Administering DVT Prophylaxis Sooner Than 48 Hours Does Not Increase Failure of Nonoperative Management of High-Grade (Grades III-V) Splenic Injuries

Splenic injuries are mostly treated with nonoperative management (NOM) with observation to monitor for continued hemorrhage and holding early chemical DVT prophylaxis to reduce the risk of NOM failure. Eberle et al demonstrated chemoprophylaxis prior to 72 hours didn’t increase failure rate of NOM....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2021-04, Vol.87 (4), p.527-531
Hauptverfasser: Griffard, Jared, Sappington, Bethany, Griffard, Megan, Bollig, Reagan, McMillen, James, McKinney, Amanda, Smith, Lou, Daley, Brian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 531
container_issue 4
container_start_page 527
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 87
creator Griffard, Jared
Sappington, Bethany
Griffard, Megan
Bollig, Reagan
McMillen, James
McKinney, Amanda
Smith, Lou
Daley, Brian
description Splenic injuries are mostly treated with nonoperative management (NOM) with observation to monitor for continued hemorrhage and holding early chemical DVT prophylaxis to reduce the risk of NOM failure. Eberle et al demonstrated chemoprophylaxis prior to 72 hours didn’t increase failure rate of NOM. We chose to extrapolate this finding and compare outcomes in high-grade splenic injuries (HGSI) with chemoprophylaxis before and after 48 hours. From January 2013 to December 2017, 104 patients with HGSI received chemoprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 72 hours of diagnosis. Of these, 8 patients received chemoprophylaxis within 24 hours, 46 between 24 and 48 hours, and 50 patients between 48 and 72 hours. This population consisted of 70 males and 34 females, with an average age of 40.1 years. The average ISS was 23 and the majority (77%) were grade 3 injuries. We observed 6 failures of NOM: 1 in the
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0003134820950303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2452093757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0003134820950303</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2452093757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-de5ccd2da677ec60c325e8462b1094f86161ec86b51af4c3fdd9f4adc37559f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS3Uqkyhe1aVpW7oItSO7cRZIihMJPqQGNhGHvtmxqPEDnZSlR_S_4uH4SEhdXVln-8eW-cgdETJCaVl-Y0QwijjMieVIIywPTSjQoiskjl7h2ZbOdvq--hjjJt05IWgH9A-Y6TkhJYz9O_U9NbZOEKwboXPbxf4d_DD-r5Tf23E1947CHixVg5zied-ChGfe4j4px9x7XQAFQFfKNtNAbBv073zAwQ12j-AfyinVtCDG7fS3K7W2WVQBvDx44i4ruvs9iu-HjpwVifDzRQsxEP0vlVdhE9P8wDdXHxfnM2zq1-X9dnpVaZZIcbMgNDa5EYVZQm6IJrlAiQv8iUlFW9lQQsKWhZLQVXLNWuNqVqujGalEFUr2QE63vkOwd9NEMemt1FD1ykHfopNzkWKNtFlQr-8QTcpDJd-1-SCSiIFpzRRZEfp4GMM0DZDsL0K9w0lzbay5m1laeXzk_G07MG8LDx3lIBsB8SU5eur_zV8AOkGnO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518085411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Administering DVT Prophylaxis Sooner Than 48 Hours Does Not Increase Failure of Nonoperative Management of High-Grade (Grades III-V) Splenic Injuries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Griffard, Jared ; Sappington, Bethany ; Griffard, Megan ; Bollig, Reagan ; McMillen, James ; McKinney, Amanda ; Smith, Lou ; Daley, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffard, Jared ; Sappington, Bethany ; Griffard, Megan ; Bollig, Reagan ; McMillen, James ; McKinney, Amanda ; Smith, Lou ; Daley, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Splenic injuries are mostly treated with nonoperative management (NOM) with observation to monitor for continued hemorrhage and holding early chemical DVT prophylaxis to reduce the risk of NOM failure. Eberle et al demonstrated chemoprophylaxis prior to 72 hours didn’t increase failure rate of NOM. We chose to extrapolate this finding and compare outcomes in high-grade splenic injuries (HGSI) with chemoprophylaxis before and after 48 hours. From January 2013 to December 2017, 104 patients with HGSI received chemoprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 72 hours of diagnosis. Of these, 8 patients received chemoprophylaxis within 24 hours, 46 between 24 and 48 hours, and 50 patients between 48 and 72 hours. This population consisted of 70 males and 34 females, with an average age of 40.1 years. The average ISS was 23 and the majority (77%) were grade 3 injuries. We observed 6 failures of NOM: 1 in the &lt;24 hour group, 3 in the 24-48 hour group, and 2 in the 48-72 hour group. There was no statistically significant difference between the &lt;24 hour and &gt;24 groups or between the &lt;48 hour and 48-72 hour groups. A linear regression analysis created a model describing the time to initiation of DVT prophylaxis using age, sex, splenic injury grade, and ISS; the failure rate decreased by 0.00002% for each hour prior to giving DVT prophylaxis, with a P value of .111. We conclude a noninferiority statement that DVT prophylaxis prior to 48 hours does not increase the risk of NOM failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0003134820950303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33074017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Abdominal Injuries - therapy ; Adult ; Age ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Chemoprevention ; Disease prevention ; Embolization ; Failure ; Failure rates ; Female ; Hemorrhage ; Heparin ; Heparin - therapeutic use ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Injuries ; Injury Severity Score ; Laboratories ; Low molecular weights ; Male ; Males ; Molecular weight ; Patients ; Prophylaxis ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary embolisms ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Spleen ; Spleen - injuries ; Statistical analysis ; Thrombosis ; Time Factors ; Trauma ; Treatment Failure ; Venous Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2021-04, Vol.87 (4), p.527-531</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-de5ccd2da677ec60c325e8462b1094f86161ec86b51af4c3fdd9f4adc37559f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-de5ccd2da677ec60c325e8462b1094f86161ec86b51af4c3fdd9f4adc37559f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0003134820950303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003134820950303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffard, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sappington, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffard, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollig, Reagan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillen, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Administering DVT Prophylaxis Sooner Than 48 Hours Does Not Increase Failure of Nonoperative Management of High-Grade (Grades III-V) Splenic Injuries</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Splenic injuries are mostly treated with nonoperative management (NOM) with observation to monitor for continued hemorrhage and holding early chemical DVT prophylaxis to reduce the risk of NOM failure. Eberle et al demonstrated chemoprophylaxis prior to 72 hours didn’t increase failure rate of NOM. We chose to extrapolate this finding and compare outcomes in high-grade splenic injuries (HGSI) with chemoprophylaxis before and after 48 hours. From January 2013 to December 2017, 104 patients with HGSI received chemoprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 72 hours of diagnosis. Of these, 8 patients received chemoprophylaxis within 24 hours, 46 between 24 and 48 hours, and 50 patients between 48 and 72 hours. This population consisted of 70 males and 34 females, with an average age of 40.1 years. The average ISS was 23 and the majority (77%) were grade 3 injuries. We observed 6 failures of NOM: 1 in the &lt;24 hour group, 3 in the 24-48 hour group, and 2 in the 48-72 hour group. There was no statistically significant difference between the &lt;24 hour and &gt;24 groups or between the &lt;48 hour and 48-72 hour groups. A linear regression analysis created a model describing the time to initiation of DVT prophylaxis using age, sex, splenic injury grade, and ISS; the failure rate decreased by 0.00002% for each hour prior to giving DVT prophylaxis, with a P value of .111. We conclude a noninferiority statement that DVT prophylaxis prior to 48 hours does not increase the risk of NOM failure.</description><subject>Abdominal Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Chemoprevention</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Embolization</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure rates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Heparin</subject><subject>Heparin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Low molecular weights</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulmonary embolisms</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Spleen</subject><subject>Spleen - injuries</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS3Uqkyhe1aVpW7oItSO7cRZIihMJPqQGNhGHvtmxqPEDnZSlR_S_4uH4SEhdXVln-8eW-cgdETJCaVl-Y0QwijjMieVIIywPTSjQoiskjl7h2ZbOdvq--hjjJt05IWgH9A-Y6TkhJYz9O_U9NbZOEKwboXPbxf4d_DD-r5Tf23E1947CHixVg5zied-ChGfe4j4px9x7XQAFQFfKNtNAbBv073zAwQ12j-AfyinVtCDG7fS3K7W2WVQBvDx44i4ruvs9iu-HjpwVifDzRQsxEP0vlVdhE9P8wDdXHxfnM2zq1-X9dnpVaZZIcbMgNDa5EYVZQm6IJrlAiQv8iUlFW9lQQsKWhZLQVXLNWuNqVqujGalEFUr2QE63vkOwd9NEMemt1FD1ykHfopNzkWKNtFlQr-8QTcpDJd-1-SCSiIFpzRRZEfp4GMM0DZDsL0K9w0lzbay5m1laeXzk_G07MG8LDx3lIBsB8SU5eur_zV8AOkGnO0</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Griffard, Jared</creator><creator>Sappington, Bethany</creator><creator>Griffard, Megan</creator><creator>Bollig, Reagan</creator><creator>McMillen, James</creator><creator>McKinney, Amanda</creator><creator>Smith, Lou</creator><creator>Daley, Brian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Administering DVT Prophylaxis Sooner Than 48 Hours Does Not Increase Failure of Nonoperative Management of High-Grade (Grades III-V) Splenic Injuries</title><author>Griffard, Jared ; Sappington, Bethany ; Griffard, Megan ; Bollig, Reagan ; McMillen, James ; McKinney, Amanda ; Smith, Lou ; Daley, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-de5ccd2da677ec60c325e8462b1094f86161ec86b51af4c3fdd9f4adc37559f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Chemoprevention</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Embolization</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure rates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Heparin</topic><topic>Heparin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Low molecular weights</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulmonary embolisms</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Spleen</topic><topic>Spleen - injuries</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffard, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sappington, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffard, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollig, Reagan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillen, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffard, Jared</au><au>Sappington, Bethany</au><au>Griffard, Megan</au><au>Bollig, Reagan</au><au>McMillen, James</au><au>McKinney, Amanda</au><au>Smith, Lou</au><au>Daley, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Administering DVT Prophylaxis Sooner Than 48 Hours Does Not Increase Failure of Nonoperative Management of High-Grade (Grades III-V) Splenic Injuries</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>527-531</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Splenic injuries are mostly treated with nonoperative management (NOM) with observation to monitor for continued hemorrhage and holding early chemical DVT prophylaxis to reduce the risk of NOM failure. Eberle et al demonstrated chemoprophylaxis prior to 72 hours didn’t increase failure rate of NOM. We chose to extrapolate this finding and compare outcomes in high-grade splenic injuries (HGSI) with chemoprophylaxis before and after 48 hours. From January 2013 to December 2017, 104 patients with HGSI received chemoprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 72 hours of diagnosis. Of these, 8 patients received chemoprophylaxis within 24 hours, 46 between 24 and 48 hours, and 50 patients between 48 and 72 hours. This population consisted of 70 males and 34 females, with an average age of 40.1 years. The average ISS was 23 and the majority (77%) were grade 3 injuries. We observed 6 failures of NOM: 1 in the &lt;24 hour group, 3 in the 24-48 hour group, and 2 in the 48-72 hour group. There was no statistically significant difference between the &lt;24 hour and &gt;24 groups or between the &lt;48 hour and 48-72 hour groups. A linear regression analysis created a model describing the time to initiation of DVT prophylaxis using age, sex, splenic injury grade, and ISS; the failure rate decreased by 0.00002% for each hour prior to giving DVT prophylaxis, with a P value of .111. We conclude a noninferiority statement that DVT prophylaxis prior to 48 hours does not increase the risk of NOM failure.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33074017</pmid><doi>10.1177/0003134820950303</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2021-04, Vol.87 (4), p.527-531
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2452093757
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Abdominal Injuries - therapy
Adult
Age
Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
Chemoprevention
Disease prevention
Embolization
Failure
Failure rates
Female
Hemorrhage
Heparin
Heparin - therapeutic use
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use
Humans
Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Laboratories
Low molecular weights
Male
Males
Molecular weight
Patients
Prophylaxis
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary embolisms
Regression analysis
Regression models
Spleen
Spleen - injuries
Statistical analysis
Thrombosis
Time Factors
Trauma
Treatment Failure
Venous Thrombosis - prevention & control
title Administering DVT Prophylaxis Sooner Than 48 Hours Does Not Increase Failure of Nonoperative Management of High-Grade (Grades III-V) Splenic Injuries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Administering%20DVT%20Prophylaxis%20Sooner%20Than%2048%20Hours%20Does%20Not%20Increase%20Failure%20of%20Nonoperative%20Management%20of%20High-Grade%20(Grades%20III-V)%20Splenic%20Injuries&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Griffard,%20Jared&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=527-531&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0003134820950303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2452093757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518085411&rft_id=info:pmid/33074017&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0003134820950303&rfr_iscdi=true