Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)
Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2021-01, Vol.127 (2), p.188-192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 188 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Pakarainen, Tomi Nevalainen, Jaakko Talala, Kirsi Taari, Kimmo Raitanen, Jani Kujala, Paula Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan Tammela, Teuvo L. J. Auvinen, Anssi |
description | Background
The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group.
Methods
The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions.
Results
The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk.
Conclusions
Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages.
Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.33254 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2450672561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2475782243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URJctFx4AWeqlIKXYHsdJjlXUAlJVqt0icYu89qTrsnFaO1G1nHgE7rwdT4KXtD1w4GRZ_uabGf-EvObsmDMm3htvwjGAyOUzMuOsKjLGpdgjM8ZYmeUSvu6TlzHepGshcnhB9gGYLKGSM_LrYuxWGGjf0mgConf-moZ-9DZSPQzoLVqqvaXOG2fRG9yha3e9_v3jZ3DxG70NfRz0gNTo9BoSSIc10jPnvYtrukjFfee-J81yGO12V7586tT2gV4-CupJcJRKF8vL-u0Bed7qTcRXD-ecfDk7vao_ZuefP3yqT84zAxXIzLY5y_NKgWq10LYsFZMrZFa1IAEMgEQoBRZMFpUyqxa0tFwj10phwQWDOTmavGmVuxHj0HQuGtxstMd-jI2QOVPp5xRP6OE_6E0_Bp-mS1SRF6UQqeecvJsok1aLAdvmNrhOh23DWbOLrNlF1vyNLMFvHpTjqkP7hD5mlAA-Afdug9v_qJr6ol5M0j-8hqJf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475782243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pakarainen, Tomi ; Nevalainen, Jaakko ; Talala, Kirsi ; Taari, Kimmo ; Raitanen, Jani ; Kujala, Paula ; Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan ; Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ; Auvinen, Anssi</creator><creatorcontrib>Pakarainen, Tomi ; Nevalainen, Jaakko ; Talala, Kirsi ; Taari, Kimmo ; Raitanen, Jani ; Kujala, Paula ; Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan ; Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ; Auvinen, Anssi</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group.
Methods
The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions.
Results
The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk.
Conclusions
Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages.
Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33048394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antigens ; cancer incidence ; Emigration ; Health risks ; Impact analysis ; Oncology ; Prostate cancer ; prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) ; Randomization ; randomized trials ; Risk ; Risk groups ; screening ; Time dependence ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2021-01, Vol.127 (2), p.188-192</ispartof><rights>2020 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2020 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6432-2242 ; 0000-0002-9705-9265 ; 0000-0001-6295-0245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33254$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pakarainen, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevalainen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talala, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taari, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raitanen, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvinen, Anssi</creatorcontrib><title>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group.
Methods
The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions.
Results
The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk.
Conclusions
Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages.
Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>cancer incidence</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>randomized trials</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URJctFx4AWeqlIKXYHsdJjlXUAlJVqt0icYu89qTrsnFaO1G1nHgE7rwdT4KXtD1w4GRZ_uabGf-EvObsmDMm3htvwjGAyOUzMuOsKjLGpdgjM8ZYmeUSvu6TlzHepGshcnhB9gGYLKGSM_LrYuxWGGjf0mgConf-moZ-9DZSPQzoLVqqvaXOG2fRG9yha3e9_v3jZ3DxG70NfRz0gNTo9BoSSIc10jPnvYtrukjFfee-J81yGO12V7586tT2gV4-CupJcJRKF8vL-u0Bed7qTcRXD-ecfDk7vao_ZuefP3yqT84zAxXIzLY5y_NKgWq10LYsFZMrZFa1IAEMgEQoBRZMFpUyqxa0tFwj10phwQWDOTmavGmVuxHj0HQuGtxstMd-jI2QOVPp5xRP6OE_6E0_Bp-mS1SRF6UQqeecvJsok1aLAdvmNrhOh23DWbOLrNlF1vyNLMFvHpTjqkP7hD5mlAA-Afdug9v_qJr6ol5M0j-8hqJf</recordid><startdate>20210115</startdate><enddate>20210115</enddate><creator>Pakarainen, Tomi</creator><creator>Nevalainen, Jaakko</creator><creator>Talala, Kirsi</creator><creator>Taari, Kimmo</creator><creator>Raitanen, Jani</creator><creator>Kujala, Paula</creator><creator>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</creator><creator>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</creator><creator>Auvinen, Anssi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-2242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-9265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-0245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210115</creationdate><title>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</title><author>Pakarainen, Tomi ; Nevalainen, Jaakko ; Talala, Kirsi ; Taari, Kimmo ; Raitanen, Jani ; Kujala, Paula ; Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan ; Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ; Auvinen, Anssi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-df50559636fa2ad88604be0d6f3433c334e382e704796cbf3a4d1ae1a66e71203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>cancer incidence</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>randomized trials</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pakarainen, Tomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevalainen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talala, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taari, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raitanen, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auvinen, Anssi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pakarainen, Tomi</au><au>Nevalainen, Jaakko</au><au>Talala, Kirsi</au><au>Taari, Kimmo</au><au>Raitanen, Jani</au><au>Kujala, Paula</au><au>Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan</au><au>Tammela, Teuvo L. J.</au><au>Auvinen, Anssi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC)</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-01-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>188-192</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background
The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality by prostate‐specific antigen–based screening. In addition, screening has been shown to reduce the risk of advanced PC. The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of screening participation on the incidence of PC by risk group.
Methods
The participants in the screening arm of the Finnish trial (31,867 men) were classified according to screening attendance in a time‐dependent fashion. Initially, all men in the screening arm were regarded as nonattenders until the first screening attendance; they then remained in the once‐screened group until the second screen and similarly for the possible third round. The control arm formed the reference group. Follow‐up started at randomization and ended at the time of diagnosis of PC, emigration, or the end of 2015. PC cases were divided into risk groups according to European Association of Urology definitions.
Results
The incidence of low‐risk PC increased with the number of screens, whereas no clear relation with participation was noted in the intermediate‐risk and high‐risk cases. For patients with advanced PC, attending screening at least twice was associated with a lower risk.
Conclusions
Screening reduces the risk of advanced PC after only 2 screening cycles. A single screen demonstrated no benefit in terms of PC incidence. Repeated screening is necessary to achieve screening advantages.
Attending at least 2 rounds of prostate‐specific antigen–based screening is associated with a reduced incidence of advanced prostate cancer. This benefit should be weighed against an excess of low‐risk cancer, which increases with each screen.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33048394</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33254</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-2242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-9265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-0245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2021-01, Vol.127 (2), p.188-192 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2450672561 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Antigens cancer incidence Emigration Health risks Impact analysis Oncology Prostate cancer prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) Randomization randomized trials Risk Risk groups screening Time dependence Urology |
title | Number of screening rounds attended and incidence of high‐risk prostate cancer in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A54%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Number%20of%20screening%20rounds%20attended%20and%20incidence%20of%20high%E2%80%90risk%20prostate%20cancer%20in%20the%20Finnish%20Randomized%20Study%20of%20Screening%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer%20(FinRSPC)&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Pakarainen,%20Tomi&rft.date=2021-01-15&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=188-192&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475782243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475782243&rft_id=info:pmid/33048394&rfr_iscdi=true |