Establishing best practices in measles, mumps, and rubella serologic screening for kidney transplant candidates

Optimizing immunity against vaccine‐preventable diseases improves outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) patients (Arora et al, World J Transplant, 2019, 9:1; Sester et al, Transplant Rev, 2008, 22:274; Fishman, N Engl J Med, 2007, 357:2601). The American Society for Transplantation (AST) Clinical Pract...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplant infectious disease 2021-06, Vol.23 (3), p.e13529-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M., Brumble, Lisa M., Larimore, Kelly L., Wadei, Hani M., Jarmi, Tambi, Libertin, Claudia R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page e13529
container_title Transplant infectious disease
container_volume 23
creator Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M.
Brumble, Lisa M.
Larimore, Kelly L.
Wadei, Hani M.
Jarmi, Tambi
Libertin, Claudia R.
description Optimizing immunity against vaccine‐preventable diseases improves outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) patients (Arora et al, World J Transplant, 2019, 9:1; Sester et al, Transplant Rev, 2008, 22:274; Fishman, N Engl J Med, 2007, 357:2601). The American Society for Transplantation (AST) Clinical Practice Guidelines advises that serologic screening for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) be conducted for all KT candidates, since live‐attenuated vaccines are contraindicated post‐transplantation (Malinis et al, Clin Transplant, 2019, 33:e13548). Our team at Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative to establish a best MMR screening and immunizations clinical practice in KT candidates using a Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act (PDSA) model. By retrospective chart review of all KT candidates evaluated at our institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, baseline data determining the rate of MMR serologic screening was established. PDSA cycles were implemented to adopt protocol‐driven testing for MMR serologies, immunization documentation, and vaccination in cases of seronegativity to any of the three MMR viruses in all pre‐KT candidates. Two PDSA cycles were completed in 4 months. The study population totaled 447 patients (baseline n = 283, PDSA 1 n = 61, PDSA 2 n = 103). Baseline data showed that 83% (n = 235) of pre‐KT candidates received infectious disease consultation (IDC). Complete MMR (all three viruses) serological screening in KT candidates improved from baseline 3.9%‐87.4% post‐PDSA cycle 2 (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tid.13529
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465436484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544432373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-3baf3b3f00e7736fea7591750f1dcf43a6c271b43df4e047116a728478bf1a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhCMEElA48A8scQGJFr8SJ0dUykNC4tK75ThrMCRO8CZC_fe4LSck9jJ7-GY1O1l2weiCpbkdfbNgIufVQXbCRFXNBS344W4v55wrcZydIn5QylQlq5OsX-Fo6tbjuw9vpAYcyRCNHb0FJD6QDgy2gDekm7ohiQkNiVMNbWsIQuzb_s1bgjYChO0F10fy6ZsAGzJGE3BoTRiJTTbfmBHwLDtypkU4_9VZtn5YrZdP85fXx-fl3cvcCkFT6to4UQtHKSglCgdG5RVTOXWssU4KU1iuWC1F4yRQqRgrjOKlVGXtmCnFLLvanx1i_zWlr3Tn0W5TB-gn1FwWuRSFLGVCL_-gH_0UQwqneS6lFFwokajrPWVjjxjB6SH6zsSNZlRvm9epeb1rPrG3e_bbt7D5H9Tr5_u94wd1XIXR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544432373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing best practices in measles, mumps, and rubella serologic screening for kidney transplant candidates</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M. ; Brumble, Lisa M. ; Larimore, Kelly L. ; Wadei, Hani M. ; Jarmi, Tambi ; Libertin, Claudia R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M. ; Brumble, Lisa M. ; Larimore, Kelly L. ; Wadei, Hani M. ; Jarmi, Tambi ; Libertin, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><description>Optimizing immunity against vaccine‐preventable diseases improves outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) patients (Arora et al, World J Transplant, 2019, 9:1; Sester et al, Transplant Rev, 2008, 22:274; Fishman, N Engl J Med, 2007, 357:2601). The American Society for Transplantation (AST) Clinical Practice Guidelines advises that serologic screening for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) be conducted for all KT candidates, since live‐attenuated vaccines are contraindicated post‐transplantation (Malinis et al, Clin Transplant, 2019, 33:e13548). Our team at Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative to establish a best MMR screening and immunizations clinical practice in KT candidates using a Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act (PDSA) model. By retrospective chart review of all KT candidates evaluated at our institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, baseline data determining the rate of MMR serologic screening was established. PDSA cycles were implemented to adopt protocol‐driven testing for MMR serologies, immunization documentation, and vaccination in cases of seronegativity to any of the three MMR viruses in all pre‐KT candidates. Two PDSA cycles were completed in 4 months. The study population totaled 447 patients (baseline n = 283, PDSA 1 n = 61, PDSA 2 n = 103). Baseline data showed that 83% (n = 235) of pre‐KT candidates received infectious disease consultation (IDC). Complete MMR (all three viruses) serological screening in KT candidates improved from baseline 3.9%‐87.4% post‐PDSA cycle 2 (P &lt; .001). Necessary immunizations per AST guidelines were ordered in only 41.1% (n = 23) of the control cohort vs 100% (n = 12) and 96.9% (n = 31) of PDSA cycles 1 and 2, respectively (P &lt; .001). The data reflect significant practice improvements in MMR screening and immunization rates among KT candidates by using protocol‐driven orders combined with our pre‐existing IDCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1398-2273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-3062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tid.13529</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Clinical medicine ; Guidelines ; Immunization ; Infectious diseases ; Kidney transplantation ; Kidney transplants ; Kidneys ; Measles ; Mumps ; Population studies ; Public health ; Quality control ; Rubella ; Transplantation ; Vaccines ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Transplant infectious disease, 2021-06, Vol.23 (3), p.e13529-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-3baf3b3f00e7736fea7591750f1dcf43a6c271b43df4e047116a728478bf1a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-3baf3b3f00e7736fea7591750f1dcf43a6c271b43df4e047116a728478bf1a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9650-8292 ; 0000-0003-4886-0897 ; 0000-0001-9649-6802</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftid.13529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftid.13529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumble, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larimore, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadei, Hani M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarmi, Tambi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libertin, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing best practices in measles, mumps, and rubella serologic screening for kidney transplant candidates</title><title>Transplant infectious disease</title><description>Optimizing immunity against vaccine‐preventable diseases improves outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) patients (Arora et al, World J Transplant, 2019, 9:1; Sester et al, Transplant Rev, 2008, 22:274; Fishman, N Engl J Med, 2007, 357:2601). The American Society for Transplantation (AST) Clinical Practice Guidelines advises that serologic screening for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) be conducted for all KT candidates, since live‐attenuated vaccines are contraindicated post‐transplantation (Malinis et al, Clin Transplant, 2019, 33:e13548). Our team at Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative to establish a best MMR screening and immunizations clinical practice in KT candidates using a Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act (PDSA) model. By retrospective chart review of all KT candidates evaluated at our institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, baseline data determining the rate of MMR serologic screening was established. PDSA cycles were implemented to adopt protocol‐driven testing for MMR serologies, immunization documentation, and vaccination in cases of seronegativity to any of the three MMR viruses in all pre‐KT candidates. Two PDSA cycles were completed in 4 months. The study population totaled 447 patients (baseline n = 283, PDSA 1 n = 61, PDSA 2 n = 103). Baseline data showed that 83% (n = 235) of pre‐KT candidates received infectious disease consultation (IDC). Complete MMR (all three viruses) serological screening in KT candidates improved from baseline 3.9%‐87.4% post‐PDSA cycle 2 (P &lt; .001). Necessary immunizations per AST guidelines were ordered in only 41.1% (n = 23) of the control cohort vs 100% (n = 12) and 96.9% (n = 31) of PDSA cycles 1 and 2, respectively (P &lt; .001). The data reflect significant practice improvements in MMR screening and immunization rates among KT candidates by using protocol‐driven orders combined with our pre‐existing IDCs.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Measles</subject><subject>Mumps</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rubella</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1398-2273</issn><issn>1399-3062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhCMEElA48A8scQGJFr8SJ0dUykNC4tK75ThrMCRO8CZC_fe4LSck9jJ7-GY1O1l2weiCpbkdfbNgIufVQXbCRFXNBS344W4v55wrcZydIn5QylQlq5OsX-Fo6tbjuw9vpAYcyRCNHb0FJD6QDgy2gDekm7ohiQkNiVMNbWsIQuzb_s1bgjYChO0F10fy6ZsAGzJGE3BoTRiJTTbfmBHwLDtypkU4_9VZtn5YrZdP85fXx-fl3cvcCkFT6to4UQtHKSglCgdG5RVTOXWssU4KU1iuWC1F4yRQqRgrjOKlVGXtmCnFLLvanx1i_zWlr3Tn0W5TB-gn1FwWuRSFLGVCL_-gH_0UQwqneS6lFFwokajrPWVjjxjB6SH6zsSNZlRvm9epeb1rPrG3e_bbt7D5H9Tr5_u94wd1XIXR</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M.</creator><creator>Brumble, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Larimore, Kelly L.</creator><creator>Wadei, Hani M.</creator><creator>Jarmi, Tambi</creator><creator>Libertin, Claudia R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-8292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4886-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-6802</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Establishing best practices in measles, mumps, and rubella serologic screening for kidney transplant candidates</title><author>Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M. ; Brumble, Lisa M. ; Larimore, Kelly L. ; Wadei, Hani M. ; Jarmi, Tambi ; Libertin, Claudia R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-3baf3b3f00e7736fea7591750f1dcf43a6c271b43df4e047116a728478bf1a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Measles</topic><topic>Mumps</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rubella</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumble, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larimore, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadei, Hani M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarmi, Tambi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libertin, Claudia R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplant infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M.</au><au>Brumble, Lisa M.</au><au>Larimore, Kelly L.</au><au>Wadei, Hani M.</au><au>Jarmi, Tambi</au><au>Libertin, Claudia R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing best practices in measles, mumps, and rubella serologic screening for kidney transplant candidates</atitle><jtitle>Transplant infectious disease</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e13529</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13529-n/a</pages><issn>1398-2273</issn><eissn>1399-3062</eissn><abstract>Optimizing immunity against vaccine‐preventable diseases improves outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) patients (Arora et al, World J Transplant, 2019, 9:1; Sester et al, Transplant Rev, 2008, 22:274; Fishman, N Engl J Med, 2007, 357:2601). The American Society for Transplantation (AST) Clinical Practice Guidelines advises that serologic screening for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) be conducted for all KT candidates, since live‐attenuated vaccines are contraindicated post‐transplantation (Malinis et al, Clin Transplant, 2019, 33:e13548). Our team at Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative to establish a best MMR screening and immunizations clinical practice in KT candidates using a Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act (PDSA) model. By retrospective chart review of all KT candidates evaluated at our institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, baseline data determining the rate of MMR serologic screening was established. PDSA cycles were implemented to adopt protocol‐driven testing for MMR serologies, immunization documentation, and vaccination in cases of seronegativity to any of the three MMR viruses in all pre‐KT candidates. Two PDSA cycles were completed in 4 months. The study population totaled 447 patients (baseline n = 283, PDSA 1 n = 61, PDSA 2 n = 103). Baseline data showed that 83% (n = 235) of pre‐KT candidates received infectious disease consultation (IDC). Complete MMR (all three viruses) serological screening in KT candidates improved from baseline 3.9%‐87.4% post‐PDSA cycle 2 (P &lt; .001). Necessary immunizations per AST guidelines were ordered in only 41.1% (n = 23) of the control cohort vs 100% (n = 12) and 96.9% (n = 31) of PDSA cycles 1 and 2, respectively (P &lt; .001). The data reflect significant practice improvements in MMR screening and immunization rates among KT candidates by using protocol‐driven orders combined with our pre‐existing IDCs.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/tid.13529</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-8292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4886-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-6802</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1398-2273
ispartof Transplant infectious disease, 2021-06, Vol.23 (3), p.e13529-n/a
issn 1398-2273
1399-3062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2465436484
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Best practice
Clinical medicine
Guidelines
Immunization
Infectious diseases
Kidney transplantation
Kidney transplants
Kidneys
Measles
Mumps
Population studies
Public health
Quality control
Rubella
Transplantation
Vaccines
Viruses
title Establishing best practices in measles, mumps, and rubella serologic screening for kidney transplant candidates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A05%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20best%20practices%20in%20measles,%20mumps,%20and%20rubella%20serologic%20screening%20for%20kidney%20transplant%20candidates&rft.jtitle=Transplant%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Ramakrishna,%20Jahanavi%20M.&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e13529&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13529-n/a&rft.issn=1398-2273&rft.eissn=1399-3062&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tid.13529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544432373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544432373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true