Positional difference of malleoli-midpoint from three-dimensional geometric centre of rotation of ankle and its effect on ankle joint kinetics

•The malleoli-midpoint and ankle geometric centre of rotation were compared.•The centre of rotation was medial and anterior from the malleoli-midpoint.•The conventional ankle joint underestimated dorsiflexion and inversion torques.•The conventional ankle joint overestimated plantar flexion torque.•T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2021-01, Vol.83, p.223-229
Hauptverfasser: Sado, Natsuki, Shiotani, Hiroto, Saeki, Junya, Kawakami, Yasuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 229
container_issue
container_start_page 223
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 83
creator Sado, Natsuki
Shiotani, Hiroto
Saeki, Junya
Kawakami, Yasuo
description •The malleoli-midpoint and ankle geometric centre of rotation were compared.•The centre of rotation was medial and anterior from the malleoli-midpoint.•The conventional ankle joint underestimated dorsiflexion and inversion torques.•The conventional ankle joint overestimated plantar flexion torque.•The potential necessity to re-assess the 3D mechanical load on ankle is suggested. Backgrounds: Joint kinetic calculations are sensitive to joint centre locations. Although geometric hip and knee joint centre/axis are generally developed, the ankle joint centre (AJC) is conventionally defined as the midpoint between the malleolus lateralis and medialis (AJCMID) in most gait analyses. Research question: We examined the positional difference of the AJCMID from the geometric centre of rotation (AJCFUN) and its effect on the ankle joint kinetics in representative human gaits. Methods: In the first experiment, we calculated the AJCFUN and indicated its location on the ankle MRI in 14 (seven male and seven female) participants. In the second experiment, we compared ankle kinematics/kinetics based on AJCFUN and AJCMID during walking and hopping at 2.6 Hz in 17 (nine male and eight female) participants. Results: In both experiments, AJCFUN was located at positions significantly medial (-9.2 ± 5.4 mm and -10.1 ± 4.4 mm) and anterior (17.0 ± 7.4 mm and 15.3 ± 5.2 mm) from the AJCMID. Furthermore, the AJCMID underestimated peak dorsiflexion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 52.6 ± 17.1%) and inversion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 62.2 ± 11.5%) torques and their durations in walking. Additionally, AJCMID overestimated the plantar flexion torque in both gait modes [AJCMID/AJCFUN: 111.3 ± 4.8% (walking) and 112.7 ± 6.3% (hopping)]. Significance: We therefore concluded that the positional difference between the geometric and landmark-based AJC definitions significantly affected ankle kinetics, thereby indicating that the functional method should be used for defining AJC for gait analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460080676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636220305981</els_id><sourcerecordid>2460080676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-d433c56e5e9b94076c9b792eb0bc4f3ba9ae411fcd4823b1fa1f1c4655d52c693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctu1TAUtBAVvbT9hcpLNrn4FSfZgSpeUiVY0LXl2Mfl3CbxxfZF4if4ZpymZcvGtsYzc3RmCLnmbM8Z128P-3uL5Rhz2QsmVnDPeP-C7HjfDY0QfHhJdmzQutFSi3PyOucDY0zJXrwi51LyTgspd-TPt5ixYFzsRD2GAAkWBzQGOttpgjhhM6M_RlwKDSnOtPxIAI3HGZa8ye4hzlASOupgKelRnGKxq-v6tsvDBPX0FEumUGe4QuvXhh8erR9wgYIuX5KzYKcMV0_3Bbn7-OH7zefm9uunLzfvbxunuC6NV1K6VkMLwzgo1mk3jN0gYGSjU0GOdrCgOA_Oq17IkQfLA3dKt61vhdODvCBvNt9jij9PkIuZMTuYJrtAPGUjlGasZ7rTlao3qksx5wTBHBPONv02nJm1C3Mwz12YtYsVr11U4fXTjNM4g_8new6_Et5tBKib_kJIJjtc4_eYakbGR_zfjL8RD6H1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2460080676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positional difference of malleoli-midpoint from three-dimensional geometric centre of rotation of ankle and its effect on ankle joint kinetics</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sado, Natsuki ; Shiotani, Hiroto ; Saeki, Junya ; Kawakami, Yasuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Sado, Natsuki ; Shiotani, Hiroto ; Saeki, Junya ; Kawakami, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><description>•The malleoli-midpoint and ankle geometric centre of rotation were compared.•The centre of rotation was medial and anterior from the malleoli-midpoint.•The conventional ankle joint underestimated dorsiflexion and inversion torques.•The conventional ankle joint overestimated plantar flexion torque.•The potential necessity to re-assess the 3D mechanical load on ankle is suggested. Backgrounds: Joint kinetic calculations are sensitive to joint centre locations. Although geometric hip and knee joint centre/axis are generally developed, the ankle joint centre (AJC) is conventionally defined as the midpoint between the malleolus lateralis and medialis (AJCMID) in most gait analyses. Research question: We examined the positional difference of the AJCMID from the geometric centre of rotation (AJCFUN) and its effect on the ankle joint kinetics in representative human gaits. Methods: In the first experiment, we calculated the AJCFUN and indicated its location on the ankle MRI in 14 (seven male and seven female) participants. In the second experiment, we compared ankle kinematics/kinetics based on AJCFUN and AJCMID during walking and hopping at 2.6 Hz in 17 (nine male and eight female) participants. Results: In both experiments, AJCFUN was located at positions significantly medial (-9.2 ± 5.4 mm and -10.1 ± 4.4 mm) and anterior (17.0 ± 7.4 mm and 15.3 ± 5.2 mm) from the AJCMID. Furthermore, the AJCMID underestimated peak dorsiflexion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 52.6 ± 17.1%) and inversion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 62.2 ± 11.5%) torques and their durations in walking. Additionally, AJCMID overestimated the plantar flexion torque in both gait modes [AJCMID/AJCFUN: 111.3 ± 4.8% (walking) and 112.7 ± 6.3% (hopping)]. Significance: We therefore concluded that the positional difference between the geometric and landmark-based AJC definitions significantly affected ankle kinetics, thereby indicating that the functional method should be used for defining AJC for gait analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33176233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>biomechanics ; functional method ; joint torque ; least square method ; locomotion</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2021-01, Vol.83, p.223-229</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-d433c56e5e9b94076c9b792eb0bc4f3ba9ae411fcd4823b1fa1f1c4655d52c693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-d433c56e5e9b94076c9b792eb0bc4f3ba9ae411fcd4823b1fa1f1c4655d52c693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636220305981$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sado, Natsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiotani, Hiroto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><title>Positional difference of malleoli-midpoint from three-dimensional geometric centre of rotation of ankle and its effect on ankle joint kinetics</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>•The malleoli-midpoint and ankle geometric centre of rotation were compared.•The centre of rotation was medial and anterior from the malleoli-midpoint.•The conventional ankle joint underestimated dorsiflexion and inversion torques.•The conventional ankle joint overestimated plantar flexion torque.•The potential necessity to re-assess the 3D mechanical load on ankle is suggested. Backgrounds: Joint kinetic calculations are sensitive to joint centre locations. Although geometric hip and knee joint centre/axis are generally developed, the ankle joint centre (AJC) is conventionally defined as the midpoint between the malleolus lateralis and medialis (AJCMID) in most gait analyses. Research question: We examined the positional difference of the AJCMID from the geometric centre of rotation (AJCFUN) and its effect on the ankle joint kinetics in representative human gaits. Methods: In the first experiment, we calculated the AJCFUN and indicated its location on the ankle MRI in 14 (seven male and seven female) participants. In the second experiment, we compared ankle kinematics/kinetics based on AJCFUN and AJCMID during walking and hopping at 2.6 Hz in 17 (nine male and eight female) participants. Results: In both experiments, AJCFUN was located at positions significantly medial (-9.2 ± 5.4 mm and -10.1 ± 4.4 mm) and anterior (17.0 ± 7.4 mm and 15.3 ± 5.2 mm) from the AJCMID. Furthermore, the AJCMID underestimated peak dorsiflexion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 52.6 ± 17.1%) and inversion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 62.2 ± 11.5%) torques and their durations in walking. Additionally, AJCMID overestimated the plantar flexion torque in both gait modes [AJCMID/AJCFUN: 111.3 ± 4.8% (walking) and 112.7 ± 6.3% (hopping)]. Significance: We therefore concluded that the positional difference between the geometric and landmark-based AJC definitions significantly affected ankle kinetics, thereby indicating that the functional method should be used for defining AJC for gait analysis.</description><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>functional method</subject><subject>joint torque</subject><subject>least square method</subject><subject>locomotion</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUctu1TAUtBAVvbT9hcpLNrn4FSfZgSpeUiVY0LXl2Mfl3CbxxfZF4if4ZpymZcvGtsYzc3RmCLnmbM8Z128P-3uL5Rhz2QsmVnDPeP-C7HjfDY0QfHhJdmzQutFSi3PyOucDY0zJXrwi51LyTgspd-TPt5ixYFzsRD2GAAkWBzQGOttpgjhhM6M_RlwKDSnOtPxIAI3HGZa8ye4hzlASOupgKelRnGKxq-v6tsvDBPX0FEumUGe4QuvXhh8erR9wgYIuX5KzYKcMV0_3Bbn7-OH7zefm9uunLzfvbxunuC6NV1K6VkMLwzgo1mk3jN0gYGSjU0GOdrCgOA_Oq17IkQfLA3dKt61vhdODvCBvNt9jij9PkIuZMTuYJrtAPGUjlGasZ7rTlao3qksx5wTBHBPONv02nJm1C3Mwz12YtYsVr11U4fXTjNM4g_8new6_Et5tBKib_kJIJjtc4_eYakbGR_zfjL8RD6H1</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Sado, Natsuki</creator><creator>Shiotani, Hiroto</creator><creator>Saeki, Junya</creator><creator>Kawakami, Yasuo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Positional difference of malleoli-midpoint from three-dimensional geometric centre of rotation of ankle and its effect on ankle joint kinetics</title><author>Sado, Natsuki ; Shiotani, Hiroto ; Saeki, Junya ; Kawakami, Yasuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-d433c56e5e9b94076c9b792eb0bc4f3ba9ae411fcd4823b1fa1f1c4655d52c693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>functional method</topic><topic>joint torque</topic><topic>least square method</topic><topic>locomotion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sado, Natsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiotani, Hiroto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sado, Natsuki</au><au>Shiotani, Hiroto</au><au>Saeki, Junya</au><au>Kawakami, Yasuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positional difference of malleoli-midpoint from three-dimensional geometric centre of rotation of ankle and its effect on ankle joint kinetics</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>83</volume><spage>223</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>223-229</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>•The malleoli-midpoint and ankle geometric centre of rotation were compared.•The centre of rotation was medial and anterior from the malleoli-midpoint.•The conventional ankle joint underestimated dorsiflexion and inversion torques.•The conventional ankle joint overestimated plantar flexion torque.•The potential necessity to re-assess the 3D mechanical load on ankle is suggested. Backgrounds: Joint kinetic calculations are sensitive to joint centre locations. Although geometric hip and knee joint centre/axis are generally developed, the ankle joint centre (AJC) is conventionally defined as the midpoint between the malleolus lateralis and medialis (AJCMID) in most gait analyses. Research question: We examined the positional difference of the AJCMID from the geometric centre of rotation (AJCFUN) and its effect on the ankle joint kinetics in representative human gaits. Methods: In the first experiment, we calculated the AJCFUN and indicated its location on the ankle MRI in 14 (seven male and seven female) participants. In the second experiment, we compared ankle kinematics/kinetics based on AJCFUN and AJCMID during walking and hopping at 2.6 Hz in 17 (nine male and eight female) participants. Results: In both experiments, AJCFUN was located at positions significantly medial (-9.2 ± 5.4 mm and -10.1 ± 4.4 mm) and anterior (17.0 ± 7.4 mm and 15.3 ± 5.2 mm) from the AJCMID. Furthermore, the AJCMID underestimated peak dorsiflexion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 52.6 ± 17.1%) and inversion (AJCMID/AJCFUN: 62.2 ± 11.5%) torques and their durations in walking. Additionally, AJCMID overestimated the plantar flexion torque in both gait modes [AJCMID/AJCFUN: 111.3 ± 4.8% (walking) and 112.7 ± 6.3% (hopping)]. Significance: We therefore concluded that the positional difference between the geometric and landmark-based AJC definitions significantly affected ankle kinetics, thereby indicating that the functional method should be used for defining AJC for gait analysis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33176233</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2021-01, Vol.83, p.223-229
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460080676
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects biomechanics
functional method
joint torque
least square method
locomotion
title Positional difference of malleoli-midpoint from three-dimensional geometric centre of rotation of ankle and its effect on ankle joint kinetics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positional%20difference%20of%20malleoli-midpoint%20from%20three-dimensional%20geometric%20centre%20of%20rotation%20of%20ankle%20and%20its%20effect%20on%20ankle%20joint%20kinetics&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Sado,%20Natsuki&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=83&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=223-229&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2460080676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2460080676&rft_id=info:pmid/33176233&rft_els_id=S0966636220305981&rfr_iscdi=true