B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates
Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2022-01, Vol.106 (1), p.32-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Silva, Luzia Diegues Santos, Albert Hirai, Flavio Allemann, Norma Berezovsky, Adriana Salomão, Solange Rios Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de Andrade, Gabriel Maia, André Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de |
description | Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454120678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610724172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcGOFCEQhonRuOPqKxgSLx5spYAB-qib1d1kEy967tBA7zDS0AK9yTyE7yyTWVfjxXgBinx__VX5EcJA3gIw8W7cp2VXdzrMKXSUUNIxEL2gj9AGuFDtS_aP0YYQIjsAAWfoWSn7VlIB8ik6Y4z0DLZsg3586IrREa-hZl3SGu0bfOfLqgN2wZmam9Gh-BTS7QHraPHisk_t0NXfuYZal1y0qZi0HPCUMl6ys95UH2_xtMb2SLE1y640i4J9xN-O4rTkVOrOFV9w87fe6urKc_Rk0qG4F_f3Ofr68fLLxVV38_nT9cX7m27kjNbOCM25A5BCMAJUb0UPQllheqWFknYr-3EEyUclrLIMOHWTkSCV5IQyY9g5en3q26b4vrpSh9kX40LQ0aW1DJRvOVAipGroq7_QfVpzW6lRAoikHCRtlDpRpq1VspuGJftZ58MAZDhGNvwZ2XCMbDhF1qQv7w3WcXb2QfgrowawEzDO-_9py3-rHkb-p-wnh0-7QQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610724172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Silva, Luzia Diegues ; Santos, Albert ; Hirai, Flavio ; Allemann, Norma ; Berezovsky, Adriana ; Salomão, Solange Rios ; Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de ; Andrade, Gabriel ; Maia, André ; Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de ; Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luzia Diegues ; Santos, Albert ; Hirai, Flavio ; Allemann, Norma ; Berezovsky, Adriana ; Salomão, Solange Rios ; Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de ; Andrade, Gabriel ; Maia, André ; Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de ; Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creatorcontrib><description>Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33093153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial Organs ; Clinical science ; Cornea ; Cornea - diagnostic imaging ; Cornea - surgery ; Corneal Diseases - diagnosis ; Corneal Diseases - surgery ; Electrophysiology ; Endoscopy ; Evoked Potentials, Visual ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Prostheses and Implants ; Prosthesis ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Retina ; Retinal detachment ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2022-01, Vol.106 (1), p.32-36</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6350-8221 ; 0000-0002-7384-9342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luzia Diegues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allemann, Norma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berezovsky, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salomão, Solange Rios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creatorcontrib><title>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing.</description><subject>Artificial Organs</subject><subject>Clinical science</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Cornea - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cornea - surgery</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Prosthesis</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Retinal detachment</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkcGOFCEQhonRuOPqKxgSLx5spYAB-qib1d1kEy967tBA7zDS0AK9yTyE7yyTWVfjxXgBinx__VX5EcJA3gIw8W7cp2VXdzrMKXSUUNIxEL2gj9AGuFDtS_aP0YYQIjsAAWfoWSn7VlIB8ik6Y4z0DLZsg3586IrREa-hZl3SGu0bfOfLqgN2wZmam9Gh-BTS7QHraPHisk_t0NXfuYZal1y0qZi0HPCUMl6ys95UH2_xtMb2SLE1y640i4J9xN-O4rTkVOrOFV9w87fe6urKc_Rk0qG4F_f3Ofr68fLLxVV38_nT9cX7m27kjNbOCM25A5BCMAJUb0UPQllheqWFknYr-3EEyUclrLIMOHWTkSCV5IQyY9g5en3q26b4vrpSh9kX40LQ0aW1DJRvOVAipGroq7_QfVpzW6lRAoikHCRtlDpRpq1VspuGJftZ58MAZDhGNvwZ2XCMbDhF1qQv7w3WcXb2QfgrowawEzDO-_9py3-rHkb-p-wnh0-7QQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Silva, Luzia Diegues</creator><creator>Santos, Albert</creator><creator>Hirai, Flavio</creator><creator>Allemann, Norma</creator><creator>Berezovsky, Adriana</creator><creator>Salomão, Solange Rios</creator><creator>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</creator><creator>Andrade, Gabriel</creator><creator>Maia, André</creator><creator>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</creator><creator>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-8221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-9342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</title><author>Silva, Luzia Diegues ; Santos, Albert ; Hirai, Flavio ; Allemann, Norma ; Berezovsky, Adriana ; Salomão, Solange Rios ; Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de ; Andrade, Gabriel ; Maia, André ; Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de ; Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial Organs</topic><topic>Clinical science</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Cornea - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cornea - surgery</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Prosthesis</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Retinal detachment</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luzia Diegues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allemann, Norma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berezovsky, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salomão, Solange Rios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Luzia Diegues</au><au>Santos, Albert</au><au>Hirai, Flavio</au><au>Allemann, Norma</au><au>Berezovsky, Adriana</au><au>Salomão, Solange Rios</au><au>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</au><au>Andrade, Gabriel</au><au>Maia, André</au><au>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</au><au>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Br J Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>32-36</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><abstract>Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>33093153</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-8221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-9342</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2022-01, Vol.106 (1), p.32-36 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454120678 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Artificial Organs Clinical science Cornea Cornea - diagnostic imaging Cornea - surgery Corneal Diseases - diagnosis Corneal Diseases - surgery Electrophysiology Endoscopy Evoked Potentials, Visual Glaucoma Humans Patients Postoperative Complications - surgery Prospective Studies Prostheses and Implants Prosthesis Prosthesis Implantation - methods Retina Retinal detachment Retrospective Studies Surgery Treatment Surgery Ultrasonic imaging |
title | B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=B-scan%20ultrasound,%20visual%20electrophysiology%20and%20perioperative%20videoendoscopy%20for%20predicting%20functional%20results%20in%20keratoprosthesis%20candidates&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Silva,%20Luzia%20Diegues&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=32-36&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610724172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610724172&rft_id=info:pmid/33093153&rfr_iscdi=true |