Research on dental plaque removal methods for efficient oral prophylaxis: With a focus on air polishing and rubber cup polishing
Objectives This study was conducted to compare the plaque control effectiveness of rubber cup polishing with that of air polishing during oral prophylaxis procedures and to investigate the effect of the order of air‐polishing application on the efficiency of oral prophylaxis. Methods The study inclu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of dental hygiene 2021-08, Vol.19 (3), p.255-261 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 261 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 255 |
| container_title | International journal of dental hygiene |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Park, Bo‐young Kim, Minjung park, Junghyun Jeong, Ju‐Hui Noh, Hiejin |
| description | Objectives
This study was conducted to compare the plaque control effectiveness of rubber cup polishing with that of air polishing during oral prophylaxis procedures and to investigate the effect of the order of air‐polishing application on the efficiency of oral prophylaxis.
Methods
The study included adult patients (≥20 years of age) who had visited the dental clinic for oral prophylaxis. A total of 173 subjects were divided into three groups (scaling followed by rubber cup polishing, SR; scaling followed by air polishing, SA; and air polishing followed by scaling, AS) based on sex, age, oral health status, oral hygiene status, and indications and contraindications according to the oral prophylaxis method. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the difference in oral prophylaxis time, residual deposits rate, subjects and dental hygienist satisfaction.
Results
The total scaling time was shorter in the AS group (15.4 ± 6.9 minutes) than in the SA (18.7 ± 5.5 minutes) and SR groups (19.9 ± 6.2 minutes) (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/idh.12481 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463106765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552802045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dff520ebc9aa3148cf383cc506150747f808fe4ce59c63b6768c1ec9e35819783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOxCAUhonReBld-AKGxI0uRqGUlroz4zUxMTEal4TSg8W0pcJUnZ2PLuOMmpgICyB858uBH6FdSo5oHMe2qo9okgq6gjZpRuiYE5av_uyTYgNthfBMSBInX0cbjCU0z3OyiT7uIIDyusauwxV0U9XgvlEvA2APrXuNxxamtasCNs5jMMZqGzHs_Jz0rq9njXq34QQ_2mmNVcT0EOY2ZT3uXWNDbbsnrLoK-6EswWM99L8X22jNqCbAznIdoYeL8_vJ1fjm9vJ6cnoz1owzOq6M4QmBUhdKMZoKbZhgWnOSUU7yNDeCCAOpBl7ojJVZnglNQRfAuKBFLtgIHSy8sef4ujCVrQ0amkZ14IYgkzRjlMQ6HtH9P-izG3wXu5MJ54mIn5jOqcMFpb0LwYORvbet8jNJiZzHImMs8iuWyO4tjUPZQvVDfucQgeMF8GYbmP1vktdnVwvlJ730lw4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552802045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research on dental plaque removal methods for efficient oral prophylaxis: With a focus on air polishing and rubber cup polishing</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Park, Bo‐young ; Kim, Minjung ; park, Junghyun ; Jeong, Ju‐Hui ; Noh, Hiejin</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Bo‐young ; Kim, Minjung ; park, Junghyun ; Jeong, Ju‐Hui ; Noh, Hiejin</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This study was conducted to compare the plaque control effectiveness of rubber cup polishing with that of air polishing during oral prophylaxis procedures and to investigate the effect of the order of air‐polishing application on the efficiency of oral prophylaxis.
Methods
The study included adult patients (≥20 years of age) who had visited the dental clinic for oral prophylaxis. A total of 173 subjects were divided into three groups (scaling followed by rubber cup polishing, SR; scaling followed by air polishing, SA; and air polishing followed by scaling, AS) based on sex, age, oral health status, oral hygiene status, and indications and contraindications according to the oral prophylaxis method. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the difference in oral prophylaxis time, residual deposits rate, subjects and dental hygienist satisfaction.
Results
The total scaling time was shorter in the AS group (15.4 ± 6.9 minutes) than in the SA (18.7 ± 5.5 minutes) and SR groups (19.9 ± 6.2 minutes) (p < 0.05). The rate of residual deposits was significantly higher in the SR group than in the AS or SA groups (p < 0.05). The satisfaction level of dental hygienists was higher in the AS group (8.8 ± 1.0 points) and the SA group (8.4 ± 1.0 points) than in the SR group (6.2 ± 1.3 points).
Conclusion
During oral prophylaxis, dental plaque removal using air polishing requires a relatively longer time when compared to rubber cup polishing, but it can better eliminate dental plaque. In addition, we found that dental plaque removal using air polishing prior to scaling reduced the total scaling time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-5029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/idh.12481</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33217770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>air polishing ; Dental plaque ; Dentistry ; Disease prevention ; Hygiene ; Oral hygiene ; oral prophylaxis ; Prophylaxis ; Rubber ; rubber cup polishing ; Scaling ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>International journal of dental hygiene, 2021-08, Vol.19 (3), p.255-261</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dff520ebc9aa3148cf383cc506150747f808fe4ce59c63b6768c1ec9e35819783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dff520ebc9aa3148cf383cc506150747f808fe4ce59c63b6768c1ec9e35819783</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1077-526X ; 0000-0002-8186-5203 ; 0000-0002-4058-2186 ; 0000-0002-8698-3380 ; 0000-0002-0629-2652</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fidh.12481$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fidh.12481$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33217770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Bo‐young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minjung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>park, Junghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Ju‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Hiejin</creatorcontrib><title>Research on dental plaque removal methods for efficient oral prophylaxis: With a focus on air polishing and rubber cup polishing</title><title>International journal of dental hygiene</title><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><description>Objectives
This study was conducted to compare the plaque control effectiveness of rubber cup polishing with that of air polishing during oral prophylaxis procedures and to investigate the effect of the order of air‐polishing application on the efficiency of oral prophylaxis.
Methods
The study included adult patients (≥20 years of age) who had visited the dental clinic for oral prophylaxis. A total of 173 subjects were divided into three groups (scaling followed by rubber cup polishing, SR; scaling followed by air polishing, SA; and air polishing followed by scaling, AS) based on sex, age, oral health status, oral hygiene status, and indications and contraindications according to the oral prophylaxis method. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the difference in oral prophylaxis time, residual deposits rate, subjects and dental hygienist satisfaction.
Results
The total scaling time was shorter in the AS group (15.4 ± 6.9 minutes) than in the SA (18.7 ± 5.5 minutes) and SR groups (19.9 ± 6.2 minutes) (p < 0.05). The rate of residual deposits was significantly higher in the SR group than in the AS or SA groups (p < 0.05). The satisfaction level of dental hygienists was higher in the AS group (8.8 ± 1.0 points) and the SA group (8.4 ± 1.0 points) than in the SR group (6.2 ± 1.3 points).
Conclusion
During oral prophylaxis, dental plaque removal using air polishing requires a relatively longer time when compared to rubber cup polishing, but it can better eliminate dental plaque. In addition, we found that dental plaque removal using air polishing prior to scaling reduced the total scaling time.</description><subject>air polishing</subject><subject>Dental plaque</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>oral prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>rubber cup polishing</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1601-5029</issn><issn>1601-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctOxCAUhonReBld-AKGxI0uRqGUlroz4zUxMTEal4TSg8W0pcJUnZ2PLuOMmpgICyB858uBH6FdSo5oHMe2qo9okgq6gjZpRuiYE5av_uyTYgNthfBMSBInX0cbjCU0z3OyiT7uIIDyusauwxV0U9XgvlEvA2APrXuNxxamtasCNs5jMMZqGzHs_Jz0rq9njXq34QQ_2mmNVcT0EOY2ZT3uXWNDbbsnrLoK-6EswWM99L8X22jNqCbAznIdoYeL8_vJ1fjm9vJ6cnoz1owzOq6M4QmBUhdKMZoKbZhgWnOSUU7yNDeCCAOpBl7ojJVZnglNQRfAuKBFLtgIHSy8sef4ujCVrQ0amkZ14IYgkzRjlMQ6HtH9P-izG3wXu5MJ54mIn5jOqcMFpb0LwYORvbet8jNJiZzHImMs8iuWyO4tjUPZQvVDfucQgeMF8GYbmP1vktdnVwvlJ730lw4</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Park, Bo‐young</creator><creator>Kim, Minjung</creator><creator>park, Junghyun</creator><creator>Jeong, Ju‐Hui</creator><creator>Noh, Hiejin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-526X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-5203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-2186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-2652</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Research on dental plaque removal methods for efficient oral prophylaxis: With a focus on air polishing and rubber cup polishing</title><author>Park, Bo‐young ; Kim, Minjung ; park, Junghyun ; Jeong, Ju‐Hui ; Noh, Hiejin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-dff520ebc9aa3148cf383cc506150747f808fe4ce59c63b6768c1ec9e35819783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>air polishing</topic><topic>Dental plaque</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>oral prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>rubber cup polishing</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Bo‐young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minjung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>park, Junghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Ju‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Hiejin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Bo‐young</au><au>Kim, Minjung</au><au>park, Junghyun</au><au>Jeong, Ju‐Hui</au><au>Noh, Hiejin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research on dental plaque removal methods for efficient oral prophylaxis: With a focus on air polishing and rubber cup polishing</atitle><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>255-261</pages><issn>1601-5029</issn><eissn>1601-5037</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This study was conducted to compare the plaque control effectiveness of rubber cup polishing with that of air polishing during oral prophylaxis procedures and to investigate the effect of the order of air‐polishing application on the efficiency of oral prophylaxis.
Methods
The study included adult patients (≥20 years of age) who had visited the dental clinic for oral prophylaxis. A total of 173 subjects were divided into three groups (scaling followed by rubber cup polishing, SR; scaling followed by air polishing, SA; and air polishing followed by scaling, AS) based on sex, age, oral health status, oral hygiene status, and indications and contraindications according to the oral prophylaxis method. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the difference in oral prophylaxis time, residual deposits rate, subjects and dental hygienist satisfaction.
Results
The total scaling time was shorter in the AS group (15.4 ± 6.9 minutes) than in the SA (18.7 ± 5.5 minutes) and SR groups (19.9 ± 6.2 minutes) (p < 0.05). The rate of residual deposits was significantly higher in the SR group than in the AS or SA groups (p < 0.05). The satisfaction level of dental hygienists was higher in the AS group (8.8 ± 1.0 points) and the SA group (8.4 ± 1.0 points) than in the SR group (6.2 ± 1.3 points).
Conclusion
During oral prophylaxis, dental plaque removal using air polishing requires a relatively longer time when compared to rubber cup polishing, but it can better eliminate dental plaque. In addition, we found that dental plaque removal using air polishing prior to scaling reduced the total scaling time.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33217770</pmid><doi>10.1111/idh.12481</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-526X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-5203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-2186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-2652</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1601-5029 |
| ispartof | International journal of dental hygiene, 2021-08, Vol.19 (3), p.255-261 |
| issn | 1601-5029 1601-5037 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463106765 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | air polishing Dental plaque Dentistry Disease prevention Hygiene Oral hygiene oral prophylaxis Prophylaxis Rubber rubber cup polishing Scaling Variance analysis |
| title | Research on dental plaque removal methods for efficient oral prophylaxis: With a focus on air polishing and rubber cup polishing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A30%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20on%20dental%20plaque%20removal%20methods%20for%20efficient%20oral%20prophylaxis:%20With%20a%20focus%20on%20air%20polishing%20and%20rubber%20cup%20polishing&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20dental%20hygiene&rft.au=Park,%20Bo%E2%80%90young&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=255-261&rft.issn=1601-5029&rft.eissn=1601-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/idh.12481&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552802045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552802045&rft_id=info:pmid/33217770&rfr_iscdi=true |