Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities for assessment of axillary response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgery 2021-04, Vol.273 (4), p.694-700 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 700 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 694 |
container_title | Annals of surgery |
container_volume | 273 |
creator | Samiei, Sanaz de Mooij, Cornelis M. Lobbes, Marc B. I. Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I. van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A. Smidt, Marjolein L. |
description | OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities for assessment of axillary response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:NST can lead to downstaging of axillary lymph node disease. Imaging can potentially provide information about the axillary response to NST and, consequently, tailor the surgical management.
METHODS:PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that compared noninvasive imaging after NST with axillary surgery outcome to identify axillary response in patients with initial pathologically proven axillary lymph node metastasis. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was performed by computing the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
RESULTS:Thirteen studies describing 2380 patients were included for final analysis. Of these patients, 1322 had undergone axillary ultrasound, 849 breast MRI, and 209 whole-body F-FDG PET-CT. The overall axillary pathologic complete response rate was 39.5% (941/2380). For axillary ultrasound, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 65%, 69%, 77%, 50%, respectively. For breast MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 60%, 76%, 78%, 58%, respectively. For whole-body F-FDG PET-CT, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 38%, 86%, 78%, 49%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:The diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities is limited to accurately assess axillary response after NST in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004356 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461399692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461399692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3506-4bfe8d9a93f44ca629210e6436d0639ec4da9c5c1804f2a245eca45010d27a313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUVtv0zAUjhCIlcE_QMiPvGT4ljThLZTbpDLQNp6jM-ek9Ujs4JO09Afyv3BpmSYewJJl2f4uR9-XJM8FPxO8nL-6WlZn_N7SKssfJDORySIVQvOHySy-qlSXSp4kT4huORe64PPHyYlSkkeRbJb8fGth5TyN1rAvGFofenAGmW_ZhXfWbYDsBtl5DyvrViz-s4oIiXp04x5V_bBdB2HHLpEG7whZ1Y4Y2AV6aG6nDUTY1Y5G7KPD9RoDDDtmHVt01lkDXbeLRg2mgyc77q3eBAQa2WI_RnjNqiMb9hNe4sbiloFr2CccIQUH3Y4sPU0etdARPjuep8nX9--uFx_T5ecP54tqmRqV8TzVNy0WTQmlarU2kMtSCo65VnnDc1Wi0Q2UJjOi4LqVIHWGBnQWo2rkHJRQp8nLg-4Q_PcJaax7SwZjAA79RLXUuVBlmZcyQvUBaoInCtjWQ7B9DKoWvN4XWMcC678LjLQXR4fppsfmjvSnsQgoDoCt72LO9K2bthjqNUI3rv-nrf9B_Y3LsyKVPKai4yWNW0j1C3orunU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461399692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Samiei, Sanaz ; de Mooij, Cornelis M. ; Lobbes, Marc B. I. ; Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I. ; van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A. ; Smidt, Marjolein L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Samiei, Sanaz ; de Mooij, Cornelis M. ; Lobbes, Marc B. I. ; Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I. ; van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A. ; Smidt, Marjolein L.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities for assessment of axillary response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:NST can lead to downstaging of axillary lymph node disease. Imaging can potentially provide information about the axillary response to NST and, consequently, tailor the surgical management.
METHODS:PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that compared noninvasive imaging after NST with axillary surgery outcome to identify axillary response in patients with initial pathologically proven axillary lymph node metastasis. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was performed by computing the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
RESULTS:Thirteen studies describing 2380 patients were included for final analysis. Of these patients, 1322 had undergone axillary ultrasound, 849 breast MRI, and 209 whole-body F-FDG PET-CT. The overall axillary pathologic complete response rate was 39.5% (941/2380). For axillary ultrasound, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 65%, 69%, 77%, 50%, respectively. For breast MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 60%, 76%, 78%, 58%, respectively. For whole-body F-FDG PET-CT, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 38%, 86%, 78%, 49%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:The diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities is limited to accurately assess axillary response after NST in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33201095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Axilla ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - secondary ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Multimodal Imaging - methods ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2021-04, Vol.273 (4), p.694-700</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3506-4bfe8d9a93f44ca629210e6436d0639ec4da9c5c1804f2a245eca45010d27a313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samiei, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mooij, Cornelis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobbes, Marc B. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidt, Marjolein L.</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities for assessment of axillary response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:NST can lead to downstaging of axillary lymph node disease. Imaging can potentially provide information about the axillary response to NST and, consequently, tailor the surgical management.
METHODS:PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that compared noninvasive imaging after NST with axillary surgery outcome to identify axillary response in patients with initial pathologically proven axillary lymph node metastasis. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was performed by computing the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
RESULTS:Thirteen studies describing 2380 patients were included for final analysis. Of these patients, 1322 had undergone axillary ultrasound, 849 breast MRI, and 209 whole-body F-FDG PET-CT. The overall axillary pathologic complete response rate was 39.5% (941/2380). For axillary ultrasound, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 65%, 69%, 77%, 50%, respectively. For breast MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 60%, 76%, 78%, 58%, respectively. For whole-body F-FDG PET-CT, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 38%, 86%, 78%, 49%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:The diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities is limited to accurately assess axillary response after NST in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.</description><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUVtv0zAUjhCIlcE_QMiPvGT4ljThLZTbpDLQNp6jM-ek9Ujs4JO09Afyv3BpmSYewJJl2f4uR9-XJM8FPxO8nL-6WlZn_N7SKssfJDORySIVQvOHySy-qlSXSp4kT4huORe64PPHyYlSkkeRbJb8fGth5TyN1rAvGFofenAGmW_ZhXfWbYDsBtl5DyvrViz-s4oIiXp04x5V_bBdB2HHLpEG7whZ1Y4Y2AV6aG6nDUTY1Y5G7KPD9RoDDDtmHVt01lkDXbeLRg2mgyc77q3eBAQa2WI_RnjNqiMb9hNe4sbiloFr2CccIQUH3Y4sPU0etdARPjuep8nX9--uFx_T5ecP54tqmRqV8TzVNy0WTQmlarU2kMtSCo65VnnDc1Wi0Q2UJjOi4LqVIHWGBnQWo2rkHJRQp8nLg-4Q_PcJaax7SwZjAA79RLXUuVBlmZcyQvUBaoInCtjWQ7B9DKoWvN4XWMcC678LjLQXR4fppsfmjvSnsQgoDoCt72LO9K2bthjqNUI3rv-nrf9B_Y3LsyKVPKai4yWNW0j1C3orunU</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Samiei, Sanaz</creator><creator>de Mooij, Cornelis M.</creator><creator>Lobbes, Marc B. I.</creator><creator>Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I.</creator><creator>van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A.</creator><creator>Smidt, Marjolein L.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Samiei, Sanaz ; de Mooij, Cornelis M. ; Lobbes, Marc B. I. ; Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I. ; van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A. ; Smidt, Marjolein L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3506-4bfe8d9a93f44ca629210e6436d0639ec4da9c5c1804f2a245eca45010d27a313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samiei, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mooij, Cornelis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobbes, Marc B. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidt, Marjolein L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samiei, Sanaz</au><au>de Mooij, Cornelis M.</au><au>Lobbes, Marc B. I.</au><au>Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I.</au><au>van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A.</au><au>Smidt, Marjolein L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>273</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>700</epage><pages>694-700</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities for assessment of axillary response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:NST can lead to downstaging of axillary lymph node disease. Imaging can potentially provide information about the axillary response to NST and, consequently, tailor the surgical management.
METHODS:PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that compared noninvasive imaging after NST with axillary surgery outcome to identify axillary response in patients with initial pathologically proven axillary lymph node metastasis. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was performed by computing the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
RESULTS:Thirteen studies describing 2380 patients were included for final analysis. Of these patients, 1322 had undergone axillary ultrasound, 849 breast MRI, and 209 whole-body F-FDG PET-CT. The overall axillary pathologic complete response rate was 39.5% (941/2380). For axillary ultrasound, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 65%, 69%, 77%, 50%, respectively. For breast MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 60%, 76%, 78%, 58%, respectively. For whole-body F-FDG PET-CT, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 38%, 86%, 78%, 49%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:The diagnostic performance of current noninvasive imaging modalities is limited to accurately assess axillary response after NST in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>33201095</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000004356</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4932 |
ispartof | Annals of surgery, 2021-04, Vol.273 (4), p.694-700 |
issn | 0003-4932 1528-1140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461399692 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | Axilla Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - secondary Breast Neoplasms - therapy Female Humans Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging Lymphatic Metastasis Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Multimodal Imaging - methods Neoadjuvant Therapy Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Reproducibility of Results Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A31%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Performance%20of%20Noninvasive%20Imaging%20for%20Assessment%20of%20Axillary%20Response%20After%20Neoadjuvant%20Systemic%20Therapy%20in%20Clinically%20Node-positive%20Breast%20Cancer:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Samiei,%20Sanaz&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=273&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=700&rft.pages=694-700&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2461399692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461399692&rft_id=info:pmid/33201095&rfr_iscdi=true |