To Go Virtual or Not to Go Virtual, That is the Question: A Comparative Study of Face-To-Face Versus Virtual Laboratories in a Physical Science Course
This article outlines a study that compared an online virtual laboratory with a face-to-face laboratory. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual method of instruction for a general studies, physical science laboratory course. Using a pretest–posttest only desig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of college science teaching 2018-11, Vol.48 (2), p.59-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Journal of college science teaching |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Miller, Travis A. Carver, Jeffrey S. Roy, Abhik |
description | This article outlines a study that compared an online virtual laboratory with a face-to-face laboratory. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual method of instruction for a general studies, physical science laboratory course. Using a pretest–posttest only design with nonequivalent control groups, differences between assessment scores, attitudes, and personal preferences were used to evaluate the likelihood of any impact of the online delivery when compared with that of the traditional method. No significant differences were found between the groups’ content knowledge gained or in their attitudes or preferences. While this result may seem discouraging at first, virtual laboratory sections can often be cost-effective for institutions to use and therefore may be a favorable choice. Also, there is a growing need or desire for online formats, and this study demonstrates that virtual methods are an effective alternative to face-to-face methods with laboratory content knowledge attainment. A discussion follows with suggestions or items to consider in designing or switching to a virtual format. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2505/4/jcst18_048_02_59 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461130078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1195681</ericid><jstor_id>26616271</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26616271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-220d7a02acfaa62d71025e319f48220634a3302076f70df38a32d34328b51d543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfQBACXjy4dmaSTbJHkVqVoghVvIW4f-iWtqlJevDbu6VSpYdhYN7vzQyPsXOEG8ohH8jBrIwJjQXZFdm8OGA9LKTIpCnMIesBSJ2RwI9jdhLjDABJAfaYmXg-8vy9DWnt5twH_uwTT_-H13wydYm3kadpzV_XdUytX56yo8bNY3322_vs7X44uXvIxi-jx7vbcVaS0ikjgko7IFc2zimqNALltcCikabTlJBOCCDQqtFQNcI4QZWQgsxnjlUuRZ9dbfeugv_a3LaLNpb1fO6WtV9HS1IhCgBtOvRyD535dVh231lCgSgl6KKjaEuVwccY6sauQrtw4dsi2E2YVtr9MDvTxdZUh7bcGYZPiEWuDP7ps5h82AGkFCrSKH4AvA539g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131144079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To Go Virtual or Not to Go Virtual, That is the Question: A Comparative Study of Face-To-Face Versus Virtual Laboratories in a Physical Science Course</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Miller, Travis A. ; Carver, Jeffrey S. ; Roy, Abhik</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Travis A. ; Carver, Jeffrey S. ; Roy, Abhik</creatorcontrib><description>This article outlines a study that compared an online virtual laboratory with a face-to-face laboratory. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual method of instruction for a general studies, physical science laboratory course. Using a pretest–posttest only design with nonequivalent control groups, differences between assessment scores, attitudes, and personal preferences were used to evaluate the likelihood of any impact of the online delivery when compared with that of the traditional method. No significant differences were found between the groups’ content knowledge gained or in their attitudes or preferences. While this result may seem discouraging at first, virtual laboratory sections can often be cost-effective for institutions to use and therefore may be a favorable choice. Also, there is a growing need or desire for online formats, and this study demonstrates that virtual methods are an effective alternative to face-to-face methods with laboratory content knowledge attainment. A discussion follows with suggestions or items to consider in designing or switching to a virtual format.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-231X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2505/4/jcst18_048_02_59</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: National Science Teachers Association</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; College Science ; College Students ; Computer Simulation ; Control Groups ; Conventional Instruction ; Educational Technology ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Knowledge Level ; Laboratories ; Online instruction ; Physical Sciences ; RESEARCH AND TEACHING ; Science ; Science Curriculum ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Science Laboratories ; Student Attitudes ; Student Needs ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Uses in Education</subject><ispartof>Journal of college science teaching, 2018-11, Vol.48 (2), p.59-67</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Science Teachers Association Nov/Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-220d7a02acfaa62d71025e319f48220634a3302076f70df38a32d34328b51d543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-220d7a02acfaa62d71025e319f48220634a3302076f70df38a32d34328b51d543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26616271$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26616271$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1195681$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carver, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Abhik</creatorcontrib><title>To Go Virtual or Not to Go Virtual, That is the Question: A Comparative Study of Face-To-Face Versus Virtual Laboratories in a Physical Science Course</title><title>Journal of college science teaching</title><description>This article outlines a study that compared an online virtual laboratory with a face-to-face laboratory. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual method of instruction for a general studies, physical science laboratory course. Using a pretest–posttest only design with nonequivalent control groups, differences between assessment scores, attitudes, and personal preferences were used to evaluate the likelihood of any impact of the online delivery when compared with that of the traditional method. No significant differences were found between the groups’ content knowledge gained or in their attitudes or preferences. While this result may seem discouraging at first, virtual laboratory sections can often be cost-effective for institutions to use and therefore may be a favorable choice. Also, there is a growing need or desire for online formats, and this study demonstrates that virtual methods are an effective alternative to face-to-face methods with laboratory content knowledge attainment. A discussion follows with suggestions or items to consider in designing or switching to a virtual format.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>RESEARCH AND TEACHING</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Laboratories</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Needs</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><issn>0047-231X</issn><issn>1943-4898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfQBACXjy4dmaSTbJHkVqVoghVvIW4f-iWtqlJevDbu6VSpYdhYN7vzQyPsXOEG8ohH8jBrIwJjQXZFdm8OGA9LKTIpCnMIesBSJ2RwI9jdhLjDABJAfaYmXg-8vy9DWnt5twH_uwTT_-H13wydYm3kadpzV_XdUytX56yo8bNY3322_vs7X44uXvIxi-jx7vbcVaS0ikjgko7IFc2zimqNALltcCikabTlJBOCCDQqtFQNcI4QZWQgsxnjlUuRZ9dbfeugv_a3LaLNpb1fO6WtV9HS1IhCgBtOvRyD535dVh231lCgSgl6KKjaEuVwccY6sauQrtw4dsi2E2YVtr9MDvTxdZUh7bcGYZPiEWuDP7ps5h82AGkFCrSKH4AvA539g</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Miller, Travis A.</creator><creator>Carver, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Roy, Abhik</creator><general>National Science Teachers Association</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>To Go Virtual or Not to Go Virtual, That is the Question</title><author>Miller, Travis A. ; Carver, Jeffrey S. ; Roy, Abhik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-220d7a02acfaa62d71025e319f48220634a3302076f70df38a32d34328b51d543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>RESEARCH AND TEACHING</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Laboratories</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Needs</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carver, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Abhik</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of college science teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Travis A.</au><au>Carver, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Roy, Abhik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1195681</ericid><atitle>To Go Virtual or Not to Go Virtual, That is the Question: A Comparative Study of Face-To-Face Versus Virtual Laboratories in a Physical Science Course</atitle><jtitle>Journal of college science teaching</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>59-67</pages><issn>0047-231X</issn><eissn>1943-4898</eissn><abstract>This article outlines a study that compared an online virtual laboratory with a face-to-face laboratory. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual method of instruction for a general studies, physical science laboratory course. Using a pretest–posttest only design with nonequivalent control groups, differences between assessment scores, attitudes, and personal preferences were used to evaluate the likelihood of any impact of the online delivery when compared with that of the traditional method. No significant differences were found between the groups’ content knowledge gained or in their attitudes or preferences. While this result may seem discouraging at first, virtual laboratory sections can often be cost-effective for institutions to use and therefore may be a favorable choice. Also, there is a growing need or desire for online formats, and this study demonstrates that virtual methods are an effective alternative to face-to-face methods with laboratory content knowledge attainment. A discussion follows with suggestions or items to consider in designing or switching to a virtual format.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>National Science Teachers Association</pub><doi>10.2505/4/jcst18_048_02_59</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-231X |
ispartof | Journal of college science teaching, 2018-11, Vol.48 (2), p.59-67 |
issn | 0047-231X 1943-4898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461130078 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source |
subjects | Academic Achievement College Science College Students Computer Simulation Control Groups Conventional Instruction Educational Technology Instructional Effectiveness Knowledge Level Laboratories Online instruction Physical Sciences RESEARCH AND TEACHING Science Science Curriculum Science education Science Instruction Science Laboratories Student Attitudes Student Needs Teaching Methods Technology Uses in Education |
title | To Go Virtual or Not to Go Virtual, That is the Question: A Comparative Study of Face-To-Face Versus Virtual Laboratories in a Physical Science Course |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A19%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20Go%20Virtual%20or%20Not%20to%20Go%20Virtual,%20That%20is%20the%20Question:%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20Face-To-Face%20Versus%20Virtual%20Laboratories%20in%20a%20Physical%20Science%20Course&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20college%20science%20teaching&rft.au=Miller,%20Travis%20A.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=59-67&rft.issn=0047-231X&rft.eissn=1943-4898&rft_id=info:doi/10.2505/4/jcst18_048_02_59&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26616271%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131144079&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1195681&rft_jstor_id=26616271&rfr_iscdi=true |