American Board of Surgery Statement on Assessment and Robotic Surgery
[...]for urologic oncology, the number of robotic procedures was greater than open surgery. Other authors have found no significant differences in outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic surgery11–13 In rectal surgery for cancer, some investigators have shown that compared to laparoscopic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2021-02, Vol.221 (2), p.424-426 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 426 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 424 |
| container_title | The American journal of surgery |
| container_volume | 221 |
| creator | Arca, Marjorie J. Adams, Reid B. Angelos, Peter Fanelli, Robert D. Mammen, Joshua M.V. Nelson, M. Timothy Neumeister, Michael W. Robinson, Allison J. Buyske, Jo |
| description | [...]for urologic oncology, the number of robotic procedures was greater than open surgery. Other authors have found no significant differences in outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic surgery11–13 In rectal surgery for cancer, some investigators have shown that compared to laparoscopic surgery, robotic rectal resection is associated with decreased likelihood of successful oncologic resection.14 At this point, there is no consensus supporting the superiority of robotic surgery for procedures within the realm of the specialties represented by the American Board of Surgery.Score The subject of “Robotic Surgery Principles” has been included in the ABS SCORE curriculum and is designated a “Core” knowledge content.Education and training committee recommendations Robotic surgery is not a discipline on its own, rather it is an enabling technology. Elements of robotic surgery are considered either core or advanced in the ABS SCORE Curriculum. [...]knowledge and skills in robotic surgery can and should be assessed in ITE and QE, CE, or even CCA, as deemed appropriate by each subspecialty board. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.039 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454133459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961020306085</els_id><sourcerecordid>2576660449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3ae05626a9a1e34024403857a6d72f4d6e5c1ddce77a52197213937ff967b5503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LHEEQhhtJ0FXzEyIDuXiZSfX39imsoiYgCGrOTW93TZhhZ9p0zwj-e3vd1UMuORUFz_tW8RDylUJDgarvfeOGPs_pT8OAQQOmAW4OyIIutanpcsk_kQUAsNooCkfkOOe-rJQKfkiOOAejqYEFuVoNmDrvxuoiuhSq2FYPpRTTS_UwuQkHHKcqjtUqZ8z5bXNjqO7jOk6df2dPyefWbTJ-2c8T8vv66vHyZ317d_PrcnVbe274VHOHIBVTzjiKXAATAvhSaqeCZq0ICqWnIXjU2klGjWa05HTbGqXXUgI_Iee73qcU_86YJzt02eNm40aMc7ZMSEE5F9IU9Ns_aB_nNJbvLJNaKQVCbCm5o3yKOSds7VPqBpdeLAW79Wx7u_dst54tGFs8l9zZvn1eDxg-Uu9iC_BjB2DR8dxhstl3OHoMXUI_2RC7_5x4BWAUjwo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576660449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>American Board of Surgery Statement on Assessment and Robotic Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Arca, Marjorie J. ; Adams, Reid B. ; Angelos, Peter ; Fanelli, Robert D. ; Mammen, Joshua M.V. ; Nelson, M. Timothy ; Neumeister, Michael W. ; Robinson, Allison J. ; Buyske, Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Arca, Marjorie J. ; Adams, Reid B. ; Angelos, Peter ; Fanelli, Robert D. ; Mammen, Joshua M.V. ; Nelson, M. Timothy ; Neumeister, Michael W. ; Robinson, Allison J. ; Buyske, Jo</creatorcontrib><description>[...]for urologic oncology, the number of robotic procedures was greater than open surgery. Other authors have found no significant differences in outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic surgery11–13 In rectal surgery for cancer, some investigators have shown that compared to laparoscopic surgery, robotic rectal resection is associated with decreased likelihood of successful oncologic resection.14 At this point, there is no consensus supporting the superiority of robotic surgery for procedures within the realm of the specialties represented by the American Board of Surgery.Score The subject of “Robotic Surgery Principles” has been included in the ABS SCORE curriculum and is designated a “Core” knowledge content.Education and training committee recommendations Robotic surgery is not a discipline on its own, rather it is an enabling technology. Elements of robotic surgery are considered either core or advanced in the ABS SCORE Curriculum. [...]knowledge and skills in robotic surgery can and should be assessed in ITE and QE, CE, or even CCA, as deemed appropriate by each subspecialty board.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33097190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accreditation - standards ; Clinical outcomes ; Conflicts of interest ; Councils ; Curricula ; Discipline ; Education ; Endoscopy ; FDA approval ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Patients ; Rectum ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - education ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - trends ; Specialties, Surgical - organization & administration ; Specialties, Surgical - standards ; Specialty Boards - standards ; Surgeons ; Surgeons - education ; Surgeons - standards ; Surgery ; Training ; United States ; Urology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2021-02, Vol.221 (2), p.424-426</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3ae05626a9a1e34024403857a6d72f4d6e5c1ddce77a52197213937ff967b5503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3ae05626a9a1e34024403857a6d72f4d6e5c1ddce77a52197213937ff967b5503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2576660449?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994,64384,64386,64388,72240</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33097190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arca, Marjorie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Reid B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelos, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammen, Joshua M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, M. Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumeister, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Allison J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyske, Jo</creatorcontrib><title>American Board of Surgery Statement on Assessment and Robotic Surgery</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>[...]for urologic oncology, the number of robotic procedures was greater than open surgery. Other authors have found no significant differences in outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic surgery11–13 In rectal surgery for cancer, some investigators have shown that compared to laparoscopic surgery, robotic rectal resection is associated with decreased likelihood of successful oncologic resection.14 At this point, there is no consensus supporting the superiority of robotic surgery for procedures within the realm of the specialties represented by the American Board of Surgery.Score The subject of “Robotic Surgery Principles” has been included in the ABS SCORE curriculum and is designated a “Core” knowledge content.Education and training committee recommendations Robotic surgery is not a discipline on its own, rather it is an enabling technology. Elements of robotic surgery are considered either core or advanced in the ABS SCORE Curriculum. [...]knowledge and skills in robotic surgery can and should be assessed in ITE and QE, CE, or even CCA, as deemed appropriate by each subspecialty board.</description><subject>Accreditation - standards</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - education</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - trends</subject><subject>Specialties, Surgical - organization & administration</subject><subject>Specialties, Surgical - standards</subject><subject>Specialty Boards - standards</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgeons - education</subject><subject>Surgeons - standards</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LHEEQhhtJ0FXzEyIDuXiZSfX39imsoiYgCGrOTW93TZhhZ9p0zwj-e3vd1UMuORUFz_tW8RDylUJDgarvfeOGPs_pT8OAQQOmAW4OyIIutanpcsk_kQUAsNooCkfkOOe-rJQKfkiOOAejqYEFuVoNmDrvxuoiuhSq2FYPpRTTS_UwuQkHHKcqjtUqZ8z5bXNjqO7jOk6df2dPyefWbTJ-2c8T8vv66vHyZ317d_PrcnVbe274VHOHIBVTzjiKXAATAvhSaqeCZq0ICqWnIXjU2klGjWa05HTbGqXXUgI_Iee73qcU_86YJzt02eNm40aMc7ZMSEE5F9IU9Ns_aB_nNJbvLJNaKQVCbCm5o3yKOSds7VPqBpdeLAW79Wx7u_dst54tGFs8l9zZvn1eDxg-Uu9iC_BjB2DR8dxhstl3OHoMXUI_2RC7_5x4BWAUjwo</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Arca, Marjorie J.</creator><creator>Adams, Reid B.</creator><creator>Angelos, Peter</creator><creator>Fanelli, Robert D.</creator><creator>Mammen, Joshua M.V.</creator><creator>Nelson, M. Timothy</creator><creator>Neumeister, Michael W.</creator><creator>Robinson, Allison J.</creator><creator>Buyske, Jo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>American Board of Surgery Statement on Assessment and Robotic Surgery</title><author>Arca, Marjorie J. ; Adams, Reid B. ; Angelos, Peter ; Fanelli, Robert D. ; Mammen, Joshua M.V. ; Nelson, M. Timothy ; Neumeister, Michael W. ; Robinson, Allison J. ; Buyske, Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3ae05626a9a1e34024403857a6d72f4d6e5c1ddce77a52197213937ff967b5503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accreditation - standards</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - education</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - trends</topic><topic>Specialties, Surgical - organization & administration</topic><topic>Specialties, Surgical - standards</topic><topic>Specialty Boards - standards</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgeons - education</topic><topic>Surgeons - standards</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arca, Marjorie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Reid B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelos, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammen, Joshua M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, M. Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumeister, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Allison J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyske, Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arca, Marjorie J.</au><au>Adams, Reid B.</au><au>Angelos, Peter</au><au>Fanelli, Robert D.</au><au>Mammen, Joshua M.V.</au><au>Nelson, M. Timothy</au><au>Neumeister, Michael W.</au><au>Robinson, Allison J.</au><au>Buyske, Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>American Board of Surgery Statement on Assessment and Robotic Surgery</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>221</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>424</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>424-426</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>[...]for urologic oncology, the number of robotic procedures was greater than open surgery. Other authors have found no significant differences in outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic surgery11–13 In rectal surgery for cancer, some investigators have shown that compared to laparoscopic surgery, robotic rectal resection is associated with decreased likelihood of successful oncologic resection.14 At this point, there is no consensus supporting the superiority of robotic surgery for procedures within the realm of the specialties represented by the American Board of Surgery.Score The subject of “Robotic Surgery Principles” has been included in the ABS SCORE curriculum and is designated a “Core” knowledge content.Education and training committee recommendations Robotic surgery is not a discipline on its own, rather it is an enabling technology. Elements of robotic surgery are considered either core or advanced in the ABS SCORE Curriculum. [...]knowledge and skills in robotic surgery can and should be assessed in ITE and QE, CE, or even CCA, as deemed appropriate by each subspecialty board.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33097190</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.039</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
| ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2021-02, Vol.221 (2), p.424-426 |
| issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454133459 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Accreditation - standards Clinical outcomes Conflicts of interest Councils Curricula Discipline Education Endoscopy FDA approval Gynecology Humans Laparoscopy Patients Rectum Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - education Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards Robotic Surgical Procedures - trends Specialties, Surgical - organization & administration Specialties, Surgical - standards Specialty Boards - standards Surgeons Surgeons - education Surgeons - standards Surgery Training United States Urology |
| title | American Board of Surgery Statement on Assessment and Robotic Surgery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A46%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=American%20Board%20of%20Surgery%20Statement%20on%20Assessment%20and%20Robotic%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Arca,%20Marjorie%20J.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=221&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=424&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=424-426&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576660449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576660449&rft_id=info:pmid/33097190&rft_els_id=S0002961020306085&rfr_iscdi=true |