Evaluation of undergraduate Endodontic teaching in dental schools within Spain

Aim To evaluate the current situation of undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools. Methodology An online version, translated into Spanish, of a survey conducted in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077) was sent via email to the undergraduate endodontic programme leads in all 23 Span...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International endodontic journal 2021-03, Vol.54 (3), p.454-463
Hauptverfasser: Segura‐Egea, J. J., Zarza‐Rebollo, A., Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C., Cabanillas‐Balsera, D., Areal‐Quecuty, V., Martín‐González, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 463
container_issue 3
container_start_page 454
container_title International endodontic journal
container_volume 54
creator Segura‐Egea, J. J.
Zarza‐Rebollo, A.
Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C.
Cabanillas‐Balsera, D.
Areal‐Quecuty, V.
Martín‐González, J.
description Aim To evaluate the current situation of undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools. Methodology An online version, translated into Spanish, of a survey conducted in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077) was sent via email to the undergraduate endodontic programme leads in all 23 Spanish dental schools. Results The response rate was 96%. In 95% of dental schools, endodontics is taught in the fourth year. Students treat simple root canal treatment cases in 100% of schools and only in 40% treat moderate cases. In 65% of schools, students are supervised by full‐time professors who are specialists in Endodontics, significantly more frequently in private dental schools (P = 0.002). Spanish dental schools use both rotary and reciprocating instrumentation systems during endodontic training, with consistency on methods of working length determination, use of silicate‐based endodontic cements, irrigating solutions, inter‐visit medicaments and canal filling techniques. No type of magnification is used in 90% of dental schools, and only 25% use ultrasonic instruments. Private dental schools have a significantly better staff: student ratio during clinical practice (P = 0.041), spend significantly more hours in clinical training (P = 0.04) and have significantly greater number of clinical areas specifically dedicated to Endodontics (P = 0.010). Conclusions Undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools follows the key recommendations of the ESE Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines (Int Endod J 46, 2013, 1105), being, in most respects, comparable to that carried out in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077). The use of magnification and ultrasonic instruments needs to be increased. Private schools reported better results than public schools in some of the variables that were analysed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iej.13430
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2451859227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2451859227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-5e795bc1566c3a32774aa94eb553e0fc69525e9efaf97224c03bd9503366e82a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgipvTg_-ABLzooTPJa9L2KGP-QvSgnkuWvm4ZXTKbVtl_b3TqQfBdAi8fvjy-hBxzNuZxLiwuxxxSYDtkyEHJRMiC75Ih4ykkIs_lgByEsGSMSQZ8nwwAmIJcySF5mL7ppted9Y76mvauwnbe6iqukE5d5SvvOmtoh9osrJtT62iFrtMNDWbhfRPou-3iD31aa-sOyV6tm4BH3--IvFxNnyc3yf3j9e3k8j4xIIElErNCzgyXShnQILIs1bpIcSYlIKuNKqSQWGCt6yITIjUMZlURjwelMBcaRuRsm7tu_WuPoStXNhhsGu3Q96EUqeS5LITIIj39Q5e-b128Lqo856mCTEV1vlWm9SG0WJfr1q50uyk5Kz9LLmPJ5VfJ0Z58J_azFVa_8qfVCC624N02uPk_qbyd3m0jPwBK6ISb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488146376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of undergraduate Endodontic teaching in dental schools within Spain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Segura‐Egea, J. J. ; Zarza‐Rebollo, A. ; Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C. ; Cabanillas‐Balsera, D. ; Areal‐Quecuty, V. ; Martín‐González, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Segura‐Egea, J. J. ; Zarza‐Rebollo, A. ; Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C. ; Cabanillas‐Balsera, D. ; Areal‐Quecuty, V. ; Martín‐González, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To evaluate the current situation of undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools. Methodology An online version, translated into Spanish, of a survey conducted in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077) was sent via email to the undergraduate endodontic programme leads in all 23 Spanish dental schools. Results The response rate was 96%. In 95% of dental schools, endodontics is taught in the fourth year. Students treat simple root canal treatment cases in 100% of schools and only in 40% treat moderate cases. In 65% of schools, students are supervised by full‐time professors who are specialists in Endodontics, significantly more frequently in private dental schools (P = 0.002). Spanish dental schools use both rotary and reciprocating instrumentation systems during endodontic training, with consistency on methods of working length determination, use of silicate‐based endodontic cements, irrigating solutions, inter‐visit medicaments and canal filling techniques. No type of magnification is used in 90% of dental schools, and only 25% use ultrasonic instruments. Private dental schools have a significantly better staff: student ratio during clinical practice (P = 0.041), spend significantly more hours in clinical training (P = 0.04) and have significantly greater number of clinical areas specifically dedicated to Endodontics (P = 0.010). Conclusions Undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools follows the key recommendations of the ESE Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines (Int Endod J 46, 2013, 1105), being, in most respects, comparable to that carried out in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077). The use of magnification and ultrasonic instruments needs to be increased. Private schools reported better results than public schools in some of the variables that were analysed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iej.13430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33063865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical competence ; Curricula ; Dental schools ; Dentistry ; Education, Dental ; Educational evaluation ; endodontic curriculum ; endodontic teaching ; Endodontics ; Experiential learning ; Humans ; online survey ; Root canals ; Schools, Dental ; Spain ; Students ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2021-03, Vol.54 (3), p.454-463</ispartof><rights>2020 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-5e795bc1566c3a32774aa94eb553e0fc69525e9efaf97224c03bd9503366e82a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-5e795bc1566c3a32774aa94eb553e0fc69525e9efaf97224c03bd9503366e82a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0427-9059</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiej.13430$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiej.13430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Segura‐Egea, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarza‐Rebollo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabanillas‐Balsera, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Areal‐Quecuty, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín‐González, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of undergraduate Endodontic teaching in dental schools within Spain</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim To evaluate the current situation of undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools. Methodology An online version, translated into Spanish, of a survey conducted in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077) was sent via email to the undergraduate endodontic programme leads in all 23 Spanish dental schools. Results The response rate was 96%. In 95% of dental schools, endodontics is taught in the fourth year. Students treat simple root canal treatment cases in 100% of schools and only in 40% treat moderate cases. In 65% of schools, students are supervised by full‐time professors who are specialists in Endodontics, significantly more frequently in private dental schools (P = 0.002). Spanish dental schools use both rotary and reciprocating instrumentation systems during endodontic training, with consistency on methods of working length determination, use of silicate‐based endodontic cements, irrigating solutions, inter‐visit medicaments and canal filling techniques. No type of magnification is used in 90% of dental schools, and only 25% use ultrasonic instruments. Private dental schools have a significantly better staff: student ratio during clinical practice (P = 0.041), spend significantly more hours in clinical training (P = 0.04) and have significantly greater number of clinical areas specifically dedicated to Endodontics (P = 0.010). Conclusions Undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools follows the key recommendations of the ESE Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines (Int Endod J 46, 2013, 1105), being, in most respects, comparable to that carried out in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077). The use of magnification and ultrasonic instruments needs to be increased. Private schools reported better results than public schools in some of the variables that were analysed.</description><subject>Clinical competence</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Dental schools</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Education, Dental</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>endodontic curriculum</subject><subject>endodontic teaching</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>online survey</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Schools, Dental</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgipvTg_-ABLzooTPJa9L2KGP-QvSgnkuWvm4ZXTKbVtl_b3TqQfBdAi8fvjy-hBxzNuZxLiwuxxxSYDtkyEHJRMiC75Ih4ykkIs_lgByEsGSMSQZ8nwwAmIJcySF5mL7ppted9Y76mvauwnbe6iqukE5d5SvvOmtoh9osrJtT62iFrtMNDWbhfRPou-3iD31aa-sOyV6tm4BH3--IvFxNnyc3yf3j9e3k8j4xIIElErNCzgyXShnQILIs1bpIcSYlIKuNKqSQWGCt6yITIjUMZlURjwelMBcaRuRsm7tu_WuPoStXNhhsGu3Q96EUqeS5LITIIj39Q5e-b128Lqo856mCTEV1vlWm9SG0WJfr1q50uyk5Kz9LLmPJ5VfJ0Z58J_azFVa_8qfVCC624N02uPk_qbyd3m0jPwBK6ISb</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Segura‐Egea, J. J.</creator><creator>Zarza‐Rebollo, A.</creator><creator>Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C.</creator><creator>Cabanillas‐Balsera, D.</creator><creator>Areal‐Quecuty, V.</creator><creator>Martín‐González, J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-9059</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Evaluation of undergraduate Endodontic teaching in dental schools within Spain</title><author>Segura‐Egea, J. J. ; Zarza‐Rebollo, A. ; Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C. ; Cabanillas‐Balsera, D. ; Areal‐Quecuty, V. ; Martín‐González, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-5e795bc1566c3a32774aa94eb553e0fc69525e9efaf97224c03bd9503366e82a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical competence</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Dental schools</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Education, Dental</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>endodontic curriculum</topic><topic>endodontic teaching</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>online survey</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Schools, Dental</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Segura‐Egea, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarza‐Rebollo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabanillas‐Balsera, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Areal‐Quecuty, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín‐González, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Segura‐Egea, J. J.</au><au>Zarza‐Rebollo, A.</au><au>Jiménez‐Sánchez, M. C.</au><au>Cabanillas‐Balsera, D.</au><au>Areal‐Quecuty, V.</au><au>Martín‐González, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of undergraduate Endodontic teaching in dental schools within Spain</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>463</epage><pages>454-463</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim To evaluate the current situation of undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools. Methodology An online version, translated into Spanish, of a survey conducted in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077) was sent via email to the undergraduate endodontic programme leads in all 23 Spanish dental schools. Results The response rate was 96%. In 95% of dental schools, endodontics is taught in the fourth year. Students treat simple root canal treatment cases in 100% of schools and only in 40% treat moderate cases. In 65% of schools, students are supervised by full‐time professors who are specialists in Endodontics, significantly more frequently in private dental schools (P = 0.002). Spanish dental schools use both rotary and reciprocating instrumentation systems during endodontic training, with consistency on methods of working length determination, use of silicate‐based endodontic cements, irrigating solutions, inter‐visit medicaments and canal filling techniques. No type of magnification is used in 90% of dental schools, and only 25% use ultrasonic instruments. Private dental schools have a significantly better staff: student ratio during clinical practice (P = 0.041), spend significantly more hours in clinical training (P = 0.04) and have significantly greater number of clinical areas specifically dedicated to Endodontics (P = 0.010). Conclusions Undergraduate endodontic teaching in Spanish dental schools follows the key recommendations of the ESE Undergraduate Curriculum Guidelines (Int Endod J 46, 2013, 1105), being, in most respects, comparable to that carried out in the UK (Int Endod J 52, 2019, 1077). The use of magnification and ultrasonic instruments needs to be increased. Private schools reported better results than public schools in some of the variables that were analysed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33063865</pmid><doi>10.1111/iej.13430</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-9059</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2885
ispartof International endodontic journal, 2021-03, Vol.54 (3), p.454-463
issn 0143-2885
1365-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2451859227
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Clinical competence
Curricula
Dental schools
Dentistry
Education, Dental
Educational evaluation
endodontic curriculum
endodontic teaching
Endodontics
Experiential learning
Humans
online survey
Root canals
Schools, Dental
Spain
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Evaluation of undergraduate Endodontic teaching in dental schools within Spain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T15%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20undergraduate%20Endodontic%20teaching%20in%20dental%20schools%20within%20Spain&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Segura%E2%80%90Egea,%20J.%20J.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=463&rft.pages=454-463&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iej.13430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451859227%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488146376&rft_id=info:pmid/33063865&rfr_iscdi=true