The Impact of No Next of Kin Decision Makers on End-of-Life Care
For critically ill burn patients without a next of kin, the medical team is tasked with becoming the surrogate decision maker. This poses ethical and legal challenges for burn providers. Despite this frequent problem, there has been no investigation of how the presence of a next of kin affects treat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of burn care & research 2021-02, Vol.42 (1), p.9-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Journal of burn care & research |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Ota, Ryan K Johnson, Maxwell B Pickering, Trevor A Garner, Warren L Gillenwater, T Justin Yenikomshian, Haig A |
description | For critically ill burn patients without a next of kin, the medical team is tasked with becoming the surrogate decision maker. This poses ethical and legal challenges for burn providers. Despite this frequent problem, there has been no investigation of how the presence of a next of kin affects treatment in burn patients. To evaluate this relationship, a retrospective chart review was performed on a cohort of patients who died during the acute phase of their burn care. Variables collected included age, gender, length of stay, total body surface area, course of treatment, and presence of a next of kin. In total, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 14 (21%) did not have a next of kin involved in medical decisions. Patients without a next of kin were significantly younger (P = .02), more likely to be homeless (P < .01), had higher total body surface area burns (P = .008), had shorter length of stay (P < .001), and were five times less likely to receive comfort care (P = .01). Differences in gender and ethnicity were not statistically significant. We report that patients without a next of kin present to participate in medical decisions are transitioned to comfort care less often despite having a higher burden of injury. This disparity in standard of care demonstrates a need for a cultural shift in burn care to prevent the suffering of these marginalized patients. Burn providers should be empowered to reduce suffering when no decision maker is present. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jbcr/iraa165 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449960443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449960443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-21d1d3ad99c5d4771e756d19303eb57f367e56dfa12f556c1da7d69178107add3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFPAjEQRhujEUVvnk2PHlxpt-2W3jSISkS8YOKtKe00FtkttpDov3cR5DRfJi9fZh5CF5TcUKJYbz6zqReSMbQSB-iECqEKwvv9w32W7x10mvOcEM6JFMeowxhhkjNxgm6nH4BH9dLYFY4eTyKewPdffA4NvgcbcogNfjGfkDJu07BxRfTFOHjAA5PgDB15s8hwvptd9PYwnA6eivHr42hwNy5sqeiqKKmjjhmnlBWOS0lBispR1R4CMyE9qyS0C29o6YWoLHVGukpR2adEGudYF11te5cpfq0hr3QdsoXFwjQQ11mXnCtVtR-yFr3eojbFnBN4vUyhNulHU6I3zvTGmd45a_HLXfN6VoPbw_-S2C-1f2Zi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449960443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of No Next of Kin Decision Makers on End-of-Life Care</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Ota, Ryan K ; Johnson, Maxwell B ; Pickering, Trevor A ; Garner, Warren L ; Gillenwater, T Justin ; Yenikomshian, Haig A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ota, Ryan K ; Johnson, Maxwell B ; Pickering, Trevor A ; Garner, Warren L ; Gillenwater, T Justin ; Yenikomshian, Haig A</creatorcontrib><description>For critically ill burn patients without a next of kin, the medical team is tasked with becoming the surrogate decision maker. This poses ethical and legal challenges for burn providers. Despite this frequent problem, there has been no investigation of how the presence of a next of kin affects treatment in burn patients. To evaluate this relationship, a retrospective chart review was performed on a cohort of patients who died during the acute phase of their burn care. Variables collected included age, gender, length of stay, total body surface area, course of treatment, and presence of a next of kin. In total, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 14 (21%) did not have a next of kin involved in medical decisions. Patients without a next of kin were significantly younger (P = .02), more likely to be homeless (P < .01), had higher total body surface area burns (P = .008), had shorter length of stay (P < .001), and were five times less likely to receive comfort care (P = .01). Differences in gender and ethnicity were not statistically significant. We report that patients without a next of kin present to participate in medical decisions are transitioned to comfort care less often despite having a higher burden of injury. This disparity in standard of care demonstrates a need for a cultural shift in burn care to prevent the suffering of these marginalized patients. Burn providers should be empowered to reduce suffering when no decision maker is present.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-047X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33037435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Journal of burn care & research, 2021-02, Vol.42 (1), p.9-13</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-21d1d3ad99c5d4771e756d19303eb57f367e56dfa12f556c1da7d69178107add3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-21d1d3ad99c5d4771e756d19303eb57f367e56dfa12f556c1da7d69178107add3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8230-1565 ; 0000-0002-2281-641X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33037435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ota, Ryan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Maxwell B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Trevor A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Warren L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillenwater, T Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yenikomshian, Haig A</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of No Next of Kin Decision Makers on End-of-Life Care</title><title>Journal of burn care & research</title><addtitle>J Burn Care Res</addtitle><description>For critically ill burn patients without a next of kin, the medical team is tasked with becoming the surrogate decision maker. This poses ethical and legal challenges for burn providers. Despite this frequent problem, there has been no investigation of how the presence of a next of kin affects treatment in burn patients. To evaluate this relationship, a retrospective chart review was performed on a cohort of patients who died during the acute phase of their burn care. Variables collected included age, gender, length of stay, total body surface area, course of treatment, and presence of a next of kin. In total, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 14 (21%) did not have a next of kin involved in medical decisions. Patients without a next of kin were significantly younger (P = .02), more likely to be homeless (P < .01), had higher total body surface area burns (P = .008), had shorter length of stay (P < .001), and were five times less likely to receive comfort care (P = .01). Differences in gender and ethnicity were not statistically significant. We report that patients without a next of kin present to participate in medical decisions are transitioned to comfort care less often despite having a higher burden of injury. This disparity in standard of care demonstrates a need for a cultural shift in burn care to prevent the suffering of these marginalized patients. Burn providers should be empowered to reduce suffering when no decision maker is present.</description><issn>1559-047X</issn><issn>1559-0488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFPAjEQRhujEUVvnk2PHlxpt-2W3jSISkS8YOKtKe00FtkttpDov3cR5DRfJi9fZh5CF5TcUKJYbz6zqReSMbQSB-iECqEKwvv9w32W7x10mvOcEM6JFMeowxhhkjNxgm6nH4BH9dLYFY4eTyKewPdffA4NvgcbcogNfjGfkDJu07BxRfTFOHjAA5PgDB15s8hwvptd9PYwnA6eivHr42hwNy5sqeiqKKmjjhmnlBWOS0lBispR1R4CMyE9qyS0C29o6YWoLHVGukpR2adEGudYF11te5cpfq0hr3QdsoXFwjQQ11mXnCtVtR-yFr3eojbFnBN4vUyhNulHU6I3zvTGmd45a_HLXfN6VoPbw_-S2C-1f2Zi</recordid><startdate>20210203</startdate><enddate>20210203</enddate><creator>Ota, Ryan K</creator><creator>Johnson, Maxwell B</creator><creator>Pickering, Trevor A</creator><creator>Garner, Warren L</creator><creator>Gillenwater, T Justin</creator><creator>Yenikomshian, Haig A</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8230-1565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-641X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210203</creationdate><title>The Impact of No Next of Kin Decision Makers on End-of-Life Care</title><author>Ota, Ryan K ; Johnson, Maxwell B ; Pickering, Trevor A ; Garner, Warren L ; Gillenwater, T Justin ; Yenikomshian, Haig A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-21d1d3ad99c5d4771e756d19303eb57f367e56dfa12f556c1da7d69178107add3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ota, Ryan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Maxwell B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Trevor A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Warren L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillenwater, T Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yenikomshian, Haig A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of burn care & research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ota, Ryan K</au><au>Johnson, Maxwell B</au><au>Pickering, Trevor A</au><au>Garner, Warren L</au><au>Gillenwater, T Justin</au><au>Yenikomshian, Haig A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of No Next of Kin Decision Makers on End-of-Life Care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of burn care & research</jtitle><addtitle>J Burn Care Res</addtitle><date>2021-02-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>9-13</pages><issn>1559-047X</issn><eissn>1559-0488</eissn><abstract>For critically ill burn patients without a next of kin, the medical team is tasked with becoming the surrogate decision maker. This poses ethical and legal challenges for burn providers. Despite this frequent problem, there has been no investigation of how the presence of a next of kin affects treatment in burn patients. To evaluate this relationship, a retrospective chart review was performed on a cohort of patients who died during the acute phase of their burn care. Variables collected included age, gender, length of stay, total body surface area, course of treatment, and presence of a next of kin. In total, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 14 (21%) did not have a next of kin involved in medical decisions. Patients without a next of kin were significantly younger (P = .02), more likely to be homeless (P < .01), had higher total body surface area burns (P = .008), had shorter length of stay (P < .001), and were five times less likely to receive comfort care (P = .01). Differences in gender and ethnicity were not statistically significant. We report that patients without a next of kin present to participate in medical decisions are transitioned to comfort care less often despite having a higher burden of injury. This disparity in standard of care demonstrates a need for a cultural shift in burn care to prevent the suffering of these marginalized patients. Burn providers should be empowered to reduce suffering when no decision maker is present.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33037435</pmid><doi>10.1093/jbcr/iraa165</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8230-1565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-641X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-047X |
ispartof | Journal of burn care & research, 2021-02, Vol.42 (1), p.9-13 |
issn | 1559-047X 1559-0488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449960443 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | The Impact of No Next of Kin Decision Makers on End-of-Life Care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A32%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20No%20Next%20of%20Kin%20Decision%20Makers%20on%20End-of-Life%20Care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20burn%20care%20&%20research&rft.au=Ota,%20Ryan%20K&rft.date=2021-02-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=9-13&rft.issn=1559-047X&rft.eissn=1559-0488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jbcr/iraa165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449960443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449960443&rft_id=info:pmid/33037435&rfr_iscdi=true |