Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?

Introduction and objectives New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2022, Vol.142 (1), p.145-155
Hauptverfasser: Luque Pérez, Rafael, Checa Betegón, Pablo, Galán-Olleros, María, Arvinius, Camila, Valle-Cruz, Jose, Marco, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155
container_issue 1
container_start_page 145
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 142
creator Luque Pérez, Rafael
Checa Betegón, Pablo
Galán-Olleros, María
Arvinius, Camila
Valle-Cruz, Jose
Marco, Fernando
description Introduction and objectives New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengths of nails. Materials and methods Retrospective study including 123 pertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures 31A2 treated with Gamma3 nail ® between January/2017 and January/2019. 19 patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 104 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Two groups, Long Dynamic Gamma3 Nail (LGN) and Short Static Gamma3 Nail (SGN), with 52 patients each were compared. Mean age was 81 years (range 50–99), being 78% female. Preoperative variables included: age, medical comorbidities, mobility, anesthetic risk, associated fractures, hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Postoperatively, functional and radiological results, quality of life, hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration, transfusion requirements, mobility, and pain were evaluated. Additionally, perioperative complications were also analyzed, such as malunion, non-union, infection rates, cut-outs, and peri-implant fractures. Results A correct radiological fracture reduction was obtained in 73% of the cases (73% SGN/74% LGN). Two patients in LGN group had intraoperative complications (greater trochanter fractures). 38% of the patients with LGN presented nail tip impaction upon the distal anterior femoral cortex, associated with anterior knee pain. Blood loss and operative time was statistically different between groups. Despite the previous, no differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life were found. Conclusions The present study comparing two lengths of the Gamma3 Nail in 31A2 fractures showed no overall differences in clinical and radiological outcomes, and complication rates. However, the use of LGN was associated with a statistically significant higher blood loss and operative time, and a tendency for increased need for transfusion, and anterior knee pain and reoperation rate. Therefore, we recommend the use of locked SGN in the treatment of 31A2 fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457671840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457671840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c66c21fa10d5194773f11f55291825e815aeb36603399c74218e3e494a36d6823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLlOxDAQQC0EYpfjByhQJBqawIzvUIAQ4pIQNFBbXu9kCcomi50U8PVkWQ6JgsrFPD97HmN7CEcIYI4TgASeA4cchNY2hzU2RilkLgrU62wMhdC5BYUjtpXSCwByW8AmGwmBUhvFx-z03ld11cyyvkmdn9SULSh2sQ3PvukoViErow9dHymdZNOWUpaqd8rmvhum6WyHbZS-TrT7dW6zp6vLx4ub_O7h-vbi_C4PwqguD1oHjqVHmCospDGiRCyV4gVarsii8jQZVgAhiiIYydGSIFlIL_RUWy622eHKu4jta0-pc_MqBapr31DbJ8elMtqglTCgB3_Ql7aPzfA7xzVqY8GYpZCvqBDblCKVbhGruY9vDsEt67pVXTfUdZ913VK9_6XuJ3Oa_lz5zjkAYgWkYdTMKP6-_Y_2A9HEglw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616780772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Luque Pérez, Rafael ; Checa Betegón, Pablo ; Galán-Olleros, María ; Arvinius, Camila ; Valle-Cruz, Jose ; Marco, Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Luque Pérez, Rafael ; Checa Betegón, Pablo ; Galán-Olleros, María ; Arvinius, Camila ; Valle-Cruz, Jose ; Marco, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and objectives New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengths of nails. Materials and methods Retrospective study including 123 pertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures 31A2 treated with Gamma3 nail ® between January/2017 and January/2019. 19 patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 104 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Two groups, Long Dynamic Gamma3 Nail (LGN) and Short Static Gamma3 Nail (SGN), with 52 patients each were compared. Mean age was 81 years (range 50–99), being 78% female. Preoperative variables included: age, medical comorbidities, mobility, anesthetic risk, associated fractures, hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Postoperatively, functional and radiological results, quality of life, hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration, transfusion requirements, mobility, and pain were evaluated. Additionally, perioperative complications were also analyzed, such as malunion, non-union, infection rates, cut-outs, and peri-implant fractures. Results A correct radiological fracture reduction was obtained in 73% of the cases (73% SGN/74% LGN). Two patients in LGN group had intraoperative complications (greater trochanter fractures). 38% of the patients with LGN presented nail tip impaction upon the distal anterior femoral cortex, associated with anterior knee pain. Blood loss and operative time was statistically different between groups. Despite the previous, no differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life were found. Conclusions The present study comparing two lengths of the Gamma3 Nail in 31A2 fractures showed no overall differences in clinical and radiological outcomes, and complication rates. However, the use of LGN was associated with a statistically significant higher blood loss and operative time, and a tendency for increased need for transfusion, and anterior knee pain and reoperation rate. Therefore, we recommend the use of locked SGN in the treatment of 31A2 fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33146752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Nails ; Female ; Femoral Fractures ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects ; Hemoglobin ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Pain ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Trauma Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022, Vol.142 (1), p.145-155</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c66c21fa10d5194773f11f55291825e815aeb36603399c74218e3e494a36d6823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c66c21fa10d5194773f11f55291825e815aeb36603399c74218e3e494a36d6823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8658-2600</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luque Pérez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checa Betegón, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galán-Olleros, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvinius, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle-Cruz, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marco, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction and objectives New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengths of nails. Materials and methods Retrospective study including 123 pertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures 31A2 treated with Gamma3 nail ® between January/2017 and January/2019. 19 patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 104 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Two groups, Long Dynamic Gamma3 Nail (LGN) and Short Static Gamma3 Nail (SGN), with 52 patients each were compared. Mean age was 81 years (range 50–99), being 78% female. Preoperative variables included: age, medical comorbidities, mobility, anesthetic risk, associated fractures, hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Postoperatively, functional and radiological results, quality of life, hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration, transfusion requirements, mobility, and pain were evaluated. Additionally, perioperative complications were also analyzed, such as malunion, non-union, infection rates, cut-outs, and peri-implant fractures. Results A correct radiological fracture reduction was obtained in 73% of the cases (73% SGN/74% LGN). Two patients in LGN group had intraoperative complications (greater trochanter fractures). 38% of the patients with LGN presented nail tip impaction upon the distal anterior femoral cortex, associated with anterior knee pain. Blood loss and operative time was statistically different between groups. Despite the previous, no differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life were found. Conclusions The present study comparing two lengths of the Gamma3 Nail in 31A2 fractures showed no overall differences in clinical and radiological outcomes, and complication rates. However, the use of LGN was associated with a statistically significant higher blood loss and operative time, and a tendency for increased need for transfusion, and anterior knee pain and reoperation rate. Therefore, we recommend the use of locked SGN in the treatment of 31A2 fractures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Trauma Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLlOxDAQQC0EYpfjByhQJBqawIzvUIAQ4pIQNFBbXu9kCcomi50U8PVkWQ6JgsrFPD97HmN7CEcIYI4TgASeA4cchNY2hzU2RilkLgrU62wMhdC5BYUjtpXSCwByW8AmGwmBUhvFx-z03ld11cyyvkmdn9SULSh2sQ3PvukoViErow9dHymdZNOWUpaqd8rmvhum6WyHbZS-TrT7dW6zp6vLx4ub_O7h-vbi_C4PwqguD1oHjqVHmCospDGiRCyV4gVarsii8jQZVgAhiiIYydGSIFlIL_RUWy622eHKu4jta0-pc_MqBapr31DbJ8elMtqglTCgB3_Ql7aPzfA7xzVqY8GYpZCvqBDblCKVbhGruY9vDsEt67pVXTfUdZ913VK9_6XuJ3Oa_lz5zjkAYgWkYdTMKP6-_Y_2A9HEglw</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Luque Pérez, Rafael</creator><creator>Checa Betegón, Pablo</creator><creator>Galán-Olleros, María</creator><creator>Arvinius, Camila</creator><creator>Valle-Cruz, Jose</creator><creator>Marco, Fernando</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-2600</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?</title><author>Luque Pérez, Rafael ; Checa Betegón, Pablo ; Galán-Olleros, María ; Arvinius, Camila ; Valle-Cruz, Jose ; Marco, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c66c21fa10d5194773f11f55291825e815aeb36603399c74218e3e494a36d6823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Trauma Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luque Pérez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checa Betegón, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galán-Olleros, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvinius, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle-Cruz, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marco, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luque Pérez, Rafael</au><au>Checa Betegón, Pablo</au><au>Galán-Olleros, María</au><au>Arvinius, Camila</au><au>Valle-Cruz, Jose</au><au>Marco, Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>145-155</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction and objectives New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengths of nails. Materials and methods Retrospective study including 123 pertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures 31A2 treated with Gamma3 nail ® between January/2017 and January/2019. 19 patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 104 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Two groups, Long Dynamic Gamma3 Nail (LGN) and Short Static Gamma3 Nail (SGN), with 52 patients each were compared. Mean age was 81 years (range 50–99), being 78% female. Preoperative variables included: age, medical comorbidities, mobility, anesthetic risk, associated fractures, hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Postoperatively, functional and radiological results, quality of life, hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration, transfusion requirements, mobility, and pain were evaluated. Additionally, perioperative complications were also analyzed, such as malunion, non-union, infection rates, cut-outs, and peri-implant fractures. Results A correct radiological fracture reduction was obtained in 73% of the cases (73% SGN/74% LGN). Two patients in LGN group had intraoperative complications (greater trochanter fractures). 38% of the patients with LGN presented nail tip impaction upon the distal anterior femoral cortex, associated with anterior knee pain. Blood loss and operative time was statistically different between groups. Despite the previous, no differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life were found. Conclusions The present study comparing two lengths of the Gamma3 Nail in 31A2 fractures showed no overall differences in clinical and radiological outcomes, and complication rates. However, the use of LGN was associated with a statistically significant higher blood loss and operative time, and a tendency for increased need for transfusion, and anterior knee pain and reoperation rate. Therefore, we recommend the use of locked SGN in the treatment of 31A2 fractures.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33146752</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-2600</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-8051
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022, Vol.142 (1), p.145-155
issn 0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457671840
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Nails
Female
Femoral Fractures
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects
Hemoglobin
Hip Fractures - surgery
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Pain
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Trauma Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T04%3A35%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nailing%20unstable%20pertrochanteric%20fractures:%20does%20size%20matters?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Luque%20P%C3%A9rez,%20Rafael&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=145-155&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2457671840%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616780772&rft_id=info:pmid/33146752&rfr_iscdi=true