Untreated small posterior fragment of ankle fracture with early removal of syndesmotic screw is associated with recurrent syndesmotic instability

•In cases of tri-malleolar fracture without PMF fixation, the syndesmotic screw should be removed at 3 months later.•Syndesmotic instability should be kept in mind and intraoperative image examination must be performed for all cases with posterior malleolar fracture.•Untreated posterior fragment of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2021-03, Vol.52 (3), p.638-643
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Tzu-Cheng, Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan, Wang, Chien-Shun, Lin, Chun-Cheng, Chang, Ming-Chau, Chiang, Chao-Ching
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 643
container_issue 3
container_start_page 638
container_title Injury
container_volume 52
creator Yang, Tzu-Cheng
Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan
Wang, Chien-Shun
Lin, Chun-Cheng
Chang, Ming-Chau
Chiang, Chao-Ching
description •In cases of tri-malleolar fracture without PMF fixation, the syndesmotic screw should be removed at 3 months later.•Syndesmotic instability should be kept in mind and intraoperative image examination must be performed for all cases with posterior malleolar fracture.•Untreated posterior fragment of ankle fracture is regarded as a risk factor for recurrent syndesmotic diastasis This retrospective study aimed to report outcomes of fixation of bi-malleolar or tri-malleolar fractures combined with syndesmotic injury with or without posterior malleolar fracture (PMF), and to ascertain whether syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks or 3 months postoperatively is more beneficial. We retrospectively reviewed patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for bi-malleolar (without PMF) or tri-malleolar ankle fracture (with PMF) with syndesmotic injury between January 2013 and December 2017 with at least 24 months of postoperative follow-up. All patients suffered syndesmotic instabilities and were treated using a syndesmotic screw without PMF fixation. Patients with bi-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively were included in Group I, tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks in Group II, and tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 3 months in Group III. Demographic data, clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed. A total of 113 patients were included (Group I, n=47; Group II, n=43; Group III, n=23). Average size of PMF was 14% in patients with tri-malleolar fractures (Groups II and III). No significant difference in ankle functional outcome among groups was observed. The recurrence rate of syndesmotic instability was 10.6% in Group I, 20.9% in Group II, and 8.7% in Group III. Although the difference in recurrence rates of syndesmotic instability among three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.264), Group II showed more interval change in tibiofibular clear space between initial postoperative radiographs and last follow-up radiographs (P=0.028) compared to the other two groups. Fracture union was achieved in all patients without screw breakage. We suggest that the better timing for syndesmotic screw removal is 3 months, instead of 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively, to reduce the risk of recurrence of syndesmotic instability for tri-malleolar fracture without posterior fragment fixation. Level III- Case-control study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2451131264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138320308305</els_id><sourcerecordid>2451131264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-127dff69ab1911b87d1d10a62a6850134875af93e445aefd2c5ecbe4f57e0e2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uFDEQhC0EIkvgDRDykcssbnv-9oKEIv6kSFzI2fLYbfDiGS9tT6J5DN6YmWxAnDhZKn_Vpe5i7CWIPQho3xz3YTrOtOylkJu0F0o8Yjvou0MlZNs9Zjux_lSgenXBnuV8FAI6odRTdqGUaEB0asd-3UyF0BR0PI8mRn5KuSCFRNyT-TbiVHjy3Ew_Im6KLTMhvwvlO0dDceGEY7o1cYPyMjnMYyrB8mwJ73jI3OScbLgPuHcR2ploG_svHqZczBBiKMtz9sSbmPHFw3vJbj68_3r1qbr-8vHz1bvryqpWlgpk57xvD2aAA8DQdw4cCNNK0_aNAFX3XWP8QWFdNwa9k7ZBO2Dtmw4FykFdstfnuSdKP2fMRY8hW4zRTJjmrGXdACiQbb2i9Rm1lHIm9PpEYTS0aBB6K0Mf9bkMvZWxqWsZq-3VQ8I8jOj-mv5cfwXengFc97wNSDrbgJNFF9YzFe1S-H_Cb0-eocs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451131264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Untreated small posterior fragment of ankle fracture with early removal of syndesmotic screw is associated with recurrent syndesmotic instability</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Yang, Tzu-Cheng ; Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan ; Wang, Chien-Shun ; Lin, Chun-Cheng ; Chang, Ming-Chau ; Chiang, Chao-Ching</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tzu-Cheng ; Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan ; Wang, Chien-Shun ; Lin, Chun-Cheng ; Chang, Ming-Chau ; Chiang, Chao-Ching</creatorcontrib><description>•In cases of tri-malleolar fracture without PMF fixation, the syndesmotic screw should be removed at 3 months later.•Syndesmotic instability should be kept in mind and intraoperative image examination must be performed for all cases with posterior malleolar fracture.•Untreated posterior fragment of ankle fracture is regarded as a risk factor for recurrent syndesmotic diastasis This retrospective study aimed to report outcomes of fixation of bi-malleolar or tri-malleolar fractures combined with syndesmotic injury with or without posterior malleolar fracture (PMF), and to ascertain whether syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks or 3 months postoperatively is more beneficial. We retrospectively reviewed patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for bi-malleolar (without PMF) or tri-malleolar ankle fracture (with PMF) with syndesmotic injury between January 2013 and December 2017 with at least 24 months of postoperative follow-up. All patients suffered syndesmotic instabilities and were treated using a syndesmotic screw without PMF fixation. Patients with bi-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively were included in Group I, tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks in Group II, and tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 3 months in Group III. Demographic data, clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed. A total of 113 patients were included (Group I, n=47; Group II, n=43; Group III, n=23). Average size of PMF was 14% in patients with tri-malleolar fractures (Groups II and III). No significant difference in ankle functional outcome among groups was observed. The recurrence rate of syndesmotic instability was 10.6% in Group I, 20.9% in Group II, and 8.7% in Group III. Although the difference in recurrence rates of syndesmotic instability among three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.264), Group II showed more interval change in tibiofibular clear space between initial postoperative radiographs and last follow-up radiographs (P=0.028) compared to the other two groups. Fracture union was achieved in all patients without screw breakage. We suggest that the better timing for syndesmotic screw removal is 3 months, instead of 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively, to reduce the risk of recurrence of syndesmotic instability for tri-malleolar fracture without posterior fragment fixation. Level III- Case-control study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33051073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ankle ; Instability ; Posterior malleolar fracture ; Recurrence ; Syndesmosis</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2021-03, Vol.52 (3), p.638-643</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-127dff69ab1911b87d1d10a62a6850134875af93e445aefd2c5ecbe4f57e0e2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-127dff69ab1911b87d1d10a62a6850134875af93e445aefd2c5ecbe4f57e0e2b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7386-7487 ; 0000-0001-8707-1108</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tzu-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chien-Shun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ming-Chau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Chao-Ching</creatorcontrib><title>Untreated small posterior fragment of ankle fracture with early removal of syndesmotic screw is associated with recurrent syndesmotic instability</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>•In cases of tri-malleolar fracture without PMF fixation, the syndesmotic screw should be removed at 3 months later.•Syndesmotic instability should be kept in mind and intraoperative image examination must be performed for all cases with posterior malleolar fracture.•Untreated posterior fragment of ankle fracture is regarded as a risk factor for recurrent syndesmotic diastasis This retrospective study aimed to report outcomes of fixation of bi-malleolar or tri-malleolar fractures combined with syndesmotic injury with or without posterior malleolar fracture (PMF), and to ascertain whether syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks or 3 months postoperatively is more beneficial. We retrospectively reviewed patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for bi-malleolar (without PMF) or tri-malleolar ankle fracture (with PMF) with syndesmotic injury between January 2013 and December 2017 with at least 24 months of postoperative follow-up. All patients suffered syndesmotic instabilities and were treated using a syndesmotic screw without PMF fixation. Patients with bi-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively were included in Group I, tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks in Group II, and tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 3 months in Group III. Demographic data, clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed. A total of 113 patients were included (Group I, n=47; Group II, n=43; Group III, n=23). Average size of PMF was 14% in patients with tri-malleolar fractures (Groups II and III). No significant difference in ankle functional outcome among groups was observed. The recurrence rate of syndesmotic instability was 10.6% in Group I, 20.9% in Group II, and 8.7% in Group III. Although the difference in recurrence rates of syndesmotic instability among three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.264), Group II showed more interval change in tibiofibular clear space between initial postoperative radiographs and last follow-up radiographs (P=0.028) compared to the other two groups. Fracture union was achieved in all patients without screw breakage. We suggest that the better timing for syndesmotic screw removal is 3 months, instead of 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively, to reduce the risk of recurrence of syndesmotic instability for tri-malleolar fracture without posterior fragment fixation. Level III- Case-control study.</description><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Instability</subject><subject>Posterior malleolar fracture</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Syndesmosis</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1uFDEQhC0EIkvgDRDykcssbnv-9oKEIv6kSFzI2fLYbfDiGS9tT6J5DN6YmWxAnDhZKn_Vpe5i7CWIPQho3xz3YTrOtOylkJu0F0o8Yjvou0MlZNs9Zjux_lSgenXBnuV8FAI6odRTdqGUaEB0asd-3UyF0BR0PI8mRn5KuSCFRNyT-TbiVHjy3Ew_Im6KLTMhvwvlO0dDceGEY7o1cYPyMjnMYyrB8mwJ73jI3OScbLgPuHcR2ploG_svHqZczBBiKMtz9sSbmPHFw3vJbj68_3r1qbr-8vHz1bvryqpWlgpk57xvD2aAA8DQdw4cCNNK0_aNAFX3XWP8QWFdNwa9k7ZBO2Dtmw4FykFdstfnuSdKP2fMRY8hW4zRTJjmrGXdACiQbb2i9Rm1lHIm9PpEYTS0aBB6K0Mf9bkMvZWxqWsZq-3VQ8I8jOj-mv5cfwXengFc97wNSDrbgJNFF9YzFe1S-H_Cb0-eocs</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Yang, Tzu-Cheng</creator><creator>Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan</creator><creator>Wang, Chien-Shun</creator><creator>Lin, Chun-Cheng</creator><creator>Chang, Ming-Chau</creator><creator>Chiang, Chao-Ching</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7386-7487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-1108</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Untreated small posterior fragment of ankle fracture with early removal of syndesmotic screw is associated with recurrent syndesmotic instability</title><author>Yang, Tzu-Cheng ; Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan ; Wang, Chien-Shun ; Lin, Chun-Cheng ; Chang, Ming-Chau ; Chiang, Chao-Ching</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-127dff69ab1911b87d1d10a62a6850134875af93e445aefd2c5ecbe4f57e0e2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Instability</topic><topic>Posterior malleolar fracture</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Syndesmosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tzu-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chien-Shun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ming-Chau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Chao-Ching</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Tzu-Cheng</au><au>Tzeng, Yun-Hsuan</au><au>Wang, Chien-Shun</au><au>Lin, Chun-Cheng</au><au>Chang, Ming-Chau</au><au>Chiang, Chao-Ching</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Untreated small posterior fragment of ankle fracture with early removal of syndesmotic screw is associated with recurrent syndesmotic instability</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>638</spage><epage>643</epage><pages>638-643</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>•In cases of tri-malleolar fracture without PMF fixation, the syndesmotic screw should be removed at 3 months later.•Syndesmotic instability should be kept in mind and intraoperative image examination must be performed for all cases with posterior malleolar fracture.•Untreated posterior fragment of ankle fracture is regarded as a risk factor for recurrent syndesmotic diastasis This retrospective study aimed to report outcomes of fixation of bi-malleolar or tri-malleolar fractures combined with syndesmotic injury with or without posterior malleolar fracture (PMF), and to ascertain whether syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks or 3 months postoperatively is more beneficial. We retrospectively reviewed patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for bi-malleolar (without PMF) or tri-malleolar ankle fracture (with PMF) with syndesmotic injury between January 2013 and December 2017 with at least 24 months of postoperative follow-up. All patients suffered syndesmotic instabilities and were treated using a syndesmotic screw without PMF fixation. Patients with bi-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively were included in Group I, tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks in Group II, and tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 3 months in Group III. Demographic data, clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed. A total of 113 patients were included (Group I, n=47; Group II, n=43; Group III, n=23). Average size of PMF was 14% in patients with tri-malleolar fractures (Groups II and III). No significant difference in ankle functional outcome among groups was observed. The recurrence rate of syndesmotic instability was 10.6% in Group I, 20.9% in Group II, and 8.7% in Group III. Although the difference in recurrence rates of syndesmotic instability among three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.264), Group II showed more interval change in tibiofibular clear space between initial postoperative radiographs and last follow-up radiographs (P=0.028) compared to the other two groups. Fracture union was achieved in all patients without screw breakage. We suggest that the better timing for syndesmotic screw removal is 3 months, instead of 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively, to reduce the risk of recurrence of syndesmotic instability for tri-malleolar fracture without posterior fragment fixation. Level III- Case-control study.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33051073</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.030</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7386-7487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-1108</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2021-03, Vol.52 (3), p.638-643
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2451131264
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Ankle
Instability
Posterior malleolar fracture
Recurrence
Syndesmosis
title Untreated small posterior fragment of ankle fracture with early removal of syndesmotic screw is associated with recurrent syndesmotic instability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A43%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Untreated%20small%20posterior%20fragment%20of%20ankle%20fracture%20with%20early%20removal%20of%20syndesmotic%20screw%20is%20associated%20with%20recurrent%20syndesmotic%20instability&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Yang,%20Tzu-Cheng&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=638&rft.epage=643&rft.pages=638-643&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2451131264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451131264&rft_id=info:pmid/33051073&rft_els_id=S0020138320308305&rfr_iscdi=true