Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees

The purpose of this study was to provide a quantitative description of residual femur motion within the socket during gait and to explore the relationship between residual femur motion and patient-reported comfort and function. It was hypothesized that increased residual bone movement would correlat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2020-11, Vol.112, p.110050-110050, Article 110050
Hauptverfasser: Gale, Tom, Yang, Shumeng, McGough, Richard, Fiedler, Goeran, Anderst, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110050
container_issue
container_start_page 110050
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 112
creator Gale, Tom
Yang, Shumeng
McGough, Richard
Fiedler, Goeran
Anderst, William
description The purpose of this study was to provide a quantitative description of residual femur motion within the socket during gait and to explore the relationship between residual femur motion and patient-reported comfort and function. It was hypothesized that increased residual bone movement would correlate to worse patient-reported comfort and function. The secondary goals were to assess within-subject step-to-step variability and between-subject variability in residual femur motion within the socket during gait. Dynamic biplane radiography, combined with conventional motion capture, was used to measure residual femur motion within the socket during treadmill walking for 10 unilateral transfemoral amputees. The questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA) was administered to assess prosthetic use, mobility, health problems, and global health. Increased femur pistoning (proximal-distal translation relative to the socket) correlated with worsening Q-TFA problem and global scores (ρ = 0.741, p = 0.04 and ρ = -0.783, p = 0.02, respectively). Average residual femur rotation ROMs were 7.3°±3.7°, 10.8°±4.4°, and 7.7°±4.8° for anterior tilt, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus, respectively. Average residual femur translation ROMs were 8.6 mm ± 3.0 mm, 28.4 mm ± 13.9 mm, and 20.4 mm ± 7.2 mm for medial–lateral, pistoning, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Within-subject rotational and translational variability during gait averaged 2.8° and 2.0 mm or less, whereas the between-subject variability was up to 9.4° and 18.6 mm, which demonstrates residual femur motion relative to the socket is repeatable within subjects, but inconsistent across subjects during gait. The results suggest residual bone motion within the socket is a potential mechanism behind patient-reported problems and suggests a target for intervention aimed at improving transfemoral amputee quality of life.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449956489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929020304747</els_id><sourcerecordid>2453977045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1522b6937282f04d83b2cfb9f83660b4d686d3067f65f4c79afcc4a8f8531e243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EosvCV6gsceGSZWInjn0DVfyTirjA2XKccdchiYPtFHHjo-Ptthy4cBrpzW_ejOYRclnDoYZavB4PY-_DjPZ4YMCKWAO08IjsatnxinEJj8kOgNWVYgouyLOURgDomk49JRecA29lAzvy-3PIPiw0OJqPSCMmP2xmog7nLdKfPh_9ctdJwX7HTIct-uWG3hifqU_UpKJ7k3G4Y-lqssclVxHXEE_qGkM_4ZzoySaaJRXjEMsCM69bRkzPyRNnpoQv7uuefHv_7uvVx-r6y4dPV2-vK8uVyFXdMtYLxTsmmYNmkLxn1vXKSS4E9M0gpBg4iM6J1jW2U8ZZ2xjpZMtrZA3fk1dn33LRjw1T1rNPFqfJLBi2pFnTKNWKRqqCvvwHHcMWl3JdoVquug5K2RNxpmwMKUV0eo1-NvGXrkGfMtKjfshInzLS54zK4OW9_dbPOPwdewilAG_OAJZ_3HqMOtnyVYuDj2izHoL_344_23GnHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2453977045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Gale, Tom ; Yang, Shumeng ; McGough, Richard ; Fiedler, Goeran ; Anderst, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Gale, Tom ; Yang, Shumeng ; McGough, Richard ; Fiedler, Goeran ; Anderst, William</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to provide a quantitative description of residual femur motion within the socket during gait and to explore the relationship between residual femur motion and patient-reported comfort and function. It was hypothesized that increased residual bone movement would correlate to worse patient-reported comfort and function. The secondary goals were to assess within-subject step-to-step variability and between-subject variability in residual femur motion within the socket during gait. Dynamic biplane radiography, combined with conventional motion capture, was used to measure residual femur motion within the socket during treadmill walking for 10 unilateral transfemoral amputees. The questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA) was administered to assess prosthetic use, mobility, health problems, and global health. Increased femur pistoning (proximal-distal translation relative to the socket) correlated with worsening Q-TFA problem and global scores (ρ = 0.741, p = 0.04 and ρ = -0.783, p = 0.02, respectively). Average residual femur rotation ROMs were 7.3°±3.7°, 10.8°±4.4°, and 7.7°±4.8° for anterior tilt, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus, respectively. Average residual femur translation ROMs were 8.6 mm ± 3.0 mm, 28.4 mm ± 13.9 mm, and 20.4 mm ± 7.2 mm for medial–lateral, pistoning, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Within-subject rotational and translational variability during gait averaged 2.8° and 2.0 mm or less, whereas the between-subject variability was up to 9.4° and 18.6 mm, which demonstrates residual femur motion relative to the socket is repeatable within subjects, but inconsistent across subjects during gait. The results suggest residual bone motion within the socket is a potential mechanism behind patient-reported problems and suggests a target for intervention aimed at improving transfemoral amputee quality of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33035840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amputation ; Amputees ; Artificial Limbs ; Bones ; Femur ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Fitness equipment ; Gait ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Motion capture ; Nuclear accidents &amp; safety ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthetics ; Public health ; Quality of Life ; Radiography ; Residual limb ; Rotation ; Skin ; Suspension ; Trans-femoral amputees ; Translation ; Treadmills</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2020-11, Vol.112, p.110050-110050, Article 110050</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1522b6937282f04d83b2cfb9f83660b4d686d3067f65f4c79afcc4a8f8531e243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1522b6937282f04d83b2cfb9f83660b4d686d3067f65f4c79afcc4a8f8531e243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2453977045?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33035840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gale, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shumeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGough, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Goeran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderst, William</creatorcontrib><title>Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to provide a quantitative description of residual femur motion within the socket during gait and to explore the relationship between residual femur motion and patient-reported comfort and function. It was hypothesized that increased residual bone movement would correlate to worse patient-reported comfort and function. The secondary goals were to assess within-subject step-to-step variability and between-subject variability in residual femur motion within the socket during gait. Dynamic biplane radiography, combined with conventional motion capture, was used to measure residual femur motion within the socket during treadmill walking for 10 unilateral transfemoral amputees. The questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA) was administered to assess prosthetic use, mobility, health problems, and global health. Increased femur pistoning (proximal-distal translation relative to the socket) correlated with worsening Q-TFA problem and global scores (ρ = 0.741, p = 0.04 and ρ = -0.783, p = 0.02, respectively). Average residual femur rotation ROMs were 7.3°±3.7°, 10.8°±4.4°, and 7.7°±4.8° for anterior tilt, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus, respectively. Average residual femur translation ROMs were 8.6 mm ± 3.0 mm, 28.4 mm ± 13.9 mm, and 20.4 mm ± 7.2 mm for medial–lateral, pistoning, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Within-subject rotational and translational variability during gait averaged 2.8° and 2.0 mm or less, whereas the between-subject variability was up to 9.4° and 18.6 mm, which demonstrates residual femur motion relative to the socket is repeatable within subjects, but inconsistent across subjects during gait. The results suggest residual bone motion within the socket is a potential mechanism behind patient-reported problems and suggests a target for intervention aimed at improving transfemoral amputee quality of life.</description><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Amputees</subject><subject>Artificial Limbs</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Motion capture</subject><subject>Nuclear accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthetics</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Residual limb</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Suspension</subject><subject>Trans-femoral amputees</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Treadmills</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EosvCV6gsceGSZWInjn0DVfyTirjA2XKccdchiYPtFHHjo-Ptthy4cBrpzW_ejOYRclnDoYZavB4PY-_DjPZ4YMCKWAO08IjsatnxinEJj8kOgNWVYgouyLOURgDomk49JRecA29lAzvy-3PIPiw0OJqPSCMmP2xmog7nLdKfPh_9ctdJwX7HTIct-uWG3hifqU_UpKJ7k3G4Y-lqssclVxHXEE_qGkM_4ZzoySaaJRXjEMsCM69bRkzPyRNnpoQv7uuefHv_7uvVx-r6y4dPV2-vK8uVyFXdMtYLxTsmmYNmkLxn1vXKSS4E9M0gpBg4iM6J1jW2U8ZZ2xjpZMtrZA3fk1dn33LRjw1T1rNPFqfJLBi2pFnTKNWKRqqCvvwHHcMWl3JdoVquug5K2RNxpmwMKUV0eo1-NvGXrkGfMtKjfshInzLS54zK4OW9_dbPOPwdewilAG_OAJZ_3HqMOtnyVYuDj2izHoL_344_23GnHQ</recordid><startdate>20201109</startdate><enddate>20201109</enddate><creator>Gale, Tom</creator><creator>Yang, Shumeng</creator><creator>McGough, Richard</creator><creator>Fiedler, Goeran</creator><creator>Anderst, William</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201109</creationdate><title>Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees</title><author>Gale, Tom ; Yang, Shumeng ; McGough, Richard ; Fiedler, Goeran ; Anderst, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-1522b6937282f04d83b2cfb9f83660b4d686d3067f65f4c79afcc4a8f8531e243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Amputees</topic><topic>Artificial Limbs</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Motion capture</topic><topic>Nuclear accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthetics</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Residual limb</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Suspension</topic><topic>Trans-femoral amputees</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Treadmills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gale, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shumeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGough, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Goeran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderst, William</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gale, Tom</au><au>Yang, Shumeng</au><au>McGough, Richard</au><au>Fiedler, Goeran</au><au>Anderst, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2020-11-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>110050</spage><epage>110050</epage><pages>110050-110050</pages><artnum>110050</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to provide a quantitative description of residual femur motion within the socket during gait and to explore the relationship between residual femur motion and patient-reported comfort and function. It was hypothesized that increased residual bone movement would correlate to worse patient-reported comfort and function. The secondary goals were to assess within-subject step-to-step variability and between-subject variability in residual femur motion within the socket during gait. Dynamic biplane radiography, combined with conventional motion capture, was used to measure residual femur motion within the socket during treadmill walking for 10 unilateral transfemoral amputees. The questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA) was administered to assess prosthetic use, mobility, health problems, and global health. Increased femur pistoning (proximal-distal translation relative to the socket) correlated with worsening Q-TFA problem and global scores (ρ = 0.741, p = 0.04 and ρ = -0.783, p = 0.02, respectively). Average residual femur rotation ROMs were 7.3°±3.7°, 10.8°±4.4°, and 7.7°±4.8° for anterior tilt, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus, respectively. Average residual femur translation ROMs were 8.6 mm ± 3.0 mm, 28.4 mm ± 13.9 mm, and 20.4 mm ± 7.2 mm for medial–lateral, pistoning, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Within-subject rotational and translational variability during gait averaged 2.8° and 2.0 mm or less, whereas the between-subject variability was up to 9.4° and 18.6 mm, which demonstrates residual femur motion relative to the socket is repeatable within subjects, but inconsistent across subjects during gait. The results suggest residual bone motion within the socket is a potential mechanism behind patient-reported problems and suggests a target for intervention aimed at improving transfemoral amputee quality of life.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33035840</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110050</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2020-11, Vol.112, p.110050-110050, Article 110050
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449956489
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Amputation
Amputees
Artificial Limbs
Bones
Femur
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - surgery
Fitness equipment
Gait
Humans
Kinematics
Motion capture
Nuclear accidents & safety
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patients
Prostheses
Prosthesis Design
Prosthetics
Public health
Quality of Life
Radiography
Residual limb
Rotation
Skin
Suspension
Trans-femoral amputees
Translation
Treadmills
title Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motion%20of%20the%20residual%20femur%20within%20the%20socket%20during%20gait%20is%20associated%20with%20patient-reported%20problems%20in%20transfemoral%20amputees&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Gale,%20Tom&rft.date=2020-11-09&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=110050&rft.epage=110050&rft.pages=110050-110050&rft.artnum=110050&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2453977045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2453977045&rft_id=info:pmid/33035840&rft_els_id=S0021929020304747&rfr_iscdi=true