Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes

The prognostic value of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measured by using multidetector computed tomography imaging has been well validated in native aortic stenosis, and sex-specific thresholds have been proposed. However, few data are available regarding the impact of leaflet calcification on out...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020-10, Vol.76 (15), p.1737-1748
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Bin, Salaun, Erwan, Côté, Nancy, Wu, Yongjian, Mahjoub, Haifa, Mathieu, Patrick, Dahou, Abdellaziz, Zenses, Anne-Sophie, Clisson, Marine, Pibarot, Philippe, Clavel, Marie-Annick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1748
container_issue 15
container_start_page 1737
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 76
creator Zhang, Bin
Salaun, Erwan
Côté, Nancy
Wu, Yongjian
Mahjoub, Haifa
Mathieu, Patrick
Dahou, Abdellaziz
Zenses, Anne-Sophie
Clisson, Marine
Pibarot, Philippe
Clavel, Marie-Annick
description The prognostic value of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measured by using multidetector computed tomography imaging has been well validated in native aortic stenosis, and sex-specific thresholds have been proposed. However, few data are available regarding the impact of leaflet calcification on outcomes after biological aortic valve replacement (AVR). The goal of this study was to analyze the association of quantitative bioprosthetic leaflet AVC with hemodynamic and clinical outcomes, as well as its possible interaction with sex. From 2008 to 2010, a total of 204 patients were prospectively enrolled with a median of 7.0 years (interquartile range: 5.1 to 9.2 years) after biological surgical AVR. AVC measured by using the Agatston method was indexed to the cross-sectional area of aortic annulus measured by echocardiography to calculate the AVC density (AVCd). Presence of hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD; increase in mean gradient [MG] ≥10 mm Hg and/or increase in transprosthetic regurgitation ≥1) was assessed by echocardiography in 137 patients at the 3-year follow-up. The primary clinical endpoint was mortality or aortic valve re-intervention. There was no significant sex-related difference in the relationship between bioprosthetic AVCd and the progression of MG. Baseline AVCd showed an independent association with HVD at 3 years. During follow-up, there were 134 (65.7%) deaths (n = 100) or valve re-interventions (n = 47). AVCd ≥58 AU/cm was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality or aortic valve re-intervention (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 3.35; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449953325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449953325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-874dea0ee37574ba6763cc0c7a464f2b6e1ef1686efecf86ca42eb0739ca1f363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LwzAcxoMobk6_gAfJ0Utr0qRJe5xFnTDYRb2GNP0HU9pmNp3gtzdl09NzeF7g-SF0S0lKCRUPbdpqY9KMZCQlRUoYP0NLmudFwvJSnqMlkSxPKCnlAl2F0BJCREHLS7RgjLAsmkvUrEPwxunJ-QF7ix-d348-TJ8wOYPXfpzlQ3ffgLegbQcTrnRnnHXm1BnwBnrf_Ay6j1E9NLjq3BDtDu8Ok_E9hGt0YXUX4OakK_T-_PRWbZLt7uW1Wm8Tw7ickkLyBjQBYDKXvNZCCmYMMVJzwW1WC6BgqSgEWDC2EEbzDOp4sjSaWibYCt0fd-OFrwOESfUuGOg6PYA_BJVxXpY5Y1keo9kxauLbMIJV-9H1evxRlKiZrmrVTFfNdBUpVKQbS3en_UPdQ_Nf-cPJfgEl0nhP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449953325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Bin ; Salaun, Erwan ; Côté, Nancy ; Wu, Yongjian ; Mahjoub, Haifa ; Mathieu, Patrick ; Dahou, Abdellaziz ; Zenses, Anne-Sophie ; Clisson, Marine ; Pibarot, Philippe ; Clavel, Marie-Annick</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bin ; Salaun, Erwan ; Côté, Nancy ; Wu, Yongjian ; Mahjoub, Haifa ; Mathieu, Patrick ; Dahou, Abdellaziz ; Zenses, Anne-Sophie ; Clisson, Marine ; Pibarot, Philippe ; Clavel, Marie-Annick</creatorcontrib><description>The prognostic value of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measured by using multidetector computed tomography imaging has been well validated in native aortic stenosis, and sex-specific thresholds have been proposed. However, few data are available regarding the impact of leaflet calcification on outcomes after biological aortic valve replacement (AVR). The goal of this study was to analyze the association of quantitative bioprosthetic leaflet AVC with hemodynamic and clinical outcomes, as well as its possible interaction with sex. From 2008 to 2010, a total of 204 patients were prospectively enrolled with a median of 7.0 years (interquartile range: 5.1 to 9.2 years) after biological surgical AVR. AVC measured by using the Agatston method was indexed to the cross-sectional area of aortic annulus measured by echocardiography to calculate the AVC density (AVCd). Presence of hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD; increase in mean gradient [MG] ≥10 mm Hg and/or increase in transprosthetic regurgitation ≥1) was assessed by echocardiography in 137 patients at the 3-year follow-up. The primary clinical endpoint was mortality or aortic valve re-intervention. There was no significant sex-related difference in the relationship between bioprosthetic AVCd and the progression of MG. Baseline AVCd showed an independent association with HVD at 3 years. During follow-up, there were 134 (65.7%) deaths (n = 100) or valve re-interventions (n = 47). AVCd ≥58 AU/cm was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality or aortic valve re-intervention (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 3.35; p &lt; 0.001). The AVCd threshold combined with an MG progression threshold of 10 mm Hg amplified the stratification of patients at risk (log-rank, p &lt; 0.001). The addition of AVCd threshold into the prediction model including traditional risk factors improved outcome prediction (net classification improvement: 0.25, p = 0.04; likelihood ratio test, p &lt; 0.001). Aortic bioprosthetic leaflet calcification is strongly and independently associated with HVD and the risk of death or aortic valve re-intervention. As opposed to native aortic stenosis, there is no sex-related differences in the relationship between AVCd and hemodynamic or clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33032735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - pathology ; Aortic Valve - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Bioprosthesis - adverse effects ; Calcinosis - diagnosis ; Calcinosis - physiopathology ; Echocardiography, Doppler ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020-10, Vol.76 (15), p.1737-1748</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-874dea0ee37574ba6763cc0c7a464f2b6e1ef1686efecf86ca42eb0739ca1f363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-874dea0ee37574ba6763cc0c7a464f2b6e1ef1686efecf86ca42eb0739ca1f363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salaun, Erwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yongjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahjoub, Haifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathieu, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahou, Abdellaziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenses, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clisson, Marine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pibarot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavel, Marie-Annick</creatorcontrib><title>Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>The prognostic value of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measured by using multidetector computed tomography imaging has been well validated in native aortic stenosis, and sex-specific thresholds have been proposed. However, few data are available regarding the impact of leaflet calcification on outcomes after biological aortic valve replacement (AVR). The goal of this study was to analyze the association of quantitative bioprosthetic leaflet AVC with hemodynamic and clinical outcomes, as well as its possible interaction with sex. From 2008 to 2010, a total of 204 patients were prospectively enrolled with a median of 7.0 years (interquartile range: 5.1 to 9.2 years) after biological surgical AVR. AVC measured by using the Agatston method was indexed to the cross-sectional area of aortic annulus measured by echocardiography to calculate the AVC density (AVCd). Presence of hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD; increase in mean gradient [MG] ≥10 mm Hg and/or increase in transprosthetic regurgitation ≥1) was assessed by echocardiography in 137 patients at the 3-year follow-up. The primary clinical endpoint was mortality or aortic valve re-intervention. There was no significant sex-related difference in the relationship between bioprosthetic AVCd and the progression of MG. Baseline AVCd showed an independent association with HVD at 3 years. During follow-up, there were 134 (65.7%) deaths (n = 100) or valve re-interventions (n = 47). AVCd ≥58 AU/cm was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality or aortic valve re-intervention (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 3.35; p &lt; 0.001). The AVCd threshold combined with an MG progression threshold of 10 mm Hg amplified the stratification of patients at risk (log-rank, p &lt; 0.001). The addition of AVCd threshold into the prediction model including traditional risk factors improved outcome prediction (net classification improvement: 0.25, p = 0.04; likelihood ratio test, p &lt; 0.001). Aortic bioprosthetic leaflet calcification is strongly and independently associated with HVD and the risk of death or aortic valve re-intervention. As opposed to native aortic stenosis, there is no sex-related differences in the relationship between AVCd and hemodynamic or clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - pathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Calcinosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Calcinosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LwzAcxoMobk6_gAfJ0Utr0qRJe5xFnTDYRb2GNP0HU9pmNp3gtzdl09NzeF7g-SF0S0lKCRUPbdpqY9KMZCQlRUoYP0NLmudFwvJSnqMlkSxPKCnlAl2F0BJCREHLS7RgjLAsmkvUrEPwxunJ-QF7ix-d348-TJ8wOYPXfpzlQ3ffgLegbQcTrnRnnHXm1BnwBnrf_Ay6j1E9NLjq3BDtDu8Ok_E9hGt0YXUX4OakK_T-_PRWbZLt7uW1Wm8Tw7ickkLyBjQBYDKXvNZCCmYMMVJzwW1WC6BgqSgEWDC2EEbzDOp4sjSaWibYCt0fd-OFrwOESfUuGOg6PYA_BJVxXpY5Y1keo9kxauLbMIJV-9H1evxRlKiZrmrVTFfNdBUpVKQbS3en_UPdQ_Nf-cPJfgEl0nhP</recordid><startdate>20201013</startdate><enddate>20201013</enddate><creator>Zhang, Bin</creator><creator>Salaun, Erwan</creator><creator>Côté, Nancy</creator><creator>Wu, Yongjian</creator><creator>Mahjoub, Haifa</creator><creator>Mathieu, Patrick</creator><creator>Dahou, Abdellaziz</creator><creator>Zenses, Anne-Sophie</creator><creator>Clisson, Marine</creator><creator>Pibarot, Philippe</creator><creator>Clavel, Marie-Annick</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201013</creationdate><title>Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes</title><author>Zhang, Bin ; Salaun, Erwan ; Côté, Nancy ; Wu, Yongjian ; Mahjoub, Haifa ; Mathieu, Patrick ; Dahou, Abdellaziz ; Zenses, Anne-Sophie ; Clisson, Marine ; Pibarot, Philippe ; Clavel, Marie-Annick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-874dea0ee37574ba6763cc0c7a464f2b6e1ef1686efecf86ca42eb0739ca1f363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - pathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Calcinosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Calcinosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salaun, Erwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yongjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahjoub, Haifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathieu, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahou, Abdellaziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenses, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clisson, Marine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pibarot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavel, Marie-Annick</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Bin</au><au>Salaun, Erwan</au><au>Côté, Nancy</au><au>Wu, Yongjian</au><au>Mahjoub, Haifa</au><au>Mathieu, Patrick</au><au>Dahou, Abdellaziz</au><au>Zenses, Anne-Sophie</au><au>Clisson, Marine</au><au>Pibarot, Philippe</au><au>Clavel, Marie-Annick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2020-10-13</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1737</spage><epage>1748</epage><pages>1737-1748</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>The prognostic value of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measured by using multidetector computed tomography imaging has been well validated in native aortic stenosis, and sex-specific thresholds have been proposed. However, few data are available regarding the impact of leaflet calcification on outcomes after biological aortic valve replacement (AVR). The goal of this study was to analyze the association of quantitative bioprosthetic leaflet AVC with hemodynamic and clinical outcomes, as well as its possible interaction with sex. From 2008 to 2010, a total of 204 patients were prospectively enrolled with a median of 7.0 years (interquartile range: 5.1 to 9.2 years) after biological surgical AVR. AVC measured by using the Agatston method was indexed to the cross-sectional area of aortic annulus measured by echocardiography to calculate the AVC density (AVCd). Presence of hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD; increase in mean gradient [MG] ≥10 mm Hg and/or increase in transprosthetic regurgitation ≥1) was assessed by echocardiography in 137 patients at the 3-year follow-up. The primary clinical endpoint was mortality or aortic valve re-intervention. There was no significant sex-related difference in the relationship between bioprosthetic AVCd and the progression of MG. Baseline AVCd showed an independent association with HVD at 3 years. During follow-up, there were 134 (65.7%) deaths (n = 100) or valve re-interventions (n = 47). AVCd ≥58 AU/cm was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality or aortic valve re-intervention (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 3.35; p &lt; 0.001). The AVCd threshold combined with an MG progression threshold of 10 mm Hg amplified the stratification of patients at risk (log-rank, p &lt; 0.001). The addition of AVCd threshold into the prediction model including traditional risk factors improved outcome prediction (net classification improvement: 0.25, p = 0.04; likelihood ratio test, p &lt; 0.001). Aortic bioprosthetic leaflet calcification is strongly and independently associated with HVD and the risk of death or aortic valve re-intervention. As opposed to native aortic stenosis, there is no sex-related differences in the relationship between AVCd and hemodynamic or clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33032735</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.034</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020-10, Vol.76 (15), p.1737-1748
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449953325
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve - pathology
Aortic Valve - physiopathology
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Bioprosthesis - adverse effects
Calcinosis - diagnosis
Calcinosis - physiopathology
Echocardiography, Doppler
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects
Hemodynamics - physiology
Humans
Male
Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Time Factors
title Association of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Calcification on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A19%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20Bioprosthetic%20Aortic%20Valve%20Leaflet%20Calcification%20on%20Hemodynamic%20and%20Clinical%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Zhang,%20Bin&rft.date=2020-10-13&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1737&rft.epage=1748&rft.pages=1737-1748&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2449953325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449953325&rft_id=info:pmid/33032735&rfr_iscdi=true