Ethics codes and medical decision making

•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regard...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Patient education and counseling 2021-06, Vol.104 (6), p.1312-1316
Hauptverfasser: Borysowski, Jan, Ehni, Hans-Jörg, Górski, Andrzej
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1316
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1312
container_title Patient education and counseling
container_volume 104
creator Borysowski, Jan
Ehni, Hans-Jörg
Górski, Andrzej
description •Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making. The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes. We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway. The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making. All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated. Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460999752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0738399120305954</els_id><sourcerecordid>2460999752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAeyy7CZhHD9iixWqSkGqxAbWlmNPwCWPYqdI_D2JyprVaEb3jHQPIbcUCgpU3u2LA7qihHLeC2D8jCyoqlguKOPnZAEVUznTml6Sq5T2ACAlpwuy2owfwaXMDR5TZnufdeiDs23m0YUUhj7r7Gfo36_JRWPbhDd_c0neHjev66d897J9Xj_scscYjHmjXCM1WhQgHC1d02hd17UVpfQgrUbgtSorKxUHqRg2tBbeC654jai5ZkuyOv09xOHriGk0XUgO29b2OByTKbkErXUlyilKT1EXh5QiNuYQQ2fjj6FgZitmbyYrZrYynyYrE3N_YnDq8B0wmuQC9m4qHdGNxg_hH_oXD6JpHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2460999752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics codes and medical decision making</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Borysowski, Jan ; Ehni, Hans-Jörg ; Górski, Andrzej</creator><creatorcontrib>Borysowski, Jan ; Ehni, Hans-Jörg ; Górski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><description>•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making. The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes. We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway. The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making. All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated. Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-3991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Code of medical ethics ; Ethics code ; Informed decision making ; Nursing ; Paternalism ; Shared decision making</subject><ispartof>Patient education and counseling, 2021-06, Vol.104 (6), p.1312-1316</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borysowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics codes and medical decision making</title><title>Patient education and counseling</title><description>•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making. The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes. We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway. The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making. All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated. Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.</description><subject>Code of medical ethics</subject><subject>Ethics code</subject><subject>Informed decision making</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Paternalism</subject><subject>Shared decision making</subject><issn>0738-3991</issn><issn>1873-5134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAeyy7CZhHD9iixWqSkGqxAbWlmNPwCWPYqdI_D2JyprVaEb3jHQPIbcUCgpU3u2LA7qihHLeC2D8jCyoqlguKOPnZAEVUznTml6Sq5T2ACAlpwuy2owfwaXMDR5TZnufdeiDs23m0YUUhj7r7Gfo36_JRWPbhDd_c0neHjev66d897J9Xj_scscYjHmjXCM1WhQgHC1d02hd17UVpfQgrUbgtSorKxUHqRg2tBbeC654jai5ZkuyOv09xOHriGk0XUgO29b2OByTKbkErXUlyilKT1EXh5QiNuYQQ2fjj6FgZitmbyYrZrYynyYrE3N_YnDq8B0wmuQC9m4qHdGNxg_hH_oXD6JpHw</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Borysowski, Jan</creator><creator>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</creator><creator>Górski, Andrzej</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Ethics codes and medical decision making</title><author>Borysowski, Jan ; Ehni, Hans-Jörg ; Górski, Andrzej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Code of medical ethics</topic><topic>Ethics code</topic><topic>Informed decision making</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Paternalism</topic><topic>Shared decision making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borysowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borysowski, Jan</au><au>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</au><au>Górski, Andrzej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics codes and medical decision making</atitle><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1312</spage><epage>1316</epage><pages>1312-1316</pages><issn>0738-3991</issn><eissn>1873-5134</eissn><abstract>•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making. The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes. We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway. The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making. All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated. Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-3991
ispartof Patient education and counseling, 2021-06, Vol.104 (6), p.1312-1316
issn 0738-3991
1873-5134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460999752
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Code of medical ethics
Ethics code
Informed decision making
Nursing
Paternalism
Shared decision making
title Ethics codes and medical decision making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A39%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20codes%20and%20medical%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Patient%20education%20and%20counseling&rft.au=Borysowski,%20Jan&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1312&rft.epage=1316&rft.pages=1312-1316&rft.issn=0738-3991&rft.eissn=1873-5134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2460999752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2460999752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0738399120305954&rfr_iscdi=true