Endomyocardial Biopsy and Prevalence of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplantation

Percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the criterion standard method for surveillance of allograft rejection after heart transplant (HT). However, data regarding utility of EMBs and prevalence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in Asian populations are still limited. We aimed to report our...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2021-01, Vol.53 (1), p.318-323
Hauptverfasser: Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee, Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach, Siwamogsatham, Sarawut, Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan, Puwanant, Sarinya, Benjacholamas, Vichai, Ongcharit, Pat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 1
container_start_page 318
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 53
creator Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee
Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach
Siwamogsatham, Sarawut
Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan
Puwanant, Sarinya
Benjacholamas, Vichai
Ongcharit, Pat
description Percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the criterion standard method for surveillance of allograft rejection after heart transplant (HT). However, data regarding utility of EMBs and prevalence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in Asian populations are still limited. We aimed to report our experience in the use of EMBs and prevalence of ACR in HT recipients. We retrospectively evaluated all EMBs from consecutive HT recipients between January 2008 and December 2018. EMB pathology results were according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2004 revision of biopsy grading. We also divided patients into previous era and current era group (underwent HT before and after 2015) to compare prevalence of ACR and survival outcome. A total of 832 EMBs from 81 HT recipients were included. Pathologic reports revealed ACR grade 1R 22.8%, 2R 4.2%, and 3R 0.6%. At patient level, at least 1 episode of ACR grade 1R, 2R, and 3R were found in 70.6%, 24.7%, and 3.5% of the patients, respectively. When compared between era, frequency of EMB during the first year after HT in current era was significantly higher (9.74 ± 3.38 vs 4.93 ± 3.29, P < .001), but lower frequency of rejection grade ≥ 2R were found (2.3% vs 8.1%, P < .001). However, 1-year survival was not statistically different (76% in previous era vs 80% in current era, P = .37). From our study, prevalence of grade ≥ 2R rejection was approximately 5%, which is comparable with previous studies. Further studies are needed to evaluate proper interval and number of EMBs in HT recipients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2450004296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134520326828</els_id><sourcerecordid>2450004296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-88b811559d9bdcc345e2d49b29804069d42ddd1d4c8ac508bcd43906b4b118e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWj_-ggRPXnbN126z3mqtVhAU0YOnkE2mkLLd1GS30H9v-gUePQ3D-87MOw9CN5TklNDybp53QbdxGbwBsDkjjORE5oSKIzSgcsgzVjJ-jAaECJpRLoozdB7jnKSeCX6KzjhPChlWA_Q9aa1frL3RwTrd4Afnl3GNdWvxe4CVbqA1gP0Mj0zfAR5D0_SNDvgD5mA651vsWjwFHTr8uQ3V6LbTG-ESncx0E-FqXy_Q19PkczzNXt-eX8aj18wIPuwyKWtJaVFUtqqtMSksMCuqmlWSCFJWVjBrLbXCSG0KImtjBa9IWYuaUgmSX6Db3d7E46eH2KmFiybl1C34Piomiu3jVZms9zurCT7GADO1DG6hw1pRojZo1Vz9Ras2aBWRKqFNw9f7O329SNph9MAyGR53BkjfrhwEFY3b4LMuJFbKevefO78wrZHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2450004296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endomyocardial Biopsy and Prevalence of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplantation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee ; Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach ; Siwamogsatham, Sarawut ; Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan ; Puwanant, Sarinya ; Benjacholamas, Vichai ; Ongcharit, Pat</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee ; Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach ; Siwamogsatham, Sarawut ; Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan ; Puwanant, Sarinya ; Benjacholamas, Vichai ; Ongcharit, Pat</creatorcontrib><description>Percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the criterion standard method for surveillance of allograft rejection after heart transplant (HT). However, data regarding utility of EMBs and prevalence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in Asian populations are still limited. We aimed to report our experience in the use of EMBs and prevalence of ACR in HT recipients. We retrospectively evaluated all EMBs from consecutive HT recipients between January 2008 and December 2018. EMB pathology results were according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2004 revision of biopsy grading. We also divided patients into previous era and current era group (underwent HT before and after 2015) to compare prevalence of ACR and survival outcome. A total of 832 EMBs from 81 HT recipients were included. Pathologic reports revealed ACR grade 1R 22.8%, 2R 4.2%, and 3R 0.6%. At patient level, at least 1 episode of ACR grade 1R, 2R, and 3R were found in 70.6%, 24.7%, and 3.5% of the patients, respectively. When compared between era, frequency of EMB during the first year after HT in current era was significantly higher (9.74 ± 3.38 vs 4.93 ± 3.29, P &lt; .001), but lower frequency of rejection grade ≥ 2R were found (2.3% vs 8.1%, P &lt; .001). However, 1-year survival was not statistically different (76% in previous era vs 80% in current era, P = .37). From our study, prevalence of grade ≥ 2R rejection was approximately 5%, which is comparable with previous studies. Further studies are needed to evaluate proper interval and number of EMBs in HT recipients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33041079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsy - methods ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods ; Female ; Graft Rejection - diagnosis ; Graft Rejection - epidemiology ; Heart Transplantation - mortality ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Myocardium - pathology ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2021-01, Vol.53 (1), p.318-323</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-88b811559d9bdcc345e2d49b29804069d42ddd1d4c8ac508bcd43906b4b118e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-88b811559d9bdcc345e2d49b29804069d42ddd1d4c8ac508bcd43906b4b118e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2116-2140 ; 0000-0003-1471-1922</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siwamogsatham, Sarawut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puwanant, Sarinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjacholamas, Vichai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongcharit, Pat</creatorcontrib><title>Endomyocardial Biopsy and Prevalence of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplantation</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the criterion standard method for surveillance of allograft rejection after heart transplant (HT). However, data regarding utility of EMBs and prevalence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in Asian populations are still limited. We aimed to report our experience in the use of EMBs and prevalence of ACR in HT recipients. We retrospectively evaluated all EMBs from consecutive HT recipients between January 2008 and December 2018. EMB pathology results were according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2004 revision of biopsy grading. We also divided patients into previous era and current era group (underwent HT before and after 2015) to compare prevalence of ACR and survival outcome. A total of 832 EMBs from 81 HT recipients were included. Pathologic reports revealed ACR grade 1R 22.8%, 2R 4.2%, and 3R 0.6%. At patient level, at least 1 episode of ACR grade 1R, 2R, and 3R were found in 70.6%, 24.7%, and 3.5% of the patients, respectively. When compared between era, frequency of EMB during the first year after HT in current era was significantly higher (9.74 ± 3.38 vs 4.93 ± 3.29, P &lt; .001), but lower frequency of rejection grade ≥ 2R were found (2.3% vs 8.1%, P &lt; .001). However, 1-year survival was not statistically different (76% in previous era vs 80% in current era, P = .37). From our study, prevalence of grade ≥ 2R rejection was approximately 5%, which is comparable with previous studies. Further studies are needed to evaluate proper interval and number of EMBs in HT recipients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Heart Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Myocardium - pathology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWj_-ggRPXnbN126z3mqtVhAU0YOnkE2mkLLd1GS30H9v-gUePQ3D-87MOw9CN5TklNDybp53QbdxGbwBsDkjjORE5oSKIzSgcsgzVjJ-jAaECJpRLoozdB7jnKSeCX6KzjhPChlWA_Q9aa1frL3RwTrd4Afnl3GNdWvxe4CVbqA1gP0Mj0zfAR5D0_SNDvgD5mA651vsWjwFHTr8uQ3V6LbTG-ESncx0E-FqXy_Q19PkczzNXt-eX8aj18wIPuwyKWtJaVFUtqqtMSksMCuqmlWSCFJWVjBrLbXCSG0KImtjBa9IWYuaUgmSX6Db3d7E46eH2KmFiybl1C34Piomiu3jVZms9zurCT7GADO1DG6hw1pRojZo1Vz9Ras2aBWRKqFNw9f7O329SNph9MAyGR53BkjfrhwEFY3b4LMuJFbKevefO78wrZHg</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee</creator><creator>Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach</creator><creator>Siwamogsatham, Sarawut</creator><creator>Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan</creator><creator>Puwanant, Sarinya</creator><creator>Benjacholamas, Vichai</creator><creator>Ongcharit, Pat</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-2140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-1922</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Endomyocardial Biopsy and Prevalence of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplantation</title><author>Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee ; Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach ; Siwamogsatham, Sarawut ; Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan ; Puwanant, Sarinya ; Benjacholamas, Vichai ; Ongcharit, Pat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-88b811559d9bdcc345e2d49b29804069d42ddd1d4c8ac508bcd43906b4b118e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Heart Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Myocardium - pathology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siwamogsatham, Sarawut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puwanant, Sarinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjacholamas, Vichai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongcharit, Pat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee</au><au>Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach</au><au>Siwamogsatham, Sarawut</au><au>Thammanatsakul, Kanokwan</au><au>Puwanant, Sarinya</au><au>Benjacholamas, Vichai</au><au>Ongcharit, Pat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endomyocardial Biopsy and Prevalence of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>318</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>318-323</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>Percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the criterion standard method for surveillance of allograft rejection after heart transplant (HT). However, data regarding utility of EMBs and prevalence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in Asian populations are still limited. We aimed to report our experience in the use of EMBs and prevalence of ACR in HT recipients. We retrospectively evaluated all EMBs from consecutive HT recipients between January 2008 and December 2018. EMB pathology results were according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2004 revision of biopsy grading. We also divided patients into previous era and current era group (underwent HT before and after 2015) to compare prevalence of ACR and survival outcome. A total of 832 EMBs from 81 HT recipients were included. Pathologic reports revealed ACR grade 1R 22.8%, 2R 4.2%, and 3R 0.6%. At patient level, at least 1 episode of ACR grade 1R, 2R, and 3R were found in 70.6%, 24.7%, and 3.5% of the patients, respectively. When compared between era, frequency of EMB during the first year after HT in current era was significantly higher (9.74 ± 3.38 vs 4.93 ± 3.29, P &lt; .001), but lower frequency of rejection grade ≥ 2R were found (2.3% vs 8.1%, P &lt; .001). However, 1-year survival was not statistically different (76% in previous era vs 80% in current era, P = .37). From our study, prevalence of grade ≥ 2R rejection was approximately 5%, which is comparable with previous studies. Further studies are needed to evaluate proper interval and number of EMBs in HT recipients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33041079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.014</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-2140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-1922</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2021-01, Vol.53 (1), p.318-323
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2450004296
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Biopsy - methods
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods
Female
Graft Rejection - diagnosis
Graft Rejection - epidemiology
Heart Transplantation - mortality
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Myocardium - pathology
Postoperative Complications - diagnosis
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Prevalence
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
title Endomyocardial Biopsy and Prevalence of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A18%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endomyocardial%20Biopsy%20and%20Prevalence%20of%20Acute%20Cellular%20Rejection%20in%20Heart%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Sinphurmsukskul,%20Supanee&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=318-323&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2450004296%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2450004296&rft_id=info:pmid/33041079&rft_els_id=S0041134520326828&rfr_iscdi=true