Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
•This meta-analysis comprehensively summarizes the evidence for the diagnostic value of PDD ureteroscopy in UTUC.•A large number of cases were included in our study.•Our meta-analysis shows that photodynamic diagnosis can accurately differentiate UTUC from benign lesions.•PDD is a valid technique th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2020-12, Vol.32, p.102067-102067, Article 102067 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 102067 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 102067 |
| container_title | Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Liu, Qiangzhao Zhang, Xiaofeng Zhou, Fenghai Lian, Qiong Lv, Haidi Guo, Bohong Xi, Xinsheng |
| description | •This meta-analysis comprehensively summarizes the evidence for the diagnostic value of PDD ureteroscopy in UTUC.•A large number of cases were included in our study.•Our meta-analysis shows that photodynamic diagnosis can accurately differentiate UTUC from benign lesions.•PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by performing a meta-analysis.
Relevant articles were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies evaluating the accuracy of PDD for the diagnosis of upper UTUC were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by STATA 16.0 at the per-lesion level.
Six studies with 289 lesions were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that PDD can differentiate upper UTUC from benign lesions with a sensitivity of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.85−0.99) and a specificity of 0.86 (95 % confidence interval: [0.64−0.95]; AUC, 0.97). Compared with white-light ureterorenoscopy, PDD can significantly improve the additional detection rate of UTUC (RR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.07–0.34 P = 0.000).
PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102067 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454137260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S157210002030421X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2454137260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-ead9f9bcdb9ae70cde94662029ed752e1c7d19987401e6c90d79f0698ff06fa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9P3DAQxa2qqFDaT4BU-dhLlnH-eY3UA6ItICFxac_WrD0Br5I4tZ1WOfab422gRy5jj_3ejN6PsTMBGwGiPd9vJjvZtCmhPLyU0Mo37ERsZVWIRsm3-d7IshAAcMzex7gHqGoF9Tt2XFWg2nLbnLC_Xx0-jD4mZzgaMwc0C_cdnx598nYZccgfdtW4yDsf-DxNlGtwI4aFp-xIufPpkXqHPTcYjBv9gBf8ksclJhrwMD3Qb0d_OI6WD5SwwBH7Jc_8wI467CN9fD5P2c_v335c3RR399e3V5d3hakalQpCqzq1M3ankCQYS6pu25xdkZVNScJIK5TayhoEtUaBlaqDVm27XDtU1Sn7vM6dgv81U0x6cNFQ3-NIfo66rJtaVLJsIUurVWqCjzFQp6fghpxWC9AH9nqv_7HXB_Z6ZZ9dn54XzLuB7H_PC-ws-LIKKMfMMIKOxtFoyLpAJmnr3asLngAo-Zl_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454137260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Qiangzhao ; Zhang, Xiaofeng ; Zhou, Fenghai ; Lian, Qiong ; Lv, Haidi ; Guo, Bohong ; Xi, Xinsheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qiangzhao ; Zhang, Xiaofeng ; Zhou, Fenghai ; Lian, Qiong ; Lv, Haidi ; Guo, Bohong ; Xi, Xinsheng</creatorcontrib><description>•This meta-analysis comprehensively summarizes the evidence for the diagnostic value of PDD ureteroscopy in UTUC.•A large number of cases were included in our study.•Our meta-analysis shows that photodynamic diagnosis can accurately differentiate UTUC from benign lesions.•PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by performing a meta-analysis.
Relevant articles were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies evaluating the accuracy of PDD for the diagnosis of upper UTUC were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by STATA 16.0 at the per-lesion level.
Six studies with 289 lesions were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that PDD can differentiate upper UTUC from benign lesions with a sensitivity of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.85−0.99) and a specificity of 0.86 (95 % confidence interval: [0.64−0.95]; AUC, 0.97). Compared with white-light ureterorenoscopy, PDD can significantly improve the additional detection rate of UTUC (RR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.07–0.34 P = 0.000).
PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-1000</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102067</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33096285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms ; Meta-analysis ; Photochemotherapy - methods ; Photodynamic diagnosis ; Photosensitizing Agents ; Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma</subject><ispartof>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2020-12, Vol.32, p.102067-102067, Article 102067</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-ead9f9bcdb9ae70cde94662029ed752e1c7d19987401e6c90d79f0698ff06fa93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-ead9f9bcdb9ae70cde94662029ed752e1c7d19987401e6c90d79f0698ff06fa93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qiangzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Fenghai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Haidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Bohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Xinsheng</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy</title><addtitle>Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther</addtitle><description>•This meta-analysis comprehensively summarizes the evidence for the diagnostic value of PDD ureteroscopy in UTUC.•A large number of cases were included in our study.•Our meta-analysis shows that photodynamic diagnosis can accurately differentiate UTUC from benign lesions.•PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by performing a meta-analysis.
Relevant articles were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies evaluating the accuracy of PDD for the diagnosis of upper UTUC were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by STATA 16.0 at the per-lesion level.
Six studies with 289 lesions were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that PDD can differentiate upper UTUC from benign lesions with a sensitivity of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.85−0.99) and a specificity of 0.86 (95 % confidence interval: [0.64−0.95]; AUC, 0.97). Compared with white-light ureterorenoscopy, PDD can significantly improve the additional detection rate of UTUC (RR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.07–0.34 P = 0.000).
PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.</description><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Photochemotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Photodynamic diagnosis</subject><subject>Photosensitizing Agents</subject><subject>Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma</subject><issn>1572-1000</issn><issn>1873-1597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9P3DAQxa2qqFDaT4BU-dhLlnH-eY3UA6ItICFxac_WrD0Br5I4tZ1WOfab422gRy5jj_3ejN6PsTMBGwGiPd9vJjvZtCmhPLyU0Mo37ERsZVWIRsm3-d7IshAAcMzex7gHqGoF9Tt2XFWg2nLbnLC_Xx0-jD4mZzgaMwc0C_cdnx598nYZccgfdtW4yDsf-DxNlGtwI4aFp-xIufPpkXqHPTcYjBv9gBf8ksclJhrwMD3Qb0d_OI6WD5SwwBH7Jc_8wI467CN9fD5P2c_v335c3RR399e3V5d3hakalQpCqzq1M3ankCQYS6pu25xdkZVNScJIK5TayhoEtUaBlaqDVm27XDtU1Sn7vM6dgv81U0x6cNFQ3-NIfo66rJtaVLJsIUurVWqCjzFQp6fghpxWC9AH9nqv_7HXB_Z6ZZ9dn54XzLuB7H_PC-ws-LIKKMfMMIKOxtFoyLpAJmnr3asLngAo-Zl_</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Liu, Qiangzhao</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiaofeng</creator><creator>Zhou, Fenghai</creator><creator>Lian, Qiong</creator><creator>Lv, Haidi</creator><creator>Guo, Bohong</creator><creator>Xi, Xinsheng</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Liu, Qiangzhao ; Zhang, Xiaofeng ; Zhou, Fenghai ; Lian, Qiong ; Lv, Haidi ; Guo, Bohong ; Xi, Xinsheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-ead9f9bcdb9ae70cde94662029ed752e1c7d19987401e6c90d79f0698ff06fa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Photochemotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Photodynamic diagnosis</topic><topic>Photosensitizing Agents</topic><topic>Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qiangzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Fenghai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Haidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Bohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Xinsheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Qiangzhao</au><au>Zhang, Xiaofeng</au><au>Zhou, Fenghai</au><au>Lian, Qiong</au><au>Lv, Haidi</au><au>Guo, Bohong</au><au>Xi, Xinsheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><spage>102067</spage><epage>102067</epage><pages>102067-102067</pages><artnum>102067</artnum><issn>1572-1000</issn><eissn>1873-1597</eissn><abstract>•This meta-analysis comprehensively summarizes the evidence for the diagnostic value of PDD ureteroscopy in UTUC.•A large number of cases were included in our study.•Our meta-analysis shows that photodynamic diagnosis can accurately differentiate UTUC from benign lesions.•PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by performing a meta-analysis.
Relevant articles were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies evaluating the accuracy of PDD for the diagnosis of upper UTUC were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by STATA 16.0 at the per-lesion level.
Six studies with 289 lesions were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that PDD can differentiate upper UTUC from benign lesions with a sensitivity of 0.96 (95 % confidence interval: 0.85−0.99) and a specificity of 0.86 (95 % confidence interval: [0.64−0.95]; AUC, 0.97). Compared with white-light ureterorenoscopy, PDD can significantly improve the additional detection rate of UTUC (RR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.07–0.34 P = 0.000).
PDD is a valid technique that improves the diagnostic accuracy of UTUC compared with standard white-light ureterorenoscopy at the per-lesion level. PDD is a promising endoscopic technique for upper UTUC.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33096285</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102067</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1572-1000 |
| ispartof | Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2020-12, Vol.32, p.102067-102067, Article 102067 |
| issn | 1572-1000 1873-1597 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454137260 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis Humans Kidney Neoplasms Meta-analysis Photochemotherapy - methods Photodynamic diagnosis Photosensitizing Agents Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma |
| title | Diagnostic accuracy of photodynamic diagnosis for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20photodynamic%20diagnosis%20for%20upper%20urinary%20tract%20urothelial%20carcinoma:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Photodiagnosis%20and%20photodynamic%20therapy&rft.au=Liu,%20Qiangzhao&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=32&rft.spage=102067&rft.epage=102067&rft.pages=102067-102067&rft.artnum=102067&rft.issn=1572-1000&rft.eissn=1873-1597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2454137260%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454137260&rft_id=info:pmid/33096285&rft_els_id=S157210002030421X&rfr_iscdi=true |