergrowth‐21st and WHO growth charts raises the question of which growth data prenatal providers should use in clinical practice. Is it better to use a universal chart applied globally, or metrics based on local or regional growth patterns? And what about customized charts versu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2021-02, Vol.152 (2), p.148-151 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 151 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 148 |
| container_title | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics |
| container_volume | 152 |
| creator | Visser, Gerard H. A. Nicholson, Wanda K. Barnea, Eytan R. Ramasauskaite, Diana Nassar, Anwar H. |
| description | Publication of the Intergrowth‐21st and WHO growth charts raises the question of which growth data prenatal providers should use in clinical practice. Is it better to use a universal chart applied globally, or metrics based on local or regional growth patterns? And what about customized charts versus local charts? FIGO has reviewed the different growth charts and studies assessing their reproducibility and predictive values for small‐ and large‐for‐gestational age newborns and, where available, adverse fetal outcomes. It concludes that local or regional charts are likely to be best for identifying the 10th percentile of newborns at highest risk. However, international standards for growth may also be used when coupled with locally appropriate thresholds for risk interpretation.
Local fetal growth charts better identify fetuses at highest risk. Global charts may be used, but with a locally appropriate threshold for risk interpretation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijgo.13500 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465441001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465441001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-b84f3efcf4a348d7b4937f7af31da8d28df0e2f8649c479b7fbbabd3f60de5303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4Mobk5f_ACSRxE6kyZdW19EhpuTwV4Un6Sk7WXN6JqapIz56c2s-ujTHdzv_tz9ELqkZEwJCW_VZq3HlEWEHKEhTeI0YDxOj9HQD0kQh2k4QGfWbgghNKb0FA0YCz0RJUP0PlvMV7jVVjmlG9yKFgz2jQEJBpoCcFEJ4yyW2mAJTtR4bfTOVVg0JbbqE7BwOFfGVXf4rVJF5bcBO407C_fn6ESK2sLFTx2h19njy_QpWK7mi-nDMihYmJIgT7hkIAvJBeNJGec8ZbGMhWS0FEkZJqUkEMpkwtPC353HMs9FXjI5ISVEjLARuu5zW6M_OrAu2ypbQF2LBnRns5BPIs69LOrRmx4tjLbWv5m1Rm2F2WeUZAed2UFn9q3Tw1c_uV2-hfIP_fXnAdoDO1XD_p-obPE8X_WhX1atf-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465441001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Visser, Gerard H. A. ; Nicholson, Wanda K. ; Barnea, Eytan R. ; Ramasauskaite, Diana ; Nassar, Anwar H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Visser, Gerard H. A. ; Nicholson, Wanda K. ; Barnea, Eytan R. ; Ramasauskaite, Diana ; Nassar, Anwar H. ; FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee ; For the FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee</creatorcontrib><description>Publication of the Intergrowth‐21st and WHO growth charts raises the question of which growth data prenatal providers should use in clinical practice. Is it better to use a universal chart applied globally, or metrics based on local or regional growth patterns? And what about customized charts versus local charts? FIGO has reviewed the different growth charts and studies assessing their reproducibility and predictive values for small‐ and large‐for‐gestational age newborns and, where available, adverse fetal outcomes. It concludes that local or regional charts are likely to be best for identifying the 10th percentile of newborns at highest risk. However, international standards for growth may also be used when coupled with locally appropriate thresholds for risk interpretation.
Local fetal growth charts better identify fetuses at highest risk. Global charts may be used, but with a locally appropriate threshold for risk interpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13500</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33247958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Birth Weight - physiology ; Female ; Fetal Development - physiology ; Fetal growth charts ; Gestational Age ; Growth Charts ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Small for Gestational Age - growth & development ; Intergrowth ; Neonatal birthweight charts ; Pregnancy ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2), p.148-151</ispartof><rights>2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-b84f3efcf4a348d7b4937f7af31da8d28df0e2f8649c479b7fbbabd3f60de5303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-b84f3efcf4a348d7b4937f7af31da8d28df0e2f8649c479b7fbbabd3f60de5303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijgo.13500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijgo.13500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visser, Gerard H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Wanda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnea, Eytan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramasauskaite, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Anwar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>For the FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee</creatorcontrib><title>FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use?</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Publication of the Intergrowth‐21st and WHO growth charts raises the question of which growth data prenatal providers should use in clinical practice. Is it better to use a universal chart applied globally, or metrics based on local or regional growth patterns? And what about customized charts versus local charts? FIGO has reviewed the different growth charts and studies assessing their reproducibility and predictive values for small‐ and large‐for‐gestational age newborns and, where available, adverse fetal outcomes. It concludes that local or regional charts are likely to be best for identifying the 10th percentile of newborns at highest risk. However, international standards for growth may also be used when coupled with locally appropriate thresholds for risk interpretation.
Local fetal growth charts better identify fetuses at highest risk. Global charts may be used, but with a locally appropriate threshold for risk interpretation.</description><subject>Birth Weight - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Development - physiology</subject><subject>Fetal growth charts</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Growth Charts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Small for Gestational Age - growth & development</subject><subject>Intergrowth</subject><subject>Neonatal birthweight charts</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAQx4Mobk5f_ACSRxE6kyZdW19EhpuTwV4Un6Sk7WXN6JqapIz56c2s-ujTHdzv_tz9ELqkZEwJCW_VZq3HlEWEHKEhTeI0YDxOj9HQD0kQh2k4QGfWbgghNKb0FA0YCz0RJUP0PlvMV7jVVjmlG9yKFgz2jQEJBpoCcFEJ4yyW2mAJTtR4bfTOVVg0JbbqE7BwOFfGVXf4rVJF5bcBO407C_fn6ESK2sLFTx2h19njy_QpWK7mi-nDMihYmJIgT7hkIAvJBeNJGec8ZbGMhWS0FEkZJqUkEMpkwtPC353HMs9FXjI5ISVEjLARuu5zW6M_OrAu2ypbQF2LBnRns5BPIs69LOrRmx4tjLbWv5m1Rm2F2WeUZAed2UFn9q3Tw1c_uV2-hfIP_fXnAdoDO1XD_p-obPE8X_WhX1atf-w</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Visser, Gerard H. A.</creator><creator>Nicholson, Wanda K.</creator><creator>Barnea, Eytan R.</creator><creator>Ramasauskaite, Diana</creator><creator>Nassar, Anwar H.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use?</title><author>Visser, Gerard H. A. ; Nicholson, Wanda K. ; Barnea, Eytan R. ; Ramasauskaite, Diana ; Nassar, Anwar H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-b84f3efcf4a348d7b4937f7af31da8d28df0e2f8649c479b7fbbabd3f60de5303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Birth Weight - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Development - physiology</topic><topic>Fetal growth charts</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Growth Charts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Small for Gestational Age - growth & development</topic><topic>Intergrowth</topic><topic>Neonatal birthweight charts</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visser, Gerard H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Wanda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnea, Eytan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramasauskaite, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Anwar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>For the FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visser, Gerard H. A.</au><au>Nicholson, Wanda K.</au><au>Barnea, Eytan R.</au><au>Ramasauskaite, Diana</au><au>Nassar, Anwar H.</au><aucorp>FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee</aucorp><aucorp>For the FIGO Safe Motherhood, Newborn Health Committee</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>148-151</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Publication of the Intergrowth‐21st and WHO growth charts raises the question of which growth data prenatal providers should use in clinical practice. Is it better to use a universal chart applied globally, or metrics based on local or regional growth patterns? And what about customized charts versus local charts? FIGO has reviewed the different growth charts and studies assessing their reproducibility and predictive values for small‐ and large‐for‐gestational age newborns and, where available, adverse fetal outcomes. It concludes that local or regional charts are likely to be best for identifying the 10th percentile of newborns at highest risk. However, international standards for growth may also be used when coupled with locally appropriate thresholds for risk interpretation.
Local fetal growth charts better identify fetuses at highest risk. Global charts may be used, but with a locally appropriate threshold for risk interpretation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33247958</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijgo.13500</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7292 |
| ispartof | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2), p.148-151 |
| issn | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465441001 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Birth Weight - physiology Female Fetal Development - physiology Fetal growth charts Gestational Age Growth Charts Humans Infant, Newborn Infant, Small for Gestational Age - growth & development Intergrowth Neonatal birthweight charts Pregnancy Reproducibility of Results |
| title | FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FIGO%20position%20paper%20on%20reference%20charts%20for%20fetal%20growth%20and%20size%20at%20birth:%20Which%20one%20to%20use?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Visser,%20Gerard%20H.%20A.&rft.aucorp=FIGO%20Safe%20Motherhood,%20Newborn%20Health%20Committee&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=148-151&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijgo.13500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465441001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465441001&rft_id=info:pmid/33247958&rfr_iscdi=true |