Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) vs regional or general anaesthesia for flexor tendon repair in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Flexor tendon injuries most commonly occur following a penetrating injury to the hand or wrist. These are challenging injuries and the standard treatment is surgical repair under general or regional anaesthesia. 'Wide-awake' surgery is an emerging technique in hand surgery where a consciou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systematic Reviews 2020-11, Vol.9 (1), p.264-264, Article 264
Hauptverfasser: Nolan, Grant S, Kiely, Ailbhe L, Madura, Tomas, Karantana, Alexia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 264
container_issue 1
container_start_page 264
container_title Systematic Reviews
container_volume 9
creator Nolan, Grant S
Kiely, Ailbhe L
Madura, Tomas
Karantana, Alexia
description Flexor tendon injuries most commonly occur following a penetrating injury to the hand or wrist. These are challenging injuries and the standard treatment is surgical repair under general or regional anaesthesia. 'Wide-awake' surgery is an emerging technique in hand surgery where a conscious patient is operated on under local anaesthetic. The vasoconstrictive effect of adrenaline (epinephrine) creates a 'bloodless' operating field and a tourniquet is not required. The potential advantages include intra-operative testing of the repair; removal of the risks of general anaesthesia; reduced costs; no aerosol generation from intubation therefore reduced risk of COVID-19 spread to healthcare professionals. The aim of this study will be to systematically evaluate the evidence to determine if wide-awake surgery is superior to general/regional anaesthetic in adults who undergo flexor tendon repair. We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative studies. The primary outcome will be functional active range of motion. Secondary outcomes will be complications, resource use (operative time) and patient-reported outcome measures. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from 1946 to present) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through Open Grey, dissertation databases and clinical trials registers. All studies on wide-awake surgery for flexor tendon repair will be included. The comparator will be general or regional anaesthesia. No limitations will be imposed on peer review status or language of publication. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion or referral to a third author when necessary. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis. This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish if function, complications, cost, or patient-reported outcomes are improved when flexor tendons are repaired using wide-awake technique. It will determine if this novel approach is superior to general or regional anaesthesia. This knowledge will help guide hand surgeons by continuing to improve outcomes from flexor tendon injuries. PROSPERO CRD42020182196.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13643-020-01532-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463601022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A650681750</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e5bfea2a26f94d22a274b08a709b3e70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A650681750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-fae86cb689ea6a8d574005bb888ad97c608f2bce059b98623a84bc5ccc817fdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks9u1DAQxiMEolXpC3BAlri0hxTbSRyHA9Kq4k-lFVyKerQmzmTrJbEXO7tlH4p3ZHa3VG2dg63xN794Zr4seyv4hRBafUiiUGWRc8lzLqpC5uJFdix5qfKSV8XLR-ej7DSlJaelKi64ep0dFYWUvObVcfb3xnWYwx38QjYECwMDD5imW0wOmA9sCuvo3e81TuzsZjaffb8-Z5vEIi5c8CQPkS3QY3yW2VO8H_APbRP6LnjKWIGLzHkG3XqY0ke2imEKNgx7MbC0TROOMDlL2o3DOwJ2bMQJciIP2-TSm-xVD0PC0_v9JPv55fP15bd8_uPr1eVsnttKFVPeA2plW6UbBAW6q-qS86pttdbQNbVVXPeytcirpm20kgXosrWVtVaLuu_64iS7OnC7AEuzim6EuDUBnNkHQlwYiPTQAQ1WbY8gQaq-KTtJh7psuYaaN22BNSfWpwNrtW5H7Cz6iZr1BPr0xrtbswgbUytNIysJcHYPiIHmkCYzumRxGMBjWCcjS1UoGqyUJH3_TLrcjY9aRapaCEXMHfDioFoAFeB8H-i_lr4OR2eDx95RfEZuUdSPaleCPCTYGFKK2D-8XnCzc6M5uNGQG83ejUZQ0rvHdT-k_Pde8Q-Fid3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471167684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) vs regional or general anaesthesia for flexor tendon repair in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nolan, Grant S ; Kiely, Ailbhe L ; Madura, Tomas ; Karantana, Alexia</creator><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Grant S ; Kiely, Ailbhe L ; Madura, Tomas ; Karantana, Alexia</creatorcontrib><description>Flexor tendon injuries most commonly occur following a penetrating injury to the hand or wrist. These are challenging injuries and the standard treatment is surgical repair under general or regional anaesthesia. 'Wide-awake' surgery is an emerging technique in hand surgery where a conscious patient is operated on under local anaesthetic. The vasoconstrictive effect of adrenaline (epinephrine) creates a 'bloodless' operating field and a tourniquet is not required. The potential advantages include intra-operative testing of the repair; removal of the risks of general anaesthesia; reduced costs; no aerosol generation from intubation therefore reduced risk of COVID-19 spread to healthcare professionals. The aim of this study will be to systematically evaluate the evidence to determine if wide-awake surgery is superior to general/regional anaesthetic in adults who undergo flexor tendon repair. We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative studies. The primary outcome will be functional active range of motion. Secondary outcomes will be complications, resource use (operative time) and patient-reported outcome measures. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from 1946 to present) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through Open Grey, dissertation databases and clinical trials registers. All studies on wide-awake surgery for flexor tendon repair will be included. The comparator will be general or regional anaesthesia. No limitations will be imposed on peer review status or language of publication. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion or referral to a third author when necessary. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis. This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish if function, complications, cost, or patient-reported outcomes are improved when flexor tendons are repaired using wide-awake technique. It will determine if this novel approach is superior to general or regional anaesthesia. This knowledge will help guide hand surgeons by continuing to improve outcomes from flexor tendon injuries. PROSPERO CRD42020182196.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-4053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-4053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01532-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33220705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Anaesthetics ; Analysis ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Conduction ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Local ; Anesthetics, Local ; COVID-19 - etiology ; COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control ; COVID-19 - virology ; Epinephrine ; Finger injuries ; Flexor tendon injury ; Hand ; Hand - surgery ; Hand injuries ; Humans ; Infection Control ; Injuries ; Local anesthesia ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Orthopedic Procedures ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Peer review ; Protocol ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Regional anesthesia ; Research Design ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Tendon injuries ; Tendon Injuries - surgery ; Tendons ; Tendons - surgery ; Tourniquets ; Treatment Outcome ; Wakefulness ; Wide-awake</subject><ispartof>Systematic Reviews, 2020-11, Vol.9 (1), p.264-264, Article 264</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-fae86cb689ea6a8d574005bb888ad97c608f2bce059b98623a84bc5ccc817fdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-fae86cb689ea6a8d574005bb888ad97c608f2bce059b98623a84bc5ccc817fdf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0220-3218</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680064/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680064/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33220705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Grant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiely, Ailbhe L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madura, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantana, Alexia</creatorcontrib><title>Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) vs regional or general anaesthesia for flexor tendon repair in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Systematic Reviews</title><addtitle>Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Flexor tendon injuries most commonly occur following a penetrating injury to the hand or wrist. These are challenging injuries and the standard treatment is surgical repair under general or regional anaesthesia. 'Wide-awake' surgery is an emerging technique in hand surgery where a conscious patient is operated on under local anaesthetic. The vasoconstrictive effect of adrenaline (epinephrine) creates a 'bloodless' operating field and a tourniquet is not required. The potential advantages include intra-operative testing of the repair; removal of the risks of general anaesthesia; reduced costs; no aerosol generation from intubation therefore reduced risk of COVID-19 spread to healthcare professionals. The aim of this study will be to systematically evaluate the evidence to determine if wide-awake surgery is superior to general/regional anaesthetic in adults who undergo flexor tendon repair. We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative studies. The primary outcome will be functional active range of motion. Secondary outcomes will be complications, resource use (operative time) and patient-reported outcome measures. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from 1946 to present) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through Open Grey, dissertation databases and clinical trials registers. All studies on wide-awake surgery for flexor tendon repair will be included. The comparator will be general or regional anaesthesia. No limitations will be imposed on peer review status or language of publication. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion or referral to a third author when necessary. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis. This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish if function, complications, cost, or patient-reported outcomes are improved when flexor tendons are repaired using wide-awake technique. It will determine if this novel approach is superior to general or regional anaesthesia. This knowledge will help guide hand surgeons by continuing to improve outcomes from flexor tendon injuries. PROSPERO CRD42020182196.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Anaesthetics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Conduction</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>COVID-19 - etiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>COVID-19 - virology</subject><subject>Epinephrine</subject><subject>Finger injuries</subject><subject>Flexor tendon injury</subject><subject>Hand</subject><subject>Hand - surgery</subject><subject>Hand injuries</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Local anesthesia</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>Tendon injuries</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Tendons - surgery</subject><subject>Tourniquets</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wakefulness</subject><subject>Wide-awake</subject><issn>2046-4053</issn><issn>2046-4053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks9u1DAQxiMEolXpC3BAlri0hxTbSRyHA9Kq4k-lFVyKerQmzmTrJbEXO7tlH4p3ZHa3VG2dg63xN794Zr4seyv4hRBafUiiUGWRc8lzLqpC5uJFdix5qfKSV8XLR-ej7DSlJaelKi64ep0dFYWUvObVcfb3xnWYwx38QjYECwMDD5imW0wOmA9sCuvo3e81TuzsZjaffb8-Z5vEIi5c8CQPkS3QY3yW2VO8H_APbRP6LnjKWIGLzHkG3XqY0ke2imEKNgx7MbC0TROOMDlL2o3DOwJ2bMQJciIP2-TSm-xVD0PC0_v9JPv55fP15bd8_uPr1eVsnttKFVPeA2plW6UbBAW6q-qS86pttdbQNbVVXPeytcirpm20kgXosrWVtVaLuu_64iS7OnC7AEuzim6EuDUBnNkHQlwYiPTQAQ1WbY8gQaq-KTtJh7psuYaaN22BNSfWpwNrtW5H7Cz6iZr1BPr0xrtbswgbUytNIysJcHYPiIHmkCYzumRxGMBjWCcjS1UoGqyUJH3_TLrcjY9aRapaCEXMHfDioFoAFeB8H-i_lr4OR2eDx95RfEZuUdSPaleCPCTYGFKK2D-8XnCzc6M5uNGQG83ejUZQ0rvHdT-k_Pde8Q-Fid3E</recordid><startdate>20201121</startdate><enddate>20201121</enddate><creator>Nolan, Grant S</creator><creator>Kiely, Ailbhe L</creator><creator>Madura, Tomas</creator><creator>Karantana, Alexia</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0220-3218</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201121</creationdate><title>Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) vs regional or general anaesthesia for flexor tendon repair in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Nolan, Grant S ; Kiely, Ailbhe L ; Madura, Tomas ; Karantana, Alexia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-fae86cb689ea6a8d574005bb888ad97c608f2bce059b98623a84bc5ccc817fdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Anaesthetics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Conduction</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>COVID-19 - etiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>COVID-19 - virology</topic><topic>Epinephrine</topic><topic>Finger injuries</topic><topic>Flexor tendon injury</topic><topic>Hand</topic><topic>Hand - surgery</topic><topic>Hand injuries</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Local anesthesia</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>Tendon injuries</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Tendons - surgery</topic><topic>Tourniquets</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wakefulness</topic><topic>Wide-awake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Grant S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiely, Ailbhe L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madura, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantana, Alexia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Systematic Reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nolan, Grant S</au><au>Kiely, Ailbhe L</au><au>Madura, Tomas</au><au>Karantana, Alexia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) vs regional or general anaesthesia for flexor tendon repair in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Systematic Reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2020-11-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>264</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>264-264</pages><artnum>264</artnum><issn>2046-4053</issn><eissn>2046-4053</eissn><abstract>Flexor tendon injuries most commonly occur following a penetrating injury to the hand or wrist. These are challenging injuries and the standard treatment is surgical repair under general or regional anaesthesia. 'Wide-awake' surgery is an emerging technique in hand surgery where a conscious patient is operated on under local anaesthetic. The vasoconstrictive effect of adrenaline (epinephrine) creates a 'bloodless' operating field and a tourniquet is not required. The potential advantages include intra-operative testing of the repair; removal of the risks of general anaesthesia; reduced costs; no aerosol generation from intubation therefore reduced risk of COVID-19 spread to healthcare professionals. The aim of this study will be to systematically evaluate the evidence to determine if wide-awake surgery is superior to general/regional anaesthetic in adults who undergo flexor tendon repair. We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative studies. The primary outcome will be functional active range of motion. Secondary outcomes will be complications, resource use (operative time) and patient-reported outcome measures. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from 1946 to present) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through Open Grey, dissertation databases and clinical trials registers. All studies on wide-awake surgery for flexor tendon repair will be included. The comparator will be general or regional anaesthesia. No limitations will be imposed on peer review status or language of publication. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion or referral to a third author when necessary. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis. This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish if function, complications, cost, or patient-reported outcomes are improved when flexor tendons are repaired using wide-awake technique. It will determine if this novel approach is superior to general or regional anaesthesia. This knowledge will help guide hand surgeons by continuing to improve outcomes from flexor tendon injuries. PROSPERO CRD42020182196.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>33220705</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13643-020-01532-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0220-3218</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-4053
ispartof Systematic Reviews, 2020-11, Vol.9 (1), p.264-264, Article 264
issn 2046-4053
2046-4053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463601022
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Adults
Anaesthetics
Analysis
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, Conduction
Anesthesia, General
Anesthesia, Local
Anesthetics, Local
COVID-19 - etiology
COVID-19 - prevention & control
COVID-19 - virology
Epinephrine
Finger injuries
Flexor tendon injury
Hand
Hand - surgery
Hand injuries
Humans
Infection Control
Injuries
Local anesthesia
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Meta-analysis
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Orthopedic Procedures
Pandemics
Patients
Peer review
Protocol
Range of motion
Range of Motion, Articular
Regional anesthesia
Research Design
SARS-CoV-2
Surgery
Systematic review
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Tendon injuries
Tendon Injuries - surgery
Tendons
Tendons - surgery
Tourniquets
Treatment Outcome
Wakefulness
Wide-awake
title Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) vs regional or general anaesthesia for flexor tendon repair in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A00%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wide-awake%20local%20anaesthesia%20no%20tourniquet%20(WALANT)%20vs%20regional%20or%20general%20anaesthesia%20for%20flexor%20tendon%20repair%20in%20adults:%20protocol%20for%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20Reviews&rft.au=Nolan,%20Grant%20S&rft.date=2020-11-21&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=264&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=264-264&rft.artnum=264&rft.issn=2046-4053&rft.eissn=2046-4053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13643-020-01532-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA650681750%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471167684&rft_id=info:pmid/33220705&rft_galeid=A650681750&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e5bfea2a26f94d22a274b08a709b3e70&rfr_iscdi=true