The influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention

Across seven experiments, the present article examined the influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention, as assessed by both reconstruction of order and serial recall tests. Historically, part-set cueing facilitation occurs when half of the items are provided as valid part-set cues on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2021-05, Vol.74 (5), p.928-943
Hauptverfasser: Kelley, Matthew R, Strejc, Madison, Walts, Zoe L, Uribe, Yesenia, Gonzales, Leslie, Tcaturian, Estella, Keller, Anne E, Bronswick, Julia K, Stephany, Sophia E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 943
container_issue 5
container_start_page 928
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 74
creator Kelley, Matthew R
Strejc, Madison
Walts, Zoe L
Uribe, Yesenia
Gonzales, Leslie
Tcaturian, Estella
Keller, Anne E
Bronswick, Julia K
Stephany, Sophia E
description Across seven experiments, the present article examined the influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention, as assessed by both reconstruction of order and serial recall tests. Historically, part-set cueing facilitation occurs when half of the items are provided as valid part-set cues on tests of order memory. Using a variety of list lengths (10 or 16), numbers of cues (0–14), and types of cues (full or partial), the present experiments showed disparate effects of the number of part-set cues on reconstruction and serial recall tasks. On reconstruction tests, a minimum number of full cues was required before part-set cueing facilitation was produced and the magnitude of facilitation increased as the number of cues increased. Generally, partial cues did not influence order retention until almost the entire list was provided as partial cues. On serial recall tests, part-set cueing facilitation was only evident with a few full cues. In contrast, part-set cueing impairment was the norm when many partial cues were provided. These results were largely consistent with predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis, as well as with an anchoring account of part-set cueing for order.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1747021820977047
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460080216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747021820977047</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2513954150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-38277fb36f7a4e3e214127f202b6edb845a002246ef5edd17d69c121d2def8a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9PwyAcxYnRuDm9ezJNvHip8gUK3cmYxV_JEi_z3NDyRbt0MKE9-N_LsjmTJZ6AL5_3eDxCLoHeAih1B0ooyqBkdKoUFeqIjDejnDImj_d7KEfkLMYlpYIrqU7JiHNQUlI-JveLT8xaZ7sBXYOZt1mfBm5Y1Rg2p7UOfR6xz5oBY-Zd5oNJNwF7dH3r3Tk5sbqLeLFbJ-T96XExe8nnb8-vs4d53nBZ9DkvmVK25tIqLZAjAwFMWUZZLdHUpSg0TaGFRFugMaCMnDbAwDCDttTAJ-Rm67sO_itF6atVGxvsOu3QD7FKUkrL9FeZ0OsDdOmH4FK6ihXAp4WAgiaKbqkm-BgD2mod2pUO3xXQalNudVhuklztjId6hWYv-G0zAfkWiPoD_1791_AHIIN-wA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513954150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kelley, Matthew R ; Strejc, Madison ; Walts, Zoe L ; Uribe, Yesenia ; Gonzales, Leslie ; Tcaturian, Estella ; Keller, Anne E ; Bronswick, Julia K ; Stephany, Sophia E</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Matthew R ; Strejc, Madison ; Walts, Zoe L ; Uribe, Yesenia ; Gonzales, Leslie ; Tcaturian, Estella ; Keller, Anne E ; Bronswick, Julia K ; Stephany, Sophia E</creatorcontrib><description>Across seven experiments, the present article examined the influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention, as assessed by both reconstruction of order and serial recall tests. Historically, part-set cueing facilitation occurs when half of the items are provided as valid part-set cues on tests of order memory. Using a variety of list lengths (10 or 16), numbers of cues (0–14), and types of cues (full or partial), the present experiments showed disparate effects of the number of part-set cues on reconstruction and serial recall tasks. On reconstruction tests, a minimum number of full cues was required before part-set cueing facilitation was produced and the magnitude of facilitation increased as the number of cues increased. Generally, partial cues did not influence order retention until almost the entire list was provided as partial cues. On serial recall tests, part-set cueing facilitation was only evident with a few full cues. In contrast, part-set cueing impairment was the norm when many partial cues were provided. These results were largely consistent with predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis, as well as with an anchoring account of part-set cueing for order.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747021820977047</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33176603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Retention</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2021-05, Vol.74 (5), p.928-943</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-38277fb36f7a4e3e214127f202b6edb845a002246ef5edd17d69c121d2def8a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-38277fb36f7a4e3e214127f202b6edb845a002246ef5edd17d69c121d2def8a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2893-8706</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1747021820977047$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1747021820977047$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strejc, Madison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walts, Zoe L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Yesenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tcaturian, Estella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Anne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronswick, Julia K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephany, Sophia E</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Across seven experiments, the present article examined the influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention, as assessed by both reconstruction of order and serial recall tests. Historically, part-set cueing facilitation occurs when half of the items are provided as valid part-set cues on tests of order memory. Using a variety of list lengths (10 or 16), numbers of cues (0–14), and types of cues (full or partial), the present experiments showed disparate effects of the number of part-set cues on reconstruction and serial recall tasks. On reconstruction tests, a minimum number of full cues was required before part-set cueing facilitation was produced and the magnitude of facilitation increased as the number of cues increased. Generally, partial cues did not influence order retention until almost the entire list was provided as partial cues. On serial recall tests, part-set cueing facilitation was only evident with a few full cues. In contrast, part-set cueing impairment was the norm when many partial cues were provided. These results were largely consistent with predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis, as well as with an anchoring account of part-set cueing for order.</description><subject>Retention</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9PwyAcxYnRuDm9ezJNvHip8gUK3cmYxV_JEi_z3NDyRbt0MKE9-N_LsjmTJZ6AL5_3eDxCLoHeAih1B0ooyqBkdKoUFeqIjDejnDImj_d7KEfkLMYlpYIrqU7JiHNQUlI-JveLT8xaZ7sBXYOZt1mfBm5Y1Rg2p7UOfR6xz5oBY-Zd5oNJNwF7dH3r3Tk5sbqLeLFbJ-T96XExe8nnb8-vs4d53nBZ9DkvmVK25tIqLZAjAwFMWUZZLdHUpSg0TaGFRFugMaCMnDbAwDCDttTAJ-Rm67sO_itF6atVGxvsOu3QD7FKUkrL9FeZ0OsDdOmH4FK6ihXAp4WAgiaKbqkm-BgD2mod2pUO3xXQalNudVhuklztjId6hWYv-G0zAfkWiPoD_1791_AHIIN-wA</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Kelley, Matthew R</creator><creator>Strejc, Madison</creator><creator>Walts, Zoe L</creator><creator>Uribe, Yesenia</creator><creator>Gonzales, Leslie</creator><creator>Tcaturian, Estella</creator><creator>Keller, Anne E</creator><creator>Bronswick, Julia K</creator><creator>Stephany, Sophia E</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-8706</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>The influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention</title><author>Kelley, Matthew R ; Strejc, Madison ; Walts, Zoe L ; Uribe, Yesenia ; Gonzales, Leslie ; Tcaturian, Estella ; Keller, Anne E ; Bronswick, Julia K ; Stephany, Sophia E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-38277fb36f7a4e3e214127f202b6edb845a002246ef5edd17d69c121d2def8a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Retention</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strejc, Madison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walts, Zoe L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Yesenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tcaturian, Estella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Anne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronswick, Julia K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephany, Sophia E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelley, Matthew R</au><au>Strejc, Madison</au><au>Walts, Zoe L</au><au>Uribe, Yesenia</au><au>Gonzales, Leslie</au><au>Tcaturian, Estella</au><au>Keller, Anne E</au><au>Bronswick, Julia K</au><au>Stephany, Sophia E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>928</spage><epage>943</epage><pages>928-943</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Across seven experiments, the present article examined the influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention, as assessed by both reconstruction of order and serial recall tests. Historically, part-set cueing facilitation occurs when half of the items are provided as valid part-set cues on tests of order memory. Using a variety of list lengths (10 or 16), numbers of cues (0–14), and types of cues (full or partial), the present experiments showed disparate effects of the number of part-set cues on reconstruction and serial recall tasks. On reconstruction tests, a minimum number of full cues was required before part-set cueing facilitation was produced and the magnitude of facilitation increased as the number of cues increased. Generally, partial cues did not influence order retention until almost the entire list was provided as partial cues. On serial recall tests, part-set cueing facilitation was only evident with a few full cues. In contrast, part-set cueing impairment was the norm when many partial cues were provided. These results were largely consistent with predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis, as well as with an anchoring account of part-set cueing for order.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33176603</pmid><doi>10.1177/1747021820977047</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-8706</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2021-05, Vol.74 (5), p.928-943
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2460080216
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Retention
title The influence of the number of part-set cues on order retention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A13%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20the%20number%20of%20part-set%20cues%20on%20order%20retention&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Kelley,%20Matthew%20R&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=928&rft.epage=943&rft.pages=928-943&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747021820977047&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2513954150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513954150&rft_id=info:pmid/33176603&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747021820977047&rfr_iscdi=true