Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Revised Brief Addiction Monitor

There are currently 2 versions of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) being widely used within Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and other treatment settings: the BAM, which entails use of discrete response options for all items, and the revised version, the BAM-R, which consists of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological assessment 2021-03, Vol.33 (3), p.273-278
Hauptverfasser: Hallinan, Sean, Gaddy, Melinda, Ghosh, Arpita, Burgen, Emily
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 278
container_issue 3
container_start_page 273
container_title Psychological assessment
container_volume 33
creator Hallinan, Sean
Gaddy, Melinda
Ghosh, Arpita
Burgen, Emily
description There are currently 2 versions of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) being widely used within Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and other treatment settings: the BAM, which entails use of discrete response options for all items, and the revised version, the BAM-R, which consists of the same items but uses continuous response options for several of the items. There is also conflicting evidence about the factor structure of the original BAM, with a 4-factor structure proposed by 1 study that refutes a 3-factor structure proposed from the original study of the measure. The BAM-R is widely administered in substance use treatment settings across the country and is overtaking the discrete BAM as the preferred instrument, although little research has examined the factor structure or longitudinal performance of this version of the measure. The purpose of this study is to examine the factor structure and temporal stability of the BAM-R among a large national sample of veterans across multiple treatment settings (i.e., all VA veterans with at least 2 complete BAM-R administrations reflected in the medical record; N = 22,453). Findings suggest that the 4-factor structure is superior to the commonly used 3-factor structure for both model fit and stability over two occasions of measurement and should be the factor structure used for clinical and research purposes pending further measure revisions. Public Significance Statement A widely used assessment in substance use disorder treatment settings, the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM), has 2 versions: the BAM and the BAM-R. In this study, we demonstrate that the original 3-factor structure of the BAM does not fit the data from the BAM-R as well as does an alternative 4-factor structure, and we discuss implications for future research and clinical use of the BAM-R.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pas0000973
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454128693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509633987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ed71c3f1d3c7fb46a1827e11d73b44e4a73196f1f6185feb3a62fffcbaf04e633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UFrFTEQB_BQLLY-vfQDSMCLKFuTnexmc6zFaqGlUBW8hdnsBFPe212TbKHfvnm81woezGXm8OPPkD9jJ1KcSgH604xJlGc0HLBjacBUEtSvF2UXSlTQGHHEXqV0J4RU0DUv2RGAMKKr9TG7vUCXp8i_57i4vETiOA78mjCVfUNj5pfjPcaAoyM-eZ5_E7-l-5Bo4J9jIM_PhiG4HKaRX09jKFmv2aHHdaI3-7liPy--_Dj_Vl3dfL08P7uqELTJFQ1aOvByAKd9r1qU5SCSctDQK0UKNUjTeulb2TWeesC29t67Hr1Q1AKs2Ptd7hynPwulbDchOVqvcaRpSbZWjZJ115otffcPvZuWOJbrbN0IU8JMp_-rVAN7uWIfdsrFKaVI3s4xbDA-WCnstg_7t4-C3-4jl35DwzN9KqCAjzuAM9o5PTiMObg1JbfEWL5_G1a0BVswPAJuyZQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2453250963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Revised Brief Addiction Monitor</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Hallinan, Sean ; Gaddy, Melinda ; Ghosh, Arpita ; Burgen, Emily</creator><contributor>Ben-Porath, Yossef S ; Suhr, Julie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Sean ; Gaddy, Melinda ; Ghosh, Arpita ; Burgen, Emily ; Ben-Porath, Yossef S ; Suhr, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>There are currently 2 versions of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) being widely used within Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and other treatment settings: the BAM, which entails use of discrete response options for all items, and the revised version, the BAM-R, which consists of the same items but uses continuous response options for several of the items. There is also conflicting evidence about the factor structure of the original BAM, with a 4-factor structure proposed by 1 study that refutes a 3-factor structure proposed from the original study of the measure. The BAM-R is widely administered in substance use treatment settings across the country and is overtaking the discrete BAM as the preferred instrument, although little research has examined the factor structure or longitudinal performance of this version of the measure. The purpose of this study is to examine the factor structure and temporal stability of the BAM-R among a large national sample of veterans across multiple treatment settings (i.e., all VA veterans with at least 2 complete BAM-R administrations reflected in the medical record; N = 22,453). Findings suggest that the 4-factor structure is superior to the commonly used 3-factor structure for both model fit and stability over two occasions of measurement and should be the factor structure used for clinical and research purposes pending further measure revisions. Public Significance Statement A widely used assessment in substance use disorder treatment settings, the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM), has 2 versions: the BAM and the BAM-R. In this study, we demonstrate that the original 3-factor structure of the BAM does not fit the data from the BAM-R as well as does an alternative 4-factor structure, and we discuss implications for future research and clinical use of the BAM-R.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0000973</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33090827</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Addictions ; Clinical Models ; Discrete element method ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Human ; Male ; Measurement ; Military Veterans ; Quantitative psychology ; Structural Equation Modeling ; Substance Use Treatment ; Treatment ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2021-03, Vol.33 (3), p.273-278</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ed71c3f1d3c7fb46a1827e11d73b44e4a73196f1f6185feb3a62fffcbaf04e633</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0287-6914</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33090827$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</contributor><contributor>Suhr, Julie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaddy, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Arpita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgen, Emily</creatorcontrib><title>Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Revised Brief Addiction Monitor</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>There are currently 2 versions of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) being widely used within Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and other treatment settings: the BAM, which entails use of discrete response options for all items, and the revised version, the BAM-R, which consists of the same items but uses continuous response options for several of the items. There is also conflicting evidence about the factor structure of the original BAM, with a 4-factor structure proposed by 1 study that refutes a 3-factor structure proposed from the original study of the measure. The BAM-R is widely administered in substance use treatment settings across the country and is overtaking the discrete BAM as the preferred instrument, although little research has examined the factor structure or longitudinal performance of this version of the measure. The purpose of this study is to examine the factor structure and temporal stability of the BAM-R among a large national sample of veterans across multiple treatment settings (i.e., all VA veterans with at least 2 complete BAM-R administrations reflected in the medical record; N = 22,453). Findings suggest that the 4-factor structure is superior to the commonly used 3-factor structure for both model fit and stability over two occasions of measurement and should be the factor structure used for clinical and research purposes pending further measure revisions. Public Significance Statement A widely used assessment in substance use disorder treatment settings, the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM), has 2 versions: the BAM and the BAM-R. In this study, we demonstrate that the original 3-factor structure of the BAM does not fit the data from the BAM-R as well as does an alternative 4-factor structure, and we discuss implications for future research and clinical use of the BAM-R.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Clinical Models</subject><subject>Discrete element method</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Military Veterans</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Structural Equation Modeling</subject><subject>Substance Use Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UFrFTEQB_BQLLY-vfQDSMCLKFuTnexmc6zFaqGlUBW8hdnsBFPe212TbKHfvnm81woezGXm8OPPkD9jJ1KcSgH604xJlGc0HLBjacBUEtSvF2UXSlTQGHHEXqV0J4RU0DUv2RGAMKKr9TG7vUCXp8i_57i4vETiOA78mjCVfUNj5pfjPcaAoyM-eZ5_E7-l-5Bo4J9jIM_PhiG4HKaRX09jKFmv2aHHdaI3-7liPy--_Dj_Vl3dfL08P7uqELTJFQ1aOvByAKd9r1qU5SCSctDQK0UKNUjTeulb2TWeesC29t67Hr1Q1AKs2Ptd7hynPwulbDchOVqvcaRpSbZWjZJ115otffcPvZuWOJbrbN0IU8JMp_-rVAN7uWIfdsrFKaVI3s4xbDA-WCnstg_7t4-C3-4jl35DwzN9KqCAjzuAM9o5PTiMObg1JbfEWL5_G1a0BVswPAJuyZQU</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Hallinan, Sean</creator><creator>Gaddy, Melinda</creator><creator>Ghosh, Arpita</creator><creator>Burgen, Emily</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-6914</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Revised Brief Addiction Monitor</title><author>Hallinan, Sean ; Gaddy, Melinda ; Ghosh, Arpita ; Burgen, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ed71c3f1d3c7fb46a1827e11d73b44e4a73196f1f6185feb3a62fffcbaf04e633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Clinical Models</topic><topic>Discrete element method</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Military Veterans</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Structural Equation Modeling</topic><topic>Substance Use Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaddy, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Arpita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgen, Emily</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallinan, Sean</au><au>Gaddy, Melinda</au><au>Ghosh, Arpita</au><au>Burgen, Emily</au><au>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</au><au>Suhr, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Revised Brief Addiction Monitor</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>273-278</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>There are currently 2 versions of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) being widely used within Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and other treatment settings: the BAM, which entails use of discrete response options for all items, and the revised version, the BAM-R, which consists of the same items but uses continuous response options for several of the items. There is also conflicting evidence about the factor structure of the original BAM, with a 4-factor structure proposed by 1 study that refutes a 3-factor structure proposed from the original study of the measure. The BAM-R is widely administered in substance use treatment settings across the country and is overtaking the discrete BAM as the preferred instrument, although little research has examined the factor structure or longitudinal performance of this version of the measure. The purpose of this study is to examine the factor structure and temporal stability of the BAM-R among a large national sample of veterans across multiple treatment settings (i.e., all VA veterans with at least 2 complete BAM-R administrations reflected in the medical record; N = 22,453). Findings suggest that the 4-factor structure is superior to the commonly used 3-factor structure for both model fit and stability over two occasions of measurement and should be the factor structure used for clinical and research purposes pending further measure revisions. Public Significance Statement A widely used assessment in substance use disorder treatment settings, the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM), has 2 versions: the BAM and the BAM-R. In this study, we demonstrate that the original 3-factor structure of the BAM does not fit the data from the BAM-R as well as does an alternative 4-factor structure, and we discuss implications for future research and clinical use of the BAM-R.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>33090827</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0000973</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-6914</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-3590
ispartof Psychological assessment, 2021-03, Vol.33 (3), p.273-278
issn 1040-3590
1939-134X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454128693
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Addiction
Addictions
Clinical Models
Discrete element method
Factor Structure
Female
Human
Male
Measurement
Military Veterans
Quantitative psychology
Structural Equation Modeling
Substance Use Treatment
Treatment
Veterans
title Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Revised Brief Addiction Monitor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A12%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factor%20Structure%20and%20Measurement%20Invariance%20of%20the%20Revised%20Brief%20Addiction%20Monitor&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Hallinan,%20Sean&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=273-278&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0000973&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509633987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2453250963&rft_id=info:pmid/33090827&rfr_iscdi=true