A Review and Proposed Classification System for the No-Option Patient With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

A growing, but poorly defined subset of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have “no option” for revascularization. One notable subgroup includes patients with severe ischemia and advanced pedal artery occlusive disease, termed “desert foot,” who are at high risk for major amputat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2021-04, Vol.28 (2), p.183-193
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Tanner I., Vartanian, Shant S., Schneider, Peter A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A growing, but poorly defined subset of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have “no option” for revascularization. One notable subgroup includes patients with severe ischemia and advanced pedal artery occlusive disease, termed “desert foot,” who are at high risk for major amputation due to a lack of conventional revascularization options. Although new therapies are being developed for no-option patients with desert foot anatomy, this subgroup and the broader group of no-option patients are not well defined, limiting the ability to evaluate outcomes. Based on a systematic review, a classification of the no-option CLTI patient was constructed for use in clinical practice and studies. Several no-option conditions were identified, including type I—severe and pedal occlusive disease (desert foot anatomy) for which there is no accepted method of repair; type II—lack of suitable venous conduit for bypass in the setting of an acceptable target for bypass; type III—extensive tissue loss with exposure of vital structures that renders salvage impossible; type IV—advanced medical comorbidities for which available revascularization options would pose a prohibitive risk; and type V—presence of a nonfunctional limb. While type I and type II patients may have no option for revascularization, type III and type V patients have wounds, infection, comorbidities, or functional status that may leave them with few options for revascularization. As treatment strategies continue to evolve and novel methods of revascularization are developed, the ability to identify no-option patients in a standardized fashion will aid in treatment selection and assessment of outcomes.
ISSN:1526-6028
1545-1550
DOI:10.1177/1526602820963911