Countermeasure and opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer

•Reported Countermeasure and Opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer.•Checked 19,721 persons in Countermeasure Screening over 27 years.•Checked 29,912 persons in Opportunistic Screening over 13 years.•Detection of oral cancer, 0.13, 0.08% in countermeasure, opportunistic screening.•Screening...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral oncology 2021-01, Vol.112, p.105047-105047, Article 105047
Hauptverfasser: Morikawa, Takamichi, Shibahara, Takahiko, Takano, Masayuki, Iwamoto, Masashi, Takaki, Takashi, Kasahara, Kiyohiro, Nomura, Takeshi, Takano, Nobuo, Katakura, Akira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105047
container_issue
container_start_page 105047
container_title Oral oncology
container_volume 112
creator Morikawa, Takamichi
Shibahara, Takahiko
Takano, Masayuki
Iwamoto, Masashi
Takaki, Takashi
Kasahara, Kiyohiro
Nomura, Takeshi
Takano, Nobuo
Katakura, Akira
description •Reported Countermeasure and Opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer.•Checked 19,721 persons in Countermeasure Screening over 27 years.•Checked 29,912 persons in Opportunistic Screening over 13 years.•Detection of oral cancer, 0.13, 0.08% in countermeasure, opportunistic screening.•Screening Systems is useful for detecting oral cancer and mucosal disease. Tokyo Dental College started oral cancer screening in cooperation with a local dental association in 1992. Reveal the usefulness of Countermeasure and Opportunistic Screening Systems for Oral Cancer. The actual results of countermeasure and opportunistic oral cancer screening systems are reported. Countermeasure screening for the public was performed in each region, and opportunistic screening was performed in a general dental clinic of a cooperating physician. In countermeasure screening, 19,721 persons were checked from 1992 to 2018; the gender ratio was 1:3. The close examination rate was 4.45%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.13% and 1.85%, respectively. In opportunistic screening, 29,912 persons were checked from 2006 to 2018; the gender ratio was 2:3. The close examination rate was 2.33%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.08% and 2.15%, respectively. The close examination rate was significantly lower in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. The oral cancer detection rates and the positive predictive value for cancer were equivalent. In addition, the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders was significantly higher in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. Oral cancer detection rates were equivalent between countermeasure and opportunistic screenings, and opportunistic screening were more effective on number of participants and the close examination rate, and the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105047
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456417604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1368837520304838</els_id><sourcerecordid>2456417604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-7f60db5b49ef5d73ff1a0cb22b0a400d4e45c66ce9b279870dd1e142b291df743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPwzAQgC0EoqXwF1DExJJyduy4YYPylCqxwGw59qVylcTFTpD670nUghiZ7qT77vURckVhToHmN5u5D7r2rfG1X-_mDNhYEMDlEZnShSxSEEV2PORZvkgXmRQTchbjBgAEFXBKJllGWTFAU3K_9H3bYWhQxz5golub-O3Wh65vXeycSaIJiK1r10ncxQ6bmFQ-JOMFidGtwXBOTipdR7w4xBn5eHp8X76kq7fn1-XdKjVc5l0qqxxsKUpeYCWszKqKajAlYyVoDmA5cmHy3GBRMlksJFhLkXJWsoLaSvJsRq73c7fBf_YYO9W4aLCudYu-j4pxkXMqcxjR2z1qgo8xYKW2wTU67BQFNTpUG_XXoRodqr3DofnysKcvG7S_rT_SBuBhD-Dw7ZfDoKJxOKiwLqDplPXuP3u-Ab7Ais4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2456417604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Countermeasure and opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Morikawa, Takamichi ; Shibahara, Takahiko ; Takano, Masayuki ; Iwamoto, Masashi ; Takaki, Takashi ; Kasahara, Kiyohiro ; Nomura, Takeshi ; Takano, Nobuo ; Katakura, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>Morikawa, Takamichi ; Shibahara, Takahiko ; Takano, Masayuki ; Iwamoto, Masashi ; Takaki, Takashi ; Kasahara, Kiyohiro ; Nomura, Takeshi ; Takano, Nobuo ; Katakura, Akira</creatorcontrib><description>•Reported Countermeasure and Opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer.•Checked 19,721 persons in Countermeasure Screening over 27 years.•Checked 29,912 persons in Opportunistic Screening over 13 years.•Detection of oral cancer, 0.13, 0.08% in countermeasure, opportunistic screening.•Screening Systems is useful for detecting oral cancer and mucosal disease. Tokyo Dental College started oral cancer screening in cooperation with a local dental association in 1992. Reveal the usefulness of Countermeasure and Opportunistic Screening Systems for Oral Cancer. The actual results of countermeasure and opportunistic oral cancer screening systems are reported. Countermeasure screening for the public was performed in each region, and opportunistic screening was performed in a general dental clinic of a cooperating physician. In countermeasure screening, 19,721 persons were checked from 1992 to 2018; the gender ratio was 1:3. The close examination rate was 4.45%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.13% and 1.85%, respectively. In opportunistic screening, 29,912 persons were checked from 2006 to 2018; the gender ratio was 2:3. The close examination rate was 2.33%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.08% and 2.15%, respectively. The close examination rate was significantly lower in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. The oral cancer detection rates and the positive predictive value for cancer were equivalent. In addition, the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders was significantly higher in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. Oral cancer detection rates were equivalent between countermeasure and opportunistic screenings, and opportunistic screening were more effective on number of participants and the close examination rate, and the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-8375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105047</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33129059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Countermeasure Screening ; Opportunistic Screening ; Oral Cancer ; Oral Cancer Detection Rate ; Oral cancer screening ; Oral Mucosal Disease ; Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders ; Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma</subject><ispartof>Oral oncology, 2021-01, Vol.112, p.105047-105047, Article 105047</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-7f60db5b49ef5d73ff1a0cb22b0a400d4e45c66ce9b279870dd1e142b291df743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-7f60db5b49ef5d73ff1a0cb22b0a400d4e45c66ce9b279870dd1e142b291df743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837520304838$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129059$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morikawa, Takamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibahara, Takahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamoto, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kiyohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katakura, Akira</creatorcontrib><title>Countermeasure and opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer</title><title>Oral oncology</title><addtitle>Oral Oncol</addtitle><description>•Reported Countermeasure and Opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer.•Checked 19,721 persons in Countermeasure Screening over 27 years.•Checked 29,912 persons in Opportunistic Screening over 13 years.•Detection of oral cancer, 0.13, 0.08% in countermeasure, opportunistic screening.•Screening Systems is useful for detecting oral cancer and mucosal disease. Tokyo Dental College started oral cancer screening in cooperation with a local dental association in 1992. Reveal the usefulness of Countermeasure and Opportunistic Screening Systems for Oral Cancer. The actual results of countermeasure and opportunistic oral cancer screening systems are reported. Countermeasure screening for the public was performed in each region, and opportunistic screening was performed in a general dental clinic of a cooperating physician. In countermeasure screening, 19,721 persons were checked from 1992 to 2018; the gender ratio was 1:3. The close examination rate was 4.45%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.13% and 1.85%, respectively. In opportunistic screening, 29,912 persons were checked from 2006 to 2018; the gender ratio was 2:3. The close examination rate was 2.33%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.08% and 2.15%, respectively. The close examination rate was significantly lower in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. The oral cancer detection rates and the positive predictive value for cancer were equivalent. In addition, the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders was significantly higher in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. Oral cancer detection rates were equivalent between countermeasure and opportunistic screenings, and opportunistic screening were more effective on number of participants and the close examination rate, and the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders.</description><subject>Countermeasure Screening</subject><subject>Opportunistic Screening</subject><subject>Oral Cancer</subject><subject>Oral Cancer Detection Rate</subject><subject>Oral cancer screening</subject><subject>Oral Mucosal Disease</subject><subject>Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders</subject><subject>Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma</subject><issn>1368-8375</issn><issn>1879-0593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDtPwzAQgC0EoqXwF1DExJJyduy4YYPylCqxwGw59qVylcTFTpD670nUghiZ7qT77vURckVhToHmN5u5D7r2rfG1X-_mDNhYEMDlEZnShSxSEEV2PORZvkgXmRQTchbjBgAEFXBKJllGWTFAU3K_9H3bYWhQxz5golub-O3Wh65vXeycSaIJiK1r10ncxQ6bmFQ-JOMFidGtwXBOTipdR7w4xBn5eHp8X76kq7fn1-XdKjVc5l0qqxxsKUpeYCWszKqKajAlYyVoDmA5cmHy3GBRMlksJFhLkXJWsoLaSvJsRq73c7fBf_YYO9W4aLCudYu-j4pxkXMqcxjR2z1qgo8xYKW2wTU67BQFNTpUG_XXoRodqr3DofnysKcvG7S_rT_SBuBhD-Dw7ZfDoKJxOKiwLqDplPXuP3u-Ab7Ais4</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Morikawa, Takamichi</creator><creator>Shibahara, Takahiko</creator><creator>Takano, Masayuki</creator><creator>Iwamoto, Masashi</creator><creator>Takaki, Takashi</creator><creator>Kasahara, Kiyohiro</creator><creator>Nomura, Takeshi</creator><creator>Takano, Nobuo</creator><creator>Katakura, Akira</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Countermeasure and opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer</title><author>Morikawa, Takamichi ; Shibahara, Takahiko ; Takano, Masayuki ; Iwamoto, Masashi ; Takaki, Takashi ; Kasahara, Kiyohiro ; Nomura, Takeshi ; Takano, Nobuo ; Katakura, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-7f60db5b49ef5d73ff1a0cb22b0a400d4e45c66ce9b279870dd1e142b291df743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Countermeasure Screening</topic><topic>Opportunistic Screening</topic><topic>Oral Cancer</topic><topic>Oral Cancer Detection Rate</topic><topic>Oral cancer screening</topic><topic>Oral Mucosal Disease</topic><topic>Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders</topic><topic>Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morikawa, Takamichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibahara, Takahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamoto, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kiyohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katakura, Akira</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morikawa, Takamichi</au><au>Shibahara, Takahiko</au><au>Takano, Masayuki</au><au>Iwamoto, Masashi</au><au>Takaki, Takashi</au><au>Kasahara, Kiyohiro</au><au>Nomura, Takeshi</au><au>Takano, Nobuo</au><au>Katakura, Akira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Countermeasure and opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer</atitle><jtitle>Oral oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>105047</spage><epage>105047</epage><pages>105047-105047</pages><artnum>105047</artnum><issn>1368-8375</issn><eissn>1879-0593</eissn><abstract>•Reported Countermeasure and Opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer.•Checked 19,721 persons in Countermeasure Screening over 27 years.•Checked 29,912 persons in Opportunistic Screening over 13 years.•Detection of oral cancer, 0.13, 0.08% in countermeasure, opportunistic screening.•Screening Systems is useful for detecting oral cancer and mucosal disease. Tokyo Dental College started oral cancer screening in cooperation with a local dental association in 1992. Reveal the usefulness of Countermeasure and Opportunistic Screening Systems for Oral Cancer. The actual results of countermeasure and opportunistic oral cancer screening systems are reported. Countermeasure screening for the public was performed in each region, and opportunistic screening was performed in a general dental clinic of a cooperating physician. In countermeasure screening, 19,721 persons were checked from 1992 to 2018; the gender ratio was 1:3. The close examination rate was 4.45%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.13% and 1.85%, respectively. In opportunistic screening, 29,912 persons were checked from 2006 to 2018; the gender ratio was 2:3. The close examination rate was 2.33%. The detection rates of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders were 0.08% and 2.15%, respectively. The close examination rate was significantly lower in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. The oral cancer detection rates and the positive predictive value for cancer were equivalent. In addition, the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders was significantly higher in opportunistic screening than in countermeasure screening. Oral cancer detection rates were equivalent between countermeasure and opportunistic screenings, and opportunistic screening were more effective on number of participants and the close examination rate, and the detection rate of oral potentially malignant disorders.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33129059</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105047</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-8375
ispartof Oral oncology, 2021-01, Vol.112, p.105047-105047, Article 105047
issn 1368-8375
1879-0593
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456417604
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Countermeasure Screening
Opportunistic Screening
Oral Cancer
Oral Cancer Detection Rate
Oral cancer screening
Oral Mucosal Disease
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title Countermeasure and opportunistic screening systems for oral cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T04%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Countermeasure%20and%20opportunistic%20screening%20systems%20for%20oral%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Oral%20oncology&rft.au=Morikawa,%20Takamichi&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=105047&rft.epage=105047&rft.pages=105047-105047&rft.artnum=105047&rft.issn=1368-8375&rft.eissn=1879-0593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105047&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2456417604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2456417604&rft_id=info:pmid/33129059&rft_els_id=S1368837520304838&rfr_iscdi=true