Response to Kappeler
We sincerely appreciate the constructive comments made by Peter Kappeler [1] regarding our paper, "Key male glandular odorants attracting female ring-tailed lemurs" [2]. We largely agree with the points raised in these comments, and believe these should be considered as critical discussion...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current biology 2020-11, Vol.30 (22), p.R1360-R1360 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | R1360 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | R1360 |
container_title | Current biology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Shirasu, Mika Ito, Satomi Itoigawa, Akihiro Hayakawa, Takashi Kinoshita, Kodzue Munechika, Isao Imai, Hiroo Touhara, Kazushige |
description | We sincerely appreciate the constructive comments made by Peter Kappeler [1] regarding our paper, "Key male glandular odorants attracting female ring-tailed lemurs" [2]. We largely agree with the points raised in these comments, and believe these should be considered as critical discussion that would enable a more reasonable assessment of our findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461859923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461859923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2598-13149f94c0515049f613d69d2bb53c65545d7384a798d0484c09c1487fd56133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EoqGwsbCgjiwJd37FHlHFS1RCQt2txHakRkkT7Gbgv8dRC9M99P1Ouo-QO4QCAeVjW9ipLijQeS4A1RnJUJU6B87FOclAS8i1onRBrmJsAZAqLS_JgrEUogwzcvvl4zjso18dhtVHNY6-8-GaXDRVF_3NqS7J9uV5u37LN5-v7-unTW6p0CpHhlw3mlsQKCC1EpmT2tG6FsxKIbhwJVO8KrVywFUCtUWuysaJhLIleTieHcPwPfl4MP0uWt911d4PUzSUS1RCazqjeERtGGIMvjFj2PVV-DEIZnZhWpNcmNnFvEouUub-dH6qe-_-E3_Ps19jMVbD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461859923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Kappeler</title><source>Cell Press Free Archives</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Shirasu, Mika ; Ito, Satomi ; Itoigawa, Akihiro ; Hayakawa, Takashi ; Kinoshita, Kodzue ; Munechika, Isao ; Imai, Hiroo ; Touhara, Kazushige</creator><creatorcontrib>Shirasu, Mika ; Ito, Satomi ; Itoigawa, Akihiro ; Hayakawa, Takashi ; Kinoshita, Kodzue ; Munechika, Isao ; Imai, Hiroo ; Touhara, Kazushige</creatorcontrib><description>We sincerely appreciate the constructive comments made by Peter Kappeler [1] regarding our paper, "Key male glandular odorants attracting female ring-tailed lemurs" [2]. We largely agree with the points raised in these comments, and believe these should be considered as critical discussion that would enable a more reasonable assessment of our findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33202231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Current biology, 2020-11, Vol.30 (22), p.R1360-R1360</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2598-13149f94c0515049f613d69d2bb53c65545d7384a798d0484c09c1487fd56133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2598-13149f94c0515049f613d69d2bb53c65545d7384a798d0484c09c1487fd56133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shirasu, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Satomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itoigawa, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Kodzue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munechika, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touhara, Kazushige</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Kappeler</title><title>Current biology</title><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><description>We sincerely appreciate the constructive comments made by Peter Kappeler [1] regarding our paper, "Key male glandular odorants attracting female ring-tailed lemurs" [2]. We largely agree with the points raised in these comments, and believe these should be considered as critical discussion that would enable a more reasonable assessment of our findings.</description><issn>0960-9822</issn><issn>1879-0445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EoqGwsbCgjiwJd37FHlHFS1RCQt2txHakRkkT7Gbgv8dRC9M99P1Ouo-QO4QCAeVjW9ipLijQeS4A1RnJUJU6B87FOclAS8i1onRBrmJsAZAqLS_JgrEUogwzcvvl4zjso18dhtVHNY6-8-GaXDRVF_3NqS7J9uV5u37LN5-v7-unTW6p0CpHhlw3mlsQKCC1EpmT2tG6FsxKIbhwJVO8KrVywFUCtUWuysaJhLIleTieHcPwPfl4MP0uWt911d4PUzSUS1RCazqjeERtGGIMvjFj2PVV-DEIZnZhWpNcmNnFvEouUub-dH6qe-_-E3_Ps19jMVbD</recordid><startdate>20201116</startdate><enddate>20201116</enddate><creator>Shirasu, Mika</creator><creator>Ito, Satomi</creator><creator>Itoigawa, Akihiro</creator><creator>Hayakawa, Takashi</creator><creator>Kinoshita, Kodzue</creator><creator>Munechika, Isao</creator><creator>Imai, Hiroo</creator><creator>Touhara, Kazushige</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201116</creationdate><title>Response to Kappeler</title><author>Shirasu, Mika ; Ito, Satomi ; Itoigawa, Akihiro ; Hayakawa, Takashi ; Kinoshita, Kodzue ; Munechika, Isao ; Imai, Hiroo ; Touhara, Kazushige</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2598-13149f94c0515049f613d69d2bb53c65545d7384a798d0484c09c1487fd56133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shirasu, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Satomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itoigawa, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Kodzue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munechika, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touhara, Kazushige</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shirasu, Mika</au><au>Ito, Satomi</au><au>Itoigawa, Akihiro</au><au>Hayakawa, Takashi</au><au>Kinoshita, Kodzue</au><au>Munechika, Isao</au><au>Imai, Hiroo</au><au>Touhara, Kazushige</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Kappeler</atitle><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><date>2020-11-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>R1360</spage><epage>R1360</epage><pages>R1360-R1360</pages><issn>0960-9822</issn><eissn>1879-0445</eissn><abstract>We sincerely appreciate the constructive comments made by Peter Kappeler [1] regarding our paper, "Key male glandular odorants attracting female ring-tailed lemurs" [2]. We largely agree with the points raised in these comments, and believe these should be considered as critical discussion that would enable a more reasonable assessment of our findings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33202231</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.018</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-9822 |
ispartof | Current biology, 2020-11, Vol.30 (22), p.R1360-R1360 |
issn | 0960-9822 1879-0445 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461859923 |
source | Cell Press Free Archives; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Response to Kappeler |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A11%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Kappeler&rft.jtitle=Current%20biology&rft.au=Shirasu,%20Mika&rft.date=2020-11-16&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=R1360&rft.epage=R1360&rft.pages=R1360-R1360&rft.issn=0960-9822&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2461859923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461859923&rft_id=info:pmid/33202231&rfr_iscdi=true |