Comparison of clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer
Purpose To compare the clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT scan with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer. Methods A total of 163 cases of patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer who came to People’s Hospital of Rizhao for treatment from June 2014 to January...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical & translational oncology 2021-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1128-1133 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1133 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1128 |
| container_title | Clinical & translational oncology |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Sun, Y. J. Lou, J. Xu, Q. L. Xing, Y. G. Zhao, X. Z. Zhao, L. L. Wang, X. N. |
| description | Purpose
To compare the clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT scan with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer.
Methods
A total of 163 cases of patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer who came to People’s Hospital of Rizhao for treatment from June 2014 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 cases of patients who received low-dose CT scanning were the low-dose group, another 84 cases of patients who received routine dose CT scanning were the routine dose group. Multislice helical CT (MSCT) scanning was performed in both groups, with tube voltage of 120 kV. Tube current was 25 m A in the low-dose group and 250 m A in the routine dose group. In addition, a total of 80 patients with lobar pneumonia were added as the control group of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Pathological diagnosis was taken as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two groups.
Results
The image quality, nodules and signs of the two groups were compared, and the results of radiation dose of the two groups were compared. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the low-dose group were 82.05%, 87.50% and 84.81%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the routine dose group were 85.71%, 86.25% and 85.97%, respectively. The diagnostic value of the two groups was not statistically significant (
p
> 0.05). However, the radiation dose in the low-dose group was significantly lower than that in the routine group.
Conclusion
Low-dose MSCT scanning can meet the clinical requirements for imaging diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer, and can reduce the radiation dose of patients. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12094-020-02503-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463607103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2463607103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-55acb5851fd22479be779117f144195100efbe9ca53f8804c1e4221ed9d4dcd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qGzEUhUVJaRy3L9BF0DKbafVrWctgkrZg6MaF7oSsubIVxtJEmkkw9OEjd5wssxD6Od89oA-hr5R8o4So74UyokVDGKlLEt6oD2hGF1o3nEh5cT4Tsfx7ia5KeSD1dUHpJ3TJOWOMSD1D_1bp0NscSoo4eey6EIOzHW6D3cVUhuDwk-1GOIWlD7lGqw1-DsO-It5DhjjgNhXAIeLeDqHey5SDzd2xKYPdAe4hh34Pp_FujDvsbHSQP6OP3nYFvpz3Ofpzf7dZ_WzWv3_8Wt2uG8eFGhoprdvKpaS-ZUwovQWlNKXKUyGoltUF-C1oZyX3yyURjoJgjEKrW9G6VvE5upl6-5weRyiDOYTioOtshDQWw8SCL4iihFeUTajLqZQM3vQ5HGw-GkrMybqZrJtq3fy3bk791-f-cXuA9m3kVXMF-ASUGsUdZPOQxhzrn9-rfQGKDo7J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463607103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Sun, Y. J. ; Lou, J. ; Xu, Q. L. ; Xing, Y. G. ; Zhao, X. Z. ; Zhao, L. L. ; Wang, X. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Y. J. ; Lou, J. ; Xu, Q. L. ; Xing, Y. G. ; Zhao, X. Z. ; Zhao, L. L. ; Wang, X. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To compare the clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT scan with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer.
Methods
A total of 163 cases of patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer who came to People’s Hospital of Rizhao for treatment from June 2014 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 cases of patients who received low-dose CT scanning were the low-dose group, another 84 cases of patients who received routine dose CT scanning were the routine dose group. Multislice helical CT (MSCT) scanning was performed in both groups, with tube voltage of 120 kV. Tube current was 25 m A in the low-dose group and 250 m A in the routine dose group. In addition, a total of 80 patients with lobar pneumonia were added as the control group of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Pathological diagnosis was taken as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two groups.
Results
The image quality, nodules and signs of the two groups were compared, and the results of radiation dose of the two groups were compared. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the low-dose group were 82.05%, 87.50% and 84.81%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the routine dose group were 85.71%, 86.25% and 85.97%, respectively. The diagnostic value of the two groups was not statistically significant (
p
> 0.05). However, the radiation dose in the low-dose group was significantly lower than that in the routine group.
Conclusion
Low-dose MSCT scanning can meet the clinical requirements for imaging diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer, and can reduce the radiation dose of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1699-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1699-3055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02503-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33222059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oncology ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Clinical & translational oncology, 2021-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1128-1133</ispartof><rights>Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-55acb5851fd22479be779117f144195100efbe9ca53f8804c1e4221ed9d4dcd73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-55acb5851fd22479be779117f144195100efbe9ca53f8804c1e4221ed9d4dcd73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9014-7107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12094-020-02503-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12094-020-02503-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33222059$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Y. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Q. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Y. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, X. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, X. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer</title><title>Clinical & translational oncology</title><addtitle>Clin Transl Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Transl Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To compare the clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT scan with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer.
Methods
A total of 163 cases of patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer who came to People’s Hospital of Rizhao for treatment from June 2014 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 cases of patients who received low-dose CT scanning were the low-dose group, another 84 cases of patients who received routine dose CT scanning were the routine dose group. Multislice helical CT (MSCT) scanning was performed in both groups, with tube voltage of 120 kV. Tube current was 25 m A in the low-dose group and 250 m A in the routine dose group. In addition, a total of 80 patients with lobar pneumonia were added as the control group of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Pathological diagnosis was taken as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two groups.
Results
The image quality, nodules and signs of the two groups were compared, and the results of radiation dose of the two groups were compared. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the low-dose group were 82.05%, 87.50% and 84.81%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the routine dose group were 85.71%, 86.25% and 85.97%, respectively. The diagnostic value of the two groups was not statistically significant (
p
> 0.05). However, the radiation dose in the low-dose group was significantly lower than that in the routine group.
Conclusion
Low-dose MSCT scanning can meet the clinical requirements for imaging diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer, and can reduce the radiation dose of patients.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>1699-048X</issn><issn>1699-3055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1qGzEUhUVJaRy3L9BF0DKbafVrWctgkrZg6MaF7oSsubIVxtJEmkkw9OEjd5wssxD6Od89oA-hr5R8o4So74UyokVDGKlLEt6oD2hGF1o3nEh5cT4Tsfx7ia5KeSD1dUHpJ3TJOWOMSD1D_1bp0NscSoo4eey6EIOzHW6D3cVUhuDwk-1GOIWlD7lGqw1-DsO-It5DhjjgNhXAIeLeDqHey5SDzd2xKYPdAe4hh34Pp_FujDvsbHSQP6OP3nYFvpz3Ofpzf7dZ_WzWv3_8Wt2uG8eFGhoprdvKpaS-ZUwovQWlNKXKUyGoltUF-C1oZyX3yyURjoJgjEKrW9G6VvE5upl6-5weRyiDOYTioOtshDQWw8SCL4iihFeUTajLqZQM3vQ5HGw-GkrMybqZrJtq3fy3bk791-f-cXuA9m3kVXMF-ASUGsUdZPOQxhzrn9-rfQGKDo7J</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Sun, Y. J.</creator><creator>Lou, J.</creator><creator>Xu, Q. L.</creator><creator>Xing, Y. G.</creator><creator>Zhao, X. Z.</creator><creator>Zhao, L. L.</creator><creator>Wang, X. N.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-7107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Comparison of clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer</title><author>Sun, Y. J. ; Lou, J. ; Xu, Q. L. ; Xing, Y. G. ; Zhao, X. Z. ; Zhao, L. L. ; Wang, X. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-55acb5851fd22479be779117f144195100efbe9ca53f8804c1e4221ed9d4dcd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Y. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Q. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Y. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, X. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, X. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical & translational oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Y. J.</au><au>Lou, J.</au><au>Xu, Q. L.</au><au>Xing, Y. G.</au><au>Zhao, X. Z.</au><au>Zhao, L. L.</au><au>Wang, X. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical & translational oncology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Transl Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Transl Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1128</spage><epage>1133</epage><pages>1128-1133</pages><issn>1699-048X</issn><eissn>1699-3055</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To compare the clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT scan with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer.
Methods
A total of 163 cases of patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer who came to People’s Hospital of Rizhao for treatment from June 2014 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 cases of patients who received low-dose CT scanning were the low-dose group, another 84 cases of patients who received routine dose CT scanning were the routine dose group. Multislice helical CT (MSCT) scanning was performed in both groups, with tube voltage of 120 kV. Tube current was 25 m A in the low-dose group and 250 m A in the routine dose group. In addition, a total of 80 patients with lobar pneumonia were added as the control group of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Pathological diagnosis was taken as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two groups.
Results
The image quality, nodules and signs of the two groups were compared, and the results of radiation dose of the two groups were compared. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the low-dose group were 82.05%, 87.50% and 84.81%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the routine dose group were 85.71%, 86.25% and 85.97%, respectively. The diagnostic value of the two groups was not statistically significant (
p
> 0.05). However, the radiation dose in the low-dose group was significantly lower than that in the routine group.
Conclusion
Low-dose MSCT scanning can meet the clinical requirements for imaging diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer, and can reduce the radiation dose of patients.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33222059</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12094-020-02503-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-7107</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1699-048X |
| ispartof | Clinical & translational oncology, 2021-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1128-1133 |
| issn | 1699-048X 1699-3055 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463607103 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oncology Research Article |
| title | Comparison of clinical diagnostic value of spiral CT with different dose in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A41%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20clinical%20diagnostic%20value%20of%20spiral%20CT%20with%20different%20dose%20in%20patients%20with%20early-stage%20peripheral%20lung%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20translational%20oncology&rft.au=Sun,%20Y.%20J.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1128&rft.epage=1133&rft.pages=1128-1133&rft.issn=1699-048X&rft.eissn=1699-3055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12094-020-02503-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2463607103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463607103&rft_id=info:pmid/33222059&rfr_iscdi=true |