Comparison of the Long-term Outcome Between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Background Various reconstruction methods have been performed following distal gastrectomy; however, each reconstruction method has its own advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes between Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after distal gastrect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2021-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1955-1961 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1961 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1955 |
container_title | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Wu, Chia-Hung Huang, Kuo-Hung Chen, Ming-Huang Fang, Wen-Liang Chao, Yee Lo, Su-Shun Li, Anna Fen-Yau Wu, Chew-Wun Shyr, Yi-Ming |
description | Background
Various reconstruction methods have been performed following distal gastrectomy; however, each reconstruction method has its own advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes between Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods
A total of 459 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy (B-I: 166, RY: 293) were included. Postoperative endoscopic findings and biliary tract stone formation were compared between the two groups.
Results
At 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, gastric residue was more common in the RY group, gastritis was similar between groups, and bile reflux was more common in the B-I group. At 5 years postoperatively, gastric residue was similar between the groups, while gastritis and bile reflux were more common in the B-I group. Gastroesophageal reflux was more common in the B-I group at 1 year postoperatively, but gastroesophageal reflux became not significantly different between the groups at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Gallstone formation was more common in the RY group and in patients aged ≥ 65 years.
Conclusion
During long-term follow-up, RY reconstruction was associated with lower incidence of bile reflux and gastritis, and higher incidence of gallstone formation than B-I reconstruction. The incidence of gastric residue was more common in the RY reconstruction group in the early postoperative period and became not significantly different between the two groups over time. For aged patients with RY reconstruction, cholecystectomy is recommended concurrently as gastrectomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11605-020-04867-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461863535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556147577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2726a639f95632ff87974f09c179878000bbecb56882d5e11e60c36e806331b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9rFDEUx4Motq7-Ax4k4MVL9CXZ_JijXW0tLBSKgp7CTPbNdspMsiYZas_9xxudquBBckjC-7zvC_kQ8pLDWw5g3mXONSgGAhisrTaMPyLH3BrJ1lrox_UMDWdCqa9H5FnO1wDcALdPyZGUApSE5pjcbeJ0aNOQY6Cxp-UK6TaGPSuYJnoxFx8npCdYbhADPRnGMcVyxc5pG3b0Ms4_GAb2jV6ijyGXNPsy1KDTOI7xZgh7-mHIpR3pWVuL6Eucbmkf03IfPN20wWN6Tp707ZjxxcO-Il9OP37efGLbi7Pzzfst89KowoQRutWy6Rulpeh7axqz7qHx3DTWWADoOvSd0taKnULOUYOXGi1oKXkn5Yq8WXIPKX6fMRc3DdnjOLYB45ydWGtutVR1rcjrf9DrOKdQX-fqf2q-NsqYSomF8inmnLB3hzRMbbp1HNxPRW5R5Koi90uR47Xp1UP03E24-9Py20kF5ALkWgp7TH9n_yf2HtAKm2k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556147577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Long-term Outcome Between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Wu, Chia-Hung ; Huang, Kuo-Hung ; Chen, Ming-Huang ; Fang, Wen-Liang ; Chao, Yee ; Lo, Su-Shun ; Li, Anna Fen-Yau ; Wu, Chew-Wun ; Shyr, Yi-Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chia-Hung ; Huang, Kuo-Hung ; Chen, Ming-Huang ; Fang, Wen-Liang ; Chao, Yee ; Lo, Su-Shun ; Li, Anna Fen-Yau ; Wu, Chew-Wun ; Shyr, Yi-Ming</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Various reconstruction methods have been performed following distal gastrectomy; however, each reconstruction method has its own advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes between Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods
A total of 459 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy (B-I: 166, RY: 293) were included. Postoperative endoscopic findings and biliary tract stone formation were compared between the two groups.
Results
At 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, gastric residue was more common in the RY group, gastritis was similar between groups, and bile reflux was more common in the B-I group. At 5 years postoperatively, gastric residue was similar between the groups, while gastritis and bile reflux were more common in the B-I group. Gastroesophageal reflux was more common in the B-I group at 1 year postoperatively, but gastroesophageal reflux became not significantly different between the groups at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Gallstone formation was more common in the RY group and in patients aged ≥ 65 years.
Conclusion
During long-term follow-up, RY reconstruction was associated with lower incidence of bile reflux and gastritis, and higher incidence of gallstone formation than B-I reconstruction. The incidence of gastric residue was more common in the RY reconstruction group in the early postoperative period and became not significantly different between the two groups over time. For aged patients with RY reconstruction, cholecystectomy is recommended concurrently as gastrectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04867-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33205309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y - adverse effects ; Gallstones ; Gastrectomy - adverse effects ; Gastric cancer ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroenterostomy - adverse effects ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2021-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1955-1961</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2020</rights><rights>2020. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2726a639f95632ff87974f09c179878000bbecb56882d5e11e60c36e806331b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2726a639f95632ff87974f09c179878000bbecb56882d5e11e60c36e806331b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5726-1066</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-020-04867-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-020-04867-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33205309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chia-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Kuo-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ming-Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Wen-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Yee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Su-Shun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Anna Fen-Yau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chew-Wun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shyr, Yi-Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Long-term Outcome Between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Various reconstruction methods have been performed following distal gastrectomy; however, each reconstruction method has its own advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes between Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods
A total of 459 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy (B-I: 166, RY: 293) were included. Postoperative endoscopic findings and biliary tract stone formation were compared between the two groups.
Results
At 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, gastric residue was more common in the RY group, gastritis was similar between groups, and bile reflux was more common in the B-I group. At 5 years postoperatively, gastric residue was similar between the groups, while gastritis and bile reflux were more common in the B-I group. Gastroesophageal reflux was more common in the B-I group at 1 year postoperatively, but gastroesophageal reflux became not significantly different between the groups at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Gallstone formation was more common in the RY group and in patients aged ≥ 65 years.
Conclusion
During long-term follow-up, RY reconstruction was associated with lower incidence of bile reflux and gastritis, and higher incidence of gallstone formation than B-I reconstruction. The incidence of gastric residue was more common in the RY reconstruction group in the early postoperative period and became not significantly different between the two groups over time. For aged patients with RY reconstruction, cholecystectomy is recommended concurrently as gastrectomy.</description><subject>Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gallstones</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroenterostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9rFDEUx4Motq7-Ax4k4MVL9CXZ_JijXW0tLBSKgp7CTPbNdspMsiYZas_9xxudquBBckjC-7zvC_kQ8pLDWw5g3mXONSgGAhisrTaMPyLH3BrJ1lrox_UMDWdCqa9H5FnO1wDcALdPyZGUApSE5pjcbeJ0aNOQY6Cxp-UK6TaGPSuYJnoxFx8npCdYbhADPRnGMcVyxc5pG3b0Ms4_GAb2jV6ijyGXNPsy1KDTOI7xZgh7-mHIpR3pWVuL6Eucbmkf03IfPN20wWN6Tp707ZjxxcO-Il9OP37efGLbi7Pzzfst89KowoQRutWy6Rulpeh7axqz7qHx3DTWWADoOvSd0taKnULOUYOXGi1oKXkn5Yq8WXIPKX6fMRc3DdnjOLYB45ydWGtutVR1rcjrf9DrOKdQX-fqf2q-NsqYSomF8inmnLB3hzRMbbp1HNxPRW5R5Koi90uR47Xp1UP03E24-9Py20kF5ALkWgp7TH9n_yf2HtAKm2k</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Wu, Chia-Hung</creator><creator>Huang, Kuo-Hung</creator><creator>Chen, Ming-Huang</creator><creator>Fang, Wen-Liang</creator><creator>Chao, Yee</creator><creator>Lo, Su-Shun</creator><creator>Li, Anna Fen-Yau</creator><creator>Wu, Chew-Wun</creator><creator>Shyr, Yi-Ming</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-1066</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Long-term Outcome Between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer</title><author>Wu, Chia-Hung ; Huang, Kuo-Hung ; Chen, Ming-Huang ; Fang, Wen-Liang ; Chao, Yee ; Lo, Su-Shun ; Li, Anna Fen-Yau ; Wu, Chew-Wun ; Shyr, Yi-Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2726a639f95632ff87974f09c179878000bbecb56882d5e11e60c36e806331b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gallstones</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroenterostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chia-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Kuo-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ming-Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Wen-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Yee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Su-Shun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Anna Fen-Yau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chew-Wun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shyr, Yi-Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Chia-Hung</au><au>Huang, Kuo-Hung</au><au>Chen, Ming-Huang</au><au>Fang, Wen-Liang</au><au>Chao, Yee</au><au>Lo, Su-Shun</au><au>Li, Anna Fen-Yau</au><au>Wu, Chew-Wun</au><au>Shyr, Yi-Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Long-term Outcome Between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1955</spage><epage>1961</epage><pages>1955-1961</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Background
Various reconstruction methods have been performed following distal gastrectomy; however, each reconstruction method has its own advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes between Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods
A total of 459 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy (B-I: 166, RY: 293) were included. Postoperative endoscopic findings and biliary tract stone formation were compared between the two groups.
Results
At 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, gastric residue was more common in the RY group, gastritis was similar between groups, and bile reflux was more common in the B-I group. At 5 years postoperatively, gastric residue was similar between the groups, while gastritis and bile reflux were more common in the B-I group. Gastroesophageal reflux was more common in the B-I group at 1 year postoperatively, but gastroesophageal reflux became not significantly different between the groups at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Gallstone formation was more common in the RY group and in patients aged ≥ 65 years.
Conclusion
During long-term follow-up, RY reconstruction was associated with lower incidence of bile reflux and gastritis, and higher incidence of gallstone formation than B-I reconstruction. The incidence of gastric residue was more common in the RY reconstruction group in the early postoperative period and became not significantly different between the two groups over time. For aged patients with RY reconstruction, cholecystectomy is recommended concurrently as gastrectomy.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33205309</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-020-04867-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-1066</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-255X |
ispartof | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2021-08, Vol.25 (8), p.1955-1961 |
issn | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461863535 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y - adverse effects Gallstones Gastrectomy - adverse effects Gastric cancer Gastroenterology Gastroenterostomy - adverse effects Gastroesophageal reflux Gastrointestinal surgery Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Stomach Neoplasms - surgery Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Comparison of the Long-term Outcome Between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Following Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Long-term%20Outcome%20Between%20Billroth-I%20and%20Roux-en-Y%20Reconstruction%20Following%20Distal%20Gastrectomy%20for%20Gastric%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Wu,%20Chia-Hung&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1955&rft.epage=1961&rft.pages=1955-1961&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-020-04867-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556147577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556147577&rft_id=info:pmid/33205309&rfr_iscdi=true |