School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index

Background There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of educational psychology 2018-12, Vol.88 (4), p.606-627
Hauptverfasser: Hughes, Claire, Foley, Sarah, White, Naomi, Devine, Rory T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 627
container_issue 4
container_start_page 606
container_title British journal of educational psychology
container_volume 88
creator Hughes, Claire
Foley, Sarah
White, Naomi
Devine, Rory T.
description Background There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, & Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND. Aims Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status. Sample Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND). Method We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables. Results The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls. Conclusion The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjep.12206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461133644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1195945</ericid><sourcerecordid>2198548439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEokNhwx5kiQ1CTbEd24nZ0WqAVpWoNLCObOea8eA4wU40zBvxmLhN6YIFeOOf891zJJ-ieE7wKcnrrd7BeEooxeJBsaKYsbKhtXxYrDDGdYmlbI6KJynt8pXXFXtcHFFJhaCYropfG7MdBo8iqM4FSAm5gMzW-S5CQHs3bVEawTjlEXSzUZMbQj4HgC4hFTrUuaS0825ykN6h63TIfj1M0RlkXcie3xKyceiRykN7lEwECPkVTTn2BE1bQGfRgUVrFf0Bbb4779PJrfVmHschTugidPDzafHIKp_g2d1-XHz9sP5y_qm8-vzx4vz9VWkYa0RZNYwJoTSpeF1rgrWouFAWhNbaYmo4B20bS2ndaaiAQN1U1BKFLWfCYlUdF68X3zEOP2ZIU9u7ZMB7FWCYU0uZIKSqBGP_RYmsJSeYYpzRV3-hu2GO-SezIZENZw2rZKbeLJSJQ0oRbDtG16t4aAlub6pub6pub6vO8Ms7y1n30N2jf7rNwIsFgFzGvby-JERyyXjWyaLvnYfDP6Las8v19RL6G3rvvpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2198548439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hughes, Claire ; Foley, Sarah ; White, Naomi ; Devine, Rory T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Claire ; Foley, Sarah ; White, Naomi ; Devine, Rory T.</creatorcontrib><description>Background There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, &amp; Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND. Aims Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status. Sample Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND). Method We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables. Results The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls. Conclusion The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29266202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic readiness ; Age differences ; Child Behavior ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Cognition ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Cutting Scores ; Daily Living Skills ; Disability adjusted life years ; Education, Special ; Educational needs ; Educational psychology ; Ethnic groups ; Ethnicity ; Family income ; Family Involvement ; Family Relationship ; Family size ; Family support ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Gender ; Humans ; Identification ; Intelligence ; Language Skills ; Learning Disorders - diagnosis ; Living skills ; Male ; Measurement ; Medical screening ; Minority groups ; Preschool Children ; Preschool Teachers ; Psychological assessment ; psychometric ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - standards ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Resistance (Psychology) ; School Readiness ; Schools ; Scores ; screening ; Screening Tests ; Special Education ; special educational needs and disability ; Special needs children ; Special Needs Students ; Student Adjustment ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational psychology, 2018-12, Vol.88 (4), p.606-627</ispartof><rights>2017 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2017 The British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjep.12206$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjep.12206$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1195945$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29266202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine, Rory T.</creatorcontrib><title>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</title><title>British journal of educational psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Educ Psychol</addtitle><description>Background There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, &amp; Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND. Aims Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status. Sample Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND). Method We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables. Results The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls. Conclusion The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND.</description><subject>Academic readiness</subject><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Cutting Scores</subject><subject>Daily Living Skills</subject><subject>Disability adjusted life years</subject><subject>Education, Special</subject><subject>Educational needs</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Ethnic groups</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Family Involvement</subject><subject>Family Relationship</subject><subject>Family size</subject><subject>Family support</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Learning Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Living skills</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preschool Teachers</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>psychometric</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>School Readiness</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>special educational needs and disability</subject><subject>Special needs children</subject><subject>Special Needs Students</subject><subject>Student Adjustment</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0007-0998</issn><issn>2044-8279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEokNhwx5kiQ1CTbEd24nZ0WqAVpWoNLCObOea8eA4wU40zBvxmLhN6YIFeOOf891zJJ-ieE7wKcnrrd7BeEooxeJBsaKYsbKhtXxYrDDGdYmlbI6KJynt8pXXFXtcHFFJhaCYropfG7MdBo8iqM4FSAm5gMzW-S5CQHs3bVEawTjlEXSzUZMbQj4HgC4hFTrUuaS0825ykN6h63TIfj1M0RlkXcie3xKyceiRykN7lEwECPkVTTn2BE1bQGfRgUVrFf0Bbb4779PJrfVmHschTugidPDzafHIKp_g2d1-XHz9sP5y_qm8-vzx4vz9VWkYa0RZNYwJoTSpeF1rgrWouFAWhNbaYmo4B20bS2ndaaiAQN1U1BKFLWfCYlUdF68X3zEOP2ZIU9u7ZMB7FWCYU0uZIKSqBGP_RYmsJSeYYpzRV3-hu2GO-SezIZENZw2rZKbeLJSJQ0oRbDtG16t4aAlub6pub6pub6vO8Ms7y1n30N2jf7rNwIsFgFzGvby-JERyyXjWyaLvnYfDP6Las8v19RL6G3rvvpg</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Hughes, Claire</creator><creator>Foley, Sarah</creator><creator>White, Naomi</creator><creator>Devine, Rory T.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</title><author>Hughes, Claire ; Foley, Sarah ; White, Naomi ; Devine, Rory T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4486-384466ab13577b10b6356afe6bbbf02c55ebf8f227dbe3e1e7832f1a0f546f0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic readiness</topic><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Cutting Scores</topic><topic>Daily Living Skills</topic><topic>Disability adjusted life years</topic><topic>Education, Special</topic><topic>Educational needs</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Ethnic groups</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Family Involvement</topic><topic>Family Relationship</topic><topic>Family size</topic><topic>Family support</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Learning Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Living skills</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preschool Teachers</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>psychometric</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>School Readiness</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>special educational needs and disability</topic><topic>Special needs children</topic><topic>Special Needs Students</topic><topic>Student Adjustment</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine, Rory T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Claire</au><au>Foley, Sarah</au><au>White, Naomi</au><au>Devine, Rory T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1195945</ericid><atitle>School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Educ Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>606-627</pages><issn>0007-0998</issn><eissn>2044-8279</eissn><abstract>Background There is an urgent need to accelerate the detection of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). A recent brief questionnaire designed for teachers and nursery staff, the Brief Early Skills and Support Index (BESSI), shows promising psychometric properties (Hughes, Daly, Foley, White, &amp; Devine, . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 332–356.), but has yet to be evaluated as a tool for detecting children who may have SEND. Aims Addressing this gap, this study aimed to assess whether BESSI scores (i) show measurement invariance across SEND status; (ii) show unique associations with SEND status; and (iii) are sensitive and specific to SEND status. Sample Eighty‐four teachers and nursery staff completed BESSI ratings for 2106 British children aged 2.5–5.5 years (48.9% male, 20% ethnic minority, 9.3% with a statement of SEND). Method We applied multilevel confirmatory factor analyses, regression analyses, and ROC analyses to examine each of the study questions, using the BESSI subscales (Behavioural Adjustment, Language and Cognition, Daily Living Skills, and Family Support) as dependent variables. Results The four BESSI subscales were reliable and showed measurement invariance across SEND status. Over and above effects of age, gender, family income, ethnicity, and family size, SEND status predicted substantial unique variance in BESSI scores. ROC analyses showed that in detecting children identified as having SEND, a cut‐off score of 8.50 on the BESSI total score produced good levels of sensitivity and specificity; gender‐specific analyses indicated a lower cut‐off score of 6.50 for girls. Conclusion The BESSI appears to be a useful tool in screening children for more detailed assessment of SEND.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>29266202</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjep.12206</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0998
ispartof British journal of educational psychology, 2018-12, Vol.88 (4), p.606-627
issn 0007-0998
2044-8279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461133644
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source (EBSCOhost); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Academic readiness
Age differences
Child Behavior
Child Development
Child, Preschool
Cognition
Confirmatory factor analysis
Cutting Scores
Daily Living Skills
Disability adjusted life years
Education, Special
Educational needs
Educational psychology
Ethnic groups
Ethnicity
Family income
Family Involvement
Family Relationship
Family size
Family support
Female
Foreign Countries
Gender
Humans
Identification
Intelligence
Language Skills
Learning Disorders - diagnosis
Living skills
Male
Measurement
Medical screening
Minority groups
Preschool Children
Preschool Teachers
Psychological assessment
psychometric
Psychometrics
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Psychometrics - standards
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Resistance (Psychology)
School Readiness
Schools
Scores
screening
Screening Tests
Special Education
special educational needs and disability
Special needs children
Special Needs Students
Student Adjustment
Teacher Attitudes
Teachers
title School readiness in children with special educational needs and disabilities: Psychometric findings from a new screening tool, the Brief Early Skills, and Support Index
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A08%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=School%20readiness%20in%20children%20with%20special%20educational%20needs%20and%20disabilities:%20Psychometric%20findings%20from%20a%20new%20screening%20tool,%20the%20Brief%20Early%20Skills,%20and%20Support%20Index&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Hughes,%20Claire&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=606-627&rft.issn=0007-0998&rft.eissn=2044-8279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjep.12206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2198548439%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2198548439&rft_id=info:pmid/29266202&rft_ericid=EJ1195945&rfr_iscdi=true