Meta‐analyzing count events over varying durations using the piecewise Poisson model: The case for poststroke seizures
Meta‐analyzing count data can be challenging when follow‐up time varies across studies. Simply pooling aggregate data over time‐periods would result in biased estimates, which may erroneously inform clinical decision‐making. In this study, we exploit the convolution property of the Poisson distribut...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research synthesis methods 2021-05, Vol.12 (3), p.347-356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 356 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | Research synthesis methods |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Wang, Wei‐Jhih Devine, Beth Bansal, Aasthaa White, H. Steve Basu, Anirban |
description | Meta‐analyzing count data can be challenging when follow‐up time varies across studies. Simply pooling aggregate data over time‐periods would result in biased estimates, which may erroneously inform clinical decision‐making. In this study, we exploit the convolution property of the Poisson distribution to develop a likelihood for observed cumulative counts over varying follow‐up periods, where different Poisson distributions are used to represent the data generating processes for the latent counts in pre‐defined successive intervals of follow‐up. We illustrate this approach using an example of poststroke seizures, a case in which risk may change over time, and mimic its survival duration with time‐varying hazard. Data were extracted from observational studies (1997‐2016) reporting poststroke seizures over a maximum of 10 years of follow‐up. Three clinically meaningful follow‐up time intervals were considered: 0 to 7 days, 8 to 365 days, and 1 to 10 years poststroke. External validation was performed using claims data. Results suggest the incidence rate of seizures was 0.0452 (95% confidence interval: 0.0429, 0.0475), 0.0001 (0, 0.016), and 0.0647 (0.0441, 0.0941) for the three time intervals, respectively, indicating that the risk of seizures changes over time poststroke. We found that the model performed well against the incidence rate of seizures among actual retrospective cohort from claims data. The piecewise Poisson model presents a flexible way to meta‐analyze count data over time and mimic survival curves. The results of the piecewise Poisson model are readily interpretable and may spur meaningful clinical action. The method may also be applied to other diseases.
Highlights
It is challenging to perform a meta‐analysis when follow‐up time varies across studies. Ideally, outcomes over different time‐periods should be pooled with individual patient‐level data (IPD).
A new model was developed to meta‐analyze count data over time using aggregate‐level data from previous published studies.
The piecewise Poisson model could be a useful tool to estimate time‐vary hazards given available data, and mimic survival curves over time which would be readily interpretable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jrsm.1465 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456865629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1294261</ericid><sourcerecordid>2521790496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-af04a604a13cc1fe30a5305914496f62331b517b52e2242cd3a1b50ad096721c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUhS1EBYiy4AGoLLEpiwH_xM64uwoBBYGoWrqOPM4N9TSJB99kYFj1EXhGngSHgVlUqiXL9j2f7pHPJWSXs0POmDiaRmwOeabVGtniuTIjMR7n66t7bjbJDuKUpSWNFjrfIJtScsm5Elvk4Qo6-_z3yba2Xjz69pa60LcdhTm0HdIwh0jnNi4Gpeyj7XxokfY4vLvfQGceHNx7BPo9eMTQ0iaUUH-hN0l0NtWrEOksYIddDH-AIvjHPgJ-JB8qWyPsvJ3b5Nfpyc3xt9Hl9dn58dfLkZNSqZGtWGZ12lw6xyuQzCrJlOFZZnSlRfrJRPF8ogQIkQlXSpsKzJbM6FxwJ7fJ52XfWQx3PWBXNB4d1LVtIfRYiEzpsVZamITu_4NOQx9TMIlSgueGJc9EHSwpFwNihKqYRd-kiArOimEixTCRYphIYj-9dewnDZQr8j3_BOwtAYjereSTCy5MJjRP-tFSv_c1LP7vVFz8-Hn1avkCKCagfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521790496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta‐analyzing count events over varying durations using the piecewise Poisson model: The case for poststroke seizures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wang, Wei‐Jhih ; Devine, Beth ; Bansal, Aasthaa ; White, H. Steve ; Basu, Anirban</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei‐Jhih ; Devine, Beth ; Bansal, Aasthaa ; White, H. Steve ; Basu, Anirban</creatorcontrib><description>Meta‐analyzing count data can be challenging when follow‐up time varies across studies. Simply pooling aggregate data over time‐periods would result in biased estimates, which may erroneously inform clinical decision‐making. In this study, we exploit the convolution property of the Poisson distribution to develop a likelihood for observed cumulative counts over varying follow‐up periods, where different Poisson distributions are used to represent the data generating processes for the latent counts in pre‐defined successive intervals of follow‐up. We illustrate this approach using an example of poststroke seizures, a case in which risk may change over time, and mimic its survival duration with time‐varying hazard. Data were extracted from observational studies (1997‐2016) reporting poststroke seizures over a maximum of 10 years of follow‐up. Three clinically meaningful follow‐up time intervals were considered: 0 to 7 days, 8 to 365 days, and 1 to 10 years poststroke. External validation was performed using claims data. Results suggest the incidence rate of seizures was 0.0452 (95% confidence interval: 0.0429, 0.0475), 0.0001 (0, 0.016), and 0.0647 (0.0441, 0.0941) for the three time intervals, respectively, indicating that the risk of seizures changes over time poststroke. We found that the model performed well against the incidence rate of seizures among actual retrospective cohort from claims data. The piecewise Poisson model presents a flexible way to meta‐analyze count data over time and mimic survival curves. The results of the piecewise Poisson model are readily interpretable and may spur meaningful clinical action. The method may also be applied to other diseases.
Highlights
It is challenging to perform a meta‐analysis when follow‐up time varies across studies. Ideally, outcomes over different time‐periods should be pooled with individual patient‐level data (IPD).
A new model was developed to meta‐analyze count data over time using aggregate‐level data from previous published studies.
The piecewise Poisson model could be a useful tool to estimate time‐vary hazards given available data, and mimic survival curves over time which would be readily interpretable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-2879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-2887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33131152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley</publisher><subject>Computation ; Confidence intervals ; Convolution ; Convulsions & seizures ; Data ; Data analysis ; Followup Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Meta Analysis ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; meta‐analyze count events ; piecewise Poisson model ; Poisson Distribution ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Seizures ; Seizures - epidemiology ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical Distributions ; Stroke ; Survival ; time‐varying hazard</subject><ispartof>Research synthesis methods, 2021-05, Vol.12 (3), p.347-356</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-af04a604a13cc1fe30a5305914496f62331b517b52e2242cd3a1b50ad096721c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7868-5458</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjrsm.1465$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjrsm.1465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1294261$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei‐Jhih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Aasthaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, H. Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Anirban</creatorcontrib><title>Meta‐analyzing count events over varying durations using the piecewise Poisson model: The case for poststroke seizures</title><title>Research synthesis methods</title><addtitle>Res Synth Methods</addtitle><description>Meta‐analyzing count data can be challenging when follow‐up time varies across studies. Simply pooling aggregate data over time‐periods would result in biased estimates, which may erroneously inform clinical decision‐making. In this study, we exploit the convolution property of the Poisson distribution to develop a likelihood for observed cumulative counts over varying follow‐up periods, where different Poisson distributions are used to represent the data generating processes for the latent counts in pre‐defined successive intervals of follow‐up. We illustrate this approach using an example of poststroke seizures, a case in which risk may change over time, and mimic its survival duration with time‐varying hazard. Data were extracted from observational studies (1997‐2016) reporting poststroke seizures over a maximum of 10 years of follow‐up. Three clinically meaningful follow‐up time intervals were considered: 0 to 7 days, 8 to 365 days, and 1 to 10 years poststroke. External validation was performed using claims data. Results suggest the incidence rate of seizures was 0.0452 (95% confidence interval: 0.0429, 0.0475), 0.0001 (0, 0.016), and 0.0647 (0.0441, 0.0941) for the three time intervals, respectively, indicating that the risk of seizures changes over time poststroke. We found that the model performed well against the incidence rate of seizures among actual retrospective cohort from claims data. The piecewise Poisson model presents a flexible way to meta‐analyze count data over time and mimic survival curves. The results of the piecewise Poisson model are readily interpretable and may spur meaningful clinical action. The method may also be applied to other diseases.
Highlights
It is challenging to perform a meta‐analysis when follow‐up time varies across studies. Ideally, outcomes over different time‐periods should be pooled with individual patient‐level data (IPD).
A new model was developed to meta‐analyze count data over time using aggregate‐level data from previous published studies.
The piecewise Poisson model could be a useful tool to estimate time‐vary hazards given available data, and mimic survival curves over time which would be readily interpretable.</description><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Convolution</subject><subject>Convulsions & seizures</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Followup Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>meta‐analyze count events</subject><subject>piecewise Poisson model</subject><subject>Poisson Distribution</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Seizures</subject><subject>Seizures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Distributions</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>time‐varying hazard</subject><issn>1759-2879</issn><issn>1759-2887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUhS1EBYiy4AGoLLEpiwH_xM64uwoBBYGoWrqOPM4N9TSJB99kYFj1EXhGngSHgVlUqiXL9j2f7pHPJWSXs0POmDiaRmwOeabVGtniuTIjMR7n66t7bjbJDuKUpSWNFjrfIJtScsm5Elvk4Qo6-_z3yba2Xjz69pa60LcdhTm0HdIwh0jnNi4Gpeyj7XxokfY4vLvfQGceHNx7BPo9eMTQ0iaUUH-hN0l0NtWrEOksYIddDH-AIvjHPgJ-JB8qWyPsvJ3b5Nfpyc3xt9Hl9dn58dfLkZNSqZGtWGZ12lw6xyuQzCrJlOFZZnSlRfrJRPF8ogQIkQlXSpsKzJbM6FxwJ7fJ52XfWQx3PWBXNB4d1LVtIfRYiEzpsVZamITu_4NOQx9TMIlSgueGJc9EHSwpFwNihKqYRd-kiArOimEixTCRYphIYj-9dewnDZQr8j3_BOwtAYjereSTCy5MJjRP-tFSv_c1LP7vVFz8-Hn1avkCKCagfA</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Wang, Wei‐Jhih</creator><creator>Devine, Beth</creator><creator>Bansal, Aasthaa</creator><creator>White, H. Steve</creator><creator>Basu, Anirban</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7868-5458</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Meta‐analyzing count events over varying durations using the piecewise Poisson model: The case for poststroke seizures</title><author>Wang, Wei‐Jhih ; Devine, Beth ; Bansal, Aasthaa ; White, H. Steve ; Basu, Anirban</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3355-af04a604a13cc1fe30a5305914496f62331b517b52e2242cd3a1b50ad096721c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Convolution</topic><topic>Convulsions & seizures</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Followup Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>meta‐analyze count events</topic><topic>piecewise Poisson model</topic><topic>Poisson Distribution</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Seizures</topic><topic>Seizures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Distributions</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>time‐varying hazard</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei‐Jhih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devine, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Aasthaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, H. Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Anirban</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research synthesis methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Wei‐Jhih</au><au>Devine, Beth</au><au>Bansal, Aasthaa</au><au>White, H. Steve</au><au>Basu, Anirban</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1294261</ericid><atitle>Meta‐analyzing count events over varying durations using the piecewise Poisson model: The case for poststroke seizures</atitle><jtitle>Research synthesis methods</jtitle><addtitle>Res Synth Methods</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>347-356</pages><issn>1759-2879</issn><eissn>1759-2887</eissn><abstract>Meta‐analyzing count data can be challenging when follow‐up time varies across studies. Simply pooling aggregate data over time‐periods would result in biased estimates, which may erroneously inform clinical decision‐making. In this study, we exploit the convolution property of the Poisson distribution to develop a likelihood for observed cumulative counts over varying follow‐up periods, where different Poisson distributions are used to represent the data generating processes for the latent counts in pre‐defined successive intervals of follow‐up. We illustrate this approach using an example of poststroke seizures, a case in which risk may change over time, and mimic its survival duration with time‐varying hazard. Data were extracted from observational studies (1997‐2016) reporting poststroke seizures over a maximum of 10 years of follow‐up. Three clinically meaningful follow‐up time intervals were considered: 0 to 7 days, 8 to 365 days, and 1 to 10 years poststroke. External validation was performed using claims data. Results suggest the incidence rate of seizures was 0.0452 (95% confidence interval: 0.0429, 0.0475), 0.0001 (0, 0.016), and 0.0647 (0.0441, 0.0941) for the three time intervals, respectively, indicating that the risk of seizures changes over time poststroke. We found that the model performed well against the incidence rate of seizures among actual retrospective cohort from claims data. The piecewise Poisson model presents a flexible way to meta‐analyze count data over time and mimic survival curves. The results of the piecewise Poisson model are readily interpretable and may spur meaningful clinical action. The method may also be applied to other diseases.
Highlights
It is challenging to perform a meta‐analysis when follow‐up time varies across studies. Ideally, outcomes over different time‐periods should be pooled with individual patient‐level data (IPD).
A new model was developed to meta‐analyze count data over time using aggregate‐level data from previous published studies.
The piecewise Poisson model could be a useful tool to estimate time‐vary hazards given available data, and mimic survival curves over time which would be readily interpretable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>33131152</pmid><doi>10.1002/jrsm.1465</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7868-5458</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1759-2879 |
ispartof | Research synthesis methods, 2021-05, Vol.12 (3), p.347-356 |
issn | 1759-2879 1759-2887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456865629 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Computation Confidence intervals Convolution Convulsions & seizures Data Data analysis Followup Studies Humans Incidence Meta Analysis Meta-Analysis as Topic meta‐analyze count events piecewise Poisson model Poisson Distribution Retrospective Studies Risk Seizures Seizures - epidemiology Statistical analysis Statistical Distributions Stroke Survival time‐varying hazard |
title | Meta‐analyzing count events over varying durations using the piecewise Poisson model: The case for poststroke seizures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta%E2%80%90analyzing%20count%20events%20over%20varying%20durations%20using%20the%20piecewise%20Poisson%20model:%20The%20case%20for%20poststroke%20seizures&rft.jtitle=Research%20synthesis%20methods&rft.au=Wang,%20Wei%E2%80%90Jhih&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=347-356&rft.issn=1759-2879&rft.eissn=1759-2887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jrsm.1465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2521790496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521790496&rft_id=info:pmid/33131152&rft_ericid=EJ1294261&rfr_iscdi=true |