Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization

Purpose To evaluate the influence of intraoral and extraoral digitization systems on marginal discrepancy of monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) crowns.Methods Forty standardized machined stainless steel specimens with th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2021, Vol.65(3), pp.291-297
Hauptverfasser: Freire, Yolanda, Gonzalo, Esther, Lopez-Suarez, Carlos, Pelaez, Jesus, Suarez, Maria J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 3
container_start_page 291
container_title Journal of Prosthodontic Research
container_volume 65
creator Freire, Yolanda
Gonzalo, Esther
Lopez-Suarez, Carlos
Pelaez, Jesus
Suarez, Maria J
description Purpose To evaluate the influence of intraoral and extraoral digitization systems on marginal discrepancy of monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) crowns.Methods Forty standardized machined stainless steel specimens with the characteristics of a first molar were manufactured and randomly assigned to two groups (n=20 each), depending on their material: monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LM), and monolithic zirconia (ZM). Then, each group was subdivided into two depending on the scanning system used: intraoral scanner (IOS), and extraoral scanner (EOS). The digitization process was standardized with two methacrylate devices, one for each scanner. After scanning and manufacturing of the crowns, the marginal discrepancy was measured under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data analysis was made using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the effect size with Cohen's d.Results All the measurements were within the limits considered acceptable. Regardless the restorative material significant differences between scanners were observed, being the effect from low to moderate. However, no differences were observed between the scanners in either the lithium disilicate or zirconia group.Conclusions The intraoral scan showed lower marginal discrepancy than the extraoral scan in CAD-CAM monolithic crowns, but these differences were not observed in each of the ceramic systems.
doi_str_mv 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449992709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449992709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-774c1a6b7bde05c987a8f8b0c9caaca6de38ea268e618fc77feb68b006d9204e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwBzjlyKUjSbs0OaIxGGgSCME5clN3y9S1I8lA49fTfWjSfLBl-30s-SXklrOB4EreL1Z-8Pr-YR6NYIZ1kZ6RnhBcJJlMxTnpcaXShOuhuiRXISwYkxnnukeK8Q_Ua4iubWhb0ThHugQ_cw3UtHJxO1u2TVu7OHeWWt_-NoFWUHhnIWJJiw0tnUcbKTQldc2hKd3MRfe3u3tNLiqoA94cap98PY0_R5Nk-vb8MnqYJnbIWUzyPLMcZJEXJbKh1SoHVamCWW0BLMgSU4UgpELJVWXzvMJCdnsmSy1Yhmmf3O3vrnz7vcYQzdIFi3UNDbbrYESWaa1FznQnFXtp91AIHiuz8q77e2M4M1tDTWeoOTW0gyZ7aBEizPCIgI_O1rhD5NCk23SKHiV2Dt5gk_4D5ueHAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449992709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization</title><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science &amp; Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><creator>Freire, Yolanda ; Gonzalo, Esther ; Lopez-Suarez, Carlos ; Pelaez, Jesus ; Suarez, Maria J</creator><creatorcontrib>Freire, Yolanda ; Gonzalo, Esther ; Lopez-Suarez, Carlos ; Pelaez, Jesus ; Suarez, Maria J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the influence of intraoral and extraoral digitization systems on marginal discrepancy of monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) crowns.Methods Forty standardized machined stainless steel specimens with the characteristics of a first molar were manufactured and randomly assigned to two groups (n=20 each), depending on their material: monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LM), and monolithic zirconia (ZM). Then, each group was subdivided into two depending on the scanning system used: intraoral scanner (IOS), and extraoral scanner (EOS). The digitization process was standardized with two methacrylate devices, one for each scanner. After scanning and manufacturing of the crowns, the marginal discrepancy was measured under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data analysis was made using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the effect size with Cohen's d.Results All the measurements were within the limits considered acceptable. Regardless the restorative material significant differences between scanners were observed, being the effect from low to moderate. However, no differences were observed between the scanners in either the lithium disilicate or zirconia group.Conclusions The intraoral scan showed lower marginal discrepancy than the extraoral scan in CAD-CAM monolithic crowns, but these differences were not observed in each of the ceramic systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1883-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-4632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1883-9207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan Prosthodontic Society</publisher><subject>CAD/CAM ; Dentistry ; digital impression ; intraoral scanner ; Marginal fit ; monolithic crowns</subject><ispartof>Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2021, Vol.65(3), pp.291-297</ispartof><rights>2021 Japan Prosthodontic Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-774c1a6b7bde05c987a8f8b0c9caaca6de38ea268e618fc77feb68b006d9204e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-774c1a6b7bde05c987a8f8b0c9caaca6de38ea268e618fc77feb68b006d9204e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freire, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Suarez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelaez, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarez, Maria J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization</title><title>Journal of Prosthodontic Research</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont Res</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the influence of intraoral and extraoral digitization systems on marginal discrepancy of monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) crowns.Methods Forty standardized machined stainless steel specimens with the characteristics of a first molar were manufactured and randomly assigned to two groups (n=20 each), depending on their material: monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LM), and monolithic zirconia (ZM). Then, each group was subdivided into two depending on the scanning system used: intraoral scanner (IOS), and extraoral scanner (EOS). The digitization process was standardized with two methacrylate devices, one for each scanner. After scanning and manufacturing of the crowns, the marginal discrepancy was measured under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data analysis was made using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the effect size with Cohen's d.Results All the measurements were within the limits considered acceptable. Regardless the restorative material significant differences between scanners were observed, being the effect from low to moderate. However, no differences were observed between the scanners in either the lithium disilicate or zirconia group.Conclusions The intraoral scan showed lower marginal discrepancy than the extraoral scan in CAD-CAM monolithic crowns, but these differences were not observed in each of the ceramic systems.</description><subject>CAD/CAM</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>digital impression</subject><subject>intraoral scanner</subject><subject>Marginal fit</subject><subject>monolithic crowns</subject><issn>1883-1958</issn><issn>2212-4632</issn><issn>1883-9207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwBzjlyKUjSbs0OaIxGGgSCME5clN3y9S1I8lA49fTfWjSfLBl-30s-SXklrOB4EreL1Z-8Pr-YR6NYIZ1kZ6RnhBcJJlMxTnpcaXShOuhuiRXISwYkxnnukeK8Q_Ua4iubWhb0ThHugQ_cw3UtHJxO1u2TVu7OHeWWt_-NoFWUHhnIWJJiw0tnUcbKTQldc2hKd3MRfe3u3tNLiqoA94cap98PY0_R5Nk-vb8MnqYJnbIWUzyPLMcZJEXJbKh1SoHVamCWW0BLMgSU4UgpELJVWXzvMJCdnsmSy1Yhmmf3O3vrnz7vcYQzdIFi3UNDbbrYESWaa1FznQnFXtp91AIHiuz8q77e2M4M1tDTWeoOTW0gyZ7aBEizPCIgI_O1rhD5NCk23SKHiV2Dt5gk_4D5ueHAg</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Freire, Yolanda</creator><creator>Gonzalo, Esther</creator><creator>Lopez-Suarez, Carlos</creator><creator>Pelaez, Jesus</creator><creator>Suarez, Maria J</creator><general>Japan Prosthodontic Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization</title><author>Freire, Yolanda ; Gonzalo, Esther ; Lopez-Suarez, Carlos ; Pelaez, Jesus ; Suarez, Maria J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-774c1a6b7bde05c987a8f8b0c9caaca6de38ea268e618fc77feb68b006d9204e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>CAD/CAM</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>digital impression</topic><topic>intraoral scanner</topic><topic>Marginal fit</topic><topic>monolithic crowns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freire, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Suarez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelaez, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarez, Maria J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Prosthodontic Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freire, Yolanda</au><au>Gonzalo, Esther</au><au>Lopez-Suarez, Carlos</au><au>Pelaez, Jesus</au><au>Suarez, Maria J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Prosthodontic Research</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont Res</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>291-297</pages><artnum>JPR_D_20_00003</artnum><issn>1883-1958</issn><eissn>2212-4632</eissn><eissn>1883-9207</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the influence of intraoral and extraoral digitization systems on marginal discrepancy of monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) crowns.Methods Forty standardized machined stainless steel specimens with the characteristics of a first molar were manufactured and randomly assigned to two groups (n=20 each), depending on their material: monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (LM), and monolithic zirconia (ZM). Then, each group was subdivided into two depending on the scanning system used: intraoral scanner (IOS), and extraoral scanner (EOS). The digitization process was standardized with two methacrylate devices, one for each scanner. After scanning and manufacturing of the crowns, the marginal discrepancy was measured under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data analysis was made using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the effect size with Cohen's d.Results All the measurements were within the limits considered acceptable. Regardless the restorative material significant differences between scanners were observed, being the effect from low to moderate. However, no differences were observed between the scanners in either the lithium disilicate or zirconia group.Conclusions The intraoral scan showed lower marginal discrepancy than the extraoral scan in CAD-CAM monolithic crowns, but these differences were not observed in each of the ceramic systems.</abstract><pub>Japan Prosthodontic Society</pub><doi>10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1883-1958
ispartof Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2021, Vol.65(3), pp.291-297
issn 1883-1958
2212-4632
1883-9207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449992709
source J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese
subjects CAD/CAM
Dentistry
digital impression
intraoral scanner
Marginal fit
monolithic crowns
title Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A47%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20marginal%20fit%20of%20monolithic%20crowns%20fabricated%20by%20direct%20and%20indirect%20digitization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Prosthodontic%20Research&rft.au=Freire,%20Yolanda&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=291-297&rft.artnum=JPR_D_20_00003&rft.issn=1883-1958&rft.eissn=2212-4632&rft_id=info:doi/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449992709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449992709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true