School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index
Background There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, W...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of educational psychology 2018-12, Vol.88 (4), p.606-627 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 627 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 606 |
container_title | British journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Hughes, Claire Foley, Sarah White, Naomi Devine, Rory T. |
description | Background
There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, & Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND.
Aims
Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status.
Sample
Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND).
Method
We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables.
Results
The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls.
Conclusion
The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjep.12206 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461133644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1195945</ericid><sourcerecordid>2198548439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEokNhwx5kiQ1CTbEd24nZ0WqAVpWoNLCObOea8eA4wU40zBvxmLhN6YIFeOOf891zJJ-ieE7wKcnrrd7BeEooxeJBsaKYsbKhtXxYrDDGdYmlbI6KJynt8pXXFXtcHFFJhaCYropfG7MdBo8iqM4FSAm5gMzW-S5CQHs3bVEawTjlEXSzUZMbQj4HgC4hFTrUuaS0825ykN6h63TIfj1M0RlkXcie3xKyceiRykN7lEwECPkVTTn2BE1bQGfRgUVrFf0Bbb4779PJrfVmHschTugidPDzafHIKp_g2d1-XHz9sP5y_qm8-vzx4vz9VWkYa0RZNYwJoTSpeF1rgrWouFAWhNbaYmo4B20bS2ndaaiAQN1U1BKFLWfCYlUdF68X3zEOP2ZIU9u7ZMB7FWCYU0uZIKSqBGP_RYmsJSeYYpzRV3-hu2GO-SezIZENZw2rZKbeLJSJQ0oRbDtG16t4aAlub6pub6pub6vO8Ms7y1n30N2jf7rNwIsFgFzGvby-JERyyXjWyaLvnYfDP6Las8v19RL6G3rvvpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2198548439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hughes, Claire ; Foley, Sarah ; White, Naomi ; Devine, Rory T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Claire ; Foley, Sarah ; White, Naomi ; Devine, Rory T.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, & Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND.
Aims
Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status.
Sample
Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND).
Method
We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables.
Results
The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls.
Conclusion
The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29266202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic readiness ; Age differences ; Child Behavior ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Cognition ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Cutting Scores ; Daily Living Skills ; Disability adjusted life years ; Education, Special ; Educational needs ; Educational psychology ; Ethnic groups ; Ethnicity ; Family income ; Family Involvement ; Family Relationship ; Family size ; Family support ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Gender ; Humans ; Identification ; Intelligence ; Language Skills ; Learning Disorders - diagnosis ; Living skills ; Male ; Measurement ; Medical screening ; Minority groups ; Preschool Children ; Preschool Teachers ; Psychological assessment ; psychometric ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - standards ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Resistance (Psychology) ; School Readiness ; Schools ; Scores ; screening ; Screening Tests ; Special Education ; special educational needs and disability ; Special needs children ; Special Needs Students ; Student Adjustment ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational psychology, 2018-12, Vol.88 (4), p.606-627</ispartof><rights>2017 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2017 The British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjep.12206$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjep.12206$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1195945$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29266202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine, Rory T.</creatorcontrib><title>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</title><title>British journal of educational psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Educ Psychol</addtitle><description>Background
There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, & Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND.
Aims
Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status.
Sample
Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND).
Method
We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables.
Results
The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls.
Conclusion
The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND.</description><subject>Academic readiness</subject><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Cutting Scores</subject><subject>Daily Living Skills</subject><subject>Disability adjusted life years</subject><subject>Education, Special</subject><subject>Educational needs</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Ethnic groups</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Family Involvement</subject><subject>Family Relationship</subject><subject>Family size</subject><subject>Family support</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Learning Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Living skills</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preschool Teachers</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>psychometric</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>School Readiness</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>special educational needs and disability</subject><subject>Special needs children</subject><subject>Special Needs Students</subject><subject>Student Adjustment</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0007-0998</issn><issn>2044-8279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEokNhwx5kiQ1CTbEd24nZ0WqAVpWoNLCObOea8eA4wU40zBvxmLhN6YIFeOOf891zJJ-ieE7wKcnrrd7BeEooxeJBsaKYsbKhtXxYrDDGdYmlbI6KJynt8pXXFXtcHFFJhaCYropfG7MdBo8iqM4FSAm5gMzW-S5CQHs3bVEawTjlEXSzUZMbQj4HgC4hFTrUuaS0825ykN6h63TIfj1M0RlkXcie3xKyceiRykN7lEwECPkVTTn2BE1bQGfRgUVrFf0Bbb4779PJrfVmHschTugidPDzafHIKp_g2d1-XHz9sP5y_qm8-vzx4vz9VWkYa0RZNYwJoTSpeF1rgrWouFAWhNbaYmo4B20bS2ndaaiAQN1U1BKFLWfCYlUdF68X3zEOP2ZIU9u7ZMB7FWCYU0uZIKSqBGP_RYmsJSeYYpzRV3-hu2GO-SezIZENZw2rZKbeLJSJQ0oRbDtG16t4aAlub6pub6pub6vO8Ms7y1n30N2jf7rNwIsFgFzGvby-JERyyXjWyaLvnYfDP6Las8v19RL6G3rvvpg</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Hughes, Claire</creator><creator>Foley, Sarah</creator><creator>White, Naomi</creator><creator>Devine, Rory T.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</title><author>Hughes, Claire ; Foley, Sarah ; White, Naomi ; Devine, Rory T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic readiness</topic><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Cutting Scores</topic><topic>Daily Living Skills</topic><topic>Disability adjusted life years</topic><topic>Education, Special</topic><topic>Educational needs</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Ethnic groups</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Family Involvement</topic><topic>Family Relationship</topic><topic>Family size</topic><topic>Family support</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Learning Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Living skills</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preschool Teachers</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>psychometric</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>School Readiness</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>special educational needs and disability</topic><topic>Special needs children</topic><topic>Special Needs Students</topic><topic>Student Adjustment</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine, Rory T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Claire</au><au>Foley, Sarah</au><au>White, Naomi</au><au>Devine, Rory T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1195945</ericid><atitle>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Educ Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>606-627</pages><issn>0007-0998</issn><eissn>2044-8279</eissn><abstract>Background
There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, & Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND.
Aims
Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status.
Sample
Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND).
Method
We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables.
Results
The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls.
Conclusion
The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>29266202</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjep.12206</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0998 |
ispartof | British journal of educational psychology, 2018-12, Vol.88 (4), p.606-627 |
issn | 0007-0998 2044-8279 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461133644 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source (EBSCOhost); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Academic readiness Age differences Child Behavior Child Development Child, Preschool Cognition Confirmatory factor analysis Cutting Scores Daily Living Skills Disability adjusted life years Education, Special Educational needs Educational psychology Ethnic groups Ethnicity Family income Family Involvement Family Relationship Family size Family support Female Foreign Countries Gender Humans Identification Intelligence Language Skills Learning Disorders - diagnosis Living skills Male Measurement Medical screening Minority groups Preschool Children Preschool Teachers Psychological assessment psychometric Psychometrics Psychometrics - instrumentation Psychometrics - standards Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Resistance (Psychology) School Readiness Schools Scores screening Screening Tests Special Education special educational needs and disability Special needs children Special Needs Students Student Adjustment Teacher Attitudes Teachers |
title | School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A08%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=School%20readiness%20in%20children%20with%20special%20educational%20needs%20and%20disabilities:%20Psychometric%20findings%20from%20a%20new%20screening%20tool,%20the%20Brief%20Early%20Skills,%20and%20Support%20Index&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Hughes,%20Claire&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=606-627&rft.issn=0007-0998&rft.eissn=2044-8279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjep.12206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2198548439%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2198548439&rft_id=info:pmid/29266202&rft_ericid=EJ1195945&rfr_iscdi=true |