Periimplant bone changes in different abutment heights and insertion timing in posterior mandibular areas: Three‐year results from a randomized prospective clinical trial
Aim To compare the influence of the abutment height and its insertion timing on the marginal bone change (MBC) variation of implants placed at posterior mandibular partial edentulous areas in a medium follow‐up period. Material and methods This randomized clinical trial (RCT) comprised a sample of p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2021-02, Vol.32 (2), p.203-211 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 211 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 203 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Borges, Tiago Montero, Javier Leitão, Bruno Pereira, Miguel Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo |
| description | Aim
To compare the influence of the abutment height and its insertion timing on the marginal bone change (MBC) variation of implants placed at posterior mandibular partial edentulous areas in a medium follow‐up period.
Material and methods
This randomized clinical trial (RCT) comprised a sample of patients with posterior mandibular edentulous areas, treated with at least two implants and distributed into three groups: implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group A); implants connected to a 1 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group B); and implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment after 2 months (Group C). Clinical and radiographic measurements were performed during a 36‐month period (T4). The MBC was set as the main variable in study. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Results
A total of 29 subjects and 59 implants were enrolled in this study. A mean MBC of 0.35 ± 0.46 mm, 0.60 ± 0.81 mm, and 0.71 ± 0.90 mm was computed for groups A, B and C, respectively, at T4. Significant differences were found between groups A and C in terms of MBC variation after 3 years of treatment (p = .048). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant influence of the first‐year MBC and the abutment insertion timing has independent predictor variables for the MBC assessed at T4.
Conclusion
The installation of 2‐mm prosthetic abutments, at the time of implant placement, in areas with limited keratinized mucosa presents as a favorable treatment option in terms of periimplant marginal bone maintenance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.13691 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2464147139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487069603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-fe7d0313301cd9ac4f1b095569846b7b23b49909286e1360f3e71ea3574ed3c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68AUk4EYXNXNTqZ-Ou6HxDxoUGddFKnWrO0N-yqRKaVc-gg_iU_kk3rZHF4LZJCRfDueew9hjAReC1qVx6ULIRok7bCUagAJqEHfZChTURSsaccYe5HwDAI1aq_vsTMpSwrqVK_bjPSZr_eR0mHkfA3Kz12GHmdvABzuOmJBedL_M_njYo93t58x1GIjImGYbA5-tt2F3_DLFPJNiTNwTYvvF6cR1Qp1f8Ot9Qvz57fsB6S5hXhwJjSl6rnkiOnr7FQc-pZgnNLP9TGacDdZox-dktXvI7o3aZXx0u5-zj69eXm_eFNt3r99urraFkbUUxYjtAFJICcIMSptqFD2ouqbhq6Zv-1L2lVKgynWDFBuMEluBWtZthYM0pTxnz066ZOXTgnnuvM0GHYWEccldWTWVqFohFaFP_0Fv4pICuSNq3VLgDUiinp8oQ7PlhGM3Jet1OnQCumOFHVXY_a6Q2Ce3ikvvcfhL_umMgMsT8MU6PPxfqdtsP5wkfwGBt6ld</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487069603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periimplant bone changes in different abutment heights and insertion timing in posterior mandibular areas: Three‐year results from a randomized prospective clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Borges, Tiago ; Montero, Javier ; Leitão, Bruno ; Pereira, Miguel ; Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creator><creatorcontrib>Borges, Tiago ; Montero, Javier ; Leitão, Bruno ; Pereira, Miguel ; Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To compare the influence of the abutment height and its insertion timing on the marginal bone change (MBC) variation of implants placed at posterior mandibular partial edentulous areas in a medium follow‐up period.
Material and methods
This randomized clinical trial (RCT) comprised a sample of patients with posterior mandibular edentulous areas, treated with at least two implants and distributed into three groups: implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group A); implants connected to a 1 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group B); and implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment after 2 months (Group C). Clinical and radiographic measurements were performed during a 36‐month period (T4). The MBC was set as the main variable in study. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Results
A total of 29 subjects and 59 implants were enrolled in this study. A mean MBC of 0.35 ± 0.46 mm, 0.60 ± 0.81 mm, and 0.71 ± 0.90 mm was computed for groups A, B and C, respectively, at T4. Significant differences were found between groups A and C in terms of MBC variation after 3 years of treatment (p = .048). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant influence of the first‐year MBC and the abutment insertion timing has independent predictor variables for the MBC assessed at T4.
Conclusion
The installation of 2‐mm prosthetic abutments, at the time of implant placement, in areas with limited keratinized mucosa presents as a favorable treatment option in terms of periimplant marginal bone maintenance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.13691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33230873</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss ; bone implant interactions ; Bone implants ; centered outcomes ; clinical assessment ; Clinical trials ; Dental Abutments ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dentistry ; diagnosis ; Edentulous ; Humans ; Independent variables ; Insertion ; Mandible ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - surgery ; Mouth, Edentulous ; Mucosa ; patient ; Prostheses ; Regression analysis ; soft tissue‐implant interactions ; Statistical analysis ; structural biology ; Surgical implants ; tissue physiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2021-02, Vol.32 (2), p.203-211</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-fe7d0313301cd9ac4f1b095569846b7b23b49909286e1360f3e71ea3574ed3c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-fe7d0313301cd9ac4f1b095569846b7b23b49909286e1360f3e71ea3574ed3c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4973-223X ; 0000-0003-3936-6539 ; 0000-0002-6614-6470 ; 0000-0002-3507-9914 ; 0000-0001-6307-5585</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.13691$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.13691$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33230873$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borges, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitão, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creatorcontrib><title>Periimplant bone changes in different abutment heights and insertion timing in posterior mandibular areas: Three‐year results from a randomized prospective clinical trial</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Aim
To compare the influence of the abutment height and its insertion timing on the marginal bone change (MBC) variation of implants placed at posterior mandibular partial edentulous areas in a medium follow‐up period.
Material and methods
This randomized clinical trial (RCT) comprised a sample of patients with posterior mandibular edentulous areas, treated with at least two implants and distributed into three groups: implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group A); implants connected to a 1 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group B); and implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment after 2 months (Group C). Clinical and radiographic measurements were performed during a 36‐month period (T4). The MBC was set as the main variable in study. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Results
A total of 29 subjects and 59 implants were enrolled in this study. A mean MBC of 0.35 ± 0.46 mm, 0.60 ± 0.81 mm, and 0.71 ± 0.90 mm was computed for groups A, B and C, respectively, at T4. Significant differences were found between groups A and C in terms of MBC variation after 3 years of treatment (p = .048). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant influence of the first‐year MBC and the abutment insertion timing has independent predictor variables for the MBC assessed at T4.
Conclusion
The installation of 2‐mm prosthetic abutments, at the time of implant placement, in areas with limited keratinized mucosa presents as a favorable treatment option in terms of periimplant marginal bone maintenance.</description><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss</subject><subject>bone implant interactions</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>centered outcomes</subject><subject>clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Insertion</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Mouth, Edentulous</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>patient</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>soft tissue‐implant interactions</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>structural biology</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>tissue physiology</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68AUk4EYXNXNTqZ-Ou6HxDxoUGddFKnWrO0N-yqRKaVc-gg_iU_kk3rZHF4LZJCRfDueew9hjAReC1qVx6ULIRok7bCUagAJqEHfZChTURSsaccYe5HwDAI1aq_vsTMpSwrqVK_bjPSZr_eR0mHkfA3Kz12GHmdvABzuOmJBedL_M_njYo93t58x1GIjImGYbA5-tt2F3_DLFPJNiTNwTYvvF6cR1Qp1f8Ot9Qvz57fsB6S5hXhwJjSl6rnkiOnr7FQc-pZgnNLP9TGacDdZox-dktXvI7o3aZXx0u5-zj69eXm_eFNt3r99urraFkbUUxYjtAFJICcIMSptqFD2ouqbhq6Zv-1L2lVKgynWDFBuMEluBWtZthYM0pTxnz066ZOXTgnnuvM0GHYWEccldWTWVqFohFaFP_0Fv4pICuSNq3VLgDUiinp8oQ7PlhGM3Jet1OnQCumOFHVXY_a6Q2Ce3ikvvcfhL_umMgMsT8MU6PPxfqdtsP5wkfwGBt6ld</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Borges, Tiago</creator><creator>Montero, Javier</creator><creator>Leitão, Bruno</creator><creator>Pereira, Miguel</creator><creator>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4973-223X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-6539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-9914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-5585</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Periimplant bone changes in different abutment heights and insertion timing in posterior mandibular areas: Three‐year results from a randomized prospective clinical trial</title><author>Borges, Tiago ; Montero, Javier ; Leitão, Bruno ; Pereira, Miguel ; Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-fe7d0313301cd9ac4f1b095569846b7b23b49909286e1360f3e71ea3574ed3c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss</topic><topic>bone implant interactions</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>centered outcomes</topic><topic>clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Insertion</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Mouth, Edentulous</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>patient</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>soft tissue‐implant interactions</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>structural biology</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>tissue physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borges, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitão, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borges, Tiago</au><au>Montero, Javier</au><au>Leitão, Bruno</au><au>Pereira, Miguel</au><au>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periimplant bone changes in different abutment heights and insertion timing in posterior mandibular areas: Three‐year results from a randomized prospective clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>203-211</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Aim
To compare the influence of the abutment height and its insertion timing on the marginal bone change (MBC) variation of implants placed at posterior mandibular partial edentulous areas in a medium follow‐up period.
Material and methods
This randomized clinical trial (RCT) comprised a sample of patients with posterior mandibular edentulous areas, treated with at least two implants and distributed into three groups: implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group A); implants connected to a 1 mm height abutment during the surgical stage (Group B); and implants connected to a 2 mm height abutment after 2 months (Group C). Clinical and radiographic measurements were performed during a 36‐month period (T4). The MBC was set as the main variable in study. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Results
A total of 29 subjects and 59 implants were enrolled in this study. A mean MBC of 0.35 ± 0.46 mm, 0.60 ± 0.81 mm, and 0.71 ± 0.90 mm was computed for groups A, B and C, respectively, at T4. Significant differences were found between groups A and C in terms of MBC variation after 3 years of treatment (p = .048). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant influence of the first‐year MBC and the abutment insertion timing has independent predictor variables for the MBC assessed at T4.
Conclusion
The installation of 2‐mm prosthetic abutments, at the time of implant placement, in areas with limited keratinized mucosa presents as a favorable treatment option in terms of periimplant marginal bone maintenance.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33230873</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.13691</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4973-223X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-6539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-9914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-5585</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2021-02, Vol.32 (2), p.203-211 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2464147139 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Alveolar Bone Loss bone implant interactions Bone implants centered outcomes clinical assessment Clinical trials Dental Abutments Dental Implantation, Endosseous Dental Implants Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Dentistry diagnosis Edentulous Humans Independent variables Insertion Mandible Mandible - diagnostic imaging Mandible - surgery Mouth, Edentulous Mucosa patient Prostheses Regression analysis soft tissue‐implant interactions Statistical analysis structural biology Surgical implants tissue physiology |
| title | Periimplant bone changes in different abutment heights and insertion timing in posterior mandibular areas: Three‐year results from a randomized prospective clinical trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A05%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periimplant%20bone%20changes%20in%20different%20abutment%20heights%20and%20insertion%20timing%20in%20posterior%20mandibular%20areas:%20Three%E2%80%90year%20results%20from%20a%20randomized%20prospective%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Borges,%20Tiago&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=203-211&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.13691&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487069603%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487069603&rft_id=info:pmid/33230873&rfr_iscdi=true |