Changes in Sexual Activity and Function After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE:We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe sexual activity and function before and after prolapse surgery. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to April 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:Prospective, comparative studies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2020-11, Vol.136 (5), p.922-931
Hauptverfasser: Antosh, Danielle D., Kim-Fine, Shunaha, Meriwether, Kate V., Kanter, Gregg, Dieter, Alexis A., Mamik, Mamta M., Good, Meadow, Singh, Ruchira, Alas, Alexandriah, Foda, Mohamed A., Balk, Ethan M., Rahn, David D., Rogers, Rebecca G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 931
container_issue 5
container_start_page 922
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 136
creator Antosh, Danielle D.
Kim-Fine, Shunaha
Meriwether, Kate V.
Kanter, Gregg
Dieter, Alexis A.
Mamik, Mamta M.
Good, Meadow
Singh, Ruchira
Alas, Alexandriah
Foda, Mohamed A.
Balk, Ethan M.
Rahn, David D.
Rogers, Rebecca G.
description OBJECTIVE:We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe sexual activity and function before and after prolapse surgery. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to April 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:Prospective, comparative studies of reconstructive pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries that reported sexual function outcomes were included. Studies were extracted for population characteristics, sexual function outcomes, and methodologic quality. Data collected included baseline and postoperative sexual activity, dyspareunia, and validated sexual function questionnaire scores. Change in validated scores were used to categorize overall sexual function as improved, unchanged, or worsened after surgery. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:The search revealed 3,124 abstracts and identified 74 articles representing 67 original studies. The overall quality of evidence was moderate to high. Studies reporting postoperative results found higher rates of sexual activity than studies reporting preoperative sexual activity in all POP surgeries except sacrospinous suspension, transvaginal mesh, and sacrocolpopexy. The prevalence of dyspareunia decreased after all prolapse surgery types. The risk of de novo dyspareunia ranged from 0% to 9% for all POP surgeries except posterior repair, which lacked sufficient data. Overall sexual function based on PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12) scores improved for mixed native tissue repairs, anterior repairs, uterosacral suspensions, sacrospinous suspensions, and sacrocolpopexy; scores were similar for posterior repairs, transvaginal mesh, and biologic grafts. Sexual function did not worsen after any POP surgeries. CONCLUSION:Sexual function improves or remains unchanged after all types of reconstructive POP surgeries and does not worsen for any surgery type. Prevalence of total dyspareunia was lower after all POP surgery types, and de novo dyspareunia was low ranging 0–9%. This information can help surgeons counsel patients preoperatively. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO, CRD42019124308.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449955933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449955933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3505-3f767a9de5300ee81f244683845976fd8be3c346e20945693c84c02e53ffdc5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1r2zAUhkVZadNu_2AMXe7G7dGXLe3OhH5BIWXZYHeeKh8n3hQ7k-yk-fdVSDvGLjbdiAPP-4rziJD3DC4YmOKynN1cwB9HMq6OyITpQmRciG9vyASAm6zQUp6Ssxh_JIjlRpyQUyFAgC7khHyfLm23wEjbjs7xabSelm5oN-2wo7ar6fXYpbHvaNkMGOgD-k3r6CwsbEcfQu_tOiKdj2GBYfeJlnS-iwOu7JCgz7hpcfuWHDfWR3z3cp-Tr9dXX6a32f3s5m5a3mdOKFCZaIq8sKZGJQAQNWu4lLkWWipT5E2tH1E4IXPkYKRKWzgtHfCEN03tlBPn5OOhdx36XyPGoVq10aH3tsN-jFWqM0YpI0RC5QF1oY8xYFOtQ7uyYVcxqPZuq-S2-tttin14eWF8XGH9O_QqMwH6AGx7n2TFn37cYqiWaP2w_F-3_Ed0j-VcQcaBA2NpyvZ_CeIZabmT9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449955933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in Sexual Activity and Function After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Antosh, Danielle D. ; Kim-Fine, Shunaha ; Meriwether, Kate V. ; Kanter, Gregg ; Dieter, Alexis A. ; Mamik, Mamta M. ; Good, Meadow ; Singh, Ruchira ; Alas, Alexandriah ; Foda, Mohamed A. ; Balk, Ethan M. ; Rahn, David D. ; Rogers, Rebecca G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Antosh, Danielle D. ; Kim-Fine, Shunaha ; Meriwether, Kate V. ; Kanter, Gregg ; Dieter, Alexis A. ; Mamik, Mamta M. ; Good, Meadow ; Singh, Ruchira ; Alas, Alexandriah ; Foda, Mohamed A. ; Balk, Ethan M. ; Rahn, David D. ; Rogers, Rebecca G.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe sexual activity and function before and after prolapse surgery. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to April 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:Prospective, comparative studies of reconstructive pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries that reported sexual function outcomes were included. Studies were extracted for population characteristics, sexual function outcomes, and methodologic quality. Data collected included baseline and postoperative sexual activity, dyspareunia, and validated sexual function questionnaire scores. Change in validated scores were used to categorize overall sexual function as improved, unchanged, or worsened after surgery. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:The search revealed 3,124 abstracts and identified 74 articles representing 67 original studies. The overall quality of evidence was moderate to high. Studies reporting postoperative results found higher rates of sexual activity than studies reporting preoperative sexual activity in all POP surgeries except sacrospinous suspension, transvaginal mesh, and sacrocolpopexy. The prevalence of dyspareunia decreased after all prolapse surgery types. The risk of de novo dyspareunia ranged from 0% to 9% for all POP surgeries except posterior repair, which lacked sufficient data. Overall sexual function based on PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12) scores improved for mixed native tissue repairs, anterior repairs, uterosacral suspensions, sacrospinous suspensions, and sacrocolpopexy; scores were similar for posterior repairs, transvaginal mesh, and biologic grafts. Sexual function did not worsen after any POP surgeries. CONCLUSION:Sexual function improves or remains unchanged after all types of reconstructive POP surgeries and does not worsen for any surgery type. Prevalence of total dyspareunia was lower after all POP surgery types, and de novo dyspareunia was low ranging 0–9%. This information can help surgeons counsel patients preoperatively. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO, CRD42019124308.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33030874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Sexual Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - epidemiology ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology ; Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2020-11, Vol.136 (5), p.922-931</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2020 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3505-3f767a9de5300ee81f244683845976fd8be3c346e20945693c84c02e53ffdc5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33030874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antosh, Danielle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim-Fine, Shunaha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meriwether, Kate V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanter, Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dieter, Alexis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamik, Mamta M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, Meadow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ruchira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alas, Alexandriah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foda, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balk, Ethan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahn, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Rebecca G.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in Sexual Activity and Function After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe sexual activity and function before and after prolapse surgery. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to April 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:Prospective, comparative studies of reconstructive pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries that reported sexual function outcomes were included. Studies were extracted for population characteristics, sexual function outcomes, and methodologic quality. Data collected included baseline and postoperative sexual activity, dyspareunia, and validated sexual function questionnaire scores. Change in validated scores were used to categorize overall sexual function as improved, unchanged, or worsened after surgery. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:The search revealed 3,124 abstracts and identified 74 articles representing 67 original studies. The overall quality of evidence was moderate to high. Studies reporting postoperative results found higher rates of sexual activity than studies reporting preoperative sexual activity in all POP surgeries except sacrospinous suspension, transvaginal mesh, and sacrocolpopexy. The prevalence of dyspareunia decreased after all prolapse surgery types. The risk of de novo dyspareunia ranged from 0% to 9% for all POP surgeries except posterior repair, which lacked sufficient data. Overall sexual function based on PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12) scores improved for mixed native tissue repairs, anterior repairs, uterosacral suspensions, sacrospinous suspensions, and sacrocolpopexy; scores were similar for posterior repairs, transvaginal mesh, and biologic grafts. Sexual function did not worsen after any POP surgeries. CONCLUSION:Sexual function improves or remains unchanged after all types of reconstructive POP surgeries and does not worsen for any surgery type. Prevalence of total dyspareunia was lower after all POP surgery types, and de novo dyspareunia was low ranging 0–9%. This information can help surgeons counsel patients preoperatively. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO, CRD42019124308.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1r2zAUhkVZadNu_2AMXe7G7dGXLe3OhH5BIWXZYHeeKh8n3hQ7k-yk-fdVSDvGLjbdiAPP-4rziJD3DC4YmOKynN1cwB9HMq6OyITpQmRciG9vyASAm6zQUp6Ssxh_JIjlRpyQUyFAgC7khHyfLm23wEjbjs7xabSelm5oN-2wo7ar6fXYpbHvaNkMGOgD-k3r6CwsbEcfQu_tOiKdj2GBYfeJlnS-iwOu7JCgz7hpcfuWHDfWR3z3cp-Tr9dXX6a32f3s5m5a3mdOKFCZaIq8sKZGJQAQNWu4lLkWWipT5E2tH1E4IXPkYKRKWzgtHfCEN03tlBPn5OOhdx36XyPGoVq10aH3tsN-jFWqM0YpI0RC5QF1oY8xYFOtQ7uyYVcxqPZuq-S2-tttin14eWF8XGH9O_QqMwH6AGx7n2TFn37cYqiWaP2w_F-3_Ed0j-VcQcaBA2NpyvZ_CeIZabmT9A</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Antosh, Danielle D.</creator><creator>Kim-Fine, Shunaha</creator><creator>Meriwether, Kate V.</creator><creator>Kanter, Gregg</creator><creator>Dieter, Alexis A.</creator><creator>Mamik, Mamta M.</creator><creator>Good, Meadow</creator><creator>Singh, Ruchira</creator><creator>Alas, Alexandriah</creator><creator>Foda, Mohamed A.</creator><creator>Balk, Ethan M.</creator><creator>Rahn, David D.</creator><creator>Rogers, Rebecca G.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Changes in Sexual Activity and Function After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review</title><author>Antosh, Danielle D. ; Kim-Fine, Shunaha ; Meriwether, Kate V. ; Kanter, Gregg ; Dieter, Alexis A. ; Mamik, Mamta M. ; Good, Meadow ; Singh, Ruchira ; Alas, Alexandriah ; Foda, Mohamed A. ; Balk, Ethan M. ; Rahn, David D. ; Rogers, Rebecca G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3505-3f767a9de5300ee81f244683845976fd8be3c346e20945693c84c02e53ffdc5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antosh, Danielle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim-Fine, Shunaha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meriwether, Kate V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanter, Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dieter, Alexis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamik, Mamta M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, Meadow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ruchira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alas, Alexandriah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foda, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balk, Ethan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahn, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Rebecca G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antosh, Danielle D.</au><au>Kim-Fine, Shunaha</au><au>Meriwether, Kate V.</au><au>Kanter, Gregg</au><au>Dieter, Alexis A.</au><au>Mamik, Mamta M.</au><au>Good, Meadow</au><au>Singh, Ruchira</au><au>Alas, Alexandriah</au><au>Foda, Mohamed A.</au><au>Balk, Ethan M.</au><au>Rahn, David D.</au><au>Rogers, Rebecca G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in Sexual Activity and Function After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>922</spage><epage>931</epage><pages>922-931</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe sexual activity and function before and after prolapse surgery. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to April 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:Prospective, comparative studies of reconstructive pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries that reported sexual function outcomes were included. Studies were extracted for population characteristics, sexual function outcomes, and methodologic quality. Data collected included baseline and postoperative sexual activity, dyspareunia, and validated sexual function questionnaire scores. Change in validated scores were used to categorize overall sexual function as improved, unchanged, or worsened after surgery. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:The search revealed 3,124 abstracts and identified 74 articles representing 67 original studies. The overall quality of evidence was moderate to high. Studies reporting postoperative results found higher rates of sexual activity than studies reporting preoperative sexual activity in all POP surgeries except sacrospinous suspension, transvaginal mesh, and sacrocolpopexy. The prevalence of dyspareunia decreased after all prolapse surgery types. The risk of de novo dyspareunia ranged from 0% to 9% for all POP surgeries except posterior repair, which lacked sufficient data. Overall sexual function based on PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12) scores improved for mixed native tissue repairs, anterior repairs, uterosacral suspensions, sacrospinous suspensions, and sacrocolpopexy; scores were similar for posterior repairs, transvaginal mesh, and biologic grafts. Sexual function did not worsen after any POP surgeries. CONCLUSION:Sexual function improves or remains unchanged after all types of reconstructive POP surgeries and does not worsen for any surgery type. Prevalence of total dyspareunia was lower after all POP surgery types, and de novo dyspareunia was low ranging 0–9%. This information can help surgeons counsel patients preoperatively. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO, CRD42019124308.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>33030874</pmid><doi>10.1097/AOG.0000000000004125</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2020-11, Vol.136 (5), p.922-931
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449955933
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Female
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Humans
Middle Aged
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - epidemiology
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology
Surgical Mesh - adverse effects
title Changes in Sexual Activity and Function After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20Sexual%20Activity%20and%20Function%20After%20Pelvic%20Organ%20Prolapse%20Surgery:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=Antosh,%20Danielle%20D.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=922&rft.epage=931&rft.pages=922-931&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449955933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449955933&rft_id=info:pmid/33030874&rfr_iscdi=true