Ethics codes and medical decision making
•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regard...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Patient education and counseling 2021-06, Vol.104 (6), p.1312-1316 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1316 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1312 |
container_title | Patient education and counseling |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Borysowski, Jan Ehni, Hans-Jörg Górski, Andrzej |
description | •Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making.
The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes.
We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway.
The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making.
All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated.
Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460999752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0738399120305954</els_id><sourcerecordid>2460999752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAeyy7CZhHD9iixWqSkGqxAbWlmNPwCWPYqdI_D2JyprVaEb3jHQPIbcUCgpU3u2LA7qihHLeC2D8jCyoqlguKOPnZAEVUznTml6Sq5T2ACAlpwuy2owfwaXMDR5TZnufdeiDs23m0YUUhj7r7Gfo36_JRWPbhDd_c0neHjev66d897J9Xj_scscYjHmjXCM1WhQgHC1d02hd17UVpfQgrUbgtSorKxUHqRg2tBbeC654jai5ZkuyOv09xOHriGk0XUgO29b2OByTKbkErXUlyilKT1EXh5QiNuYQQ2fjj6FgZitmbyYrZrYynyYrE3N_YnDq8B0wmuQC9m4qHdGNxg_hH_oXD6JpHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2460999752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics codes and medical decision making</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Borysowski, Jan ; Ehni, Hans-Jörg ; Górski, Andrzej</creator><creatorcontrib>Borysowski, Jan ; Ehni, Hans-Jörg ; Górski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><description>•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making.
The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes.
We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway.
The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making.
All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated.
Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-3991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Code of medical ethics ; Ethics code ; Informed decision making ; Nursing ; Paternalism ; Shared decision making</subject><ispartof>Patient education and counseling, 2021-06, Vol.104 (6), p.1312-1316</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borysowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics codes and medical decision making</title><title>Patient education and counseling</title><description>•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making.
The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes.
We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway.
The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making.
All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated.
Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.</description><subject>Code of medical ethics</subject><subject>Ethics code</subject><subject>Informed decision making</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Paternalism</subject><subject>Shared decision making</subject><issn>0738-3991</issn><issn>1873-5134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAeyy7CZhHD9iixWqSkGqxAbWlmNPwCWPYqdI_D2JyprVaEb3jHQPIbcUCgpU3u2LA7qihHLeC2D8jCyoqlguKOPnZAEVUznTml6Sq5T2ACAlpwuy2owfwaXMDR5TZnufdeiDs23m0YUUhj7r7Gfo36_JRWPbhDd_c0neHjev66d897J9Xj_scscYjHmjXCM1WhQgHC1d02hd17UVpfQgrUbgtSorKxUHqRg2tBbeC654jai5ZkuyOv09xOHriGk0XUgO29b2OByTKbkErXUlyilKT1EXh5QiNuYQQ2fjj6FgZitmbyYrZrYynyYrE3N_YnDq8B0wmuQC9m4qHdGNxg_hH_oXD6JpHw</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Borysowski, Jan</creator><creator>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</creator><creator>Górski, Andrzej</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Ethics codes and medical decision making</title><author>Borysowski, Jan ; Ehni, Hans-Jörg ; Górski, Andrzej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-f8cf69eae505c12cff99bbba526d06a9e04b827a6840683ef1b5dd5484bee9493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Code of medical ethics</topic><topic>Ethics code</topic><topic>Informed decision making</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Paternalism</topic><topic>Shared decision making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borysowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borysowski, Jan</au><au>Ehni, Hans-Jörg</au><au>Górski, Andrzej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics codes and medical decision making</atitle><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1312</spage><epage>1316</epage><pages>1312-1316</pages><issn>0738-3991</issn><eissn>1873-5134</eissn><abstract>•Medical decision making is a primary aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.•Shared decision making is a hallmark of patient-centered care.•Most ethics codes refer to informed decision making.•Very few ethics codes contain guidance on shared decision making.•Ethics codes should be amended regarding medical decision making.
The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes.
We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway.
The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making.
All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated.
Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0738-3991 |
ispartof | Patient education and counseling, 2021-06, Vol.104 (6), p.1312-1316 |
issn | 0738-3991 1873-5134 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460999752 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Code of medical ethics Ethics code Informed decision making Nursing Paternalism Shared decision making |
title | Ethics codes and medical decision making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A39%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20codes%20and%20medical%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Patient%20education%20and%20counseling&rft.au=Borysowski,%20Jan&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1312&rft.epage=1316&rft.pages=1312-1316&rft.issn=0738-3991&rft.eissn=1873-5134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2460999752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2460999752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0738399120305954&rfr_iscdi=true |