Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)

Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2021-01, Vol.127 (2), p.188-192
Hauptverfasser: Pakarainen, Tomi, Nevalainen, Jaakko, Talala, Kirsi, Taari, Kimmo, Raitanen, Jani, Kujala, Paula, Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan, Tammela, Teuvo L. J., Auvinen, Anssi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 192
container_issue 2
container_start_page 188
container_title Cancer
container_volume 127
creator Pakarainen, Tomi
Nevalainen, Jaakko
Talala, Kirsi
Taari, Kimmo
Raitanen, Jani
Kujala, Paula
Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan
Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
Auvinen, Anssi
description Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group. Methods The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions. Results The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk. Conclusions Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages. Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.33254
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2450672561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2475782243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URJctFx4AWeqlIKXYHsdJjlXUAlJVqt0icYu89qTrsnFaO1G1nHgE7rwdT4KXtD1w4GRZ_uabGf-EvObsmDMm3htvwjGAyOUzMuOsKjLGpdgjM8ZYmeUSvu6TlzHepGshcnhB9gGYLKGSM_LrYuxWGGjf0mgConf-moZ-9DZSPQzoLVqqvaXOG2fRG9yha3e9_v3jZ3DxG70NfRz0gNTo9BoSSIc10jPnvYtrukjFfee-J81yGO12V7586tT2gV4-CupJcJRKF8vL-u0Bed7qTcRXD-ecfDk7vao_ZuefP3yqT84zAxXIzLY5y_NKgWq10LYsFZMrZFa1IAEMgEQoBRZMFpUyqxa0tFwj10phwQWDOTmavGmVuxHj0HQuGtxstMd-jI2QOVPp5xRP6OE_6E0_Bp-mS1SRF6UQqeecvJsok1aLAdvmNrhOh23DWbOLrNlF1vyNLMFvHpTjqkP7hD5mlAA-Afdug9v_qJr6ol5M0j-8hqJf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475782243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pakarainen, Tomi ; Nevalainen, Jaakko ; Talala, Kirsi ; Taari, Kimmo ; Raitanen, Jani ; Kujala, Paula ; Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan ; Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ; Auvinen, Anssi</creator><creatorcontrib>Pakarainen, Tomi ; Nevalainen, Jaakko ; Talala, Kirsi ; Taari, Kimmo ; Raitanen, Jani ; Kujala, Paula ; Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan ; Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ; Auvinen, Anssi</creatorcontrib><description>Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group. Methods The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions. Results The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk. Conclusions Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages. Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33048394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antigens ; cancer incidence ; Emigration ; Health risks ; Impact analysis ; Oncology ; Prostate cancer ; prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) ; Randomization ; randomized trials ; Risk ; Risk groups ; screening ; Time dependence ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2021-01, Vol.127 (2), p.188-192</ispartof><rights>2020 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2020 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6432-2242 ; 0000-0002-9705-9265 ; 0000-0001-6295-0245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33254$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pakarainen, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevalainen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talala, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taari, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raitanen, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvinen, Anssi</creatorcontrib><title>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group. Methods The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions. Results The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk. Conclusions Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages. Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>cancer incidence</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>randomized trials</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URJctFx4AWeqlIKXYHsdJjlXUAlJVqt0icYu89qTrsnFaO1G1nHgE7rwdT4KXtD1w4GRZ_uabGf-EvObsmDMm3htvwjGAyOUzMuOsKjLGpdgjM8ZYmeUSvu6TlzHepGshcnhB9gGYLKGSM_LrYuxWGGjf0mgConf-moZ-9DZSPQzoLVqqvaXOG2fRG9yha3e9_v3jZ3DxG70NfRz0gNTo9BoSSIc10jPnvYtrukjFfee-J81yGO12V7586tT2gV4-CupJcJRKF8vL-u0Bed7qTcRXD-ecfDk7vao_ZuefP3yqT84zAxXIzLY5y_NKgWq10LYsFZMrZFa1IAEMgEQoBRZMFpUyqxa0tFwj10phwQWDOTmavGmVuxHj0HQuGtxstMd-jI2QOVPp5xRP6OE_6E0_Bp-mS1SRF6UQqeecvJsok1aLAdvmNrhOh23DWbOLrNlF1vyNLMFvHpTjqkP7hD5mlAA-Afdug9v_qJr6ol5M0j-8hqJf</recordid><startdate>20210115</startdate><enddate>20210115</enddate><creator>Pakarainen, Tomi</creator><creator>Nevalainen, Jaakko</creator><creator>Talala, Kirsi</creator><creator>Taari, Kimmo</creator><creator>Raitanen, Jani</creator><creator>Kujala, Paula</creator><creator>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</creator><creator>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</creator><creator>Auvinen, Anssi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-2242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-9265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-0245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210115</creationdate><title>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</title><author>Pakarainen, Tomi ; Nevalainen, Jaakko ; Talala, Kirsi ; Taari, Kimmo ; Raitanen, Jani ; Kujala, Paula ; Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan ; Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ; Auvinen, Anssi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>cancer incidence</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>randomized trials</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pakarainen, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevalainen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talala, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taari, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raitanen, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvinen, Anssi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pakarainen, Tomi</au><au>Nevalainen, Jaakko</au><au>Talala, Kirsi</au><au>Taari, Kimmo</au><au>Raitanen, Jani</au><au>Kujala, Paula</au><au>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</au><au>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</au><au>Auvinen, Anssi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-01-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>188-192</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group. Methods The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions. Results The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk. Conclusions Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages. Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33048394</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33254</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-2242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-9265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-0245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2021-01, Vol.127 (2), p.188-192
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2450672561
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antigens
cancer incidence
Emigration
Health risks
Impact analysis
Oncology
Prostate cancer
prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)
Randomization
randomized trials
Risk
Risk groups
screening
Time dependence
Urology
title Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A54%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Number%20of%20screening%20rounds%20attended%20and%20incidence%20of%20high%E2%80%90risk%20prostate%20cancer%20in%20the%20Finnish%20Randomized%20Study%20of%20Screening%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer%20(FinRSPC)&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Pakarainen,%20Tomi&rft.date=2021-01-15&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=188-192&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475782243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475782243&rft_id=info:pmid/33048394&rfr_iscdi=true