Comparison of virtual computed tomography enteroscopy using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy in patients with small-bowel tuberculosis

Objective Comparison of virtual CT enteroscopy (VCTE) using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) in small-bowel tuberculosis (SBTB). Methods This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected to have SBTB. VCTE and SBE were performed on the same...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2021-05, Vol.31 (5), p.3297-3305
Hauptverfasser: Kalra, Naveen, Gulati, Ajay, Gupta, Pankaj, Dhaka, Narendra, Sehgal, Shaurya, Singh, Shravya, Gupta, Vikas, Sharma, Kusum, Vaiphei, Kim, Rajwanshi, Arvind, Sinha, Saroj Kant, Kochhar, Rakesh, Khandelwal, Niranjan, Chawla, Yogesh K, Sandhu, Manavjit Singh, Bettmann, Michael A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3305
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3297
container_title European radiology
container_volume 31
creator Kalra, Naveen
Gulati, Ajay
Gupta, Pankaj
Dhaka, Narendra
Sehgal, Shaurya
Singh, Shravya
Gupta, Vikas
Sharma, Kusum
Vaiphei, Kim
Rajwanshi, Arvind
Sinha, Saroj Kant
Kochhar, Rakesh
Khandelwal, Niranjan
Chawla, Yogesh K
Sandhu, Manavjit Singh
Bettmann, Michael A
description Objective Comparison of virtual CT enteroscopy (VCTE) using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) in small-bowel tuberculosis (SBTB). Methods This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected to have SBTB. VCTE and SBE were performed on the same day and evaluated by independent radiologists. CE was performed within 2 weeks. VCTE was performed following insufflation of carbon dioxide via catheters in the jejunum and anorectum. A contrast-enhanced CT was followed by a delayed non-contrast CT. Image processing was done using virtual colonoscopy software. Findings on VCTE, SBE, and CE were compared. The final diagnosis of SBTB was based on either histopathological or cytological findings, response to antitubercular treatment, or a combination of these. Results Of the 55 patients in whom VCTE was performed, complete data was available in 52 patients. A final diagnosis of SBTB was established in 37 patients. All patients had VCTE and SBE. CE was performed in 34 patients. Adequate luminal distension was achieved in all patients with SBE and 35 patients with VCTE. SBE showed more strictures in jejunum (10.8%) and ileum (75.7%) compared with VCTE (jejunum, 8.1%, and ileum, 64.9%) and CE (jejunum, 5.9%, and ileum, 61.8%). However, difference was not statistically significant. VCTE revealed a greater length of strictures in both the jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Conclusion VCTE allows adequate evaluation of the bowel in most patients with SBTB. It allows detection of greater length of abnormality in jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Key Points • The use of VCTE using CO 2 bowel insufflation in patients with SBTB should be considered. • VCTE allows detection of a greater length of abnormality in the jejunum and ileum.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-020-07410-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457671782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2512160276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-42163d933c82c6aaa10c1a8377e6eef40a0f8866cd30bf47ebdb4e81b8baec3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEURoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZN6U0lXalaSjOOwoCbcR3yc6snQ6pSJhXHfiMf08x0q6DgIgRyz_kS8hHyksFbBiDfZQDOoYG2LikYNPIR2TDB24ZBLx6TDQy8b-QwiDPyLOdbABiYkE_JGedMdHLgG_JjF6dFJ5_jTONIv_m0Fh2oradlRUfXOMV90svNgeK8YorZxuVAS_bznlqdTPWcj9-9Q3rn1xuaJx1CY-IdhpNhwyH7TPXsqrDkErAO3CnIz3TRq69k_tdfi8FkS4jVf06ejDpkfHHaz8mXDxfXu4_N1efLT7v3V43lcrs2omUddwPntm9tp7VmYJnuuZTYIY4CNIx933XWcTCjkGicEdgz0xuNljt-Tt4cc5cUvxbMq5p8thiCnjGWrFqxlZ1ksm8r-vov9DaWNNfXqXbL6kOglV2l2iNl6-flhKNakp90OigG6r5HdexR1R7VQ49KVunVKbqYCd1v5VdxFeBHINfRvMf05-7_xP4ENUOuLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2512160276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of virtual computed tomography enteroscopy using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy in patients with small-bowel tuberculosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kalra, Naveen ; Gulati, Ajay ; Gupta, Pankaj ; Dhaka, Narendra ; Sehgal, Shaurya ; Singh, Shravya ; Gupta, Vikas ; Sharma, Kusum ; Vaiphei, Kim ; Rajwanshi, Arvind ; Sinha, Saroj Kant ; Kochhar, Rakesh ; Khandelwal, Niranjan ; Chawla, Yogesh K ; Sandhu, Manavjit Singh ; Bettmann, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Naveen ; Gulati, Ajay ; Gupta, Pankaj ; Dhaka, Narendra ; Sehgal, Shaurya ; Singh, Shravya ; Gupta, Vikas ; Sharma, Kusum ; Vaiphei, Kim ; Rajwanshi, Arvind ; Sinha, Saroj Kant ; Kochhar, Rakesh ; Khandelwal, Niranjan ; Chawla, Yogesh K ; Sandhu, Manavjit Singh ; Bettmann, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Comparison of virtual CT enteroscopy (VCTE) using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) in small-bowel tuberculosis (SBTB). Methods This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected to have SBTB. VCTE and SBE were performed on the same day and evaluated by independent radiologists. CE was performed within 2 weeks. VCTE was performed following insufflation of carbon dioxide via catheters in the jejunum and anorectum. A contrast-enhanced CT was followed by a delayed non-contrast CT. Image processing was done using virtual colonoscopy software. Findings on VCTE, SBE, and CE were compared. The final diagnosis of SBTB was based on either histopathological or cytological findings, response to antitubercular treatment, or a combination of these. Results Of the 55 patients in whom VCTE was performed, complete data was available in 52 patients. A final diagnosis of SBTB was established in 37 patients. All patients had VCTE and SBE. CE was performed in 34 patients. Adequate luminal distension was achieved in all patients with SBE and 35 patients with VCTE. SBE showed more strictures in jejunum (10.8%) and ileum (75.7%) compared with VCTE (jejunum, 8.1%, and ileum, 64.9%) and CE (jejunum, 5.9%, and ileum, 61.8%). However, difference was not statistically significant. VCTE revealed a greater length of strictures in both the jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Conclusion VCTE allows adequate evaluation of the bowel in most patients with SBTB. It allows detection of greater length of abnormality in jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Key Points • The use of VCTE using CO 2 bowel insufflation in patients with SBTB should be considered. • VCTE allows detection of a greater length of abnormality in the jejunum and ileum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07410-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33146793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Capsule Endoscopy ; Carbon Dioxide ; Catheters ; Colon ; Computed tomography ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Distension ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastrointestinal ; Humans ; Ileum ; Image contrast ; Image enhancement ; Image processing ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Jejunum ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Small intestine ; Statistical analysis ; Stricture ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tuberculosis ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2021-05, Vol.31 (5), p.3297-3305</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2020</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-42163d933c82c6aaa10c1a8377e6eef40a0f8866cd30bf47ebdb4e81b8baec3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-42163d933c82c6aaa10c1a8377e6eef40a0f8866cd30bf47ebdb4e81b8baec3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-020-07410-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-020-07410-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Naveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaka, Narendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehgal, Shaurya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Shravya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Kusum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaiphei, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwanshi, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Saroj Kant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochhar, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khandelwal, Niranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chawla, Yogesh K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Manavjit Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettmann, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of virtual computed tomography enteroscopy using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy in patients with small-bowel tuberculosis</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective Comparison of virtual CT enteroscopy (VCTE) using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) in small-bowel tuberculosis (SBTB). Methods This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected to have SBTB. VCTE and SBE were performed on the same day and evaluated by independent radiologists. CE was performed within 2 weeks. VCTE was performed following insufflation of carbon dioxide via catheters in the jejunum and anorectum. A contrast-enhanced CT was followed by a delayed non-contrast CT. Image processing was done using virtual colonoscopy software. Findings on VCTE, SBE, and CE were compared. The final diagnosis of SBTB was based on either histopathological or cytological findings, response to antitubercular treatment, or a combination of these. Results Of the 55 patients in whom VCTE was performed, complete data was available in 52 patients. A final diagnosis of SBTB was established in 37 patients. All patients had VCTE and SBE. CE was performed in 34 patients. Adequate luminal distension was achieved in all patients with SBE and 35 patients with VCTE. SBE showed more strictures in jejunum (10.8%) and ileum (75.7%) compared with VCTE (jejunum, 8.1%, and ileum, 64.9%) and CE (jejunum, 5.9%, and ileum, 61.8%). However, difference was not statistically significant. VCTE revealed a greater length of strictures in both the jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Conclusion VCTE allows adequate evaluation of the bowel in most patients with SBTB. It allows detection of greater length of abnormality in jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Key Points • The use of VCTE using CO 2 bowel insufflation in patients with SBTB should be considered. • VCTE allows detection of a greater length of abnormality in the jejunum and ileum.</description><subject>Capsule Endoscopy</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Distension</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileum</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Jejunum</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Small intestine</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stricture</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEURoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZN6U0lXalaSjOOwoCbcR3yc6snQ6pSJhXHfiMf08x0q6DgIgRyz_kS8hHyksFbBiDfZQDOoYG2LikYNPIR2TDB24ZBLx6TDQy8b-QwiDPyLOdbABiYkE_JGedMdHLgG_JjF6dFJ5_jTONIv_m0Fh2oradlRUfXOMV90svNgeK8YorZxuVAS_bznlqdTPWcj9-9Q3rn1xuaJx1CY-IdhpNhwyH7TPXsqrDkErAO3CnIz3TRq69k_tdfi8FkS4jVf06ejDpkfHHaz8mXDxfXu4_N1efLT7v3V43lcrs2omUddwPntm9tp7VmYJnuuZTYIY4CNIx933XWcTCjkGicEdgz0xuNljt-Tt4cc5cUvxbMq5p8thiCnjGWrFqxlZ1ksm8r-vov9DaWNNfXqXbL6kOglV2l2iNl6-flhKNakp90OigG6r5HdexR1R7VQ49KVunVKbqYCd1v5VdxFeBHINfRvMf05-7_xP4ENUOuLw</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Kalra, Naveen</creator><creator>Gulati, Ajay</creator><creator>Gupta, Pankaj</creator><creator>Dhaka, Narendra</creator><creator>Sehgal, Shaurya</creator><creator>Singh, Shravya</creator><creator>Gupta, Vikas</creator><creator>Sharma, Kusum</creator><creator>Vaiphei, Kim</creator><creator>Rajwanshi, Arvind</creator><creator>Sinha, Saroj Kant</creator><creator>Kochhar, Rakesh</creator><creator>Khandelwal, Niranjan</creator><creator>Chawla, Yogesh K</creator><creator>Sandhu, Manavjit Singh</creator><creator>Bettmann, Michael A</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Comparison of virtual computed tomography enteroscopy using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy in patients with small-bowel tuberculosis</title><author>Kalra, Naveen ; Gulati, Ajay ; Gupta, Pankaj ; Dhaka, Narendra ; Sehgal, Shaurya ; Singh, Shravya ; Gupta, Vikas ; Sharma, Kusum ; Vaiphei, Kim ; Rajwanshi, Arvind ; Sinha, Saroj Kant ; Kochhar, Rakesh ; Khandelwal, Niranjan ; Chawla, Yogesh K ; Sandhu, Manavjit Singh ; Bettmann, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-42163d933c82c6aaa10c1a8377e6eef40a0f8866cd30bf47ebdb4e81b8baec3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Capsule Endoscopy</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Distension</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileum</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Jejunum</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Small intestine</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stricture</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Naveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaka, Narendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehgal, Shaurya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Shravya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Kusum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaiphei, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwanshi, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Saroj Kant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochhar, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khandelwal, Niranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chawla, Yogesh K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Manavjit Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettmann, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalra, Naveen</au><au>Gulati, Ajay</au><au>Gupta, Pankaj</au><au>Dhaka, Narendra</au><au>Sehgal, Shaurya</au><au>Singh, Shravya</au><au>Gupta, Vikas</au><au>Sharma, Kusum</au><au>Vaiphei, Kim</au><au>Rajwanshi, Arvind</au><au>Sinha, Saroj Kant</au><au>Kochhar, Rakesh</au><au>Khandelwal, Niranjan</au><au>Chawla, Yogesh K</au><au>Sandhu, Manavjit Singh</au><au>Bettmann, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of virtual computed tomography enteroscopy using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy in patients with small-bowel tuberculosis</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3297</spage><epage>3305</epage><pages>3297-3305</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objective Comparison of virtual CT enteroscopy (VCTE) using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) in small-bowel tuberculosis (SBTB). Methods This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected to have SBTB. VCTE and SBE were performed on the same day and evaluated by independent radiologists. CE was performed within 2 weeks. VCTE was performed following insufflation of carbon dioxide via catheters in the jejunum and anorectum. A contrast-enhanced CT was followed by a delayed non-contrast CT. Image processing was done using virtual colonoscopy software. Findings on VCTE, SBE, and CE were compared. The final diagnosis of SBTB was based on either histopathological or cytological findings, response to antitubercular treatment, or a combination of these. Results Of the 55 patients in whom VCTE was performed, complete data was available in 52 patients. A final diagnosis of SBTB was established in 37 patients. All patients had VCTE and SBE. CE was performed in 34 patients. Adequate luminal distension was achieved in all patients with SBE and 35 patients with VCTE. SBE showed more strictures in jejunum (10.8%) and ileum (75.7%) compared with VCTE (jejunum, 8.1%, and ileum, 64.9%) and CE (jejunum, 5.9%, and ileum, 61.8%). However, difference was not statistically significant. VCTE revealed a greater length of strictures in both the jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Conclusion VCTE allows adequate evaluation of the bowel in most patients with SBTB. It allows detection of greater length of abnormality in jejunum and ileum compared with SBE and CE. Key Points • The use of VCTE using CO 2 bowel insufflation in patients with SBTB should be considered. • VCTE allows detection of a greater length of abnormality in the jejunum and ileum.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33146793</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-020-07410-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2021-05, Vol.31 (5), p.3297-3305
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457671782
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Capsule Endoscopy
Carbon Dioxide
Catheters
Colon
Computed tomography
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Radiology
Distension
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Gastrointestinal
Humans
Ileum
Image contrast
Image enhancement
Image processing
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Jejunum
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Prospective Studies
Radiology
Small intestine
Statistical analysis
Stricture
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tuberculosis
Ultrasound
title Comparison of virtual computed tomography enteroscopy using carbon dioxide with small-bowel enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy in patients with small-bowel tuberculosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T10%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20virtual%20computed%20tomography%20enteroscopy%20using%20carbon%20dioxide%20with%20small-bowel%20enteroclysis%20and%20capsule%20endoscopy%20in%20patients%20with%20small-bowel%20tuberculosis&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Kalra,%20Naveen&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3297&rft.epage=3305&rft.pages=3297-3305&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-020-07410-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2512160276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2512160276&rft_id=info:pmid/33146793&rfr_iscdi=true