Creating an Opioid Recommendation Card for Trainees: Methods, Use, and Impact
Background In academic hospitals, surgical residents write most of the postoperative prescriptions; yet, few residents are trained on postoperative analgesia. This leads to wide variability in practices and often excess opioid prescribing. We sought to create an opioid guideline pocket card for surg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2021-05, Vol.87 (5), p.771-776 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 776 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 771 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R. Chiu, Alexander S. White, Erin M. Yoo, Peter S. |
description | Background
In academic hospitals, surgical residents write most of the postoperative prescriptions; yet, few residents are trained on postoperative analgesia. This leads to wide variability in practices and often excess opioid prescribing. We sought to create an opioid guideline pocket card for surgical residents to access when prescribing opioids postoperatively and to evaluate the impact of this initiative.
Methods
A comprehensive literature review was conducted to generate evidence-based procedure-specific opioid recommendations; additional recommendations were formulated via consensus opinion from surgical divisions at an academic institution. A pocket-sized guideline card was developed to include these procedure-specific recommendations as well as opioid guidelines for discharges after inpatient stays, non-opioid analgesic recommendations, access to opioid safety and disposal instructions for patients discharge, an equianalgesic dosing chart, and instructions for naloxone use. The card was distributed to all General Surgery house staff at a university-affiliated hospital in the spring of 2018. Following the distribution, trainees were surveyed on their use of the card. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey.
Results
Of 85 trainees, 62 (72.9%) responded to the survey in full; 58% use the card regularly. Of the 27 junior resident respondents, 70.4% use the card at least monthly including 48.1% who use the card daily-to-weekly. Overall, 81.6% of residents changed their opioid-prescribing practices because of this initiative and 89.8% believe the card should continue to be distributed and used.
Discussion
An evidence-based guideline card for postoperative analgesia is highly valued and utilized by surgical trainees, especially those most junior in their training. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0003134820940627 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2459628924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0003134820940627</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2459628924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-36bb90ef43e3b652cb659c7fc31cca2f421e4afd87fca9750408c38c10d23ac93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwEvHrqaTJLdjTdZ_Ci0FKQ9L2l2tm7pbtZke_C_N6WCUPAyw8z7vccwhNxy9sB5lj0yxgQXMgemJUshOyMjrpRKdA7inIwOcnLQL8lVCNs4ylTxEZkXHs3QdBtqOrroG9dU9AOta1vsqii4jhbGV7R2ni69aTrE8ETnOHy6KkzoKuAkOis6bXtjh2tyUZtdwJvfPiar15dl8Z7MFm_T4nmWWMhgSES6XmuGtRQo1qkCG4u2WW0Ft9ZALYGjNHWVx5XRmWKS5VbklrMKhLFajMn9Mbf37muPYSjbJljc7UyHbh9KkEqnkGuQEb07Qbdu77t4XQlKQsq15BApdqSsdyF4rMveN63x3yVn5eG_5el_oyU5WoLZ4F_ov_wPnmd38Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2542619412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creating an Opioid Recommendation Card for Trainees: Methods, Use, and Impact</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R. ; Chiu, Alexander S. ; White, Erin M. ; Yoo, Peter S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R. ; Chiu, Alexander S. ; White, Erin M. ; Yoo, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In academic hospitals, surgical residents write most of the postoperative prescriptions; yet, few residents are trained on postoperative analgesia. This leads to wide variability in practices and often excess opioid prescribing. We sought to create an opioid guideline pocket card for surgical residents to access when prescribing opioids postoperatively and to evaluate the impact of this initiative.
Methods
A comprehensive literature review was conducted to generate evidence-based procedure-specific opioid recommendations; additional recommendations were formulated via consensus opinion from surgical divisions at an academic institution. A pocket-sized guideline card was developed to include these procedure-specific recommendations as well as opioid guidelines for discharges after inpatient stays, non-opioid analgesic recommendations, access to opioid safety and disposal instructions for patients discharge, an equianalgesic dosing chart, and instructions for naloxone use. The card was distributed to all General Surgery house staff at a university-affiliated hospital in the spring of 2018. Following the distribution, trainees were surveyed on their use of the card. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey.
Results
Of 85 trainees, 62 (72.9%) responded to the survey in full; 58% use the card regularly. Of the 27 junior resident respondents, 70.4% use the card at least monthly including 48.1% who use the card daily-to-weekly. Overall, 81.6% of residents changed their opioid-prescribing practices because of this initiative and 89.8% believe the card should continue to be distributed and used.
Discussion
An evidence-based guideline card for postoperative analgesia is highly valued and utilized by surgical trainees, especially those most junior in their training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0003134820940627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Computerized physician order entry ; Dosage ; Literature reviews ; Naloxone ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Patients ; Polls & surveys ; Prescriptions ; Recommender systems ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2021-05, Vol.87 (5), p.771-776</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-36bb90ef43e3b652cb659c7fc31cca2f421e4afd87fca9750408c38c10d23ac93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-36bb90ef43e3b652cb659c7fc31cca2f421e4afd87fca9750408c38c10d23ac93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0003134820940627$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003134820940627$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><title>Creating an Opioid Recommendation Card for Trainees: Methods, Use, and Impact</title><title>The American surgeon</title><description>Background
In academic hospitals, surgical residents write most of the postoperative prescriptions; yet, few residents are trained on postoperative analgesia. This leads to wide variability in practices and often excess opioid prescribing. We sought to create an opioid guideline pocket card for surgical residents to access when prescribing opioids postoperatively and to evaluate the impact of this initiative.
Methods
A comprehensive literature review was conducted to generate evidence-based procedure-specific opioid recommendations; additional recommendations were formulated via consensus opinion from surgical divisions at an academic institution. A pocket-sized guideline card was developed to include these procedure-specific recommendations as well as opioid guidelines for discharges after inpatient stays, non-opioid analgesic recommendations, access to opioid safety and disposal instructions for patients discharge, an equianalgesic dosing chart, and instructions for naloxone use. The card was distributed to all General Surgery house staff at a university-affiliated hospital in the spring of 2018. Following the distribution, trainees were surveyed on their use of the card. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey.
Results
Of 85 trainees, 62 (72.9%) responded to the survey in full; 58% use the card regularly. Of the 27 junior resident respondents, 70.4% use the card at least monthly including 48.1% who use the card daily-to-weekly. Overall, 81.6% of residents changed their opioid-prescribing practices because of this initiative and 89.8% believe the card should continue to be distributed and used.
Discussion
An evidence-based guideline card for postoperative analgesia is highly valued and utilized by surgical trainees, especially those most junior in their training.</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Computerized physician order entry</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Naloxone</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Recommender systems</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwEvHrqaTJLdjTdZ_Ci0FKQ9L2l2tm7pbtZke_C_N6WCUPAyw8z7vccwhNxy9sB5lj0yxgQXMgemJUshOyMjrpRKdA7inIwOcnLQL8lVCNs4ylTxEZkXHs3QdBtqOrroG9dU9AOta1vsqii4jhbGV7R2ni69aTrE8ETnOHy6KkzoKuAkOis6bXtjh2tyUZtdwJvfPiar15dl8Z7MFm_T4nmWWMhgSES6XmuGtRQo1qkCG4u2WW0Ft9ZALYGjNHWVx5XRmWKS5VbklrMKhLFajMn9Mbf37muPYSjbJljc7UyHbh9KkEqnkGuQEb07Qbdu77t4XQlKQsq15BApdqSsdyF4rMveN63x3yVn5eG_5el_oyU5WoLZ4F_ov_wPnmd38Q</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R.</creator><creator>Chiu, Alexander S.</creator><creator>White, Erin M.</creator><creator>Yoo, Peter S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Creating an Opioid Recommendation Card for Trainees: Methods, Use, and Impact</title><author>Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R. ; Chiu, Alexander S. ; White, Erin M. ; Yoo, Peter S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-36bb90ef43e3b652cb659c7fc31cca2f421e4afd87fca9750408c38c10d23ac93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Computerized physician order entry</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Naloxone</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Recommender systems</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freedman-Weiss, Mollie R.</au><au>Chiu, Alexander S.</au><au>White, Erin M.</au><au>Yoo, Peter S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Creating an Opioid Recommendation Card for Trainees: Methods, Use, and Impact</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>776</epage><pages>771-776</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Background
In academic hospitals, surgical residents write most of the postoperative prescriptions; yet, few residents are trained on postoperative analgesia. This leads to wide variability in practices and often excess opioid prescribing. We sought to create an opioid guideline pocket card for surgical residents to access when prescribing opioids postoperatively and to evaluate the impact of this initiative.
Methods
A comprehensive literature review was conducted to generate evidence-based procedure-specific opioid recommendations; additional recommendations were formulated via consensus opinion from surgical divisions at an academic institution. A pocket-sized guideline card was developed to include these procedure-specific recommendations as well as opioid guidelines for discharges after inpatient stays, non-opioid analgesic recommendations, access to opioid safety and disposal instructions for patients discharge, an equianalgesic dosing chart, and instructions for naloxone use. The card was distributed to all General Surgery house staff at a university-affiliated hospital in the spring of 2018. Following the distribution, trainees were surveyed on their use of the card. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the survey.
Results
Of 85 trainees, 62 (72.9%) responded to the survey in full; 58% use the card regularly. Of the 27 junior resident respondents, 70.4% use the card at least monthly including 48.1% who use the card daily-to-weekly. Overall, 81.6% of residents changed their opioid-prescribing practices because of this initiative and 89.8% believe the card should continue to be distributed and used.
Discussion
An evidence-based guideline card for postoperative analgesia is highly valued and utilized by surgical trainees, especially those most junior in their training.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0003134820940627</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2021-05, Vol.87 (5), p.771-776 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2459628924 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Analgesia Computerized physician order entry Dosage Literature reviews Naloxone Narcotics Opioids Pain Pain perception Patients Polls & surveys Prescriptions Recommender systems Surgeons Surgery |
title | Creating an Opioid Recommendation Card for Trainees: Methods, Use, and Impact |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A25%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creating%20an%20Opioid%20Recommendation%20Card%20for%20Trainees:%20Methods,%20Use,%20and%20Impact&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Freedman-Weiss,%20Mollie%20R.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=776&rft.pages=771-776&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0003134820940627&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2459628924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2542619412&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0003134820940627&rfr_iscdi=true |