A 5-Year Single-Institution Experience Integrating Telehealth Into Urologic Care Delivery

Objective: Telehealth is increasingly used in urology, but few studies have evaluated how it can be integrated with urology face-to-face (FTF) encounters and primary care (PC). We describe the 5-year experience of a Veterans Affairs urology service that has incorporated telehealth into their patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Telemedicine journal and e-health 2021-09, Vol.27 (9), p.997-1002
Hauptverfasser: Nourian, Alex, Smith, Nicholas, Kleinman, Leonard, Boxer, Richard, Shelton, Jeremy B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Telehealth is increasingly used in urology, but few studies have evaluated how it can be integrated with urology face-to-face (FTF) encounters and primary care (PC). We describe the 5-year experience of a Veterans Affairs urology service that has incorporated telehealth into their patient care program. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of encounters from 2013 to 2018 in telehealth urology clinics. To examine the way telehealth and FTF visits were utilized together, the key components of care were defined for the evaluation of three common referrals: elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), microscopic hematuria, and obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). A random convenience sample of 20 patients from each condition was abstracted to describe the setting of care for each component over a 2-year period. Results: We reviewed 811 unique patients who had a total of 2,008 telehealth visits. The mean utilization of telehealth (2.48) and FTF (2.42) encounters per patient were similar. The most common reasons for referral to telehealth clinics were sexual dysfunction (26.8%), LUTS (20.6%), hematuria (15.0%), prostate cancer (13.3%), and an elevated PSA (12.1%). Thirty-six percent of patients were managed by telehealth alone; 64% were by a combination of telehealth and FTF encounters. Telehealth was often used in conjunction with PC and FTF visits to perform components such as the physical exam and procedures. Conclusions: Telehealth was utilized for a wide array of diseases and often used in conjunction with PC and urologic FTF visits to deliver complete care for the three disease states we evaluated.
ISSN:1530-5627
1556-3669
DOI:10.1089/tmj.2020.0267