Predicting nitrous oxide emissions after the application of solid manure to grassland in the United Kingdom
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from agricultural soils represents a significant source of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. We evaluated the suitability of a modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to estimate the N2O flux from the application of solid manure at two grassland sites (North...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2020-01, Vol.49 (1), p.1-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Melaku, Nigus Demelash Shrestha, Narayan Kumar Wang, Junye Thorman, Rachel E. |
description | Nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from agricultural soils represents a significant source of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. We evaluated the suitability of a modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to estimate the N2O flux from the application of solid manure at two grassland sites (North Wyke [NW] and Pwllpeiran [PW]) in the United Kingdom. The simulated N2O emissions were validated against field observations measured in 2011 and 2012 for model calibration and validation, respectively. The SWAT model predicts water‐filled pore space (WFPS) very well with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), R2, RMSE, and percentage bias (PBIAS) values of 0.67, .72, 0.06, and 3.64, respectively, during the calibration period for NW site, whereas it gives 0.68, .69, 0.07, and 3.04, respectively during the validation period. At PW, the model predicted the NSE, R2, RMSE, and PBIAS of 0.55, .69, 0.04, and −4.5, respectively, during calibration and 0.63, .71, 0.05, and −2.6, respectively, during the validation period. Compared with WFPS, the model resulted in a slightly lower fit for N2O emissions for NW (NSE = 0.47, R2 = .63 during calibration, and NSE = 0.55, R2 = .58 during validation) and for PW (NSE = 0.54, R2 = .71 for calibration, and NSE = 0.47, R2 = .69 for validation). Results revealed that the SWAT model performed reasonably well in representing the dynamics of N2O emissions after solid manure application to grassland. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jeq2.20002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2448641367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2448641367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-c2d22e18a7e16e3e9149e5964637c3f4f41b5fa163090a6f73b1e7bd1b3419f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8REgtfsVplqjiXQmQ6Npy4nFxSeLUTgX9e9yGNZuZ0ejM1dyL0CUlU0oIu1nDhk0ZSeMRGtGM5xOWyjEaESLSLFh2is5iXBNCGcnlCH29BTCu6l27wq3rg99G7H-cAQyNi9H5NmJtewi4_wSsu652le7TGnuLo6-dwY1utwFw7_Eq6Bhr3Rrs2gO_TJJg8EtSN745RydW1xEu_voYLe_vPuaPk8Xrw9P8djGpOJFsUjHDGNCZzoFK4FBQUUBWSCF5XnErrKBlZjWVnBRES5vzkkJeGlpyQQvL-RhdDbpd8JstxF4lKxXU6TNI_hQTYiYF5TJP6PWAVsHHGMCqLrhGh52iRO0TVftE1SHRBNMB_nY17P4h1fPdOxtufgG7SHjb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448641367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting nitrous oxide emissions after the application of solid manure to grassland in the United Kingdom</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Melaku, Nigus Demelash ; Shrestha, Narayan Kumar ; Wang, Junye ; Thorman, Rachel E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Melaku, Nigus Demelash ; Shrestha, Narayan Kumar ; Wang, Junye ; Thorman, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><description>Nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from agricultural soils represents a significant source of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. We evaluated the suitability of a modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to estimate the N2O flux from the application of solid manure at two grassland sites (North Wyke [NW] and Pwllpeiran [PW]) in the United Kingdom. The simulated N2O emissions were validated against field observations measured in 2011 and 2012 for model calibration and validation, respectively. The SWAT model predicts water‐filled pore space (WFPS) very well with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), R2, RMSE, and percentage bias (PBIAS) values of 0.67, .72, 0.06, and 3.64, respectively, during the calibration period for NW site, whereas it gives 0.68, .69, 0.07, and 3.04, respectively during the validation period. At PW, the model predicted the NSE, R2, RMSE, and PBIAS of 0.55, .69, 0.04, and −4.5, respectively, during calibration and 0.63, .71, 0.05, and −2.6, respectively, during the validation period. Compared with WFPS, the model resulted in a slightly lower fit for N2O emissions for NW (NSE = 0.47, R2 = .63 during calibration, and NSE = 0.55, R2 = .58 during validation) and for PW (NSE = 0.54, R2 = .71 for calibration, and NSE = 0.47, R2 = .69 for validation). Results revealed that the SWAT model performed reasonably well in representing the dynamics of N2O emissions after solid manure application to grassland.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20002</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2020-01, Vol.49 (1), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Journal of Environmental Quality © 2020 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-c2d22e18a7e16e3e9149e5964637c3f4f41b5fa163090a6f73b1e7bd1b3419f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-c2d22e18a7e16e3e9149e5964637c3f4f41b5fa163090a6f73b1e7bd1b3419f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7042-4501 ; 0000-0001-5562-1400</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjeq2.20002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjeq2.20002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melaku, Nigus Demelash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Narayan Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Junye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorman, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting nitrous oxide emissions after the application of solid manure to grassland in the United Kingdom</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><description>Nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from agricultural soils represents a significant source of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. We evaluated the suitability of a modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to estimate the N2O flux from the application of solid manure at two grassland sites (North Wyke [NW] and Pwllpeiran [PW]) in the United Kingdom. The simulated N2O emissions were validated against field observations measured in 2011 and 2012 for model calibration and validation, respectively. The SWAT model predicts water‐filled pore space (WFPS) very well with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), R2, RMSE, and percentage bias (PBIAS) values of 0.67, .72, 0.06, and 3.64, respectively, during the calibration period for NW site, whereas it gives 0.68, .69, 0.07, and 3.04, respectively during the validation period. At PW, the model predicted the NSE, R2, RMSE, and PBIAS of 0.55, .69, 0.04, and −4.5, respectively, during calibration and 0.63, .71, 0.05, and −2.6, respectively, during the validation period. Compared with WFPS, the model resulted in a slightly lower fit for N2O emissions for NW (NSE = 0.47, R2 = .63 during calibration, and NSE = 0.55, R2 = .58 during validation) and for PW (NSE = 0.54, R2 = .71 for calibration, and NSE = 0.47, R2 = .69 for validation). Results revealed that the SWAT model performed reasonably well in representing the dynamics of N2O emissions after solid manure application to grassland.</description><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8REgtfsVplqjiXQmQ6Npy4nFxSeLUTgX9e9yGNZuZ0ejM1dyL0CUlU0oIu1nDhk0ZSeMRGtGM5xOWyjEaESLSLFh2is5iXBNCGcnlCH29BTCu6l27wq3rg99G7H-cAQyNi9H5NmJtewi4_wSsu652le7TGnuLo6-dwY1utwFw7_Eq6Bhr3Rrs2gO_TJJg8EtSN745RydW1xEu_voYLe_vPuaPk8Xrw9P8djGpOJFsUjHDGNCZzoFK4FBQUUBWSCF5XnErrKBlZjWVnBRES5vzkkJeGlpyQQvL-RhdDbpd8JstxF4lKxXU6TNI_hQTYiYF5TJP6PWAVsHHGMCqLrhGh52iRO0TVftE1SHRBNMB_nY17P4h1fPdOxtufgG7SHjb</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Melaku, Nigus Demelash</creator><creator>Shrestha, Narayan Kumar</creator><creator>Wang, Junye</creator><creator>Thorman, Rachel E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7042-4501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-1400</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Predicting nitrous oxide emissions after the application of solid manure to grassland in the United Kingdom</title><author>Melaku, Nigus Demelash ; Shrestha, Narayan Kumar ; Wang, Junye ; Thorman, Rachel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-c2d22e18a7e16e3e9149e5964637c3f4f41b5fa163090a6f73b1e7bd1b3419f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melaku, Nigus Demelash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Narayan Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Junye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorman, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melaku, Nigus Demelash</au><au>Shrestha, Narayan Kumar</au><au>Wang, Junye</au><au>Thorman, Rachel E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting nitrous oxide emissions after the application of solid manure to grassland in the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><abstract>Nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from agricultural soils represents a significant source of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. We evaluated the suitability of a modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to estimate the N2O flux from the application of solid manure at two grassland sites (North Wyke [NW] and Pwllpeiran [PW]) in the United Kingdom. The simulated N2O emissions were validated against field observations measured in 2011 and 2012 for model calibration and validation, respectively. The SWAT model predicts water‐filled pore space (WFPS) very well with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), R2, RMSE, and percentage bias (PBIAS) values of 0.67, .72, 0.06, and 3.64, respectively, during the calibration period for NW site, whereas it gives 0.68, .69, 0.07, and 3.04, respectively during the validation period. At PW, the model predicted the NSE, R2, RMSE, and PBIAS of 0.55, .69, 0.04, and −4.5, respectively, during calibration and 0.63, .71, 0.05, and −2.6, respectively, during the validation period. Compared with WFPS, the model resulted in a slightly lower fit for N2O emissions for NW (NSE = 0.47, R2 = .63 during calibration, and NSE = 0.55, R2 = .58 during validation) and for PW (NSE = 0.54, R2 = .71 for calibration, and NSE = 0.47, R2 = .69 for validation). Results revealed that the SWAT model performed reasonably well in representing the dynamics of N2O emissions after solid manure application to grassland.</abstract><doi>10.1002/jeq2.20002</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7042-4501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-1400</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2020-01, Vol.49 (1), p.1-13 |
issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2448641367 |
source | Wiley Journals |
title | Predicting nitrous oxide emissions after the application of solid manure to grassland in the United Kingdom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20nitrous%20oxide%20emissions%20after%20the%20application%20of%20solid%20manure%20to%20grassland%20in%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Melaku,%20Nigus%20Demelash&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeq2.20002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448641367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448641367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |