Conditioned pain modulation affects the N2/P2 complex but not the N1 wave: A pilot study with laser‐evoked potentials

Background The ‘pain‐inhibits‐pain’ effect stems from neurophysiological mechanisms involving endogenous modulatory systems termed diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) or conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Laser‐evoked potentials (LEPs) components, the N2/P2 complex, and the N1 wave, reflect t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of pain 2021-03, Vol.25 (3), p.550-557
Hauptverfasser: Squintani, Giovanna, Rasera, Andrea, Segatti, Alessia, Concon, Elisa, Bonetti, Bruno, Valeriani, Massimiliano, Tinazzi, Michele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 557
container_issue 3
container_start_page 550
container_title European journal of pain
container_volume 25
creator Squintani, Giovanna
Rasera, Andrea
Segatti, Alessia
Concon, Elisa
Bonetti, Bruno
Valeriani, Massimiliano
Tinazzi, Michele
description Background The ‘pain‐inhibits‐pain’ effect stems from neurophysiological mechanisms involving endogenous modulatory systems termed diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) or conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Laser‐evoked potentials (LEPs) components, the N2/P2 complex, and the N1 wave, reflect the medial and lateral pain pathway, respectively: anatomically, the lateral thalamic nuclei (LT) project mainly to the somatosensory cortex (N1 generator), while the medial thalamic nuclei (MT) are bound to the limbic cortices (N2/P2 generators). Methods We applied a CPM protocol in which the test stimulus was laser stimulation and the conditioning stimulus was a cold pressor test. LEPs recordings were obtained from 15 healthy subjects in three different conditions: baseline, during heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) and post‐HNCS. Results We observed a significant reduction in N2/P2 amplitude during HNCS and a return to pre‐test amplitude post‐HNCS, whereas the N1 wave remained unchanged during and post‐HNCS. Conclusions Our results indicate that CPM affects only the medial pain system. The spinothalamic tract (STT) transmits to both the LT and the MT, while the spinoreticulothalamic (SRT) projects only to the MT. The reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and the absence of change in the N1 wave suggest that DNIC inhibition on the dorsal horn neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, while the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved. The N1 wave can be a reliable neurophysiological parameter for assessment of STT function in clinical practice, as it does not seem to be influenced by CPM. Significance No reports have described the effect of DNIC on lateral and medial pain pathways. We studied the N1 wave and the N2/P2 complex to detect changes during a CPM protocol. We found a reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and no change in the N1 wave. This suggests that the DNIC inhibitory effect on dorsal horns neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, whereas the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ejp.1693
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2459624506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2459624506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3213-a292ccac40c170a51865ac580349a4a790cfce1b5f6534db90bc13bf807644fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kElOxDAQRS0EYpY4AfKSTaA8ZDA71GIUAhawjhynIgxJHGKnm95xBM7ISUjTDCs2VaVfT79Kn5A9BocMgB_hU3fIEiVWyCaLBY84k2p1nEFBJDJgG2TL-ycAkCmIdbIhBEtBZekmmU1cW9pgXYsl7bRtaePKodYLheqqQhM8DY9Ib_jRHafGNV2Nr7QYAm1dWG4YnekpHtMT2tl6FH0Yyjmd2fBIa-2x_3h7x6l7XhxwAdtgde13yFo1Ntz97tvk4ez0fnIRXd-eX05OriMjOBOR5oobo40EM36sY5YlsTZxBkIqLXWqwFQGWRFXSSxkWSgoDBNFlUGaSFmh2CYHS9-udy8D-pA31husa92iG3zOZaySsUDyh5reed9jlXe9bXQ_zxnki5jzMeZ8EfOI7n-7DkWD5S_4k-sIREtgZmuc_2uUn17dfRl-AiFkh3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2459624506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditioned pain modulation affects the N2/P2 complex but not the N1 wave: A pilot study with laser‐evoked potentials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Squintani, Giovanna ; Rasera, Andrea ; Segatti, Alessia ; Concon, Elisa ; Bonetti, Bruno ; Valeriani, Massimiliano ; Tinazzi, Michele</creator><creatorcontrib>Squintani, Giovanna ; Rasera, Andrea ; Segatti, Alessia ; Concon, Elisa ; Bonetti, Bruno ; Valeriani, Massimiliano ; Tinazzi, Michele</creatorcontrib><description>Background The ‘pain‐inhibits‐pain’ effect stems from neurophysiological mechanisms involving endogenous modulatory systems termed diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) or conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Laser‐evoked potentials (LEPs) components, the N2/P2 complex, and the N1 wave, reflect the medial and lateral pain pathway, respectively: anatomically, the lateral thalamic nuclei (LT) project mainly to the somatosensory cortex (N1 generator), while the medial thalamic nuclei (MT) are bound to the limbic cortices (N2/P2 generators). Methods We applied a CPM protocol in which the test stimulus was laser stimulation and the conditioning stimulus was a cold pressor test. LEPs recordings were obtained from 15 healthy subjects in three different conditions: baseline, during heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) and post‐HNCS. Results We observed a significant reduction in N2/P2 amplitude during HNCS and a return to pre‐test amplitude post‐HNCS, whereas the N1 wave remained unchanged during and post‐HNCS. Conclusions Our results indicate that CPM affects only the medial pain system. The spinothalamic tract (STT) transmits to both the LT and the MT, while the spinoreticulothalamic (SRT) projects only to the MT. The reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and the absence of change in the N1 wave suggest that DNIC inhibition on the dorsal horn neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, while the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved. The N1 wave can be a reliable neurophysiological parameter for assessment of STT function in clinical practice, as it does not seem to be influenced by CPM. Significance No reports have described the effect of DNIC on lateral and medial pain pathways. We studied the N1 wave and the N2/P2 complex to detect changes during a CPM protocol. We found a reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and no change in the N1 wave. This suggests that the DNIC inhibitory effect on dorsal horns neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, whereas the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-3801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33170987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control ; Evoked Potentials ; Humans ; Laser-Evoked Potentials ; Pain ; Pilot Projects</subject><ispartof>European journal of pain, 2021-03, Vol.25 (3), p.550-557</ispartof><rights>2020 European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC</rights><rights>2020 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3213-a292ccac40c170a51865ac580349a4a790cfce1b5f6534db90bc13bf807644fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3213-a292ccac40c170a51865ac580349a4a790cfce1b5f6534db90bc13bf807644fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fejp.1693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fejp.1693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Squintani, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasera, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segatti, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concon, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonetti, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valeriani, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinazzi, Michele</creatorcontrib><title>Conditioned pain modulation affects the N2/P2 complex but not the N1 wave: A pilot study with laser‐evoked potentials</title><title>European journal of pain</title><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><description>Background The ‘pain‐inhibits‐pain’ effect stems from neurophysiological mechanisms involving endogenous modulatory systems termed diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) or conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Laser‐evoked potentials (LEPs) components, the N2/P2 complex, and the N1 wave, reflect the medial and lateral pain pathway, respectively: anatomically, the lateral thalamic nuclei (LT) project mainly to the somatosensory cortex (N1 generator), while the medial thalamic nuclei (MT) are bound to the limbic cortices (N2/P2 generators). Methods We applied a CPM protocol in which the test stimulus was laser stimulation and the conditioning stimulus was a cold pressor test. LEPs recordings were obtained from 15 healthy subjects in three different conditions: baseline, during heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) and post‐HNCS. Results We observed a significant reduction in N2/P2 amplitude during HNCS and a return to pre‐test amplitude post‐HNCS, whereas the N1 wave remained unchanged during and post‐HNCS. Conclusions Our results indicate that CPM affects only the medial pain system. The spinothalamic tract (STT) transmits to both the LT and the MT, while the spinoreticulothalamic (SRT) projects only to the MT. The reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and the absence of change in the N1 wave suggest that DNIC inhibition on the dorsal horn neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, while the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved. The N1 wave can be a reliable neurophysiological parameter for assessment of STT function in clinical practice, as it does not seem to be influenced by CPM. Significance No reports have described the effect of DNIC on lateral and medial pain pathways. We studied the N1 wave and the N2/P2 complex to detect changes during a CPM protocol. We found a reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and no change in the N1 wave. This suggests that the DNIC inhibitory effect on dorsal horns neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, whereas the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser-Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><issn>1090-3801</issn><issn>1532-2149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kElOxDAQRS0EYpY4AfKSTaA8ZDA71GIUAhawjhynIgxJHGKnm95xBM7ISUjTDCs2VaVfT79Kn5A9BocMgB_hU3fIEiVWyCaLBY84k2p1nEFBJDJgG2TL-ycAkCmIdbIhBEtBZekmmU1cW9pgXYsl7bRtaePKodYLheqqQhM8DY9Ib_jRHafGNV2Nr7QYAm1dWG4YnekpHtMT2tl6FH0Yyjmd2fBIa-2x_3h7x6l7XhxwAdtgde13yFo1Ntz97tvk4ez0fnIRXd-eX05OriMjOBOR5oobo40EM36sY5YlsTZxBkIqLXWqwFQGWRFXSSxkWSgoDBNFlUGaSFmh2CYHS9-udy8D-pA31husa92iG3zOZaySsUDyh5reed9jlXe9bXQ_zxnki5jzMeZ8EfOI7n-7DkWD5S_4k-sIREtgZmuc_2uUn17dfRl-AiFkh3o</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Squintani, Giovanna</creator><creator>Rasera, Andrea</creator><creator>Segatti, Alessia</creator><creator>Concon, Elisa</creator><creator>Bonetti, Bruno</creator><creator>Valeriani, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Tinazzi, Michele</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Conditioned pain modulation affects the N2/P2 complex but not the N1 wave: A pilot study with laser‐evoked potentials</title><author>Squintani, Giovanna ; Rasera, Andrea ; Segatti, Alessia ; Concon, Elisa ; Bonetti, Bruno ; Valeriani, Massimiliano ; Tinazzi, Michele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3213-a292ccac40c170a51865ac580349a4a790cfce1b5f6534db90bc13bf807644fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser-Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Squintani, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasera, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segatti, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concon, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonetti, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valeriani, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinazzi, Michele</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Squintani, Giovanna</au><au>Rasera, Andrea</au><au>Segatti, Alessia</au><au>Concon, Elisa</au><au>Bonetti, Bruno</au><au>Valeriani, Massimiliano</au><au>Tinazzi, Michele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditioned pain modulation affects the N2/P2 complex but not the N1 wave: A pilot study with laser‐evoked potentials</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>550-557</pages><issn>1090-3801</issn><eissn>1532-2149</eissn><abstract>Background The ‘pain‐inhibits‐pain’ effect stems from neurophysiological mechanisms involving endogenous modulatory systems termed diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) or conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Laser‐evoked potentials (LEPs) components, the N2/P2 complex, and the N1 wave, reflect the medial and lateral pain pathway, respectively: anatomically, the lateral thalamic nuclei (LT) project mainly to the somatosensory cortex (N1 generator), while the medial thalamic nuclei (MT) are bound to the limbic cortices (N2/P2 generators). Methods We applied a CPM protocol in which the test stimulus was laser stimulation and the conditioning stimulus was a cold pressor test. LEPs recordings were obtained from 15 healthy subjects in three different conditions: baseline, during heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) and post‐HNCS. Results We observed a significant reduction in N2/P2 amplitude during HNCS and a return to pre‐test amplitude post‐HNCS, whereas the N1 wave remained unchanged during and post‐HNCS. Conclusions Our results indicate that CPM affects only the medial pain system. The spinothalamic tract (STT) transmits to both the LT and the MT, while the spinoreticulothalamic (SRT) projects only to the MT. The reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and the absence of change in the N1 wave suggest that DNIC inhibition on the dorsal horn neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, while the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved. The N1 wave can be a reliable neurophysiological parameter for assessment of STT function in clinical practice, as it does not seem to be influenced by CPM. Significance No reports have described the effect of DNIC on lateral and medial pain pathways. We studied the N1 wave and the N2/P2 complex to detect changes during a CPM protocol. We found a reduction in the amplitude of the N2/P2 complex and no change in the N1 wave. This suggests that the DNIC inhibitory effect on dorsal horns neurons affects only pain transmission via the SRT, whereas the neurons that give rise to the STT are not involved.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33170987</pmid><doi>10.1002/ejp.1693</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-3801
ispartof European journal of pain, 2021-03, Vol.25 (3), p.550-557
issn 1090-3801
1532-2149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2459624506
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control
Evoked Potentials
Humans
Laser-Evoked Potentials
Pain
Pilot Projects
title Conditioned pain modulation affects the N2/P2 complex but not the N1 wave: A pilot study with laser‐evoked potentials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditioned%20pain%20modulation%20affects%20the%20N2/P2%20complex%20but%20not%20the%20N1%20wave:%20A%20pilot%20study%20with%20laser%E2%80%90evoked%20potentials&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Squintani,%20Giovanna&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=550-557&rft.issn=1090-3801&rft.eissn=1532-2149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ejp.1693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2459624506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2459624506&rft_id=info:pmid/33170987&rfr_iscdi=true