B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates

Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 2022-01, Vol.106 (1), p.32-36
Hauptverfasser: Silva, Luzia Diegues, Santos, Albert, Hirai, Flavio, Allemann, Norma, Berezovsky, Adriana, Salomão, Solange Rios, Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de, Andrade, Gabriel, Maia, André, Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de, Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
container_title British journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 106
creator Silva, Luzia Diegues
Santos, Albert
Hirai, Flavio
Allemann, Norma
Berezovsky, Adriana
Salomão, Solange Rios
Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de
Andrade, Gabriel
Maia, André
Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de
Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de
description Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454120678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610724172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcGOFCEQhonRuOPqKxgSLx5spYAB-qib1d1kEy967tBA7zDS0AK9yTyE7yyTWVfjxXgBinx__VX5EcJA3gIw8W7cp2VXdzrMKXSUUNIxEL2gj9AGuFDtS_aP0YYQIjsAAWfoWSn7VlIB8ik6Y4z0DLZsg3586IrREa-hZl3SGu0bfOfLqgN2wZmam9Gh-BTS7QHraPHisk_t0NXfuYZal1y0qZi0HPCUMl6ys95UH2_xtMb2SLE1y640i4J9xN-O4rTkVOrOFV9w87fe6urKc_Rk0qG4F_f3Ofr68fLLxVV38_nT9cX7m27kjNbOCM25A5BCMAJUb0UPQllheqWFknYr-3EEyUclrLIMOHWTkSCV5IQyY9g5en3q26b4vrpSh9kX40LQ0aW1DJRvOVAipGroq7_QfVpzW6lRAoikHCRtlDpRpq1VspuGJftZ58MAZDhGNvwZ2XCMbDhF1qQv7w3WcXb2QfgrowawEzDO-_9py3-rHkb-p-wnh0-7QQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610724172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Silva, Luzia Diegues ; Santos, Albert ; Hirai, Flavio ; Allemann, Norma ; Berezovsky, Adriana ; Salomão, Solange Rios ; Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de ; Andrade, Gabriel ; Maia, André ; Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de ; Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luzia Diegues ; Santos, Albert ; Hirai, Flavio ; Allemann, Norma ; Berezovsky, Adriana ; Salomão, Solange Rios ; Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de ; Andrade, Gabriel ; Maia, André ; Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de ; Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creatorcontrib><description>Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33093153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial Organs ; Clinical science ; Cornea ; Cornea - diagnostic imaging ; Cornea - surgery ; Corneal Diseases - diagnosis ; Corneal Diseases - surgery ; Electrophysiology ; Endoscopy ; Evoked Potentials, Visual ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Prostheses and Implants ; Prosthesis ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Retina ; Retinal detachment ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2022-01, Vol.106 (1), p.32-36</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6350-8221 ; 0000-0002-7384-9342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33093153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luzia Diegues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allemann, Norma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berezovsky, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salomão, Solange Rios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creatorcontrib><title>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing.</description><subject>Artificial Organs</subject><subject>Clinical science</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Cornea - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cornea - surgery</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Prosthesis</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Retinal detachment</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkcGOFCEQhonRuOPqKxgSLx5spYAB-qib1d1kEy967tBA7zDS0AK9yTyE7yyTWVfjxXgBinx__VX5EcJA3gIw8W7cp2VXdzrMKXSUUNIxEL2gj9AGuFDtS_aP0YYQIjsAAWfoWSn7VlIB8ik6Y4z0DLZsg3586IrREa-hZl3SGu0bfOfLqgN2wZmam9Gh-BTS7QHraPHisk_t0NXfuYZal1y0qZi0HPCUMl6ys95UH2_xtMb2SLE1y640i4J9xN-O4rTkVOrOFV9w87fe6urKc_Rk0qG4F_f3Ofr68fLLxVV38_nT9cX7m27kjNbOCM25A5BCMAJUb0UPQllheqWFknYr-3EEyUclrLIMOHWTkSCV5IQyY9g5en3q26b4vrpSh9kX40LQ0aW1DJRvOVAipGroq7_QfVpzW6lRAoikHCRtlDpRpq1VspuGJftZ58MAZDhGNvwZ2XCMbDhF1qQv7w3WcXb2QfgrowawEzDO-_9py3-rHkb-p-wnh0-7QQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Silva, Luzia Diegues</creator><creator>Santos, Albert</creator><creator>Hirai, Flavio</creator><creator>Allemann, Norma</creator><creator>Berezovsky, Adriana</creator><creator>Salomão, Solange Rios</creator><creator>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</creator><creator>Andrade, Gabriel</creator><creator>Maia, André</creator><creator>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</creator><creator>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-8221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-9342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</title><author>Silva, Luzia Diegues ; Santos, Albert ; Hirai, Flavio ; Allemann, Norma ; Berezovsky, Adriana ; Salomão, Solange Rios ; Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de ; Andrade, Gabriel ; Maia, André ; Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de ; Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-c6a44e117663012a569168d6c98a687d579bb174b86d8d3142efc717874023cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial Organs</topic><topic>Clinical science</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Cornea - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cornea - surgery</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Prosthesis</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Retinal detachment</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luzia Diegues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allemann, Norma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berezovsky, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salomão, Solange Rios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Luzia Diegues</au><au>Santos, Albert</au><au>Hirai, Flavio</au><au>Allemann, Norma</au><au>Berezovsky, Adriana</au><au>Salomão, Solange Rios</au><au>Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Chaves de</au><au>Andrade, Gabriel</au><au>Maia, André</au><au>Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de</au><au>Oliveira, Lauro Augusto de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Br J Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>32-36</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><abstract>Background/AimsWe analysed the ability of B-scan ultrasound, ocular electrophysiology testing and videoendoscopic examination for predicting visual prognosis in Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1) candidates. Indirect anatomical and electrophysiological findings and results from direct endoscopic evaluations were correlated with postoperative functional data.MethodsIn this prospective and interventional study, we included 13 individuals who had previously been indicated for Kpro-1 surgery. All subjects underwent preoperative screening, including ophthalmic evaluation, B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and perioperative intraocular videoendoscopic evaluation (VE). B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE evaluation results were categorised as favourable or unfavourable predictors of postoperative functional results according to predefined criteria. The predictability values of B-scan ultrasound, electrophysiological testing, and VE prognostication were calculated based on the visual acuity level achieved.ResultsAll surgeries and perioperative VEs were uneventful. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from light perception to counting fingers. The 1-year postoperative BCVA was better than 20/200 (satisfactory visual acuity result) in 10 eyes (76.9%) and 20/40 or better in 5 eyes (38.5%). B-scan ultrasound presented a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for satisfactory postoperative visual acuity, electroretinography showed a PPV of 66.7%, and visual evoked potential presented a PPV of 66.7%. The perioperative VE PPV of a negative finding for satisfactory visual acuity was 100%.ConclusionsFundoscopic visualisation by intraocular VE is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to predict functional outcomes in keratoprosthesis candidates. This technique demonstrated better prognostication in keratoprosthesis candidates than B-scan ultrasound and electrophysiological testing.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>33093153</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-8221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-9342</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1161
ispartof British journal of ophthalmology, 2022-01, Vol.106 (1), p.32-36
issn 0007-1161
1468-2079
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2454120678
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Artificial Organs
Clinical science
Cornea
Cornea - diagnostic imaging
Cornea - surgery
Corneal Diseases - diagnosis
Corneal Diseases - surgery
Electrophysiology
Endoscopy
Evoked Potentials, Visual
Glaucoma
Humans
Patients
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Prospective Studies
Prostheses and Implants
Prosthesis
Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Retina
Retinal detachment
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Treatment Surgery
Ultrasonic imaging
title B-scan ultrasound, visual electrophysiology and perioperative videoendoscopy for predicting functional results in keratoprosthesis candidates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=B-scan%20ultrasound,%20visual%20electrophysiology%20and%20perioperative%20videoendoscopy%20for%20predicting%20functional%20results%20in%20keratoprosthesis%20candidates&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Silva,%20Luzia%20Diegues&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=32-36&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610724172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610724172&rft_id=info:pmid/33093153&rfr_iscdi=true