Rapid genome‐wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences

Genome‐wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post‐return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framewo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of genetic counseling 2021-04, Vol.30 (2), p.616-629
Hauptverfasser: Aldridge, Caitlin E., Osiovich, Horacio, (Hal) Siden, Harold, Elliott, Alison M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 629
container_issue 2
container_start_page 616
container_title Journal of genetic counseling
container_volume 30
creator Aldridge, Caitlin E.
Osiovich, Horacio
(Hal) Siden, Harold
Elliott, Alison M.
description Genome‐wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post‐return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis, to gain further insight into parents’ perceptions of the value and utility of GWS for their infant. We sought to explore whether parents’ perceptions differ if their child received a diagnosis or not, and whether their child is living or deceased. Semi‐structured, telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had rapid exome sequencing while in the neonatal intensive care unit at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Interviews addressed perceived benefits and harms of GWS and included an evaluation of decisional regret. Parents of 27 probands were approached and 14 (52%; 13 mothers and 1 father) participated in interviews. On average, 26 months had elapsed from the time of results to the interview. Six themes were identified. Firstly, parents had a positive regard for GWS. The results of GWS helped provide context for their child's admission to the NICU, and all parents experienced relief following receiving the results. A diagnosis by GWS enabled parents to picture the future, form connections with other parents, and coordinate their child's care. Lastly, some parents experienced discomfort with the concept of a genetic diagnosis, and interestingly felt lack of a genomic diagnosis indicated a reduced severity of their infant's condition. Decisional regret post‐results was found to be low. Our results highlight how parents cope with the results of GWS and suggest that a genetic counselor can have an important role in helping families understand and adjust to these results in the neonatal intensive care unit.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jgc4.1353
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456866680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509212263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-d9ed2148740156194114ec8c5c60bdb71f32e6a5168b655b0e192f6d58e0e5413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qqPyURV8AWeqmLAK-duwk7NCoUBBSpaqsLce5GXmUcYKdQNmVN-AZeZI6DHSBxMrH9ufje3QI-QLsCBjjx6ulzY9ASPGB7IAsRCZkVX1MmskqKwrGtslujCvGWFVK-ES2hQABkBc75OGXGVxDl-j7NT79fbxzDdKINxN66_ySOk8N9dh7M5ou7Ub00d0itSYgnbwbT-gpDTiGPg5ox_nqZjKdG82zxj9D14eke0_7lg7plZ-N0jkGl_7A-JlstaaLuP-y7pHrs--_Fz-yq5_nF4vTq8ymYCJrKmw45GWRM5AKqjzNj7a00ipWN3UBreCojARV1krKmiFUvFWNLJGhzEHskW8b3yH0KV4c9dpFi11nUrwpap5LVSqlSpbQr2_QVT8Fn6bTXLKKA-dKJOpwQ9kUPgZs9RDc2oR7DUzPvei5Fz33ktiDF8epXmPzn3wtIgHHG-DOdXj_vpO-PF_kz5b_ALpwmLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509212263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid genome‐wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Aldridge, Caitlin E. ; Osiovich, Horacio ; (Hal) Siden, Harold ; Elliott, Alison M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aldridge, Caitlin E. ; Osiovich, Horacio ; (Hal) Siden, Harold ; Elliott, Alison M. ; RAPIDOMICS Study ; GenCOUNSEL Study</creatorcontrib><description>Genome‐wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post‐return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis, to gain further insight into parents’ perceptions of the value and utility of GWS for their infant. We sought to explore whether parents’ perceptions differ if their child received a diagnosis or not, and whether their child is living or deceased. Semi‐structured, telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had rapid exome sequencing while in the neonatal intensive care unit at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Interviews addressed perceived benefits and harms of GWS and included an evaluation of decisional regret. Parents of 27 probands were approached and 14 (52%; 13 mothers and 1 father) participated in interviews. On average, 26 months had elapsed from the time of results to the interview. Six themes were identified. Firstly, parents had a positive regard for GWS. The results of GWS helped provide context for their child's admission to the NICU, and all parents experienced relief following receiving the results. A diagnosis by GWS enabled parents to picture the future, form connections with other parents, and coordinate their child's care. Lastly, some parents experienced discomfort with the concept of a genetic diagnosis, and interestingly felt lack of a genomic diagnosis indicated a reduced severity of their infant's condition. Decisional regret post‐results was found to be low. Our results highlight how parents cope with the results of GWS and suggest that a genetic counselor can have an important role in helping families understand and adjust to these results in the neonatal intensive care unit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1353</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33131147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Children ; decisional regret ; Diagnosis ; Discomfort ; Fathers ; Genetic counseling ; Genetic screening ; Genomes ; genome‐wide sequencing ; Genomics ; Hospitalization ; Infants ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Interviews ; lived experience ; Medical diagnosis ; Neonatal care ; Neonatal units ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Perceptions ; Qualitative research ; Regret ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of genetic counseling, 2021-04, Vol.30 (2), p.616-629</ispartof><rights>2020 National Society of Genetic Counselors</rights><rights>2020 National Society of Genetic Counselors.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 National Society of Genetic Counselors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-d9ed2148740156194114ec8c5c60bdb71f32e6a5168b655b0e192f6d58e0e5413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-d9ed2148740156194114ec8c5c60bdb71f32e6a5168b655b0e192f6d58e0e5413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8419-8912 ; 0000-0002-9896-1314 ; 0000-0001-6267-0657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjgc4.1353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjgc4.1353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aldridge, Caitlin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osiovich, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>(Hal) Siden, Harold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAPIDOMICS Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GenCOUNSEL Study</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid genome‐wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences</title><title>Journal of genetic counseling</title><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><description>Genome‐wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post‐return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis, to gain further insight into parents’ perceptions of the value and utility of GWS for their infant. We sought to explore whether parents’ perceptions differ if their child received a diagnosis or not, and whether their child is living or deceased. Semi‐structured, telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had rapid exome sequencing while in the neonatal intensive care unit at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Interviews addressed perceived benefits and harms of GWS and included an evaluation of decisional regret. Parents of 27 probands were approached and 14 (52%; 13 mothers and 1 father) participated in interviews. On average, 26 months had elapsed from the time of results to the interview. Six themes were identified. Firstly, parents had a positive regard for GWS. The results of GWS helped provide context for their child's admission to the NICU, and all parents experienced relief following receiving the results. A diagnosis by GWS enabled parents to picture the future, form connections with other parents, and coordinate their child's care. Lastly, some parents experienced discomfort with the concept of a genetic diagnosis, and interestingly felt lack of a genomic diagnosis indicated a reduced severity of their infant's condition. Decisional regret post‐results was found to be low. Our results highlight how parents cope with the results of GWS and suggest that a genetic counselor can have an important role in helping families understand and adjust to these results in the neonatal intensive care unit.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>decisional regret</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>genome‐wide sequencing</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>lived experience</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonatal units</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Regret</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1059-7700</issn><issn>1573-3599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qqPyURV8AWeqmLAK-duwk7NCoUBBSpaqsLce5GXmUcYKdQNmVN-AZeZI6DHSBxMrH9ufje3QI-QLsCBjjx6ulzY9ASPGB7IAsRCZkVX1MmskqKwrGtslujCvGWFVK-ES2hQABkBc75OGXGVxDl-j7NT79fbxzDdKINxN66_ySOk8N9dh7M5ou7Ub00d0itSYgnbwbT-gpDTiGPg5ox_nqZjKdG82zxj9D14eke0_7lg7plZ-N0jkGl_7A-JlstaaLuP-y7pHrs--_Fz-yq5_nF4vTq8ymYCJrKmw45GWRM5AKqjzNj7a00ipWN3UBreCojARV1krKmiFUvFWNLJGhzEHskW8b3yH0KV4c9dpFi11nUrwpap5LVSqlSpbQr2_QVT8Fn6bTXLKKA-dKJOpwQ9kUPgZs9RDc2oR7DUzPvei5Fz33ktiDF8epXmPzn3wtIgHHG-DOdXj_vpO-PF_kz5b_ALpwmLw</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Aldridge, Caitlin E.</creator><creator>Osiovich, Horacio</creator><creator>(Hal) Siden, Harold</creator><creator>Elliott, Alison M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8419-8912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-1314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-0657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Rapid genome‐wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences</title><author>Aldridge, Caitlin E. ; Osiovich, Horacio ; (Hal) Siden, Harold ; Elliott, Alison M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-d9ed2148740156194114ec8c5c60bdb71f32e6a5168b655b0e192f6d58e0e5413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>decisional regret</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>genome‐wide sequencing</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>lived experience</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonatal units</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Regret</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aldridge, Caitlin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osiovich, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>(Hal) Siden, Harold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAPIDOMICS Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GenCOUNSEL Study</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aldridge, Caitlin E.</au><au>Osiovich, Horacio</au><au>(Hal) Siden, Harold</au><au>Elliott, Alison M.</au><aucorp>RAPIDOMICS Study</aucorp><aucorp>GenCOUNSEL Study</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid genome‐wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>616</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>616-629</pages><issn>1059-7700</issn><eissn>1573-3599</eissn><abstract>Genome‐wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post‐return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis, to gain further insight into parents’ perceptions of the value and utility of GWS for their infant. We sought to explore whether parents’ perceptions differ if their child received a diagnosis or not, and whether their child is living or deceased. Semi‐structured, telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had rapid exome sequencing while in the neonatal intensive care unit at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Interviews addressed perceived benefits and harms of GWS and included an evaluation of decisional regret. Parents of 27 probands were approached and 14 (52%; 13 mothers and 1 father) participated in interviews. On average, 26 months had elapsed from the time of results to the interview. Six themes were identified. Firstly, parents had a positive regard for GWS. The results of GWS helped provide context for their child's admission to the NICU, and all parents experienced relief following receiving the results. A diagnosis by GWS enabled parents to picture the future, form connections with other parents, and coordinate their child's care. Lastly, some parents experienced discomfort with the concept of a genetic diagnosis, and interestingly felt lack of a genomic diagnosis indicated a reduced severity of their infant's condition. Decisional regret post‐results was found to be low. Our results highlight how parents cope with the results of GWS and suggest that a genetic counselor can have an important role in helping families understand and adjust to these results in the neonatal intensive care unit.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33131147</pmid><doi>10.1002/jgc4.1353</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8419-8912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-1314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-0657</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-7700
ispartof Journal of genetic counseling, 2021-04, Vol.30 (2), p.616-629
issn 1059-7700
1573-3599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456866680
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Children
decisional regret
Diagnosis
Discomfort
Fathers
Genetic counseling
Genetic screening
Genomes
genome‐wide sequencing
Genomics
Hospitalization
Infants
Intensive care
Intensive care units
Interviews
lived experience
Medical diagnosis
Neonatal care
Neonatal units
Neonates
Newborn babies
Parents & parenting
Perceptions
Qualitative research
Regret
Women
title Rapid genome‐wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A59%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20genome%E2%80%90wide%20sequencing%20in%20a%20neonatal%20intensive%20care%20unit:%20A%20retrospective%20qualitative%20exploration%20of%20parental%20experiences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20genetic%20counseling&rft.au=Aldridge,%20Caitlin%20E.&rft.aucorp=RAPIDOMICS%20Study&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=616&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=616-629&rft.issn=1059-7700&rft.eissn=1573-3599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgc4.1353&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509212263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509212263&rft_id=info:pmid/33131147&rfr_iscdi=true