Associations of IVF singleton birthweight and gestation with clinical treatment and laboratory factors: a multicentre cohort study

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do IVF treatment and laboratory factors affect singleton birthweight (BW)? SUMMARY ANSWER BWs of IVF-conceived singleton babies are increasing with time, but we cannot identify the specific treatment factors responsible. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY IVF-conceived singleton babies fr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2020-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2860-2870
Hauptverfasser: Castillo, Catherine M, Johnstone, Edward D, Horne, Greg, Falconer, Deborah A, Troup, Stephen A, Cutting, Rachel, Sharma, Vinay, Brison, Daniel R, Roberts, Stephen A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do IVF treatment and laboratory factors affect singleton birthweight (BW)? SUMMARY ANSWER BWs of IVF-conceived singleton babies are increasing with time, but we cannot identify the specific treatment factors responsible. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY IVF-conceived singleton babies from fresh transfers have slightly lower BW than those conceived naturally, whilst those from frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles are heavier and comparable to naturally conceived offspring. Our recent studies have shown that BW varies significantly between different IVF centres, and in a single centre, is also increasing with time, without a corresponding change in BWs of naturally conceived infants. Although it is likely that factors in the IVF treatment cycle, such as hormonal stimulation or embryo laboratory culture conditions, are associated with BW differences, our previous study designs were not able to confirm this. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Data relating to BW outcomes, IVF treatment and laboratory parameters were collated from pre-existing electronic records in five participating centres for all singleton babies conceived between August 2007 and December 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Seven thousand, five hundred and eighty-eight births, 6207 from fresh and 1381 from FET. Infants with severe congenital abnormalities were excluded. The primary outcome of gestation-adjusted BW and secondary outcomes of unadjusted BW and gestation were analysed using multivariable regression models with robust standard errors to allow for the correlation between infants with the same mother. The models tested treatment factors allowing for confounding by centre, time and patient characteristics. A similar matched analysis of a subgroup of 379 sibling pairs was also performed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE No significant associations of birth outcomes with IVF embryo culture parameters were seen independent of clinic or time, including embryo culture medium, incubator type or oxygen level, although small differences cannot be ruled out. We did not detect any significant differences associated with hormonal stimulation in fresh cycles or hormonal synchronization in FET cycles. Gestation-adjusted BW increased by 13.4 (95% CI 0.6–26.1) g per year over the period of the study, and babies born following FET were 92 (95% CI 57–128) g heavier on average than those from the fresh transfer. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although no specific relationships h
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deaa244