Factors Influencing the Dissemination of Tweets at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018

Background Social media is increasingly used in surgery, facilitating the dissemination of knowledge. Social media can potentially aid networking, education, and information exchange. This study explored the impact of tweet components and tweeter characteristics during a large surgical congress to i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2021-04, Vol.87 (4), p.520-526
Hauptverfasser: Sharp, Stephen P., Mackenzie, Douglas G., Ong, David S.Y., Mountziaris, Paschalia M., Logghe, Heather J., Ferrada, Paula, Wexner, Steven D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 526
container_issue 4
container_start_page 520
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 87
creator Sharp, Stephen P.
Mackenzie, Douglas G.
Ong, David S.Y.
Mountziaris, Paschalia M.
Logghe, Heather J.
Ferrada, Paula
Wexner, Steven D.
description Background Social media is increasingly used in surgery, facilitating the dissemination of knowledge. Social media can potentially aid networking, education, and information exchange. This study explored the impact of tweet components and tweeter characteristics during a large surgical congress to inform recommendations for optimizing social media use at future surgical conferences. Methods Twitter activity was monitored during the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018 using NodeXL to extract tweets containing the conference hashtag #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of retweet activity, also testing for multicollinearity and interactions among variables. Results There were 4386 tweets that contained #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018) posted from 1023 Twitter accounts. A larger group of Twitter accounts just retweeted. Other Twitter accounts with a stake in the conference neither tweeted nor retweeted. In a multivariable analysis of original tweets, the following were all independently associated with retweets, in decreasing order of effect size: mention of other tweeters, multimedia, inclusion of other hashtags, and the number of followers. In contrast with other conferences, the inclusion of a weblink (URL)—for example, link to paper or blog—was not associated with retweets. Discussion This study helps understand social media impact at surgical conferences. Engage by tweeting and retweeting. Mention other tweeters, add multimedia, include congress hashtags and topic-specific hashtags, and build your followers. Although not associated with retweet activity in this study, the inclusion of URLs can still contribute in substantiating the disseminated content based on findings at other conferences.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0003134820950680
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454651485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0003134820950680</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2454651485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-65c6886b24912053d3933634e05060d1e679a6de578ab4f6e416ba272d22bc8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVoaDYf956KoJdcnIw-LR-XbbYNBHpIcjayPXa92NJWsin595W72wQCPQnxPPNqNEPIJwY3jOX5LQAIJqThUCjQBk7IiimlssJw8YGsFpwt_Iycx7hLV6kV-0jOhGCggbMV2W1tPfkQ6b1rhxld3buOTj-Rfu1jxLF3duq9o76lT78Rp0jt9BevRwx9bR3d-GHADhfjcQ4dehfpZuhdgkOCrgsYI-XAzCU5be0Q8ep4XpDn7d3T5nv28OPb_Wb9kNUS8inTqtbG6IrLgnFQohGFEFpIhPRFaBjqvLC6QZUbW8lWo2S6sjznDedVbVpxQa4Pufvgf80Yp3LsY43DYB36OZZcqmUM0qikfnmn7vwcXOqu5IoZMEoWMllwsOrgYwzYlvvQjza8lAzKZQ_l-z2kks_H4LkasXkt-Df4JGQHIdoO3179b-AfVyOMwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518085494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Influencing the Dissemination of Tweets at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Sharp, Stephen P. ; Mackenzie, Douglas G. ; Ong, David S.Y. ; Mountziaris, Paschalia M. ; Logghe, Heather J. ; Ferrada, Paula ; Wexner, Steven D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Stephen P. ; Mackenzie, Douglas G. ; Ong, David S.Y. ; Mountziaris, Paschalia M. ; Logghe, Heather J. ; Ferrada, Paula ; Wexner, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Social media is increasingly used in surgery, facilitating the dissemination of knowledge. Social media can potentially aid networking, education, and information exchange. This study explored the impact of tweet components and tweeter characteristics during a large surgical congress to inform recommendations for optimizing social media use at future surgical conferences. Methods Twitter activity was monitored during the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018 using NodeXL to extract tweets containing the conference hashtag #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of retweet activity, also testing for multicollinearity and interactions among variables. Results There were 4386 tweets that contained #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018) posted from 1023 Twitter accounts. A larger group of Twitter accounts just retweeted. Other Twitter accounts with a stake in the conference neither tweeted nor retweeted. In a multivariable analysis of original tweets, the following were all independently associated with retweets, in decreasing order of effect size: mention of other tweeters, multimedia, inclusion of other hashtags, and the number of followers. In contrast with other conferences, the inclusion of a weblink (URL)—for example, link to paper or blog—was not associated with retweets. Discussion This study helps understand social media impact at surgical conferences. Engage by tweeting and retweeting. Mention other tweeters, add multimedia, include congress hashtags and topic-specific hashtags, and build your followers. Although not associated with retweet activity in this study, the inclusion of URLs can still contribute in substantiating the disseminated content based on findings at other conferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0003134820950680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33106021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Application programming interface ; Conferences ; Congresses as Topic ; Digital media ; Multimedia ; Regression analysis ; Social Media - organization &amp; administration ; Social networks ; Societies, Medical ; Specialties, Surgical ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Tagging ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2021-04, Vol.87 (4), p.520-526</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-65c6886b24912053d3933634e05060d1e679a6de578ab4f6e416ba272d22bc8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-65c6886b24912053d3933634e05060d1e679a6de578ab4f6e416ba272d22bc8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0003134820950680$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003134820950680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33106021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, David S.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountziaris, Paschalia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logghe, Heather J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrada, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexner, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Influencing the Dissemination of Tweets at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Background Social media is increasingly used in surgery, facilitating the dissemination of knowledge. Social media can potentially aid networking, education, and information exchange. This study explored the impact of tweet components and tweeter characteristics during a large surgical congress to inform recommendations for optimizing social media use at future surgical conferences. Methods Twitter activity was monitored during the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018 using NodeXL to extract tweets containing the conference hashtag #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of retweet activity, also testing for multicollinearity and interactions among variables. Results There were 4386 tweets that contained #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018) posted from 1023 Twitter accounts. A larger group of Twitter accounts just retweeted. Other Twitter accounts with a stake in the conference neither tweeted nor retweeted. In a multivariable analysis of original tweets, the following were all independently associated with retweets, in decreasing order of effect size: mention of other tweeters, multimedia, inclusion of other hashtags, and the number of followers. In contrast with other conferences, the inclusion of a weblink (URL)—for example, link to paper or blog—was not associated with retweets. Discussion This study helps understand social media impact at surgical conferences. Engage by tweeting and retweeting. Mention other tweeters, add multimedia, include congress hashtags and topic-specific hashtags, and build your followers. Although not associated with retweet activity in this study, the inclusion of URLs can still contribute in substantiating the disseminated content based on findings at other conferences.</description><subject>Application programming interface</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Congresses as Topic</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Social Media - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Specialties, Surgical</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tagging</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVoaDYf956KoJdcnIw-LR-XbbYNBHpIcjayPXa92NJWsin595W72wQCPQnxPPNqNEPIJwY3jOX5LQAIJqThUCjQBk7IiimlssJw8YGsFpwt_Iycx7hLV6kV-0jOhGCggbMV2W1tPfkQ6b1rhxld3buOTj-Rfu1jxLF3duq9o76lT78Rp0jt9BevRwx9bR3d-GHADhfjcQ4dehfpZuhdgkOCrgsYI-XAzCU5be0Q8ep4XpDn7d3T5nv28OPb_Wb9kNUS8inTqtbG6IrLgnFQohGFEFpIhPRFaBjqvLC6QZUbW8lWo2S6sjznDedVbVpxQa4Pufvgf80Yp3LsY43DYB36OZZcqmUM0qikfnmn7vwcXOqu5IoZMEoWMllwsOrgYwzYlvvQjza8lAzKZQ_l-z2kks_H4LkasXkt-Df4JGQHIdoO3179b-AfVyOMwg</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Sharp, Stephen P.</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Douglas G.</creator><creator>Ong, David S.Y.</creator><creator>Mountziaris, Paschalia M.</creator><creator>Logghe, Heather J.</creator><creator>Ferrada, Paula</creator><creator>Wexner, Steven D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Factors Influencing the Dissemination of Tweets at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018</title><author>Sharp, Stephen P. ; Mackenzie, Douglas G. ; Ong, David S.Y. ; Mountziaris, Paschalia M. ; Logghe, Heather J. ; Ferrada, Paula ; Wexner, Steven D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-65c6886b24912053d3933634e05060d1e679a6de578ab4f6e416ba272d22bc8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Application programming interface</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Congresses as Topic</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Social Media - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Specialties, Surgical</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tagging</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, David S.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountziaris, Paschalia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logghe, Heather J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrada, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexner, Steven D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharp, Stephen P.</au><au>Mackenzie, Douglas G.</au><au>Ong, David S.Y.</au><au>Mountziaris, Paschalia M.</au><au>Logghe, Heather J.</au><au>Ferrada, Paula</au><au>Wexner, Steven D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Influencing the Dissemination of Tweets at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>520</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>520-526</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Background Social media is increasingly used in surgery, facilitating the dissemination of knowledge. Social media can potentially aid networking, education, and information exchange. This study explored the impact of tweet components and tweeter characteristics during a large surgical congress to inform recommendations for optimizing social media use at future surgical conferences. Methods Twitter activity was monitored during the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018 using NodeXL to extract tweets containing the conference hashtag #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of retweet activity, also testing for multicollinearity and interactions among variables. Results There were 4386 tweets that contained #ACSCC18 (or #ACSCC2018) posted from 1023 Twitter accounts. A larger group of Twitter accounts just retweeted. Other Twitter accounts with a stake in the conference neither tweeted nor retweeted. In a multivariable analysis of original tweets, the following were all independently associated with retweets, in decreasing order of effect size: mention of other tweeters, multimedia, inclusion of other hashtags, and the number of followers. In contrast with other conferences, the inclusion of a weblink (URL)—for example, link to paper or blog—was not associated with retweets. Discussion This study helps understand social media impact at surgical conferences. Engage by tweeting and retweeting. Mention other tweeters, add multimedia, include congress hashtags and topic-specific hashtags, and build your followers. Although not associated with retweet activity in this study, the inclusion of URLs can still contribute in substantiating the disseminated content based on findings at other conferences.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33106021</pmid><doi>10.1177/0003134820950680</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2021-04, Vol.87 (4), p.520-526
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454651485
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Application programming interface
Conferences
Congresses as Topic
Digital media
Multimedia
Regression analysis
Social Media - organization & administration
Social networks
Societies, Medical
Specialties, Surgical
Surgeons
Surgery
Tagging
United States
title Factors Influencing the Dissemination of Tweets at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2018
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A15%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Influencing%20the%20Dissemination%20of%20Tweets%20at%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20Clinical%20Congress%202018&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Sharp,%20Stephen%20P.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=520&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=520-526&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0003134820950680&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2454651485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518085494&rft_id=info:pmid/33106021&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0003134820950680&rfr_iscdi=true