Influenza vaccination: A qualitative study of practice level barriers from medical practitioners caring for children with special risk medical conditions
Understanding the influenza vaccination practices of general practitioners (GP) and paediatric hospital specialists caring for children with special risk medical conditions (SRMC) is imperative for designing interventions to improve uptake. This study aimed to identify the vaccination decision makin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2020-11, Vol.38 (49), p.7806-7814 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7814 |
---|---|
container_issue | 49 |
container_start_page | 7806 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Tuckerman, Jane L Kaufman, Jessica Danchin, Margie Marshall, Helen S |
description | Understanding the influenza vaccination practices of general practitioners (GP) and paediatric hospital specialists caring for children with special risk medical conditions (SRMC) is imperative for designing interventions to improve uptake. This study aimed to identify the vaccination decision making, provider practices and perceived barriers and facilitators to recommending or delivering influenza vaccine for children with SRMCs at the tertiary and primary care levels.
Nominated GPs and hospital specialists from a single tertiary hospital were interviewed to explore influenza vaccination practices and challenges for children with confirmed SRMCs. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to inductively code these data. Resulting themes were mapped across the COM-B ('capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour') theoretical framework to understanding barriers and potential interventions.
Twenty-six medical practitioners (21 GPs and 5 hospital specialists) completed semi-structured interviews. Barriers, and facilitators for influenza vaccine recommendation (the intended behaviour) were thematically grouped. Opportunity themes included structural barriers (e.g. limited use of systems and processes to support the identification of children with SRMCs); recommendation as standard practice; vaccination inconvenience; lack of communication and educational resources; social acceptance and normalisation; and media messaging. Capability themes included provider communication with parents; knowledge of influenza vaccine recommendations; and professional boundaries to implement the recommendation. Themes in the Motivation category included provider clinical prioritisation and responsibility towards providing a recommendation.
The main barriers to influenza recommendation raised by our study participants were structural. These included lack of processes to identify children with SRMCs, limited use of reminder systems and unclear delineation of role responsibility between hospital specialists and GPs. An important driver that emerged was GPs’ responsibility for providing a recommendation. To increase influenza vaccine coverage for children with SRMCs, consideration should be given to addressing practice level structural barriers and improving collaboration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2458960448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X2031313X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2458960448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-d835d6ac4cceed3ebfdcb3b90d2cdd16b17366696e9fbc568a36da88163b3e5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oI2hI3LipFooqmnJjJhN_JpnEjSbuCFxuObQ09EBVm_FNfFspu52FG1c3XL5zIOcQ8pyzNWdcvt6uDwbAR1y3rF126zoekBVXG9G0PVcPyYq1sms6zr6ekSelbBljveDDY3ImBJedYmJFfl3FMcwYfxp69DOTT_ENvaC3swl-qscD0jLN7o6mke6zgckD0oAHDNSanD3mQsecdnSHzoMJJ2jxWa7AZB-_0TFlCjc-uIyR_vDTDS17BF_x7Mv3ey2k6P5Iy1PyaDSh4LPTPCdf3r_7fPmxuf704ery4roBMYipcUr0ThroABCdQDs6sMIOzLXgHJeWb4SUcpA4jBZ6qYyQzijFpbACeyvOyauj7z6n2xnLpHe-AIZgIqa56Lbr1SBZ16mKvvwH3aY5x_q7hdr0Axs2slL9kYKcSsk46n32O5PvNGd66U5v9ak7vXS3rOuouhcn99nWOO5Vf8uqwNsjgDWOQ81dF_AYoUaXESbtkv_PE78BakexlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2457590976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influenza vaccination: A qualitative study of practice level barriers from medical practitioners caring for children with special risk medical conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tuckerman, Jane L ; Kaufman, Jessica ; Danchin, Margie ; Marshall, Helen S</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuckerman, Jane L ; Kaufman, Jessica ; Danchin, Margie ; Marshall, Helen S</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the influenza vaccination practices of general practitioners (GP) and paediatric hospital specialists caring for children with special risk medical conditions (SRMC) is imperative for designing interventions to improve uptake. This study aimed to identify the vaccination decision making, provider practices and perceived barriers and facilitators to recommending or delivering influenza vaccine for children with SRMCs at the tertiary and primary care levels.
Nominated GPs and hospital specialists from a single tertiary hospital were interviewed to explore influenza vaccination practices and challenges for children with confirmed SRMCs. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to inductively code these data. Resulting themes were mapped across the COM-B ('capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour') theoretical framework to understanding barriers and potential interventions.
Twenty-six medical practitioners (21 GPs and 5 hospital specialists) completed semi-structured interviews. Barriers, and facilitators for influenza vaccine recommendation (the intended behaviour) were thematically grouped. Opportunity themes included structural barriers (e.g. limited use of systems and processes to support the identification of children with SRMCs); recommendation as standard practice; vaccination inconvenience; lack of communication and educational resources; social acceptance and normalisation; and media messaging. Capability themes included provider communication with parents; knowledge of influenza vaccine recommendations; and professional boundaries to implement the recommendation. Themes in the Motivation category included provider clinical prioritisation and responsibility towards providing a recommendation.
The main barriers to influenza recommendation raised by our study participants were structural. These included lack of processes to identify children with SRMCs, limited use of reminder systems and unclear delineation of role responsibility between hospital specialists and GPs. An important driver that emerged was GPs’ responsibility for providing a recommendation. To increase influenza vaccine coverage for children with SRMCs, consideration should be given to addressing practice level structural barriers and improving collaboration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33164803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Child ; Children ; Chronic medical conditions ; Clinical decision making ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Drug delivery systems ; Families & family life ; General Practitioners ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunisation ; Immunization ; Infectious diseases ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines ; Influenza, Human - prevention & control ; Intervention ; Interviews ; Motivation ; Parents & parenting ; Pediatrics ; Qualitative Research ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2020-11, Vol.38 (49), p.7806-7814</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 17, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-d835d6ac4cceed3ebfdcb3b90d2cdd16b17366696e9fbc568a36da88163b3e5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-d835d6ac4cceed3ebfdcb3b90d2cdd16b17366696e9fbc568a36da88163b3e5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5139-4183</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2031313X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33164803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuckerman, Jane L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danchin, Margie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Helen S</creatorcontrib><title>Influenza vaccination: A qualitative study of practice level barriers from medical practitioners caring for children with special risk medical conditions</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Understanding the influenza vaccination practices of general practitioners (GP) and paediatric hospital specialists caring for children with special risk medical conditions (SRMC) is imperative for designing interventions to improve uptake. This study aimed to identify the vaccination decision making, provider practices and perceived barriers and facilitators to recommending or delivering influenza vaccine for children with SRMCs at the tertiary and primary care levels.
Nominated GPs and hospital specialists from a single tertiary hospital were interviewed to explore influenza vaccination practices and challenges for children with confirmed SRMCs. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to inductively code these data. Resulting themes were mapped across the COM-B ('capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour') theoretical framework to understanding barriers and potential interventions.
Twenty-six medical practitioners (21 GPs and 5 hospital specialists) completed semi-structured interviews. Barriers, and facilitators for influenza vaccine recommendation (the intended behaviour) were thematically grouped. Opportunity themes included structural barriers (e.g. limited use of systems and processes to support the identification of children with SRMCs); recommendation as standard practice; vaccination inconvenience; lack of communication and educational resources; social acceptance and normalisation; and media messaging. Capability themes included provider communication with parents; knowledge of influenza vaccine recommendations; and professional boundaries to implement the recommendation. Themes in the Motivation category included provider clinical prioritisation and responsibility towards providing a recommendation.
The main barriers to influenza recommendation raised by our study participants were structural. These included lack of processes to identify children with SRMCs, limited use of reminder systems and unclear delineation of role responsibility between hospital specialists and GPs. An important driver that emerged was GPs’ responsibility for providing a recommendation. To increase influenza vaccine coverage for children with SRMCs, consideration should be given to addressing practice level structural barriers and improving collaboration.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Chronic medical conditions</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>General Practitioners</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunisation</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oI2hI3LipFooqmnJjJhN_JpnEjSbuCFxuObQ09EBVm_FNfFspu52FG1c3XL5zIOcQ8pyzNWdcvt6uDwbAR1y3rF126zoekBVXG9G0PVcPyYq1sms6zr6ekSelbBljveDDY3ImBJedYmJFfl3FMcwYfxp69DOTT_ENvaC3swl-qscD0jLN7o6mke6zgckD0oAHDNSanD3mQsecdnSHzoMJJ2jxWa7AZB-_0TFlCjc-uIyR_vDTDS17BF_x7Mv3ey2k6P5Iy1PyaDSh4LPTPCdf3r_7fPmxuf704ery4roBMYipcUr0ThroABCdQDs6sMIOzLXgHJeWb4SUcpA4jBZ6qYyQzijFpbACeyvOyauj7z6n2xnLpHe-AIZgIqa56Lbr1SBZ16mKvvwH3aY5x_q7hdr0Axs2slL9kYKcSsk46n32O5PvNGd66U5v9ak7vXS3rOuouhcn99nWOO5Vf8uqwNsjgDWOQ81dF_AYoUaXESbtkv_PE78BakexlA</recordid><startdate>20201117</startdate><enddate>20201117</enddate><creator>Tuckerman, Jane L</creator><creator>Kaufman, Jessica</creator><creator>Danchin, Margie</creator><creator>Marshall, Helen S</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-4183</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201117</creationdate><title>Influenza vaccination: A qualitative study of practice level barriers from medical practitioners caring for children with special risk medical conditions</title><author>Tuckerman, Jane L ; Kaufman, Jessica ; Danchin, Margie ; Marshall, Helen S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-d835d6ac4cceed3ebfdcb3b90d2cdd16b17366696e9fbc568a36da88163b3e5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Chronic medical conditions</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>General Practitioners</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunisation</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuckerman, Jane L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danchin, Margie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Helen S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuckerman, Jane L</au><au>Kaufman, Jessica</au><au>Danchin, Margie</au><au>Marshall, Helen S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influenza vaccination: A qualitative study of practice level barriers from medical practitioners caring for children with special risk medical conditions</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2020-11-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>49</issue><spage>7806</spage><epage>7814</epage><pages>7806-7814</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Understanding the influenza vaccination practices of general practitioners (GP) and paediatric hospital specialists caring for children with special risk medical conditions (SRMC) is imperative for designing interventions to improve uptake. This study aimed to identify the vaccination decision making, provider practices and perceived barriers and facilitators to recommending or delivering influenza vaccine for children with SRMCs at the tertiary and primary care levels.
Nominated GPs and hospital specialists from a single tertiary hospital were interviewed to explore influenza vaccination practices and challenges for children with confirmed SRMCs. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to inductively code these data. Resulting themes were mapped across the COM-B ('capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour') theoretical framework to understanding barriers and potential interventions.
Twenty-six medical practitioners (21 GPs and 5 hospital specialists) completed semi-structured interviews. Barriers, and facilitators for influenza vaccine recommendation (the intended behaviour) were thematically grouped. Opportunity themes included structural barriers (e.g. limited use of systems and processes to support the identification of children with SRMCs); recommendation as standard practice; vaccination inconvenience; lack of communication and educational resources; social acceptance and normalisation; and media messaging. Capability themes included provider communication with parents; knowledge of influenza vaccine recommendations; and professional boundaries to implement the recommendation. Themes in the Motivation category included provider clinical prioritisation and responsibility towards providing a recommendation.
The main barriers to influenza recommendation raised by our study participants were structural. These included lack of processes to identify children with SRMCs, limited use of reminder systems and unclear delineation of role responsibility between hospital specialists and GPs. An important driver that emerged was GPs’ responsibility for providing a recommendation. To increase influenza vaccine coverage for children with SRMCs, consideration should be given to addressing practice level structural barriers and improving collaboration.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33164803</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.020</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-4183</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2020-11, Vol.38 (49), p.7806-7814 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2458960448 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Child Children Chronic medical conditions Clinical decision making Data collection Decision making Drug delivery systems Families & family life General Practitioners Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Hospitals Humans Immunisation Immunization Infectious diseases Influenza Influenza Vaccines Influenza, Human - prevention & control Intervention Interviews Motivation Parents & parenting Pediatrics Qualitative Research Vaccination Vaccines Verbal communication |
title | Influenza vaccination: A qualitative study of practice level barriers from medical practitioners caring for children with special risk medical conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A19%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influenza%20vaccination:%20A%20qualitative%20study%20of%20practice%20level%20barriers%20from%20medical%20practitioners%20caring%20for%20children%20with%20special%20risk%20medical%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Tuckerman,%20Jane%20L&rft.date=2020-11-17&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=49&rft.spage=7806&rft.epage=7814&rft.pages=7806-7814&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2458960448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2457590976&rft_id=info:pmid/33164803&rft_els_id=S0264410X2031313X&rfr_iscdi=true |